Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective

The appropriate ecological operation method is suggested in order to create a harmonious human settlement environment and achieve the sustainable development of residential areas. The key to determining whether the model can be successfully implemented is now the stakeholders. Scholars feel that sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-10, Vol.14 (21), p.13963
Hauptverfasser: Rong, Qi, Shen, Liangfeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 13963
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Rong, Qi
Shen, Liangfeng
description The appropriate ecological operation method is suggested in order to create a harmonious human settlement environment and achieve the sustainable development of residential areas. The key to determining whether the model can be successfully implemented is now the stakeholders. Scholars feel that stakeholders in the urban development process should sustain collaboration, and they suggest collaborative measures because they have successfully identified these parties. Nevertheless, there are distinctions between the specialized research of ecological operation stakeholders and the disregard for internal differences of related groups. In order to examine the relationship strength and network density, structural location, and role interaction, this article employs social network analysis to examine the cohesiveness, relevance, reciprocity, transitivity, hierarchy, and agency of the stakeholder relationship network in the ecological operation. Interest disagreements, solutions, and recommendations among participants encourage the effective application of the ecological operating model. The study demonstrates that there are no factions, and that weak links dominate the stakeholder relationship network in ecological operations, exhibiting a “core-periphery” relationship structure. High relevance, high reciprocity, and high transmissibility describe the relationship network. Although the network’s overall power is dispersed, each group’s power is centralized. Residents and social organizations in residential areas are in a poor position, since governments at all levels have strong control over them. In order to optimize relationships and collaborative governance, which is helpful for implementing the ecological operation mode and realizing harmony and oneness between man and nature, the study explored the relationship network structure and features of stakeholders in the ecological operation.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su142113963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2769916049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747179975</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747179975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-169639ce41216cd3c354cb6f88002dddaea08e83b63a044e13f5d22b13c96e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1PwzAMhisEEtPYiT8QiRNCHUnTr3Ab04BJgyG6e5Ul7pata0qSAvv3ZBoHZh9s2c9r2XIQXBM8pJThe9uROCKEspSeBb0IZyQkOMHn__LLYGDtBnujlDCS9oK2cJ3cI90gtwY0EbrWKyV4jeYtGO6Ub7xqCTXSFSrAuRp20DiLHrkFeZAVWiiPv4H71maLRg2v91bZB1Q4voW1riUY9A7GtiCc-oKr4KLitYXBX-wHi6fJYvwSzubP0_FoFgqKiQtJ6s9gAmISkVRIKmgSi2Va5TnGkZSSA8c55HSZUo7jGAitEhlFS0IFSyGj_eDmOLY1-rMD68qN7oxfzpZRljJ_O46Zp4ZHasVrKFVTaWe48C5hp4RuoFK-PsrijGSMZYkX3J4IPOPgx614Z205LT5O2bsjK4y21kBVtkbtuNmXBJeHj5X_PkZ_AYOdh58</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769916049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rong, Qi ; Shen, Liangfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Rong, Qi ; Shen, Liangfeng</creatorcontrib><description>The appropriate ecological operation method is suggested in order to create a harmonious human settlement environment and achieve the sustainable development of residential areas. The key to determining whether the model can be successfully implemented is now the stakeholders. Scholars feel that stakeholders in the urban development process should sustain collaboration, and they suggest collaborative measures because they have successfully identified these parties. Nevertheless, there are distinctions between the specialized research of ecological operation stakeholders and the disregard for internal differences of related groups. In order to examine the relationship strength and network density, structural location, and role interaction, this article employs social network analysis to examine the cohesiveness, relevance, reciprocity, transitivity, hierarchy, and agency of the stakeholder relationship network in the ecological operation. Interest disagreements, solutions, and recommendations among participants encourage the effective application of the ecological operating model. The study demonstrates that there are no factions, and that weak links dominate the stakeholder relationship network in ecological operations, exhibiting a “core-periphery” relationship structure. High relevance, high reciprocity, and high transmissibility describe the relationship network. Although the network’s overall power is dispersed, each group’s power is centralized. Residents and social organizations in residential areas are in a poor position, since governments at all levels have strong control over them. In order to optimize relationships and collaborative governance, which is helpful for implementing the ecological operation mode and realizing harmony and oneness between man and nature, the study explored the relationship network structure and features of stakeholders in the ecological operation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142113963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Civilization ; Classification ; Collaboration ; Construction ; Cooperation ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Environmental economics ; Five year plans ; Human settlements ; Land settlement ; Neighborhoods ; Network analysis ; Reciprocity ; Redevelopment ; Research methodology ; Residential areas ; Residential development ; Social network analysis ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Stakeholders ; Sustainable development ; Urban areas ; Urban development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-10, Vol.14 (21), p.13963</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-169639ce41216cd3c354cb6f88002dddaea08e83b63a044e13f5d22b13c96e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-169639ce41216cd3c354cb6f88002dddaea08e83b63a044e13f5d22b13c96e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rong, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Liangfeng</creatorcontrib><title>Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The appropriate ecological operation method is suggested in order to create a harmonious human settlement environment and achieve the sustainable development of residential areas. The key to determining whether the model can be successfully implemented is now the stakeholders. Scholars feel that stakeholders in the urban development process should sustain collaboration, and they suggest collaborative measures because they have successfully identified these parties. Nevertheless, there are distinctions between the specialized research of ecological operation stakeholders and the disregard for internal differences of related groups. In order to examine the relationship strength and network density, structural location, and role interaction, this article employs social network analysis to examine the cohesiveness, relevance, reciprocity, transitivity, hierarchy, and agency of the stakeholder relationship network in the ecological operation. Interest disagreements, solutions, and recommendations among participants encourage the effective application of the ecological operating model. The study demonstrates that there are no factions, and that weak links dominate the stakeholder relationship network in ecological operations, exhibiting a “core-periphery” relationship structure. High relevance, high reciprocity, and high transmissibility describe the relationship network. Although the network’s overall power is dispersed, each group’s power is centralized. Residents and social organizations in residential areas are in a poor position, since governments at all levels have strong control over them. In order to optimize relationships and collaborative governance, which is helpful for implementing the ecological operation mode and realizing harmony and oneness between man and nature, the study explored the relationship network structure and features of stakeholders in the ecological operation.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Civilization</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Five year plans</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Land settlement</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential development</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1PwzAMhisEEtPYiT8QiRNCHUnTr3Ab04BJgyG6e5Ul7pata0qSAvv3ZBoHZh9s2c9r2XIQXBM8pJThe9uROCKEspSeBb0IZyQkOMHn__LLYGDtBnujlDCS9oK2cJ3cI90gtwY0EbrWKyV4jeYtGO6Ub7xqCTXSFSrAuRp20DiLHrkFeZAVWiiPv4H71maLRg2v91bZB1Q4voW1riUY9A7GtiCc-oKr4KLitYXBX-wHi6fJYvwSzubP0_FoFgqKiQtJ6s9gAmISkVRIKmgSi2Va5TnGkZSSA8c55HSZUo7jGAitEhlFS0IFSyGj_eDmOLY1-rMD68qN7oxfzpZRljJ_O46Zp4ZHasVrKFVTaWe48C5hp4RuoFK-PsrijGSMZYkX3J4IPOPgx614Z205LT5O2bsjK4y21kBVtkbtuNmXBJeHj5X_PkZ_AYOdh58</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Rong, Qi</creator><creator>Shen, Liangfeng</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective</title><author>Rong, Qi ; Shen, Liangfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-169639ce41216cd3c354cb6f88002dddaea08e83b63a044e13f5d22b13c96e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Civilization</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Five year plans</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Land settlement</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential development</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rong, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Liangfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rong, Qi</au><au>Shen, Liangfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>13963</spage><pages>13963-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The appropriate ecological operation method is suggested in order to create a harmonious human settlement environment and achieve the sustainable development of residential areas. The key to determining whether the model can be successfully implemented is now the stakeholders. Scholars feel that stakeholders in the urban development process should sustain collaboration, and they suggest collaborative measures because they have successfully identified these parties. Nevertheless, there are distinctions between the specialized research of ecological operation stakeholders and the disregard for internal differences of related groups. In order to examine the relationship strength and network density, structural location, and role interaction, this article employs social network analysis to examine the cohesiveness, relevance, reciprocity, transitivity, hierarchy, and agency of the stakeholder relationship network in the ecological operation. Interest disagreements, solutions, and recommendations among participants encourage the effective application of the ecological operating model. The study demonstrates that there are no factions, and that weak links dominate the stakeholder relationship network in ecological operations, exhibiting a “core-periphery” relationship structure. High relevance, high reciprocity, and high transmissibility describe the relationship network. Although the network’s overall power is dispersed, each group’s power is centralized. Residents and social organizations in residential areas are in a poor position, since governments at all levels have strong control over them. In order to optimize relationships and collaborative governance, which is helpful for implementing the ecological operation mode and realizing harmony and oneness between man and nature, the study explored the relationship network structure and features of stakeholders in the ecological operation.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142113963</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-10, Vol.14 (21), p.13963
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2769916049
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Analysis
Civilization
Classification
Collaboration
Construction
Cooperation
Ecological effects
Ecology
Environmental economics
Five year plans
Human settlements
Land settlement
Neighborhoods
Network analysis
Reciprocity
Redevelopment
Research methodology
Residential areas
Residential development
Social network analysis
Social networks
Social organization
Stakeholders
Sustainable development
Urban areas
Urban development
title Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A56%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Study%20on%20the%20Ecological%20Operation%20Model%20of%20Settlements%20Based%20on%20Social%20Network%20Analysis:%20Stakeholder%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Rong,%20Qi&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=13963&rft.pages=13963-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142113963&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747179975%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769916049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747179975&rfr_iscdi=true