Potential of alcohol fuels in active and passive pre-chamber applications in a passenger car spark-ignition engine

Both the shift from fossil to alternative fuels and the implementation of a pre-chamber combustion system allow for an increase in the efficiency of an internal combustion engine through optimizing its combustion process, while simultaneously reducing the engine-out emissions. The combination of alcohol-based fuels and pre-chamber combustion concepts has not been investigated on spark-ignition engines with high compression ratios in a passenger car size. This study presents investigations to show the potential in maximum achievable lean limit and net indicated efficiency. In particular, we present investigations of two alternative alcohol fuels on a direct-injection spark-ignition single-cylinder research engine for passenger car applications with a compression ratio of 16.4. The engine was operated with both an active and a passive pre-chamber, and the experimental results were compared to those of conventional spark-ignition operation. Direct injection was used for both the main combustion chamber and the pre-chamber. Methanol and ethanol were used as fuels for the main combustion chamber, whereas exclusively ethanol was used for the pre-chamber fueling. The performance of the alcohol fuels in all combustion configurations was evaluated in both part-load and high-load conditions. In particular, investigations of the combustion behavior over a variation of the excess air ratio at indicated mean effective pressures of 6 and 15 bar were performed. It can be concluded that with the use of methanol as fuel for the main combustion chamber, both higher excess air ratios and higher indicated efficiencies were achieved compared to the use of ethanol as the main combustion chamber fuel. In particular, a maximum net indicated efficiency of 48% at an excess air ratio of 2.0 was achieved with methanol. Moreover, active pre-chamber operation extended the lean limit to an excess air ratio of 2.3 compared to the maximum lean limit of 1.7 in passive pre-chamber operation.