What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers
A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.14299 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 14299 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Arnoldussen, Fenna Koetse, Mark J de Bruyn, Sander M Kuik, Onno |
description | A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su142114299 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2769917483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747189099</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747189099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVFLAzEMx4soOOae_AIFn0Q2m-vuuj7JmFMHgsMpPh69XrpVbtfZ9mD79lbmgyaEhPD7J5AQcglsxLlkt6GDcQYppDwhvYwJGALL2emf-pwMQvhkyTgHCUWP6I-NinTqkS7R7RqkH7ZpbLum0dGlOlDjPF05bVVDV12Iyraqso2Nhzs6pbONsxrpfL9Db7fYRqq2Lmnvu6g3dOba0G3RhwtyZlQTcPCb--T9Yf42exo-vzwuZtPnoeYM4lBCrnWOCLlEI3TNpDaVKpgEJQBNlo8zVheVYJXIJoZBndUcqqoutJpwroH3ydVx7s67rw5DLD9d59u0ssxEISWIcQL7ZHSk1qrB0rbGRa908hq3VrsWjU39qRgLmEgmZRJc_xMkJuI-rlUXQrlYvf5nb46s9i4Ej6bcpcsofyiBlT9fKv98iX8DqSSC7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769917483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Arnoldussen, Fenna ; Koetse, Mark J ; de Bruyn, Sander M ; Kuik, Onno</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnoldussen, Fenna ; Koetse, Mark J ; de Bruyn, Sander M ; Kuik, Onno</creatorcontrib><description>A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142114299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Child labor ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Environmental aspects ; Food industry ; Green products ; Heterogeneity ; Latent class analysis ; Preferences ; Segments ; Social aspects ; Social impact ; Social sustainability ; Society ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Values ; Willingness to pay ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.14299</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnoldussen, Fenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Sander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuik, Onno</creatorcontrib><title>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.</description><subject>Child labor</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Green products</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Latent class analysis</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVFLAzEMx4soOOae_AIFn0Q2m-vuuj7JmFMHgsMpPh69XrpVbtfZ9mD79lbmgyaEhPD7J5AQcglsxLlkt6GDcQYppDwhvYwJGALL2emf-pwMQvhkyTgHCUWP6I-NinTqkS7R7RqkH7ZpbLum0dGlOlDjPF05bVVDV12Iyraqso2Nhzs6pbONsxrpfL9Db7fYRqq2Lmnvu6g3dOba0G3RhwtyZlQTcPCb--T9Yf42exo-vzwuZtPnoeYM4lBCrnWOCLlEI3TNpDaVKpgEJQBNlo8zVheVYJXIJoZBndUcqqoutJpwroH3ydVx7s67rw5DLD9d59u0ssxEISWIcQL7ZHSk1qrB0rbGRa908hq3VrsWjU39qRgLmEgmZRJc_xMkJuI-rlUXQrlYvf5nb46s9i4Ej6bcpcsofyiBlT9fKv98iX8DqSSC7w</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Arnoldussen, Fenna</creator><creator>Koetse, Mark J</creator><creator>de Bruyn, Sander M</creator><creator>Kuik, Onno</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</title><author>Arnoldussen, Fenna ; Koetse, Mark J ; de Bruyn, Sander M ; Kuik, Onno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-915cc5ee159ef7cd09cfba6091a71ef25420d6b70b728f01d2d31bbd6ca833c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child labor</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Green products</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Latent class analysis</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnoldussen, Fenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Sander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuik, Onno</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnoldussen, Fenna</au><au>Koetse, Mark J</au><au>de Bruyn, Sander M</au><au>Kuik, Onno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>14299</spage><pages>14299-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>A relatively large number of studies has shown that consumers are willing to pay more for products that are certified as being environmentally or socially responsible, but most of these studies focus on the willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental benefits, while insights into the WTP for social benefits are limited. More research in this area will shed light on consumer choices and help policymakers to better direct the food industry toward social sustainability. In this paper, we carry out a Discrete Choice Experiment among Dutch consumers to measure consumer WTP for five social sustainability benefits; (1) no child labor; (2) liveable wage and safe working environment; (3) project for the education of workers; (4) equal wages for men and women; and (5) freedom to join a trade union. The novelty of our research in comparison with previous studies is that we aim to differentiate the WTP for various social standards instead of estimating an overall WTP for fair-trade labels. In addition to average price premiums per social standard, our latent class models also give insight into heterogeneity in WTP, or more specifically, stated price premiums by different groups (or market segments) in society. The results suggest that substantial price premiums for social sustainability benefits may exist, which currently are not reflected in food prices. Including price premiums for market products that fully incorporate societal costs of those products, so-called true prices or shadow prices, will decrease consumer demand for less-sustainable products and will lead to a fairer and more sustainable economic system. Our results also show that the price premiums may vary substantially between the various categories of social sustainability benefits and across products and market segments. Further research on assessing the motivations behind consumer choices for more-sustainable products is crucial here, especially for campaigns aimed at enhancing their market shares.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142114299</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.14299 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2769917483 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Child labor Consumer behavior Consumers Environmental aspects Food industry Green products Heterogeneity Latent class analysis Preferences Segments Social aspects Social impact Social sustainability Society Sustainability Sustainable development Values Willingness to pay Working conditions |
title | What Are People Willing to Pay for Social Sustainability? A Choice Experiment among Dutch Consumers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Are%20People%20Willing%20to%20Pay%20for%20Social%20Sustainability?%20A%20Choice%20Experiment%20among%20Dutch%20Consumers&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Arnoldussen,%20Fenna&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=14299&rft.pages=14299-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142114299&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747189099%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769917483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747189099&rfr_iscdi=true |