A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base
Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLOS sustainability and transformation 2022-07, Vol.1 (7), p.e0000023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0000023 |
container_title | PLOS sustainability and transformation |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Popkin, Megan Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J. Turner, Edgar C. Luke, Sarah H. |
description | Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, there has been little synthesis of available research on oil palm management strategies to support delivery of more sustainable cultivation. In this paper, we provide a systematic map compiling all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes. Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, we catalogued oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions tested (i.e. agricultural practices), targeted outcomes of interventions, co-occurrences between different interventions and outcomes (including multiple outcomes), and study design. Most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six interventions were observed in the literature, across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting, and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched. Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value, and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions. Most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being rarer, especially in biodiversity research. We match our findings to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policy-makers and producers may use our map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. This study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2762069893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2762069893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1703-357fd9b799e1b62d5e362fdfd3fdc5e8e598d8182854d3769377758f70f8ea743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNH3Qh6NqpZcWWtAyhLwh0066FbI0SBVtWJSXBf1-bpNDZzHA5dxYHoUeSLwll5PnQH4NT7dLHFJb5NAW9QbOCVSyjRLDbf_c9WsR4mBCeCyHIDJ3WOA4xQaeSbXCnPO4NPtu0ty7zrXJpzHuHe9tir9puJJzaQQcuYR9UM5Yg4gAnUG3ECgflrW4HvAv92bodro8jp1KzHzCcrAbXAK5VhAd0Z8YGLK57jr5fX74279n28-1js95mDWE5zWjJjBY1EwJIXRW6BFoVRhtNjW5K4FAKrjnhBS9XmrJKUMZYyQ3LDQfFVnSOni5_feh_jhCTvOqKcpRS5JXggo7U6kI1oY8xgJE-2E6FQZJcTpL_WnKSLK-S6S8h5HUi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2762069893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Popkin, Megan ; Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J. ; Turner, Edgar C. ; Luke, Sarah H.</creator><contributor>Yuan, Ze-Chun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Megan ; Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J. ; Turner, Edgar C. ; Luke, Sarah H. ; Yuan, Ze-Chun</creatorcontrib><description>Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, there has been little synthesis of available research on oil palm management strategies to support delivery of more sustainable cultivation. In this paper, we provide a systematic map compiling all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes. Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, we catalogued oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions tested (i.e. agricultural practices), targeted outcomes of interventions, co-occurrences between different interventions and outcomes (including multiple outcomes), and study design. Most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six interventions were observed in the literature, across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting, and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched. Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value, and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions. Most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being rarer, especially in biodiversity research. We match our findings to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policy-makers and producers may use our map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. This study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Air pollution ; Air pollution control ; Availability ; Best management practices ; Biodiversity ; Buffer zones ; Certification ; Crops ; Cultivation ; Design ; Ecosystems ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Environmental impact ; Geographical locations ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Habitat fragmentation ; Landscape ; Management decisions ; Oilseeds ; Palm oil ; Pest control ; Pesticides ; Plantations ; Riparian buffers ; Social impact ; Soil erosion ; Soil fertility ; Soil water ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Sustainable development ; Task forces ; Understory ; Vegetable oils ; Water quality ; Water quality control ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-07, Vol.1 (7), p.e0000023</ispartof><rights>2022 Popkin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1703-357fd9b799e1b62d5e362fdfd3fdc5e8e598d8182854d3769377758f70f8ea743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1703-357fd9b799e1b62d5e362fdfd3fdc5e8e598d8182854d3769377758f70f8ea743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8335-5960 ; 0000-0001-9508-171X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2928,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Yuan, Ze-Chun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Edgar C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luke, Sarah H.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base</title><title>PLOS sustainability and transformation</title><description>Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, there has been little synthesis of available research on oil palm management strategies to support delivery of more sustainable cultivation. In this paper, we provide a systematic map compiling all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes. Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, we catalogued oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions tested (i.e. agricultural practices), targeted outcomes of interventions, co-occurrences between different interventions and outcomes (including multiple outcomes), and study design. Most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six interventions were observed in the literature, across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting, and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched. Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value, and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions. Most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being rarer, especially in biodiversity research. We match our findings to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policy-makers and producers may use our map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. This study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution control</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Best management practices</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Buffer zones</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Oilseeds</subject><subject>Palm oil</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Understory</subject><subject>Vegetable oils</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality control</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2767-3197</issn><issn>2767-3197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNH3Qh6NqpZcWWtAyhLwh0066FbI0SBVtWJSXBf1-bpNDZzHA5dxYHoUeSLwll5PnQH4NT7dLHFJb5NAW9QbOCVSyjRLDbf_c9WsR4mBCeCyHIDJ3WOA4xQaeSbXCnPO4NPtu0ty7zrXJpzHuHe9tir9puJJzaQQcuYR9UM5Yg4gAnUG3ECgflrW4HvAv92bodro8jp1KzHzCcrAbXAK5VhAd0Z8YGLK57jr5fX74279n28-1js95mDWE5zWjJjBY1EwJIXRW6BFoVRhtNjW5K4FAKrjnhBS9XmrJKUMZYyQ3LDQfFVnSOni5_feh_jhCTvOqKcpRS5JXggo7U6kI1oY8xgJE-2E6FQZJcTpL_WnKSLK-S6S8h5HUi</recordid><startdate>20220725</startdate><enddate>20220725</enddate><creator>Popkin, Megan</creator><creator>Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J.</creator><creator>Turner, Edgar C.</creator><creator>Luke, Sarah H.</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-5960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-171X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220725</creationdate><title>A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base</title><author>Popkin, Megan ; Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J. ; Turner, Edgar C. ; Luke, Sarah H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1703-357fd9b799e1b62d5e362fdfd3fdc5e8e598d8182854d3769377758f70f8ea743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution control</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Best management practices</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Buffer zones</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Oilseeds</topic><topic>Palm oil</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Understory</topic><topic>Vegetable oils</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality control</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Edgar C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luke, Sarah H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Popkin, Megan</au><au>Reiss-Woolever, Valentine J.</au><au>Turner, Edgar C.</au><au>Luke, Sarah H.</au><au>Yuan, Ze-Chun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base</atitle><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle><date>2022-07-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0000023</spage><pages>e0000023-</pages><issn>2767-3197</issn><eissn>2767-3197</eissn><abstract>Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, there has been little synthesis of available research on oil palm management strategies to support delivery of more sustainable cultivation. In this paper, we provide a systematic map compiling all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes. Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, we catalogued oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions tested (i.e. agricultural practices), targeted outcomes of interventions, co-occurrences between different interventions and outcomes (including multiple outcomes), and study design. Most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six interventions were observed in the literature, across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting, and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched. Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value, and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions. Most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being rarer, especially in biodiversity research. We match our findings to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policy-makers and producers may use our map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. This study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pstr.0000023</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-5960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-171X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3197 |
ispartof | PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-07, Vol.1 (7), p.e0000023 |
issn | 2767-3197 2767-3197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2762069893 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural management Agricultural practices Agricultural production Air pollution Air pollution control Availability Best management practices Biodiversity Buffer zones Certification Crops Cultivation Design Ecosystems Emissions Emissions control Environmental impact Geographical locations Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Habitat fragmentation Landscape Management decisions Oilseeds Palm oil Pest control Pesticides Plantations Riparian buffers Social impact Soil erosion Soil fertility Soil water Sustainability Sustainability management Sustainable development Task forces Understory Vegetable oils Water quality Water quality control Wildlife conservation |
title | A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T07%3A44%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20map%20of%20within-plantation%20oil%20palm%20management%20practices%20reveals%20a%20rapidly%20growing%20but%20patchy%20evidence%20base&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20sustainability%20and%20transformation&rft.au=Popkin,%20Megan&rft.date=2022-07-25&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0000023&rft.pages=e0000023-&rft.issn=2767-3197&rft.eissn=2767-3197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2762069893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2762069893&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |