Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model‐simulated extreme precipitation over Indonesia

The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Gro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.174-196
Hauptverfasser: Kurniadi, Ari, Weller, Evan, Kim, Yeon‐Hee, Min, Seung‐Ki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 196
container_issue 1
container_start_page 174
container_title International journal of climatology
container_volume 43
creator Kurniadi, Ari
Weller, Evan
Kim, Yeon‐Hee
Min, Seung‐Ki
description The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014. Overall, results show that both LR and MR CMIP6 model skills in simulating mean and extreme precipitation indices vary across specific Indonesian regions and seasons. The individual and MME‐mean tend to overestimate the observed climatology, being largest over drier regions, yet MR models perform better compared to the LR regarding the mean bias presumably due to increased resolution. CMIP6 models tend to simulate extreme precipitation better in the dry seasons compared to the wet season. The MME‐means of the LR and MR groups mostly outperform the individual models of each group in simulating wet extremes (R95p and Rx5d) but not for the dry extremes (CDD). Among the 42 CMIP6 models, three models consistently perform poorly in simulating Rx5d and R95p, namely FGOALS‐g3, IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, and IPSL‐CM6A‐LR‐INCA, and one model in consecutive dry day (CDD) simulation, MPI‐ESM‐1‐2‐HAM, and caution is warranted. Given the knowledge of such biases, the LR and MR CMIP6 climate models can be suitably applied to assist policy makers in their decision on climate change adaptation and mitigation action. The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/joc.7744
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2765934006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2765934006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-9218b4b4c17e13f857b0b10cb8aebbc4c543d402e356818fc48f9420ef71b9603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LFOwzAUBVALgUQpSHyCJRaWlOfESewRVQWKitoB5sh2XkSiJA52AnTjE_hGvoSUdmV6y7n3So-QSwYzBhDeVNbM0pTzIzJhINMAQIhjMgEhZSA4E6fkzPsKAKRkyYS4xbuqB9WXtqW2oHM7dDXm9MnmWNNl26MztumUK_0INs5WaHq6eVUeaUKbnfr5-vZlM9SqH3P42TtskHYOTdmV_aH4Hd1YltsWfanOyUmhao8XhzslL3eL5_lDsFrfL-e3q8BEMuKBDJnQXHPDUmRRIeJUg2ZgtFCoteEm5lHOIcQoTgQTheGikDwELFKmZQLRlFzteztn3wb0fVbZwbXjZBamSTxuACSjut4r46z3Dousc2Wj3DZjkO0-OqZMtvvoSIM9_Shr3P7rssf1_M__AhateYs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765934006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model‐simulated extreme precipitation over Indonesia</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kurniadi, Ari ; Weller, Evan ; Kim, Yeon‐Hee ; Min, Seung‐Ki</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurniadi, Ari ; Weller, Evan ; Kim, Yeon‐Hee ; Min, Seung‐Ki</creatorcontrib><description>The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014. Overall, results show that both LR and MR CMIP6 model skills in simulating mean and extreme precipitation indices vary across specific Indonesian regions and seasons. The individual and MME‐mean tend to overestimate the observed climatology, being largest over drier regions, yet MR models perform better compared to the LR regarding the mean bias presumably due to increased resolution. CMIP6 models tend to simulate extreme precipitation better in the dry seasons compared to the wet season. The MME‐means of the LR and MR groups mostly outperform the individual models of each group in simulating wet extremes (R95p and Rx5d) but not for the dry extremes (CDD). Among the 42 CMIP6 models, three models consistently perform poorly in simulating Rx5d and R95p, namely FGOALS‐g3, IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, and IPSL‐CM6A‐LR‐INCA, and one model in consecutive dry day (CDD) simulation, MPI‐ESM‐1‐2‐HAM, and caution is warranted. Given the knowledge of such biases, the LR and MR CMIP6 climate models can be suitably applied to assist policy makers in their decision on climate change adaptation and mitigation action. The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.7744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate action ; Climate adaptation ; Climate change ; Climate change adaptation ; climate extreme ; Climate models ; Climatology ; CMIP6 ; Dry season ; Environmental hazards ; extreme precipitation ; Extreme weather ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Indonesia ; Interannual variability ; Intercomparison ; Mitigation ; model evaluation ; Modelling ; Performance evaluation ; Precipitation ; Rainy season ; Resolution ; Seasons ; Simulation ; Wet season</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.174-196</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Meteorological Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-9218b4b4c17e13f857b0b10cb8aebbc4c543d402e356818fc48f9420ef71b9603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-9218b4b4c17e13f857b0b10cb8aebbc4c543d402e356818fc48f9420ef71b9603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7503-7989 ; 0000-0003-0233-1690 ; 0000-0002-7454-9827 ; 0000-0002-6749-010X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.7744$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.7744$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurniadi, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeon‐Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Seung‐Ki</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model‐simulated extreme precipitation over Indonesia</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014. Overall, results show that both LR and MR CMIP6 model skills in simulating mean and extreme precipitation indices vary across specific Indonesian regions and seasons. The individual and MME‐mean tend to overestimate the observed climatology, being largest over drier regions, yet MR models perform better compared to the LR regarding the mean bias presumably due to increased resolution. CMIP6 models tend to simulate extreme precipitation better in the dry seasons compared to the wet season. The MME‐means of the LR and MR groups mostly outperform the individual models of each group in simulating wet extremes (R95p and Rx5d) but not for the dry extremes (CDD). Among the 42 CMIP6 models, three models consistently perform poorly in simulating Rx5d and R95p, namely FGOALS‐g3, IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, and IPSL‐CM6A‐LR‐INCA, and one model in consecutive dry day (CDD) simulation, MPI‐ESM‐1‐2‐HAM, and caution is warranted. Given the knowledge of such biases, the LR and MR CMIP6 climate models can be suitably applied to assist policy makers in their decision on climate change adaptation and mitigation action. The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014.</description><subject>Climate action</subject><subject>Climate adaptation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change adaptation</subject><subject>climate extreme</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>CMIP6</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>extreme precipitation</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>model evaluation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Wet season</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10LFOwzAUBVALgUQpSHyCJRaWlOfESewRVQWKitoB5sh2XkSiJA52AnTjE_hGvoSUdmV6y7n3So-QSwYzBhDeVNbM0pTzIzJhINMAQIhjMgEhZSA4E6fkzPsKAKRkyYS4xbuqB9WXtqW2oHM7dDXm9MnmWNNl26MztumUK_0INs5WaHq6eVUeaUKbnfr5-vZlM9SqH3P42TtskHYOTdmV_aH4Hd1YltsWfanOyUmhao8XhzslL3eL5_lDsFrfL-e3q8BEMuKBDJnQXHPDUmRRIeJUg2ZgtFCoteEm5lHOIcQoTgQTheGikDwELFKmZQLRlFzteztn3wb0fVbZwbXjZBamSTxuACSjut4r46z3Dousc2Wj3DZjkO0-OqZMtvvoSIM9_Shr3P7rssf1_M__AhateYs</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Kurniadi, Ari</creator><creator>Weller, Evan</creator><creator>Kim, Yeon‐Hee</creator><creator>Min, Seung‐Ki</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-7989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-1690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-9827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6749-010X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model‐simulated extreme precipitation over Indonesia</title><author>Kurniadi, Ari ; Weller, Evan ; Kim, Yeon‐Hee ; Min, Seung‐Ki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-9218b4b4c17e13f857b0b10cb8aebbc4c543d402e356818fc48f9420ef71b9603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Climate action</topic><topic>Climate adaptation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change adaptation</topic><topic>climate extreme</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>CMIP6</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>extreme precipitation</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>model evaluation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Wet season</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurniadi, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeon‐Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Seung‐Ki</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurniadi, Ari</au><au>Weller, Evan</au><au>Kim, Yeon‐Hee</au><au>Min, Seung‐Ki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model‐simulated extreme precipitation over Indonesia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>174-196</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014. Overall, results show that both LR and MR CMIP6 model skills in simulating mean and extreme precipitation indices vary across specific Indonesian regions and seasons. The individual and MME‐mean tend to overestimate the observed climatology, being largest over drier regions, yet MR models perform better compared to the LR regarding the mean bias presumably due to increased resolution. CMIP6 models tend to simulate extreme precipitation better in the dry seasons compared to the wet season. The MME‐means of the LR and MR groups mostly outperform the individual models of each group in simulating wet extremes (R95p and Rx5d) but not for the dry extremes (CDD). Among the 42 CMIP6 models, three models consistently perform poorly in simulating Rx5d and R95p, namely FGOALS‐g3, IPSL‐CM6A‐LR, and IPSL‐CM6A‐LR‐INCA, and one model in consecutive dry day (CDD) simulation, MPI‐ESM‐1‐2‐HAM, and caution is warranted. Given the knowledge of such biases, the LR and MR CMIP6 climate models can be suitably applied to assist policy makers in their decision on climate change adaptation and mitigation action. The ability of 42 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), consisting of 20 low resolution (LR) and 22 medium resolution (MR), are evaluated for their performance in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over Indonesia. Compared to Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), the model climatologies and interannual variability are investigated individually and as multimodel ensemble means (MME‐mean) at monthly and seasonal time scales for the historical simulation over the period 1988–2014.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.7744</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-7989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-1690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-9827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6749-010X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8418
ispartof International journal of climatology, 2023-01, Vol.43 (1), p.174-196
issn 0899-8418
1097-0088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2765934006
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Climate action
Climate adaptation
Climate change
Climate change adaptation
climate extreme
Climate models
Climatology
CMIP6
Dry season
Environmental hazards
extreme precipitation
Extreme weather
Global climate
Global climate models
Indonesia
Interannual variability
Intercomparison
Mitigation
model evaluation
Modelling
Performance evaluation
Precipitation
Rainy season
Resolution
Seasons
Simulation
Wet season
title Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 model‐simulated extreme precipitation over Indonesia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Coupled%20Model%20Intercomparison%20Project%20Phase%206%20model%E2%80%90simulated%20extreme%20precipitation%20over%20Indonesia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Kurniadi,%20Ari&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=174-196&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.7744&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765934006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765934006&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true