Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece

In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Amfiteatru economic 2022-11, Vol.24 (Special Issue No. 16), p.1014-1033
Hauptverfasser: Streimikiene, Dalia, Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1033
container_issue Special Issue No. 16
container_start_page 1014
container_title Amfiteatru economic
container_volume 24
creator Streimikiene, Dalia
Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L
description In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.
doi_str_mv 10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2769280620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769280620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e160t-b6cd44ae1349ea63ed1fb281989893c00577866acabdc1931b51e7b0f7ac46163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj01rwzAMhs3YYGXrD9hhYBjslsVyHNs5lq7rCoWxr3NwHGV1aZPMTgr990vbHTbp8Arp4ZVEyA2wBy406Hg2iTnjPH4HGQMDcUZGnAsVZcDE-Z_6koxDWLMhVJqASEfka9psW-NN53ZIJyFgCFusO9pU9A0DGm9X9J4-4g43TXucmLqkr73ZuG5_oJauQrqoS2dN1_hAXT20ulVvameO7NwjWrwmF5XZBBz_6hX5fJp9TJ-j5ct8MZ0sIwTJuqiQthTCICQiQyMTLKEquIZMD5lYxlKltJTGmqK0kCVQpICqYJUyVkiQyRW5O_m2vvnuMXT5uul9PazMuZIZ10xyNlD0RKFtahfy1rut8fsctMoywZk4GN3-Qw4Shg_z4RqpZfIDDx9tuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769280620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Assessment of Research &amp; Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Streimikiene, Dalia ; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creator><creatorcontrib>Streimikiene, Dalia ; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1582-9146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</publisher><subject>case study ; Comparative analysis ; comparative assessment ; Comparative studies ; Economic growth ; Evaluation ; Exports ; Financing ; Greece ; High technology ; Human resources ; Human resources management ; Innovations ; Lithuania ; Product development ; Product lines ; Productivity ; Quality of life ; quality of life indicators ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research &amp; development expenditures ; research and development indicators ; Science education ; Technological change ; Trends ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Amfiteatru economic, 2022-11, Vol.24 (Special Issue No. 16), p.1014-1033</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Streimikiene, Dalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Assessment of Research &amp; Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</title><title>Amfiteatru economic</title><description><![CDATA[In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.]]></description><subject>case study</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>comparative assessment</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Greece</subject><subject>High technology</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Human resources management</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Lithuania</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product lines</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>quality of life indicators</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research &amp; development expenditures</subject><subject>research and development indicators</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>1582-9146</issn><issn>2247-9104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj01rwzAMhs3YYGXrD9hhYBjslsVyHNs5lq7rCoWxr3NwHGV1aZPMTgr990vbHTbp8Arp4ZVEyA2wBy406Hg2iTnjPH4HGQMDcUZGnAsVZcDE-Z_6koxDWLMhVJqASEfka9psW-NN53ZIJyFgCFusO9pU9A0DGm9X9J4-4g43TXucmLqkr73ZuG5_oJauQrqoS2dN1_hAXT20ulVvameO7NwjWrwmF5XZBBz_6hX5fJp9TJ-j5ct8MZ0sIwTJuqiQthTCICQiQyMTLKEquIZMD5lYxlKltJTGmqK0kCVQpICqYJUyVkiQyRW5O_m2vvnuMXT5uul9PazMuZIZ10xyNlD0RKFtahfy1rut8fsctMoywZk4GN3-Qw4Shg_z4RqpZfIDDx9tuQ</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Streimikiene, Dalia</creator><creator>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creator><general>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</general><general>Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Faculty of Commerce</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Comparative Assessment of Research &amp; Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</title><author>Streimikiene, Dalia ; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e160t-b6cd44ae1349ea63ed1fb281989893c00577866acabdc1931b51e7b0f7ac46163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>case study</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>comparative assessment</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Greece</topic><topic>High technology</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Human resources management</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Lithuania</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product lines</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>quality of life indicators</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research &amp; development expenditures</topic><topic>research and development indicators</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Streimikiene, Dalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Streimikiene, Dalia</au><au>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Assessment of Research &amp; Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</atitle><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>Special Issue No. 16</issue><spage>1014</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1014-1033</pages><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>1582-9146</issn><eissn>2247-9104</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.]]></abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</pub><doi>10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2247-9104
ispartof Amfiteatru economic, 2022-11, Vol.24 (Special Issue No. 16), p.1014-1033
issn 2247-9104
1582-9146
2247-9104
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2769280620
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects case study
Comparative analysis
comparative assessment
Comparative studies
Economic growth
Evaluation
Exports
Financing
Greece
High technology
Human resources
Human resources management
Innovations
Lithuania
Product development
Product lines
Productivity
Quality of life
quality of life indicators
R&D
Research & development
Research & development expenditures
research and development indicators
Science education
Technological change
Trends
Well being
title Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A39%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Assessment%20of%20Research%20&%20Development%20and%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Indicators%20in%20Lithuania%20and%20Greece&rft.jtitle=Amfiteatru%20economic&rft.au=Streimikiene,%20Dalia&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=Special%20Issue%20No.%2016&rft.spage=1014&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1014-1033&rft.issn=2247-9104&rft.eissn=2247-9104&rft_id=info:doi/10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2769280620%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769280620&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true