Automatic shooting detection in archery from acceleration data for score prediction
In archery, avoiding postural tremor while aiming is one of the most important factors improving performance. Thus, efforts have been made to automatically detect shooting events and use basic statistics of tremor during the aiming period to predict the total score the archer will achieve. However,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sports engineering 2023-12, Vol.26 (1), Article 9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Sports engineering |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Ogasawara, Takayuki Fukamachi, Hanako Aoyagi, Kenryu kumano, Shiro Togo, Hiroyoshi Oka, Koichiro Yamaguchi, Masumi |
description | In archery, avoiding postural tremor while aiming is one of the most important factors improving performance. Thus, efforts have been made to automatically detect shooting events and use basic statistics of tremor during the aiming period to predict the total score the archer will achieve. However, although they require many shots, previous shooting detectors are not accurate enough because they use simple classification algorithms. This makes them arguably unsuitable for use in practice. Therefore, in this study, we compared seven commonly used machine learning methods on these tasks. In our experiment, first, the winning model, random forest, outperformed the conventional method by 26% in terms of the F-measure in shooting detection. Second, random forest even showed higher performance in predicting the score from the tremor during the aiming periods of detected shots than that of actual shots identified from video recordings. This is an interesting result in that random forest was trained using manual annotations as the ground truth for shooting detection in a cross-validation manner but outperformed the annotations in score prediction. In addition, we found that random forest can halve the number of shots required for both shooting detection and score prediction compared to that in the literature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12283-023-00402-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2770459226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2770459226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-e225b90ce6281c9c3f3b9fac586371dcb02f595635373fc951eec108e36fb9d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA8-ok2U02x1L8goIH9Ryy2Um7pd3UJD3sv3ftCt48DDMw7zMDDyG3DO4ZgHpIjPNaFMDHghJ4MZyRGSslFFzW6nychdSFAsUvyVVKWwAmWS1m5H1xzGFvc-do2oSQu35NW8zochd62vXURrfBOFAfw55a53CH0Z6Wrc2W-hBpciEiPURsuxN2TS683SW8-e1z8vn0-LF8KVZvz6_LxapwXEEukPOq0eBQ8po57YQXjfbWVbUUirWuAe4rXUlRCSW80xVDdAxqFNI3ulViTu6mu4cYvo6YstmGY-zHl4YrBWWlOZdjik8pF0NKEb05xG5v42AYmB95ZpJnRnnmJM8MIyQmKI3hfo3x7_Q_1De0i3NP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2770459226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic shooting detection in archery from acceleration data for score prediction</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ogasawara, Takayuki ; Fukamachi, Hanako ; Aoyagi, Kenryu ; kumano, Shiro ; Togo, Hiroyoshi ; Oka, Koichiro ; Yamaguchi, Masumi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogasawara, Takayuki ; Fukamachi, Hanako ; Aoyagi, Kenryu ; kumano, Shiro ; Togo, Hiroyoshi ; Oka, Koichiro ; Yamaguchi, Masumi</creatorcontrib><description>In archery, avoiding postural tremor while aiming is one of the most important factors improving performance. Thus, efforts have been made to automatically detect shooting events and use basic statistics of tremor during the aiming period to predict the total score the archer will achieve. However, although they require many shots, previous shooting detectors are not accurate enough because they use simple classification algorithms. This makes them arguably unsuitable for use in practice. Therefore, in this study, we compared seven commonly used machine learning methods on these tasks. In our experiment, first, the winning model, random forest, outperformed the conventional method by 26% in terms of the F-measure in shooting detection. Second, random forest even showed higher performance in predicting the score from the tremor during the aiming periods of detected shots than that of actual shots identified from video recordings. This is an interesting result in that random forest was trained using manual annotations as the ground truth for shooting detection in a cross-validation manner but outperformed the annotations in score prediction. In addition, we found that random forest can halve the number of shots required for both shooting detection and score prediction compared to that in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-7072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12283-023-00402-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Annotations ; Archery ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Machine learning ; Materials Science ; Original Article ; Performance prediction ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Sports Medicine ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; Tremors</subject><ispartof>Sports engineering, 2023-12, Vol.26 (1), Article 9</ispartof><rights>International Sports Engineering Association 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-e225b90ce6281c9c3f3b9fac586371dcb02f595635373fc951eec108e36fb9d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1657-6907 ; 0000-0002-1231-5566 ; 0000-0001-5571-042X ; 0000-0003-1383-236X ; 0000-0002-9266-516X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12283-023-00402-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12283-023-00402-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogasawara, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukamachi, Hanako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoyagi, Kenryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kumano, Shiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Togo, Hiroyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Masumi</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic shooting detection in archery from acceleration data for score prediction</title><title>Sports engineering</title><addtitle>Sports Eng</addtitle><description>In archery, avoiding postural tremor while aiming is one of the most important factors improving performance. Thus, efforts have been made to automatically detect shooting events and use basic statistics of tremor during the aiming period to predict the total score the archer will achieve. However, although they require many shots, previous shooting detectors are not accurate enough because they use simple classification algorithms. This makes them arguably unsuitable for use in practice. Therefore, in this study, we compared seven commonly used machine learning methods on these tasks. In our experiment, first, the winning model, random forest, outperformed the conventional method by 26% in terms of the F-measure in shooting detection. Second, random forest even showed higher performance in predicting the score from the tremor during the aiming periods of detected shots than that of actual shots identified from video recordings. This is an interesting result in that random forest was trained using manual annotations as the ground truth for shooting detection in a cross-validation manner but outperformed the annotations in score prediction. In addition, we found that random forest can halve the number of shots required for both shooting detection and score prediction compared to that in the literature.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Annotations</subject><subject>Archery</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>Tremors</subject><issn>1369-7072</issn><issn>1460-2687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA8-ok2U02x1L8goIH9Ryy2Um7pd3UJD3sv3ftCt48DDMw7zMDDyG3DO4ZgHpIjPNaFMDHghJ4MZyRGSslFFzW6nychdSFAsUvyVVKWwAmWS1m5H1xzGFvc-do2oSQu35NW8zochd62vXURrfBOFAfw55a53CH0Z6Wrc2W-hBpciEiPURsuxN2TS683SW8-e1z8vn0-LF8KVZvz6_LxapwXEEukPOq0eBQ8po57YQXjfbWVbUUirWuAe4rXUlRCSW80xVDdAxqFNI3ulViTu6mu4cYvo6YstmGY-zHl4YrBWWlOZdjik8pF0NKEb05xG5v42AYmB95ZpJnRnnmJM8MIyQmKI3hfo3x7_Q_1De0i3NP</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Ogasawara, Takayuki</creator><creator>Fukamachi, Hanako</creator><creator>Aoyagi, Kenryu</creator><creator>kumano, Shiro</creator><creator>Togo, Hiroyoshi</creator><creator>Oka, Koichiro</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Masumi</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1657-6907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-5566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-042X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1383-236X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9266-516X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Automatic shooting detection in archery from acceleration data for score prediction</title><author>Ogasawara, Takayuki ; Fukamachi, Hanako ; Aoyagi, Kenryu ; kumano, Shiro ; Togo, Hiroyoshi ; Oka, Koichiro ; Yamaguchi, Masumi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-e225b90ce6281c9c3f3b9fac586371dcb02f595635373fc951eec108e36fb9d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Annotations</topic><topic>Archery</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>Tremors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogasawara, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukamachi, Hanako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoyagi, Kenryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kumano, Shiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Togo, Hiroyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Masumi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Sports engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogasawara, Takayuki</au><au>Fukamachi, Hanako</au><au>Aoyagi, Kenryu</au><au>kumano, Shiro</au><au>Togo, Hiroyoshi</au><au>Oka, Koichiro</au><au>Yamaguchi, Masumi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic shooting detection in archery from acceleration data for score prediction</atitle><jtitle>Sports engineering</jtitle><stitle>Sports Eng</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>9</artnum><issn>1369-7072</issn><eissn>1460-2687</eissn><abstract>In archery, avoiding postural tremor while aiming is one of the most important factors improving performance. Thus, efforts have been made to automatically detect shooting events and use basic statistics of tremor during the aiming period to predict the total score the archer will achieve. However, although they require many shots, previous shooting detectors are not accurate enough because they use simple classification algorithms. This makes them arguably unsuitable for use in practice. Therefore, in this study, we compared seven commonly used machine learning methods on these tasks. In our experiment, first, the winning model, random forest, outperformed the conventional method by 26% in terms of the F-measure in shooting detection. Second, random forest even showed higher performance in predicting the score from the tremor during the aiming periods of detected shots than that of actual shots identified from video recordings. This is an interesting result in that random forest was trained using manual annotations as the ground truth for shooting detection in a cross-validation manner but outperformed the annotations in score prediction. In addition, we found that random forest can halve the number of shots required for both shooting detection and score prediction compared to that in the literature.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s12283-023-00402-y</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1657-6907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-5566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-042X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1383-236X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9266-516X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-7072 |
ispartof | Sports engineering, 2023-12, Vol.26 (1), Article 9 |
issn | 1369-7072 1460-2687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2770459226 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Annotations Archery Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Engineering Engineering Design Machine learning Materials Science Original Article Performance prediction Rehabilitation Medicine Sports Medicine Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Tremors |
title | Automatic shooting detection in archery from acceleration data for score prediction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A02%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20shooting%20detection%20in%20archery%20from%20acceleration%20data%20for%20score%20prediction&rft.jtitle=Sports%20engineering&rft.au=Ogasawara,%20Takayuki&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=9&rft.issn=1369-7072&rft.eissn=1460-2687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12283-023-00402-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2770459226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2770459226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |