The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes
Purpose>In light of the difficulties the governments typically face in conserving and managing their rich public cultural heritage, which often lingers in a condition of neglect, this study aims to identify a set of additional tools capable of providing adequate financial resources as well as ski...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 2023-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-14 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Boniotti, Cristina |
description | Purpose>In light of the difficulties the governments typically face in conserving and managing their rich public cultural heritage, which often lingers in a condition of neglect, this study aims to identify a set of additional tools capable of providing adequate financial resources as well as skills.Design/methodology/approach>The general research methodology adopted is of a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, nature. In fact, the resulting considerations are mainly the consequence of a first broad theoretical examination, aimed at analyzing the different management models a public entity may adopt, and an applicable verification, aimed at describing some case histories selected by means of interviews.Findings>The study develops a preliminary reflection on possible sector-specific models for public-built cultural heritage management that have not been well defined yet, especially so in reference to one of the institutional options, namely, the adoption of public–private–people agreements. Indeed, in addition to establishing the ties needed to link public institutions with the business sector, some strong involvement of society as a whole is advised to foster the implementation of projects and expedite the solution of shared problems. At a local level, for instance, private stakeholder participation must be encouraged, with special attention to the latter's cultural closeness to the territory involved.Originality/value>This research identifies some tools suitable for adoption in the cultural heritage field, which would serve as perfect examples of community involvement and commitment, and some useful case studies resulting from the Italian context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0186 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2763983191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2763983191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dc127f04964842a4b6f6d6e4759b4c5d098d29650049304494b25503e8cc78ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtKBDEQDKLgsu4XeBnwoofRvCc5yvhYZUXBFbyFTCbjzjIvk4zgzX_wD_0SM6zYl2q6i-quAuAYwXOEoLi4z5cPz1cpwimGGKYQCb4HZhhSGmcZ3f_vOT8EC--3MFaGMGFsBl7XG5sMY9HU5ufre3D1hw526mw_NHGjXeis85t6SE6f6FlS9S4xYxNGp5tkY10d9JtNWt1FaG0XopYbem_9ETiodOPt4g_n4OXmep0v09Xj7V1-uUoNRSykpYk_VpBKTgXFmha84iW3NGOyoIaVUIoSS85gpJBoQ9ICMwaJFcZkQpdkDk52uoPr30frg9r2o-viSYUzTqQgSKLIIjuWcb33zlYqWm21-1QIqilFtUtRIaymFNWUIvkF7iJmoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2763983191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Boniotti, Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Boniotti, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose>In light of the difficulties the governments typically face in conserving and managing their rich public cultural heritage, which often lingers in a condition of neglect, this study aims to identify a set of additional tools capable of providing adequate financial resources as well as skills.Design/methodology/approach>The general research methodology adopted is of a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, nature. In fact, the resulting considerations are mainly the consequence of a first broad theoretical examination, aimed at analyzing the different management models a public entity may adopt, and an applicable verification, aimed at describing some case histories selected by means of interviews.Findings>The study develops a preliminary reflection on possible sector-specific models for public-built cultural heritage management that have not been well defined yet, especially so in reference to one of the institutional options, namely, the adoption of public–private–people agreements. Indeed, in addition to establishing the ties needed to link public institutions with the business sector, some strong involvement of society as a whole is advised to foster the implementation of projects and expedite the solution of shared problems. At a local level, for instance, private stakeholder participation must be encouraged, with special attention to the latter's cultural closeness to the territory involved.Originality/value>This research identifies some tools suitable for adoption in the cultural heritage field, which would serve as perfect examples of community involvement and commitment, and some useful case studies resulting from the Italian context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-1266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Case histories ; Case studies ; Collaboration ; Community involvement ; Cooperation ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural resources ; Design ; Funding ; Infrastructure ; Nonprofit organizations ; Objectives ; Private schools ; Public private partnerships ; Public sector ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2023-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>Cristina Boniotti. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dc127f04964842a4b6f6d6e4759b4c5d098d29650049304494b25503e8cc78ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dc127f04964842a4b6f6d6e4759b4c5d098d29650049304494b25503e8cc78ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3375-586X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21676,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boniotti, Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes</title><title>Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development</title><description>Purpose>In light of the difficulties the governments typically face in conserving and managing their rich public cultural heritage, which often lingers in a condition of neglect, this study aims to identify a set of additional tools capable of providing adequate financial resources as well as skills.Design/methodology/approach>The general research methodology adopted is of a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, nature. In fact, the resulting considerations are mainly the consequence of a first broad theoretical examination, aimed at analyzing the different management models a public entity may adopt, and an applicable verification, aimed at describing some case histories selected by means of interviews.Findings>The study develops a preliminary reflection on possible sector-specific models for public-built cultural heritage management that have not been well defined yet, especially so in reference to one of the institutional options, namely, the adoption of public–private–people agreements. Indeed, in addition to establishing the ties needed to link public institutions with the business sector, some strong involvement of society as a whole is advised to foster the implementation of projects and expedite the solution of shared problems. At a local level, for instance, private stakeholder participation must be encouraged, with special attention to the latter's cultural closeness to the territory involved.Originality/value>This research identifies some tools suitable for adoption in the cultural heritage field, which would serve as perfect examples of community involvement and commitment, and some useful case studies resulting from the Italian context.</description><subject>Case histories</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural resources</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Public private partnerships</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>2044-1266</issn><issn>2044-1274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtKBDEQDKLgsu4XeBnwoofRvCc5yvhYZUXBFbyFTCbjzjIvk4zgzX_wD_0SM6zYl2q6i-quAuAYwXOEoLi4z5cPz1cpwimGGKYQCb4HZhhSGmcZ3f_vOT8EC--3MFaGMGFsBl7XG5sMY9HU5ufre3D1hw526mw_NHGjXeis85t6SE6f6FlS9S4xYxNGp5tkY10d9JtNWt1FaG0XopYbem_9ETiodOPt4g_n4OXmep0v09Xj7V1-uUoNRSykpYk_VpBKTgXFmha84iW3NGOyoIaVUIoSS85gpJBoQ9ICMwaJFcZkQpdkDk52uoPr30frg9r2o-viSYUzTqQgSKLIIjuWcb33zlYqWm21-1QIqilFtUtRIaymFNWUIvkF7iJmoQ</recordid><startdate>20230112</startdate><enddate>20230112</enddate><creator>Boniotti, Cristina</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-586X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230112</creationdate><title>The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes</title><author>Boniotti, Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dc127f04964842a4b6f6d6e4759b4c5d098d29650049304494b25503e8cc78ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Case histories</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural resources</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Public private partnerships</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boniotti, Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boniotti, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development</jtitle><date>2023-01-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>2044-1266</issn><eissn>2044-1274</eissn><abstract>Purpose>In light of the difficulties the governments typically face in conserving and managing their rich public cultural heritage, which often lingers in a condition of neglect, this study aims to identify a set of additional tools capable of providing adequate financial resources as well as skills.Design/methodology/approach>The general research methodology adopted is of a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, nature. In fact, the resulting considerations are mainly the consequence of a first broad theoretical examination, aimed at analyzing the different management models a public entity may adopt, and an applicable verification, aimed at describing some case histories selected by means of interviews.Findings>The study develops a preliminary reflection on possible sector-specific models for public-built cultural heritage management that have not been well defined yet, especially so in reference to one of the institutional options, namely, the adoption of public–private–people agreements. Indeed, in addition to establishing the ties needed to link public institutions with the business sector, some strong involvement of society as a whole is advised to foster the implementation of projects and expedite the solution of shared problems. At a local level, for instance, private stakeholder participation must be encouraged, with special attention to the latter's cultural closeness to the territory involved.Originality/value>This research identifies some tools suitable for adoption in the cultural heritage field, which would serve as perfect examples of community involvement and commitment, and some useful case studies resulting from the Italian context.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0186</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-586X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-1266 |
ispartof | Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2023-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-14 |
issn | 2044-1266 2044-1274 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2763983191 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Case histories Case studies Collaboration Community involvement Cooperation Cultural heritage Cultural resources Design Funding Infrastructure Nonprofit organizations Objectives Private schools Public private partnerships Public sector Urban planning |
title | The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A53%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20public%E2%80%93private%E2%80%93people%20partnership%20(P4)%20for%20cultural%20heritage%20management%20purposes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Cultural%20Heritage%20Management%20and%20Sustainable%20Development&rft.au=Boniotti,%20Cristina&rft.date=2023-01-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=2044-1266&rft.eissn=2044-1274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2763983191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2763983191&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |