Asset Reclassifications and Bank Recapitalization During the Financial Crisis

Regulators frequently relax accounting rules during a financial crisis as a means of regulatory forbearance. The new accounting options provide banks with an opportunity for an accrual-based increase in their regulatory capital. The use of such an accounting option helps reduce the costs of governme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management science 2023-01, Vol.69 (1), p.75-100
1. Verfasser: Bischof, Jannis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Management science
container_volume 69
creator Bischof, Jannis
description Regulators frequently relax accounting rules during a financial crisis as a means of regulatory forbearance. The new accounting options provide banks with an opportunity for an accrual-based increase in their regulatory capital. The use of such an accounting option helps reduce the costs of government interventions such as bailouts and avoid the dilution of existing shareholders’ ownership rights. We examine the introduction of the reclassification option for financial assets during the 2008 financial crisis and study the position of accrual-based options in the pecking order of banks’ recapitalization measures. The findings suggest that the accrual-based increase in regulatory capital is temporary and does not provide permanent relief. Consistent with the long-term costs of accrual-based measures, investors perceive the accounting choice as a negative signal. If banks do not complement their use of the accounting option by other corrective actions that result in a real capital increase and a liquidity injection, they continue to suffer from low capitalization and financial difficulties in the following years. Ultimately, government interventions in accounting regulation are unlikely to offer a sustainable solution to capital shortfalls in the banking sector if they are not supported by the concurrent enforcement of real corrective actions. This paper was accepted by Brian Bushee, accounting. Funding: The authors acknowledge financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 403041268-TRR 266) as well as from IAAER and KPMG under the “Research Informing the IASB Standard Setting” grant. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364 .
doi_str_mv 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2771688966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771688966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d00598ed9ce9bcbd914e89f2eefd11fa651c69ca461bbfd14b876d59e25ba5253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwMltiTrCd2LHHUiggFSEhmC3HscEldYovHeDXkxAkRqaT7n3v3ekhdE5JTpmsLrcRbM4IY3lZiPIAzShnIuOc0EM0I4TxjCqijtEJwIYQUslKzNDDAsD1-MnZ1gAEH6zpQxcBm9jgKxPfR8nsQm_a8PUj4et9CvEV928Or0I00QbT4mUKEOAUHXnTgjv7nXP0srp5Xt5l68fb--VindmCkD5rCOFKukZZp2pbN4qWTirPnPMNpd4ITq1Q1pSC1vWwKuvh14Yrx3htOOPFHF1MubvUfewd9HrT7VMcTmpWVVRIqYQYqHyibOoAkvN6l8LWpE9NiR4r02NleqxMj5UNBjwZnO1igD9clnKIVIoNSDYhIfoubeG_yG-mTnmI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771688966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asset Reclassifications and Bank Recapitalization During the Financial Crisis</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><creator>Bischof, Jannis</creator><creatorcontrib>Bischof, Jannis</creatorcontrib><description>Regulators frequently relax accounting rules during a financial crisis as a means of regulatory forbearance. The new accounting options provide banks with an opportunity for an accrual-based increase in their regulatory capital. The use of such an accounting option helps reduce the costs of government interventions such as bailouts and avoid the dilution of existing shareholders’ ownership rights. We examine the introduction of the reclassification option for financial assets during the 2008 financial crisis and study the position of accrual-based options in the pecking order of banks’ recapitalization measures. The findings suggest that the accrual-based increase in regulatory capital is temporary and does not provide permanent relief. Consistent with the long-term costs of accrual-based measures, investors perceive the accounting choice as a negative signal. If banks do not complement their use of the accounting option by other corrective actions that result in a real capital increase and a liquidity injection, they continue to suffer from low capitalization and financial difficulties in the following years. Ultimately, government interventions in accounting regulation are unlikely to offer a sustainable solution to capital shortfalls in the banking sector if they are not supported by the concurrent enforcement of real corrective actions. This paper was accepted by Brian Bushee, accounting. Funding: The authors acknowledge financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 403041268-TRR 266) as well as from IAAER and KPMG under the “Research Informing the IASB Standard Setting” grant. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Assets ; bank regulation ; Banking industry ; Capital ; Economic crisis ; Enforcement ; fair value accounting ; financial crisis ; Financial reporting ; Government ; IFRS ; Intervention ; Ownership ; Recapitalization ; Recessions ; regulatory capital ; Stockholders</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2023-01, Vol.69 (1), p.75-100</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Jan 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d00598ed9ce9bcbd914e89f2eefd11fa651c69ca461bbfd14b876d59e25ba5253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d00598ed9ce9bcbd914e89f2eefd11fa651c69ca461bbfd14b876d59e25ba5253</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8689-2385 ; 0000-0002-9793-6600 ; 0000-0001-6153-5269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3679,27901,27902,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bischof, Jannis</creatorcontrib><title>Asset Reclassifications and Bank Recapitalization During the Financial Crisis</title><title>Management science</title><description>Regulators frequently relax accounting rules during a financial crisis as a means of regulatory forbearance. The new accounting options provide banks with an opportunity for an accrual-based increase in their regulatory capital. The use of such an accounting option helps reduce the costs of government interventions such as bailouts and avoid the dilution of existing shareholders’ ownership rights. We examine the introduction of the reclassification option for financial assets during the 2008 financial crisis and study the position of accrual-based options in the pecking order of banks’ recapitalization measures. The findings suggest that the accrual-based increase in regulatory capital is temporary and does not provide permanent relief. Consistent with the long-term costs of accrual-based measures, investors perceive the accounting choice as a negative signal. If banks do not complement their use of the accounting option by other corrective actions that result in a real capital increase and a liquidity injection, they continue to suffer from low capitalization and financial difficulties in the following years. Ultimately, government interventions in accounting regulation are unlikely to offer a sustainable solution to capital shortfalls in the banking sector if they are not supported by the concurrent enforcement of real corrective actions. This paper was accepted by Brian Bushee, accounting. Funding: The authors acknowledge financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 403041268-TRR 266) as well as from IAAER and KPMG under the “Research Informing the IASB Standard Setting” grant. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364 .</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>bank regulation</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>fair value accounting</subject><subject>financial crisis</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>IFRS</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Recapitalization</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>regulatory capital</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwMltiTrCd2LHHUiggFSEhmC3HscEldYovHeDXkxAkRqaT7n3v3ekhdE5JTpmsLrcRbM4IY3lZiPIAzShnIuOc0EM0I4TxjCqijtEJwIYQUslKzNDDAsD1-MnZ1gAEH6zpQxcBm9jgKxPfR8nsQm_a8PUj4et9CvEV928Or0I00QbT4mUKEOAUHXnTgjv7nXP0srp5Xt5l68fb--VindmCkD5rCOFKukZZp2pbN4qWTirPnPMNpd4ITq1Q1pSC1vWwKuvh14Yrx3htOOPFHF1MubvUfewd9HrT7VMcTmpWVVRIqYQYqHyibOoAkvN6l8LWpE9NiR4r02NleqxMj5UNBjwZnO1igD9clnKIVIoNSDYhIfoubeG_yG-mTnmI</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Bischof, Jannis</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9793-6600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-5269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Asset Reclassifications and Bank Recapitalization During the Financial Crisis</title><author>Bischof, Jannis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d00598ed9ce9bcbd914e89f2eefd11fa651c69ca461bbfd14b876d59e25ba5253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>bank regulation</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>fair value accounting</topic><topic>financial crisis</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>IFRS</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Recapitalization</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>regulatory capital</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bischof, Jannis</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bischof, Jannis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asset Reclassifications and Bank Recapitalization During the Financial Crisis</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>75-100</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>Regulators frequently relax accounting rules during a financial crisis as a means of regulatory forbearance. The new accounting options provide banks with an opportunity for an accrual-based increase in their regulatory capital. The use of such an accounting option helps reduce the costs of government interventions such as bailouts and avoid the dilution of existing shareholders’ ownership rights. We examine the introduction of the reclassification option for financial assets during the 2008 financial crisis and study the position of accrual-based options in the pecking order of banks’ recapitalization measures. The findings suggest that the accrual-based increase in regulatory capital is temporary and does not provide permanent relief. Consistent with the long-term costs of accrual-based measures, investors perceive the accounting choice as a negative signal. If banks do not complement their use of the accounting option by other corrective actions that result in a real capital increase and a liquidity injection, they continue to suffer from low capitalization and financial difficulties in the following years. Ultimately, government interventions in accounting regulation are unlikely to offer a sustainable solution to capital shortfalls in the banking sector if they are not supported by the concurrent enforcement of real corrective actions. This paper was accepted by Brian Bushee, accounting. Funding: The authors acknowledge financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project-ID 403041268-TRR 266) as well as from IAAER and KPMG under the “Research Informing the IASB Standard Setting” grant. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364 .</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9793-6600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-5269</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1909
ispartof Management science, 2023-01, Vol.69 (1), p.75-100
issn 0025-1909
1526-5501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2771688966
source INFORMS PubsOnLine
subjects Accounting
Assets
bank regulation
Banking industry
Capital
Economic crisis
Enforcement
fair value accounting
financial crisis
Financial reporting
Government
IFRS
Intervention
Ownership
Recapitalization
Recessions
regulatory capital
Stockholders
title Asset Reclassifications and Bank Recapitalization During the Financial Crisis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asset%20Reclassifications%20and%20Bank%20Recapitalization%20During%20the%20Financial%20Crisis&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Bischof,%20Jannis&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=75-100&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4364&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2771688966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771688966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true