What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers

A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.14299
Hauptverfasser: Arnoldussen, Fenna, Koetse, Mark J, de Bruyn, Sander M, Kuik, Onno
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 14299
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Arnoldussen, Fenna
Koetse, Mark J
de Bruyn, Sander M
Kuik, Onno
description A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su142114299
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2769917483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747189099</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747189099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVFLAzEMx4soOOae_AIFn0Q2m-vuuj7JmFMHgsMpPh69XrpVbtfZ9mD79lbmgyaEhPD7J5AQcglsxLlkt6GDcQYppDwhvYwJGALL2emf-pwMQvhkyTgHCUWP6I-NinTqkS7R7RqkH7ZpbLum0dGlOlDjPF05bVVDV12Iyraqso2Nhzs6pbONsxrpfL9Db7fYRqq2Lmnvu6g3dOba0G3RhwtyZlQTcPCb--T9Yf42exo-vzwuZtPnoeYM4lBCrnWOCLlEI3TNpDaVKpgEJQBNlo8zVheVYJXIJoZBndUcqqoutJpwroH3ydVx7s67rw5DLD9d59u0ssxEISWIcQL7ZHSk1qrB0rbGRa908hq3VrsWjU39qRgLmEgmZRJc_xMkJuI-rlUXQrlYvf5nb46s9i4Ej6bcpcsofyiBlT9fKv98iX8DqSSC7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769917483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Arnoldussen, Fenna ; Koetse, Mark J ; de Bruyn, Sander M ; Kuik, Onno</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnoldussen, Fenna ; Koetse, Mark J ; de Bruyn, Sander M ; Kuik, Onno</creatorcontrib><description>A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142114299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Child labor ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Environmental aspects ; Food industry ; Green products ; Heterogeneity ; Latent class analysis ; Preferences ; Segments ; Social aspects ; Social impact ; Social sustainability ; Society ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Values ; Willingness to pay ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.14299</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnoldussen, Fenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Sander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuik, Onno</creatorcontrib><title>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.</description><subject>Child labor</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Green products</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Latent class analysis</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVFLAzEMx4soOOae_AIFn0Q2m-vuuj7JmFMHgsMpPh69XrpVbtfZ9mD79lbmgyaEhPD7J5AQcglsxLlkt6GDcQYppDwhvYwJGALL2emf-pwMQvhkyTgHCUWP6I-NinTqkS7R7RqkH7ZpbLum0dGlOlDjPF05bVVDV12Iyraqso2Nhzs6pbONsxrpfL9Db7fYRqq2Lmnvu6g3dOba0G3RhwtyZlQTcPCb--T9Yf42exo-vzwuZtPnoeYM4lBCrnWOCLlEI3TNpDaVKpgEJQBNlo8zVheVYJXIJoZBndUcqqoutJpwroH3ydVx7s67rw5DLD9d59u0ssxEISWIcQL7ZHSk1qrB0rbGRa908hq3VrsWjU39qRgLmEgmZRJc_xMkJuI-rlUXQrlYvf5nb46s9i4Ej6bcpcsofyiBlT9fKv98iX8DqSSC7w</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Arnoldussen, Fenna</creator><creator>Koetse, Mark J</creator><creator>de Bruyn, Sander M</creator><creator>Kuik, Onno</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</title><author>Arnoldussen, Fenna ; Koetse, Mark J ; de Bruyn, Sander M ; Kuik, Onno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child labor</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Green products</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Latent class analysis</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnoldussen, Fenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Sander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuik, Onno</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnoldussen, Fenna</au><au>Koetse, Mark J</au><au>de Bruyn, Sander M</au><au>Kuik, Onno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>14299</spage><pages>14299-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142114299</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.14299
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2769917483
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Child labor
Consumer behavior
Consumers
Environmental aspects
Food industry
Green products
Heterogeneity
Latent class analysis
Preferences
Segments
Social aspects
Social impact
Social sustainability
Society
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Values
Willingness to pay
Working conditions
title What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Are%20People%20Willing%20to%20Pay%20for%20Social%20Sustainability?%20A%20Choice%20Experiment%20among%20Dutch%20Consumers&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Arnoldussen,%20Fenna&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=14299&rft.pages=14299-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142114299&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747189099%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769917483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747189099&rfr_iscdi=true