Global Sea State Prediction Using OSCAT Winds: A Statistical Assessment of WAM and WWIII Hindcasts with NDBC-NOAA Buoys and Satellite Altimeter Data
This study implemented two spectral wave models, namely WAVEWATCH III and WAM, to render wave hindcasts around the globe at 1° × 1° grid resolution, and thereby to statistically evaluate their performance. The models used six-hourly spatially and temporally interpolated OSCAT wind data as input for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pure and applied geophysics 2023, Vol.180 (1), p.509-549 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 549 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | Pure and applied geophysics |
container_volume | 180 |
creator | Umesh, P. A. Parvathy, K. G. Fernandez, D. R. Raju, R. P. Harikrishnan, M. Maheswaran, P. A. Swain, J. |
description | This study implemented two spectral wave models, namely WAVEWATCH III and WAM, to render wave hindcasts around the globe at 1° × 1° grid resolution, and thereby to statistically evaluate their performance. The models used six-hourly spatially and temporally interpolated OSCAT wind data as input for the months of June and December in 2010. Global validation of WAM and WWIII hindcasts was achieved using satellite measurements (AVISO and Jason-2 wave data) and NDBC buoy data, which yielded an accurate statistical assessment. Both models were shown to reproduce the seasonal variability in wave height and wave period quite realistically at the buoy locations and along the selected global transects, albeit with different magnitudes. The statistical assessment and wave spectra validation showed that OSCAT winds are highly skilful in sea state prediction, even during a storm event such as the Boxing Day storm, 2010. The skill assessment of the models based on the boreal summer and winter revealed minor random errors and generally high correlations coefficients. It was noted that the performance of the two models was comparable during June 2010 using OSCAT winds. However, an exception was reported for the WAM model during December 2010, where it exhibited slightly better performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00024-022-03212-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2770814071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2770814071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-9cb932601e73f47341bf556739a01a11e4c25621e4ebe2e5845e128adbbb799b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O4zAUhS00SHSAF2BladaGazupE3ah_FUCilRQl5aT3oBRmjC-rhDvwQNjWiR2rM7m-86RDmNHEo4lgDkhAFCZAKUEaCWVKHbYSGYKRCn1-A8bAWgtsjzXe-wv0QuANCYvR-zjqhtq1_E5Oj6PLiK_D7j0TfRDzx_J9098Np9UD3zh-yWd8mpDeYq-SVZFhEQr7CMfWr6obrnrl3yxmE6n_DoJjaNI_M3HZ353fjYRd7Oq4mfr4Z024DztdZ1Po1UX_QojBn7uojtgu63rCA-_c589Xl48TK7FzexqOqluRKMMRFE2danVGCQa3WZGZ7Ju83xsdOlAOikxa1Q-VimxRoV5keUoVeGWdV2bsqz1Pvu37X0Nw_81UrQvwzr0adIqY6CQGRiZKLWlmjAQBWzta_ArF96tBPv1vt2-b9P7dvO-LZKktxIluH_C8FP9i_UJwKuFkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2770814071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Sea State Prediction Using OSCAT Winds: A Statistical Assessment of WAM and WWIII Hindcasts with NDBC-NOAA Buoys and Satellite Altimeter Data</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Umesh, P. A. ; Parvathy, K. G. ; Fernandez, D. R. ; Raju, R. P. ; Harikrishnan, M. ; Maheswaran, P. A. ; Swain, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Umesh, P. A. ; Parvathy, K. G. ; Fernandez, D. R. ; Raju, R. P. ; Harikrishnan, M. ; Maheswaran, P. A. ; Swain, J.</creatorcontrib><description>This study implemented two spectral wave models, namely WAVEWATCH III and WAM, to render wave hindcasts around the globe at 1° × 1° grid resolution, and thereby to statistically evaluate their performance. The models used six-hourly spatially and temporally interpolated OSCAT wind data as input for the months of June and December in 2010. Global validation of WAM and WWIII hindcasts was achieved using satellite measurements (AVISO and Jason-2 wave data) and NDBC buoy data, which yielded an accurate statistical assessment. Both models were shown to reproduce the seasonal variability in wave height and wave period quite realistically at the buoy locations and along the selected global transects, albeit with different magnitudes. The statistical assessment and wave spectra validation showed that OSCAT winds are highly skilful in sea state prediction, even during a storm event such as the Boxing Day storm, 2010. The skill assessment of the models based on the boreal summer and winter revealed minor random errors and generally high correlations coefficients. It was noted that the performance of the two models was comparable during June 2010 using OSCAT winds. However, an exception was reported for the WAM model during December 2010, where it exhibited slightly better performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00024-022-03212-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Altimeters ; Buoy data ; Buoys ; Coefficients ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Forecasting ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Ocean waves ; Oceanography ; Performance evaluation ; Random errors ; Satellite altimetry ; Satellites ; Sea state ; Sea states ; Seasonal variability ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical prediction ; Storms ; Wave data ; Wave height ; Wave models ; Wave period ; Wave spectra ; Weather ; Wind ; Wind data ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied geophysics, 2023, Vol.180 (1), p.509-549</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-9cb932601e73f47341bf556739a01a11e4c25621e4ebe2e5845e128adbbb799b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8217-7413</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00024-022-03212-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00024-022-03212-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umesh, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvathy, K. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raju, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harikrishnan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swain, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Global Sea State Prediction Using OSCAT Winds: A Statistical Assessment of WAM and WWIII Hindcasts with NDBC-NOAA Buoys and Satellite Altimeter Data</title><title>Pure and applied geophysics</title><addtitle>Pure Appl. Geophys</addtitle><description>This study implemented two spectral wave models, namely WAVEWATCH III and WAM, to render wave hindcasts around the globe at 1° × 1° grid resolution, and thereby to statistically evaluate their performance. The models used six-hourly spatially and temporally interpolated OSCAT wind data as input for the months of June and December in 2010. Global validation of WAM and WWIII hindcasts was achieved using satellite measurements (AVISO and Jason-2 wave data) and NDBC buoy data, which yielded an accurate statistical assessment. Both models were shown to reproduce the seasonal variability in wave height and wave period quite realistically at the buoy locations and along the selected global transects, albeit with different magnitudes. The statistical assessment and wave spectra validation showed that OSCAT winds are highly skilful in sea state prediction, even during a storm event such as the Boxing Day storm, 2010. The skill assessment of the models based on the boreal summer and winter revealed minor random errors and generally high correlations coefficients. It was noted that the performance of the two models was comparable during June 2010 using OSCAT winds. However, an exception was reported for the WAM model during December 2010, where it exhibited slightly better performance.</description><subject>Altimeters</subject><subject>Buoy data</subject><subject>Buoys</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Ocean waves</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Random errors</subject><subject>Satellite altimetry</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sea state</subject><subject>Sea states</subject><subject>Seasonal variability</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical prediction</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Wave data</subject><subject>Wave height</subject><subject>Wave models</subject><subject>Wave period</subject><subject>Wave spectra</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind data</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1O4zAUhS00SHSAF2BladaGazupE3ah_FUCilRQl5aT3oBRmjC-rhDvwQNjWiR2rM7m-86RDmNHEo4lgDkhAFCZAKUEaCWVKHbYSGYKRCn1-A8bAWgtsjzXe-wv0QuANCYvR-zjqhtq1_E5Oj6PLiK_D7j0TfRDzx_J9098Np9UD3zh-yWd8mpDeYq-SVZFhEQr7CMfWr6obrnrl3yxmE6n_DoJjaNI_M3HZ353fjYRd7Oq4mfr4Z024DztdZ1Po1UX_QojBn7uojtgu63rCA-_c589Xl48TK7FzexqOqluRKMMRFE2danVGCQa3WZGZ7Ju83xsdOlAOikxa1Q-VimxRoV5keUoVeGWdV2bsqz1Pvu37X0Nw_81UrQvwzr0adIqY6CQGRiZKLWlmjAQBWzta_ArF96tBPv1vt2-b9P7dvO-LZKktxIluH_C8FP9i_UJwKuFkQ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Umesh, P. A.</creator><creator>Parvathy, K. G.</creator><creator>Fernandez, D. R.</creator><creator>Raju, R. P.</creator><creator>Harikrishnan, M.</creator><creator>Maheswaran, P. A.</creator><creator>Swain, J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-7413</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Global Sea State Prediction Using OSCAT Winds: A Statistical Assessment of WAM and WWIII Hindcasts with NDBC-NOAA Buoys and Satellite Altimeter Data</title><author>Umesh, P. A. ; Parvathy, K. G. ; Fernandez, D. R. ; Raju, R. P. ; Harikrishnan, M. ; Maheswaran, P. A. ; Swain, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-9cb932601e73f47341bf556739a01a11e4c25621e4ebe2e5845e128adbbb799b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Altimeters</topic><topic>Buoy data</topic><topic>Buoys</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Ocean waves</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Random errors</topic><topic>Satellite altimetry</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sea state</topic><topic>Sea states</topic><topic>Seasonal variability</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical prediction</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Wave data</topic><topic>Wave height</topic><topic>Wave models</topic><topic>Wave period</topic><topic>Wave spectra</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind data</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umesh, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvathy, K. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raju, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harikrishnan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swain, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umesh, P. A.</au><au>Parvathy, K. G.</au><au>Fernandez, D. R.</au><au>Raju, R. P.</au><au>Harikrishnan, M.</au><au>Maheswaran, P. A.</au><au>Swain, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Sea State Prediction Using OSCAT Winds: A Statistical Assessment of WAM and WWIII Hindcasts with NDBC-NOAA Buoys and Satellite Altimeter Data</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle><stitle>Pure Appl. Geophys</stitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>180</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>509-549</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>This study implemented two spectral wave models, namely WAVEWATCH III and WAM, to render wave hindcasts around the globe at 1° × 1° grid resolution, and thereby to statistically evaluate their performance. The models used six-hourly spatially and temporally interpolated OSCAT wind data as input for the months of June and December in 2010. Global validation of WAM and WWIII hindcasts was achieved using satellite measurements (AVISO and Jason-2 wave data) and NDBC buoy data, which yielded an accurate statistical assessment. Both models were shown to reproduce the seasonal variability in wave height and wave period quite realistically at the buoy locations and along the selected global transects, albeit with different magnitudes. The statistical assessment and wave spectra validation showed that OSCAT winds are highly skilful in sea state prediction, even during a storm event such as the Boxing Day storm, 2010. The skill assessment of the models based on the boreal summer and winter revealed minor random errors and generally high correlations coefficients. It was noted that the performance of the two models was comparable during June 2010 using OSCAT winds. However, an exception was reported for the WAM model during December 2010, where it exhibited slightly better performance.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s00024-022-03212-8</doi><tpages>41</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-7413</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-4553 |
ispartof | Pure and applied geophysics, 2023, Vol.180 (1), p.509-549 |
issn | 0033-4553 1420-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2770814071 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Altimeters Buoy data Buoys Coefficients Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Forecasting Geophysics/Geodesy Mathematical models Modelling Ocean waves Oceanography Performance evaluation Random errors Satellite altimetry Satellites Sea state Sea states Seasonal variability Seasonal variation Seasonal variations Statistical analysis Statistical prediction Storms Wave data Wave height Wave models Wave period Wave spectra Weather Wind Wind data Winds |
title | Global Sea State Prediction Using OSCAT Winds: A Statistical Assessment of WAM and WWIII Hindcasts with NDBC-NOAA Buoys and Satellite Altimeter Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Sea%20State%20Prediction%20Using%20OSCAT%20Winds:%20A%20Statistical%20Assessment%20of%20WAM%20and%20WWIII%20Hindcasts%20with%20NDBC-NOAA%20Buoys%20and%20Satellite%20Altimeter%20Data&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20geophysics&rft.au=Umesh,%20P.%20A.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=180&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=509-549&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00024-022-03212-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2770814071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2770814071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |