A Comparison between Supervised Classification Methods: Study Case on Land Cover Change Detection Caused by a Hydroelectric Complex Installation in the Brazilian Amazon
The Volta Grande do Xingu (VGX) in the Amazon Forest of Brazil was chosen to analyze the land use and land cover changes (LULCC) from 2000 to 2017, with the aim of assessing the most suitable classification method for the area. Three parametric (Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood and minimum d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-01, Vol.15 (2), p.1309 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1309 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Affonso, Alynne Almeida Mandai, Silvia Sayuri Portella, Tatiana Pineda Quintanilha, José Alberto Conti, Luis Américo Grohmann, Carlos Henrique |
description | The Volta Grande do Xingu (VGX) in the Amazon Forest of Brazil was chosen to analyze the land use and land cover changes (LULCC) from 2000 to 2017, with the aim of assessing the most suitable classification method for the area. Three parametric (Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood and minimum distance) and three non-parametric (neural net, random forest and support vector machine) classification algorithms were tested in two Landsat scenes. The accuracy assessment was evaluated through a confusion matrix. Change detection of the landscape was analyzed through the post-classification comparison method. While maximum likelihood was more capable of highlighting errors in individual classes, support vector machine was slightly superior when compared with the other non-parametric options, these being the most suitable classifiers within the scope of this study. The main changes detected in the landscape were from forest to agro-pasture, from forest/agro-pasture to river, and from river to non-river, resulting in rock exposure. The methodology outlined in this research highlights the usefulness of remote sensing tools in follow-up observations of LULCC in the study area (with the possibility of application to the entire Amazon rainforest). Thus, it is possible to carry out adaptive management that aims to minimize unforeseen or underestimated impacts in previous stages of environmental licensing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su15021309 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2767298708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2767298708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-9411eac13105f30d3080d76f2868781d5d45cdbf541ab912909347f76a4ad4763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc9OwzAMxisEEtPYhSeIxA1pkDRt03Ab5c8mDXEYnCuvcVmmLhlJOtieiMekY0jgiy375--T5Sg6Z_SKc0mvfctSGjNO5VHUi6lgQ0ZTevyvPo0G3i9pF5wzybJe9DUihV2twWlvDZlj-EA0ZNau0W20R0WKBrzXta4g6I54wrCwyt-QWWjVlhTgkXTtKZgOtRt0pFiAeUNyhwGrn5UC2r3QfEuAjLfKWWy6idPVj3ODn2RifICmOThoQ8ICya2DnW40GDJawc6as-ikhsbj4Df3o9eH-5diPJw-P06K0XRYxTINQ5kwhlAx3p1bc6o4zakSWR3nWS5yplKVpJWa12nCYC5ZLKnkiahFBgmoRGS8H10cdNfOvrfoQ7m0rTOdZRmLTMQyFzTvqMsDVTnrvcO6XDu9ArctGS33zyj_nsG_AUTyfVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767298708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison between Supervised Classification Methods: Study Case on Land Cover Change Detection Caused by a Hydroelectric Complex Installation in the Brazilian Amazon</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Affonso, Alynne Almeida ; Mandai, Silvia Sayuri ; Portella, Tatiana Pineda ; Quintanilha, José Alberto ; Conti, Luis Américo ; Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</creator><creatorcontrib>Affonso, Alynne Almeida ; Mandai, Silvia Sayuri ; Portella, Tatiana Pineda ; Quintanilha, José Alberto ; Conti, Luis Américo ; Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><description>The Volta Grande do Xingu (VGX) in the Amazon Forest of Brazil was chosen to analyze the land use and land cover changes (LULCC) from 2000 to 2017, with the aim of assessing the most suitable classification method for the area. Three parametric (Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood and minimum distance) and three non-parametric (neural net, random forest and support vector machine) classification algorithms were tested in two Landsat scenes. The accuracy assessment was evaluated through a confusion matrix. Change detection of the landscape was analyzed through the post-classification comparison method. While maximum likelihood was more capable of highlighting errors in individual classes, support vector machine was slightly superior when compared with the other non-parametric options, these being the most suitable classifiers within the scope of this study. The main changes detected in the landscape were from forest to agro-pasture, from forest/agro-pasture to river, and from river to non-river, resulting in rock exposure. The methodology outlined in this research highlights the usefulness of remote sensing tools in follow-up observations of LULCC in the study area (with the possibility of application to the entire Amazon rainforest). Thus, it is possible to carry out adaptive management that aims to minimize unforeseen or underestimated impacts in previous stages of environmental licensing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15021309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adaptive management ; Algorithms ; Biodiversity ; Change detection ; Classification ; Construction ; Deforestation ; Ecosystems ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydrology ; Land cover ; Land use ; Landsat ; Landscape ; Pasture ; Planning ; Rainforests ; Remote sensing ; Rivers ; Statistical analysis ; Stream flow ; Support vector machines ; Sustainability ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (2), p.1309</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-9411eac13105f30d3080d76f2868781d5d45cdbf541ab912909347f76a4ad4763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-9411eac13105f30d3080d76f2868781d5d45cdbf541ab912909347f76a4ad4763</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9260-5327 ; 0000-0002-9507-3565 ; 0000-0003-3261-7825 ; 0000-0001-8364-1978 ; 0000-0001-5073-5572 ; 0000-0002-2646-3922</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Affonso, Alynne Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandai, Silvia Sayuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portella, Tatiana Pineda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintanilha, José Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Luis Américo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison between Supervised Classification Methods: Study Case on Land Cover Change Detection Caused by a Hydroelectric Complex Installation in the Brazilian Amazon</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The Volta Grande do Xingu (VGX) in the Amazon Forest of Brazil was chosen to analyze the land use and land cover changes (LULCC) from 2000 to 2017, with the aim of assessing the most suitable classification method for the area. Three parametric (Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood and minimum distance) and three non-parametric (neural net, random forest and support vector machine) classification algorithms were tested in two Landsat scenes. The accuracy assessment was evaluated through a confusion matrix. Change detection of the landscape was analyzed through the post-classification comparison method. While maximum likelihood was more capable of highlighting errors in individual classes, support vector machine was slightly superior when compared with the other non-parametric options, these being the most suitable classifiers within the scope of this study. The main changes detected in the landscape were from forest to agro-pasture, from forest/agro-pasture to river, and from river to non-river, resulting in rock exposure. The methodology outlined in this research highlights the usefulness of remote sensing tools in follow-up observations of LULCC in the study area (with the possibility of application to the entire Amazon rainforest). Thus, it is possible to carry out adaptive management that aims to minimize unforeseen or underestimated impacts in previous stages of environmental licensing.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adaptive management</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc9OwzAMxisEEtPYhSeIxA1pkDRt03Ab5c8mDXEYnCuvcVmmLhlJOtieiMekY0jgiy375--T5Sg6Z_SKc0mvfctSGjNO5VHUi6lgQ0ZTevyvPo0G3i9pF5wzybJe9DUihV2twWlvDZlj-EA0ZNau0W20R0WKBrzXta4g6I54wrCwyt-QWWjVlhTgkXTtKZgOtRt0pFiAeUNyhwGrn5UC2r3QfEuAjLfKWWy6idPVj3ODn2RifICmOThoQ8ICya2DnW40GDJawc6as-ikhsbj4Df3o9eH-5diPJw-P06K0XRYxTINQ5kwhlAx3p1bc6o4zakSWR3nWS5yplKVpJWa12nCYC5ZLKnkiahFBgmoRGS8H10cdNfOvrfoQ7m0rTOdZRmLTMQyFzTvqMsDVTnrvcO6XDu9ArctGS33zyj_nsG_AUTyfVc</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Affonso, Alynne Almeida</creator><creator>Mandai, Silvia Sayuri</creator><creator>Portella, Tatiana Pineda</creator><creator>Quintanilha, José Alberto</creator><creator>Conti, Luis Américo</creator><creator>Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-5327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-3565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3261-7825</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-1978</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-5572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-3922</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>A Comparison between Supervised Classification Methods: Study Case on Land Cover Change Detection Caused by a Hydroelectric Complex Installation in the Brazilian Amazon</title><author>Affonso, Alynne Almeida ; Mandai, Silvia Sayuri ; Portella, Tatiana Pineda ; Quintanilha, José Alberto ; Conti, Luis Américo ; Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-9411eac13105f30d3080d76f2868781d5d45cdbf541ab912909347f76a4ad4763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adaptive management</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Affonso, Alynne Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandai, Silvia Sayuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portella, Tatiana Pineda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintanilha, José Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Luis Américo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Affonso, Alynne Almeida</au><au>Mandai, Silvia Sayuri</au><au>Portella, Tatiana Pineda</au><au>Quintanilha, José Alberto</au><au>Conti, Luis Américo</au><au>Grohmann, Carlos Henrique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison between Supervised Classification Methods: Study Case on Land Cover Change Detection Caused by a Hydroelectric Complex Installation in the Brazilian Amazon</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1309</spage><pages>1309-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The Volta Grande do Xingu (VGX) in the Amazon Forest of Brazil was chosen to analyze the land use and land cover changes (LULCC) from 2000 to 2017, with the aim of assessing the most suitable classification method for the area. Three parametric (Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood and minimum distance) and three non-parametric (neural net, random forest and support vector machine) classification algorithms were tested in two Landsat scenes. The accuracy assessment was evaluated through a confusion matrix. Change detection of the landscape was analyzed through the post-classification comparison method. While maximum likelihood was more capable of highlighting errors in individual classes, support vector machine was slightly superior when compared with the other non-parametric options, these being the most suitable classifiers within the scope of this study. The main changes detected in the landscape were from forest to agro-pasture, from forest/agro-pasture to river, and from river to non-river, resulting in rock exposure. The methodology outlined in this research highlights the usefulness of remote sensing tools in follow-up observations of LULCC in the study area (with the possibility of application to the entire Amazon rainforest). Thus, it is possible to carry out adaptive management that aims to minimize unforeseen or underestimated impacts in previous stages of environmental licensing.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15021309</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-5327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-3565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3261-7825</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-1978</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-5572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-3922</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (2), p.1309 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2767298708 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Adaptive management Algorithms Biodiversity Change detection Classification Construction Deforestation Ecosystems Hydroelectric power Hydrology Land cover Land use Landsat Landscape Pasture Planning Rainforests Remote sensing Rivers Statistical analysis Stream flow Support vector machines Sustainability Vegetation |
title | A Comparison between Supervised Classification Methods: Study Case on Land Cover Change Detection Caused by a Hydroelectric Complex Installation in the Brazilian Amazon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20between%20Supervised%20Classification%20Methods:%20Study%20Case%20on%20Land%20Cover%20Change%20Detection%20Caused%20by%20a%20Hydroelectric%20Complex%20Installation%20in%20the%20Brazilian%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Affonso,%20Alynne%20Almeida&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1309&rft.pages=1309-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15021309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2767298708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767298708&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |