A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth: An in-vivo study
Aim of the Study: To evaluate and compare bite pressure among individuals with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side in the mandibular first molar region using the Nupai bite scan system. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 individuals (15 in which implant p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Dental Implants 2022-07, Vol.12 (2), p.86-94 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 94 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 86 |
| container_title | Journal of Dental Implants |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Singhal, MK Budakoti, Vaibhav Pratap, Hemendra Chourasiya, Priyanka Waghmare, Anagha |
| description | Aim of the Study: To evaluate and compare bite pressure among individuals with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side in the mandibular first molar region using the Nupai bite scan system. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 individuals (15 in which implant prosthesis on the right side and 15 in which implant prosthesis on the left side) with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side participated in the study. The bite pressure was measured at the first molar area on both sides using Nupai bite scan. Results: Maximum bite pressure, average bite pressure, and the amount of the pressed area were found to be more on the natural dentition side in comparison to the side with implant prosthesis. The average pressure on natural teeth was 25.33 MPa and on implant prosthesis, 21.27 MPa. Conclusion: The present study concludes that the measured bite pressure at the natural dentition side is found to be higher than those at the fabricated implant prosthesis side. P value for average bite pressure is 0.033, which is significant (P < 0.05). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jdi.jdi_10_21 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2765936711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2765936711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661-184bef856342e89137e5e4f5b77ca3482e9f5115058c6dec7806b5671d7d1bab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsXdBz04l6-ljCH0EAr3kWoxkrxsFR3YlOaX_vgoJXVh2YIfd4UPokZIlp4Q9H1q3zF1TUpf0Bs1IpXihtCC3Vy2VpvdoEeOB5JKaV0LM0OcKN8NxNMEkdwIMJ9NPWQ4eDx22LgEeA8Q4BcAW0g-Ax9H5rx6wO4698Snvh5j2EF3ExrfYmzQF0-MEkPYP6K4zfYTFdc7R7vVlt34vth9vm_VqWzRS0oJqbqHTQjJegq4oUyCAd8Iq1RjGdQlVJygVROhGttAoTaQVUtFWtdQay-bo6XI2Z_meIKb6MEzB5491qaSoWPbS7CouriYnjgG6egzuaMLvmdmZYX3m98-Q_QEVnmbW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765936711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth: An in-vivo study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Singhal, MK ; Budakoti, Vaibhav ; Pratap, Hemendra ; Chourasiya, Priyanka ; Waghmare, Anagha</creator><creatorcontrib>Singhal, MK ; Budakoti, Vaibhav ; Pratap, Hemendra ; Chourasiya, Priyanka ; Waghmare, Anagha</creatorcontrib><description>Aim of the Study: To evaluate and compare bite pressure among individuals with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side in the mandibular first molar region using the Nupai bite scan system. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 individuals (15 in which implant prosthesis on the right side and 15 in which implant prosthesis on the left side) with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side participated in the study. The bite pressure was measured at the first molar area on both sides using Nupai bite scan. Results: Maximum bite pressure, average bite pressure, and the amount of the pressed area were found to be more on the natural dentition side in comparison to the side with implant prosthesis. The average pressure on natural teeth was 25.33 MPa and on implant prosthesis, 21.27 MPa. Conclusion: The present study concludes that the measured bite pressure at the natural dentition side is found to be higher than those at the fabricated implant prosthesis side. P value for average bite pressure is 0.033, which is significant (P < 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-6781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-7850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jdi.jdi_10_21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Dentition ; Pressure ; Prostheses ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Journal of Dental Implants, 2022-07, Vol.12 (2), p.86-94</ispartof><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661-184bef856342e89137e5e4f5b77ca3482e9f5115058c6dec7806b5671d7d1bab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singhal, MK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budakoti, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratap, Hemendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chourasiya, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waghmare, Anagha</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth: An in-vivo study</title><title>Journal of Dental Implants</title><description>Aim of the Study: To evaluate and compare bite pressure among individuals with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side in the mandibular first molar region using the Nupai bite scan system. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 individuals (15 in which implant prosthesis on the right side and 15 in which implant prosthesis on the left side) with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side participated in the study. The bite pressure was measured at the first molar area on both sides using Nupai bite scan. Results: Maximum bite pressure, average bite pressure, and the amount of the pressed area were found to be more on the natural dentition side in comparison to the side with implant prosthesis. The average pressure on natural teeth was 25.33 MPa and on implant prosthesis, 21.27 MPa. Conclusion: The present study concludes that the measured bite pressure at the natural dentition side is found to be higher than those at the fabricated implant prosthesis side. P value for average bite pressure is 0.033, which is significant (P < 0.05).</description><subject>Dentition</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0974-6781</issn><issn>0974-7850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsXdBz04l6-ljCH0EAr3kWoxkrxsFR3YlOaX_vgoJXVh2YIfd4UPokZIlp4Q9H1q3zF1TUpf0Bs1IpXihtCC3Vy2VpvdoEeOB5JKaV0LM0OcKN8NxNMEkdwIMJ9NPWQ4eDx22LgEeA8Q4BcAW0g-Ax9H5rx6wO4698Snvh5j2EF3ExrfYmzQF0-MEkPYP6K4zfYTFdc7R7vVlt34vth9vm_VqWzRS0oJqbqHTQjJegq4oUyCAd8Iq1RjGdQlVJygVROhGttAoTaQVUtFWtdQay-bo6XI2Z_meIKb6MEzB5491qaSoWPbS7CouriYnjgG6egzuaMLvmdmZYX3m98-Q_QEVnmbW</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Singhal, MK</creator><creator>Budakoti, Vaibhav</creator><creator>Pratap, Hemendra</creator><creator>Chourasiya, Priyanka</creator><creator>Waghmare, Anagha</creator><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth</title><author>Singhal, MK ; Budakoti, Vaibhav ; Pratap, Hemendra ; Chourasiya, Priyanka ; Waghmare, Anagha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c661-184bef856342e89137e5e4f5b77ca3482e9f5115058c6dec7806b5671d7d1bab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dentition</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singhal, MK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budakoti, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratap, Hemendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chourasiya, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waghmare, Anagha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of Dental Implants</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singhal, MK</au><au>Budakoti, Vaibhav</au><au>Pratap, Hemendra</au><au>Chourasiya, Priyanka</au><au>Waghmare, Anagha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth: An in-vivo study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Dental Implants</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>86-94</pages><issn>0974-6781</issn><eissn>0974-7850</eissn><abstract>Aim of the Study: To evaluate and compare bite pressure among individuals with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side in the mandibular first molar region using the Nupai bite scan system. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 individuals (15 in which implant prosthesis on the right side and 15 in which implant prosthesis on the left side) with implant prosthesis on one side and natural dentition on the contralateral side participated in the study. The bite pressure was measured at the first molar area on both sides using Nupai bite scan. Results: Maximum bite pressure, average bite pressure, and the amount of the pressed area were found to be more on the natural dentition side in comparison to the side with implant prosthesis. The average pressure on natural teeth was 25.33 MPa and on implant prosthesis, 21.27 MPa. Conclusion: The present study concludes that the measured bite pressure at the natural dentition side is found to be higher than those at the fabricated implant prosthesis side. P value for average bite pressure is 0.033, which is significant (P < 0.05).</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/jdi.jdi_10_21</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0974-6781 |
| ispartof | Journal of Dental Implants, 2022-07, Vol.12 (2), p.86-94 |
| issn | 0974-6781 0974-7850 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2765936711 |
| source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Dentition Pressure Prostheses Teeth |
| title | A comparative evaluation of bite pressure between single implant prosthesis and natural teeth: An in-vivo study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T09%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20bite%20pressure%20between%20single%20implant%20prosthesis%20and%20natural%20teeth:%20An%20in-vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Dental%20Implants&rft.au=Singhal,%20MK&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=86-94&rft.issn=0974-6781&rft.eissn=0974-7850&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jdi.jdi_10_21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765936711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765936711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |