Assessment of the orbital variations of GNSS GEO and IGSO satellites for monitoring ionospheric TEC

The geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites provide a great opportunity to continuously monitor the earth system, which has shown a powerful application in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. As the GEO satellites revolve the earth over the equator synchronously with the earth's rota...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:GPS solutions 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.62, Article 62
Hauptverfasser: Li, Zhiyao, Zhong, Jiahao, Hao, Yongqiang, Zhang, Meng, Niu, Jiemin, Wan, Xin, Huang, Fuqing, Han, Hao, Song, Xingyan, Chen, Jiawen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 62
container_title GPS solutions
container_volume 27
creator Li, Zhiyao
Zhong, Jiahao
Hao, Yongqiang
Zhang, Meng
Niu, Jiemin
Wan, Xin
Huang, Fuqing
Han, Hao
Song, Xingyan
Chen, Jiawen
description The geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites provide a great opportunity to continuously monitor the earth system, which has shown a powerful application in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. As the GEO satellites revolve the earth over the equator synchronously with the earth's rotation, the GEO satellites appear motionless in the sky. In TEC studies, the position of the GEO satellites is normally assumed to be fixed, but the actual position changes slightly. We assess the effects of the orbital variations of the GEO satellites on monitoring ionospheric TEC based on precise satellite orbit solutions or broadcast ephemeris. The results indicate that the sub-satellite points of the GEO satellites change slightly and could induce certain variations of ionospheric pierce point (IPP). The orbital inclination and the receiver location with respect to the GEO satellite mainly determine the magnitude of IPP drift. Based on simulations with an empirical ionospheric model, the TEC differences due to the fixed GEO IPP assumption are not completely negligible. The day-to-day variations of the daily GEO IPP trajectories are not stable over a long-term time scale. The daily and yearly variations of the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) are also examined. The IGSO-based TEC could be used in the day-to-day comparison for a short period, though it is not suitable for long-term TEC studies. This work provides additional clues to improve the ionospheric studies based on GEO and IGSO TECs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10291-023-01403-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2769870102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769870102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efa60ef019bea7206431a387ba994efa183db0beb9754155dbcea62cb211773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gsMRvOdhInY1WVUKmiQ8ts2alDXaVxsF1U_j0uRWJjupPuvXd3H0L3FB4pgHgKFFhFCTBOgGbAyfECjWjOKKFlWVymHkogORdwjW5C2AEwqKpshJpJCCaEvekjdi2OW4Od1zaqDn8qb1W0rg-nSf26WuF6tsSq3-B5vVrioKLpOhtNwK3zeO96G523_TtOHheGrfG2wevZ9BZdtaoL5u63jtHb82w9fSGLZT2fThak4bSKJM9NqwowLdBKGyUYFBmnipdCq3RrGtKSbzRooyuRZzTPN7oxqmCNZpQKwcfo4Zw7ePdxMCHKnTv4Pq2UTBRVKSBRSip2VjXeheBNKwdv98p_SQryBFOeYcqklT8w5TGZ-NkUhtOHxv9F_-P6BoDYd64</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769870102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the orbital variations of GNSS GEO and IGSO satellites for monitoring ionospheric TEC</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Li, Zhiyao ; Zhong, Jiahao ; Hao, Yongqiang ; Zhang, Meng ; Niu, Jiemin ; Wan, Xin ; Huang, Fuqing ; Han, Hao ; Song, Xingyan ; Chen, Jiawen</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhiyao ; Zhong, Jiahao ; Hao, Yongqiang ; Zhang, Meng ; Niu, Jiemin ; Wan, Xin ; Huang, Fuqing ; Han, Hao ; Song, Xingyan ; Chen, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><description>The geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites provide a great opportunity to continuously monitor the earth system, which has shown a powerful application in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. As the GEO satellites revolve the earth over the equator synchronously with the earth's rotation, the GEO satellites appear motionless in the sky. In TEC studies, the position of the GEO satellites is normally assumed to be fixed, but the actual position changes slightly. We assess the effects of the orbital variations of the GEO satellites on monitoring ionospheric TEC based on precise satellite orbit solutions or broadcast ephemeris. The results indicate that the sub-satellite points of the GEO satellites change slightly and could induce certain variations of ionospheric pierce point (IPP). The orbital inclination and the receiver location with respect to the GEO satellite mainly determine the magnitude of IPP drift. Based on simulations with an empirical ionospheric model, the TEC differences due to the fixed GEO IPP assumption are not completely negligible. The day-to-day variations of the daily GEO IPP trajectories are not stable over a long-term time scale. The daily and yearly variations of the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) are also examined. The IGSO-based TEC could be used in the day-to-day comparison for a short period, though it is not suitable for long-term TEC studies. This work provides additional clues to improve the ionospheric studies based on GEO and IGSO TECs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-5370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-1886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10291-023-01403-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Automotive Engineering ; Earth ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth rotation ; Earth Sciences ; Electrical Engineering ; Equator ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geosynchronous orbits ; Global navigation satellite system ; Monitoring ; Satellite orbits ; Satellites ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Total Electron Content</subject><ispartof>GPS solutions, 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.62, Article 62</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efa60ef019bea7206431a387ba994efa183db0beb9754155dbcea62cb211773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efa60ef019bea7206431a387ba994efa183db0beb9754155dbcea62cb211773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10291-023-01403-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10291-023-01403-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Jiahao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Yongqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Jiemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Fuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xingyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the orbital variations of GNSS GEO and IGSO satellites for monitoring ionospheric TEC</title><title>GPS solutions</title><addtitle>GPS Solut</addtitle><description>The geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites provide a great opportunity to continuously monitor the earth system, which has shown a powerful application in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. As the GEO satellites revolve the earth over the equator synchronously with the earth's rotation, the GEO satellites appear motionless in the sky. In TEC studies, the position of the GEO satellites is normally assumed to be fixed, but the actual position changes slightly. We assess the effects of the orbital variations of the GEO satellites on monitoring ionospheric TEC based on precise satellite orbit solutions or broadcast ephemeris. The results indicate that the sub-satellite points of the GEO satellites change slightly and could induce certain variations of ionospheric pierce point (IPP). The orbital inclination and the receiver location with respect to the GEO satellite mainly determine the magnitude of IPP drift. Based on simulations with an empirical ionospheric model, the TEC differences due to the fixed GEO IPP assumption are not completely negligible. The day-to-day variations of the daily GEO IPP trajectories are not stable over a long-term time scale. The daily and yearly variations of the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) are also examined. The IGSO-based TEC could be used in the day-to-day comparison for a short period, though it is not suitable for long-term TEC studies. This work provides additional clues to improve the ionospheric studies based on GEO and IGSO TECs.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Automotive Engineering</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth rotation</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electrical Engineering</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geosynchronous orbits</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Satellite orbits</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Total Electron Content</subject><issn>1080-5370</issn><issn>1521-1886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gsMRvOdhInY1WVUKmiQ8ts2alDXaVxsF1U_j0uRWJjupPuvXd3H0L3FB4pgHgKFFhFCTBOgGbAyfECjWjOKKFlWVymHkogORdwjW5C2AEwqKpshJpJCCaEvekjdi2OW4Od1zaqDn8qb1W0rg-nSf26WuF6tsSq3-B5vVrioKLpOhtNwK3zeO96G523_TtOHheGrfG2wevZ9BZdtaoL5u63jtHb82w9fSGLZT2fThak4bSKJM9NqwowLdBKGyUYFBmnipdCq3RrGtKSbzRooyuRZzTPN7oxqmCNZpQKwcfo4Zw7ePdxMCHKnTv4Pq2UTBRVKSBRSip2VjXeheBNKwdv98p_SQryBFOeYcqklT8w5TGZ-NkUhtOHxv9F_-P6BoDYd64</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Li, Zhiyao</creator><creator>Zhong, Jiahao</creator><creator>Hao, Yongqiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Meng</creator><creator>Niu, Jiemin</creator><creator>Wan, Xin</creator><creator>Huang, Fuqing</creator><creator>Han, Hao</creator><creator>Song, Xingyan</creator><creator>Chen, Jiawen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Assessment of the orbital variations of GNSS GEO and IGSO satellites for monitoring ionospheric TEC</title><author>Li, Zhiyao ; Zhong, Jiahao ; Hao, Yongqiang ; Zhang, Meng ; Niu, Jiemin ; Wan, Xin ; Huang, Fuqing ; Han, Hao ; Song, Xingyan ; Chen, Jiawen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-55efa60ef019bea7206431a387ba994efa183db0beb9754155dbcea62cb211773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Automotive Engineering</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth rotation</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electrical Engineering</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geosynchronous orbits</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Satellite orbits</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Total Electron Content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhiyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Jiahao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Yongqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Jiemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Fuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xingyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>GPS solutions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zhiyao</au><au>Zhong, Jiahao</au><au>Hao, Yongqiang</au><au>Zhang, Meng</au><au>Niu, Jiemin</au><au>Wan, Xin</au><au>Huang, Fuqing</au><au>Han, Hao</au><au>Song, Xingyan</au><au>Chen, Jiawen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the orbital variations of GNSS GEO and IGSO satellites for monitoring ionospheric TEC</atitle><jtitle>GPS solutions</jtitle><stitle>GPS Solut</stitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>62</spage><pages>62-</pages><artnum>62</artnum><issn>1080-5370</issn><eissn>1521-1886</eissn><abstract>The geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites provide a great opportunity to continuously monitor the earth system, which has shown a powerful application in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. As the GEO satellites revolve the earth over the equator synchronously with the earth's rotation, the GEO satellites appear motionless in the sky. In TEC studies, the position of the GEO satellites is normally assumed to be fixed, but the actual position changes slightly. We assess the effects of the orbital variations of the GEO satellites on monitoring ionospheric TEC based on precise satellite orbit solutions or broadcast ephemeris. The results indicate that the sub-satellite points of the GEO satellites change slightly and could induce certain variations of ionospheric pierce point (IPP). The orbital inclination and the receiver location with respect to the GEO satellite mainly determine the magnitude of IPP drift. Based on simulations with an empirical ionospheric model, the TEC differences due to the fixed GEO IPP assumption are not completely negligible. The day-to-day variations of the daily GEO IPP trajectories are not stable over a long-term time scale. The daily and yearly variations of the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) are also examined. The IGSO-based TEC could be used in the day-to-day comparison for a short period, though it is not suitable for long-term TEC studies. This work provides additional clues to improve the ionospheric studies based on GEO and IGSO TECs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10291-023-01403-x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-5370
ispartof GPS solutions, 2023-04, Vol.27 (2), p.62, Article 62
issn 1080-5370
1521-1886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2769870102
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Atmospheric Sciences
Automotive Engineering
Earth
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth rotation
Earth Sciences
Electrical Engineering
Equator
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geosynchronous orbits
Global navigation satellite system
Monitoring
Satellite orbits
Satellites
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
Total Electron Content
title Assessment of the orbital variations of GNSS GEO and IGSO satellites for monitoring ionospheric TEC
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A41%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20orbital%20variations%20of%20GNSS%20GEO%20and%20IGSO%20satellites%20for%20monitoring%20ionospheric%20TEC&rft.jtitle=GPS%20solutions&rft.au=Li,%20Zhiyao&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=62&rft.pages=62-&rft.artnum=62&rft.issn=1080-5370&rft.eissn=1521-1886&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10291-023-01403-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2769870102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769870102&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true