Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece
In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Amfiteatru economic 2022-11, Vol.24 (Special Issue No. 16), p.1014-1033 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1033 |
---|---|
container_issue | Special Issue No. 16 |
container_start_page | 1014 |
container_title | Amfiteatru economic |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Streimikiene, Dalia Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L |
description | In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania. |
doi_str_mv | 10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2769280620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769280620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e160t-b6cd44ae1349ea63ed1fb281989893c00577866acabdc1931b51e7b0f7ac46163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj01rwzAMhs3YYGXrD9hhYBjslsVyHNs5lq7rCoWxr3NwHGV1aZPMTgr990vbHTbp8Arp4ZVEyA2wBy406Hg2iTnjPH4HGQMDcUZGnAsVZcDE-Z_6koxDWLMhVJqASEfka9psW-NN53ZIJyFgCFusO9pU9A0DGm9X9J4-4g43TXucmLqkr73ZuG5_oJauQrqoS2dN1_hAXT20ulVvameO7NwjWrwmF5XZBBz_6hX5fJp9TJ-j5ct8MZ0sIwTJuqiQthTCICQiQyMTLKEquIZMD5lYxlKltJTGmqK0kCVQpICqYJUyVkiQyRW5O_m2vvnuMXT5uul9PazMuZIZ10xyNlD0RKFtahfy1rut8fsctMoywZk4GN3-Qw4Shg_z4RqpZfIDDx9tuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769280620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Streimikiene, Dalia ; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creator><creatorcontrib>Streimikiene, Dalia ; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1582-9146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</publisher><subject>case study ; Comparative analysis ; comparative assessment ; Comparative studies ; Economic growth ; Evaluation ; Exports ; Financing ; Greece ; High technology ; Human resources ; Human resources management ; Innovations ; Lithuania ; Product development ; Product lines ; Productivity ; Quality of life ; quality of life indicators ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research & development expenditures ; research and development indicators ; Science education ; Technological change ; Trends ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Amfiteatru economic, 2022-11, Vol.24 (Special Issue No. 16), p.1014-1033</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Streimikiene, Dalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</title><title>Amfiteatru economic</title><description><![CDATA[In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.]]></description><subject>case study</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>comparative assessment</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Greece</subject><subject>High technology</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Human resources management</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Lithuania</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product lines</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>quality of life indicators</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research & development expenditures</subject><subject>research and development indicators</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>1582-9146</issn><issn>2247-9104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj01rwzAMhs3YYGXrD9hhYBjslsVyHNs5lq7rCoWxr3NwHGV1aZPMTgr990vbHTbp8Arp4ZVEyA2wBy406Hg2iTnjPH4HGQMDcUZGnAsVZcDE-Z_6koxDWLMhVJqASEfka9psW-NN53ZIJyFgCFusO9pU9A0DGm9X9J4-4g43TXucmLqkr73ZuG5_oJauQrqoS2dN1_hAXT20ulVvameO7NwjWrwmF5XZBBz_6hX5fJp9TJ-j5ct8MZ0sIwTJuqiQthTCICQiQyMTLKEquIZMD5lYxlKltJTGmqK0kCVQpICqYJUyVkiQyRW5O_m2vvnuMXT5uul9PazMuZIZ10xyNlD0RKFtahfy1rut8fsctMoywZk4GN3-Qw4Shg_z4RqpZfIDDx9tuQ</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Streimikiene, Dalia</creator><creator>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creator><general>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</general><general>Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Faculty of Commerce</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</title><author>Streimikiene, Dalia ; Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e160t-b6cd44ae1349ea63ed1fb281989893c00577866acabdc1931b51e7b0f7ac46163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>case study</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>comparative assessment</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Greece</topic><topic>High technology</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Human resources management</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Lithuania</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product lines</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>quality of life indicators</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research & development expenditures</topic><topic>research and development indicators</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Streimikiene, Dalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Streimikiene, Dalia</au><au>Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece</atitle><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>Special Issue No. 16</issue><spage>1014</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1014-1033</pages><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>1582-9146</issn><eissn>2247-9104</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[In recent years, it has been widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) is leading innovations and economic growth, as they are supposed to provide an increase in the well-being of the population. The paper analyses the scientific literature on the linkages between research and development expenditures to advance and promote the quality of life of the population. The comparative assessment of two countries – Lithuania and Greece – was performed based on the analysis of indicators such as the share of R&D financing intensity; human resources management in a new knowledge orientation; share of high-tech products in total exports, jointly with well-being indicators representing quality of life such as consumption level, productive activity; education and natural and living environment. The comparative assessment approach consists of comparative analysis of trends in R&D and the evolution of the quality of life indicator in two selected countries and comparison with a benchmark – the EU-27 average level, in addition to the identification of similarities and differences and their main reasons. To this end, a survey of experts in the selected countries defined the most relevant indicators for R&D and quality of life and constructed a framework for R&D performance and quality of life. The comparative assessment of Lithuania and Greece showed that Lithuania has a higher R&D financing intensity, but lower R&D resources and higher R&D financing outcomes compared to Greece. However, in both countries, the efficiency of R&D financing in terms of high technology products sharing in total exports is less than half than the EU-27 average. Subsequently, both countries should strengthen R&D financing outputs by implementing additional measures. Quality of life indicators related to R&D performance in Lithuania were higher than in Greece during the entire investigated period (2011-2020), demonstrating the need for greater R&D financing for national growth and the well-being of citizens. Finally, policy recommendations were proposed to increase the efficiency of R&D financing for Greece and Lithuania.]]></abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</pub><doi>10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2247-9104 |
ispartof | Amfiteatru economic, 2022-11, Vol.24 (Special Issue No. 16), p.1014-1033 |
issn | 2247-9104 1582-9146 2247-9104 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2769280620 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | case study Comparative analysis comparative assessment Comparative studies Economic growth Evaluation Exports Financing Greece High technology Human resources Human resources management Innovations Lithuania Product development Product lines Productivity Quality of life quality of life indicators R&D Research & development Research & development expenditures research and development indicators Science education Technological change Trends Well being |
title | Comparative Assessment of Research & Development and Quality of Life Indicators in Lithuania and Greece |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A39%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Assessment%20of%20Research%20&%20Development%20and%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Indicators%20in%20Lithuania%20and%20Greece&rft.jtitle=Amfiteatru%20economic&rft.au=Streimikiene,%20Dalia&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=Special%20Issue%20No.%2016&rft.spage=1014&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1014-1033&rft.issn=2247-9104&rft.eissn=2247-9104&rft_id=info:doi/10.24818/EA/2022/S16/1014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2769280620%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769280620&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |