Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA
The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first grou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresources 2022-05, Vol.17 (2), p.2810-2826 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2826 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 2810 |
container_title | Bioresources |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Rezazadeh, Eisa Vaysi, Ramin Soltani, Mojtaba Najafi, Abdollah Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh |
description | The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2766157155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2766157155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b6d8b76d16c33a5e8d90ef36081a990735af8879c1aba2ba6dd7fea7ad45b5173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1q3TAQhU1JoDdJX6EIuo0d_VxL9jLc5qcQSBbJWoylUa1gS65kL9o36dvWvjeLruYbzpkZhlMUXxmtWC2UvOl8TJgrpipe8YbRkjdcfip2rBUrMy7P_uPPxUXO75TuG8Horvh7iOMEyecYSHRk7pH4MGMKMBC3BDP7uKL_AxsQCJbkJTkwSMZovfPmJIw499HmbYXpcfTliKaHsMoDmZZhImtjc484Z7JkH36SACEaHIZliBmv1yk_xwzh-njj--vL7VVx7mDI-OWjXhZv93evh8fy6fnhx-H2qTR8L2XZSdt0SlomjRBQY2Nbik5I2jBoW6pEDa5pVGsYdMA7kNYqh6DA7uuuZkpcFt9Oe6cUfy2YZ_0el-3_rLmSktWK1fXqkieXSTHnhE5PyY-QfmtG9TEGfYpBM6W53mLQWwziH6e1gSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2766157155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rezazadeh, Eisa ; Vaysi, Ramin ; Soltani, Mojtaba ; Najafi, Abdollah ; Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rezazadeh, Eisa ; Vaysi, Ramin ; Soltani, Mojtaba ; Najafi, Abdollah ; Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creatorcontrib><description>The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Acids ; Additives ; Biopolymers ; Cellulose ; Chitosan ; Crustaceans ; Mechanical properties ; Methods ; Nanoparticles ; Opacity ; Optical properties ; Permeability ; Protective coatings ; Pulp ; Pulp & paper industry ; Sheets ; Slurries ; Spectrophotometry ; Spray coating ; Tensile strength ; Water absorption</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2022-05, Vol.17 (2), p.2810-2826</ispartof><rights>2022. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b6d8b76d16c33a5e8d90ef36081a990735af8879c1aba2ba6dd7fea7ad45b5173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rezazadeh, Eisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaysi, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najafi, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Biopolymers</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Opacity</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Protective coatings</subject><subject>Pulp</subject><subject>Pulp & paper industry</subject><subject>Sheets</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Spray coating</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Water absorption</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1q3TAQhU1JoDdJX6EIuo0d_VxL9jLc5qcQSBbJWoylUa1gS65kL9o36dvWvjeLruYbzpkZhlMUXxmtWC2UvOl8TJgrpipe8YbRkjdcfip2rBUrMy7P_uPPxUXO75TuG8Horvh7iOMEyecYSHRk7pH4MGMKMBC3BDP7uKL_AxsQCJbkJTkwSMZovfPmJIw499HmbYXpcfTliKaHsMoDmZZhImtjc484Z7JkH36SACEaHIZliBmv1yk_xwzh-njj--vL7VVx7mDI-OWjXhZv93evh8fy6fnhx-H2qTR8L2XZSdt0SlomjRBQY2Nbik5I2jBoW6pEDa5pVGsYdMA7kNYqh6DA7uuuZkpcFt9Oe6cUfy2YZ_0el-3_rLmSktWK1fXqkieXSTHnhE5PyY-QfmtG9TEGfYpBM6W53mLQWwziH6e1gSw</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Rezazadeh, Eisa</creator><creator>Vaysi, Ramin</creator><creator>Soltani, Mojtaba</creator><creator>Najafi, Abdollah</creator><creator>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</title><author>Rezazadeh, Eisa ; Vaysi, Ramin ; Soltani, Mojtaba ; Najafi, Abdollah ; Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b6d8b76d16c33a5e8d90ef36081a990735af8879c1aba2ba6dd7fea7ad45b5173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Biopolymers</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Opacity</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Protective coatings</topic><topic>Pulp</topic><topic>Pulp & paper industry</topic><topic>Sheets</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Spray coating</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Water absorption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezazadeh, Eisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaysi, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najafi, Abdollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezazadeh, Eisa</au><au>Vaysi, Ramin</au><au>Soltani, Mojtaba</au><au>Najafi, Abdollah</au><au>Ebadi, Seyed Eshagh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2810</spage><epage>2826</epage><pages>2810-2826</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>The optical and mechanical properties of paper sheets were compared following treatment with biopolymers using two different methods, i.e., internal functionalization and surface modification. Industrial chemi-mechanical pulp was provided, and two groups of paper handsheets were made. The first group of paper sheet samples were prepared with incorporated chitosan in a mixed-in-pulp slurry (at three treatment levels, i.e., 0%, 1%, and 2%), and in the second group, untreated handsheets were spray-coated with either 2% chitosan, 2% nanocellulose, 0.5% DTPA, or a mixed solution (0.5% DTPA + 2% chitosan + 2% nanocellulose). Then, the optical and mechanical properties of the prepared paper sheets were analyzed. The brightness, opacity, and greenness/redness of the samples were measured spectrophotometrically using the CIELab system. Additional properties of the paper, i.e., the water absorption, air permeability, and tear, tensile, and burst resistance, of the treated samples were also measured. The results indicated that the treatments had a considerable effect on the relative mechanical and optical parameters, which resulted in an increase in the mechanical properties, especially when the nano-particles were applied to the mixed-in-slurry process. Inversely, results from the spray-coating method indicated better results for the optical specifications.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-2126 |
ispartof | Bioresources, 2022-05, Vol.17 (2), p.2810-2826 |
issn | 1930-2126 1930-2126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2766157155 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Acids Additives Biopolymers Cellulose Chitosan Crustaceans Mechanical properties Methods Nanoparticles Opacity Optical properties Permeability Protective coatings Pulp Pulp & paper industry Sheets Slurries Spectrophotometry Spray coating Tensile strength Water absorption |
title | Comparison of the internal functionalization and surface modification methods of chemi-mechanical pulp handsheets using nanocellulose, chitosan, and DTPA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A06%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20internal%20functionalization%20and%20surface%20modification%20methods%20of%20chemi-mechanical%20pulp%20handsheets%20using%20nanocellulose,%20chitosan,%20and%20DTPA&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Rezazadeh,%20Eisa&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2810&rft.epage=2826&rft.pages=2810-2826&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.17.2.2810-2826&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2766157155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2766157155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |