Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA

The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first grou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresources 2022-05, Vol.17 (2), p.2810-2826
Hauptverfasser: Rezazadeh, Eisa, Vaysi, Ramin, Soltani, Mojtaba, Najafi, Abdollah, Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2826
container_issue 2
container_start_page 2810
container_title Bioresources
container_volume 17
creator Rezazadeh, Eisa
Vaysi, Ramin
Soltani, Mojtaba
Najafi, Abdollah
Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh
description The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.
doi_str_mv 10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2766157155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2766157155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b6d8b76d16c33a5e8d90ef36081a990735af8879c1aba2ba6dd7fea7ad45b5173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1q3TAQhU1JoDdJX6EIuo0d_VxL9jLc5qcQSBbJWoylUa1gS65kL9o36dvWvjeLruYbzpkZhlMUXxmtWC2UvOl8TJgrpipe8YbRkjdcfip2rBUrMy7P_uPPxUXO75TuG8Horvh7iOMEyecYSHRk7pH4MGMKMBC3BDP7uKL_AxsQCJbkJTkwSMZovfPmJIw499HmbYXpcfTliKaHsMoDmZZhImtjc484Z7JkH36SACEaHIZliBmv1yk_xwzh-njj--vL7VVx7mDI-OWjXhZv93evh8fy6fnhx-H2qTR8L2XZSdt0SlomjRBQY2Nbik5I2jBoW6pEDa5pVGsYdMA7kNYqh6DA7uuuZkpcFt9Oe6cUfy2YZ_0el-3_rLmSktWK1fXqkieXSTHnhE5PyY-QfmtG9TEGfYpBM6W53mLQWwziH6e1gSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2766157155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rezazadeh, Eisa ; Vaysi, Ramin ; Soltani, Mojtaba ; Najafi, Abdollah ; Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rezazadeh, Eisa ; Vaysi, Ramin ; Soltani, Mojtaba ; Najafi, Abdollah ; Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creatorcontrib><description>The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Acids ; Additives ; Biopolymers ; Cellulose ; Chitosan ; Crustaceans ; Mechanical properties ; Methods ; Nanoparticles ; Opacity ; Optical properties ; Permeability ; Protective coatings ; Pulp ; Pulp &amp; paper industry ; Sheets ; Slurries ; Spectrophotometry ; Spray coating ; Tensile strength ; Water absorption</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2022-05, Vol.17 (2), p.2810-2826</ispartof><rights>2022. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b6d8b76d16c33a5e8d90ef36081a990735af8879c1aba2ba6dd7fea7ad45b5173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rezazadeh, Eisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaysi, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najafi, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Biopolymers</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Opacity</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Protective coatings</subject><subject>Pulp</subject><subject>Pulp &amp; paper industry</subject><subject>Sheets</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Spray coating</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Water absorption</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1q3TAQhU1JoDdJX6EIuo0d_VxL9jLc5qcQSBbJWoylUa1gS65kL9o36dvWvjeLruYbzpkZhlMUXxmtWC2UvOl8TJgrpipe8YbRkjdcfip2rBUrMy7P_uPPxUXO75TuG8Horvh7iOMEyecYSHRk7pH4MGMKMBC3BDP7uKL_AxsQCJbkJTkwSMZovfPmJIw499HmbYXpcfTliKaHsMoDmZZhImtjc484Z7JkH36SACEaHIZliBmv1yk_xwzh-njj--vL7VVx7mDI-OWjXhZv93evh8fy6fnhx-H2qTR8L2XZSdt0SlomjRBQY2Nbik5I2jBoW6pEDa5pVGsYdMA7kNYqh6DA7uuuZkpcFt9Oe6cUfy2YZ_0el-3_rLmSktWK1fXqkieXSTHnhE5PyY-QfmtG9TEGfYpBM6W53mLQWwziH6e1gSw</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Rezazadeh, Eisa</creator><creator>Vaysi, Ramin</creator><creator>Soltani, Mojtaba</creator><creator>Najafi, Abdollah</creator><creator>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</title><author>Rezazadeh, Eisa ; Vaysi, Ramin ; Soltani, Mojtaba ; Najafi, Abdollah ; Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b6d8b76d16c33a5e8d90ef36081a990735af8879c1aba2ba6dd7fea7ad45b5173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Biopolymers</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Opacity</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Protective coatings</topic><topic>Pulp</topic><topic>Pulp &amp; paper industry</topic><topic>Sheets</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Spray coating</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Water absorption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezazadeh, Eisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaysi, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najafi, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezazadeh, Eisa</au><au>Vaysi, Ramin</au><au>Soltani, Mojtaba</au><au>Najafi, Abdollah</au><au>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2810</spage><epage>2826</epage><pages>2810-2826</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-2126
ispartof Bioresources, 2022-05, Vol.17 (2), p.2810-2826
issn 1930-2126
1930-2126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2766157155
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Acids
Additives
Biopolymers
Cellulose
Chitosan
Crustaceans
Mechanical properties
Methods
Nanoparticles
Opacity
Optical properties
Permeability
Protective coatings
Pulp
Pulp & paper industry
Sheets
Slurries
Spectrophotometry
Spray coating
Tensile strength
Water absorption
title Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A06%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20internal%20functionalization%20and%20surface%20modification%20methods%20of%20chemi-mechanical%20pulp%20handsheets%20using%20nanocellulose,%20chitosan,%20and%20DTPA&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Rezazadeh,%20Eisa&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2810&rft.epage=2826&rft.pages=2810-2826&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2766157155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2766157155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true