Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing
Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-01, Vol.15 (1), p.13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Arulnathan, Vivek Heidari, Mohammad Davoud Doyon, Maurice Li, Eric P. H. Pelletier, Nathan |
description | Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010–2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories—profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy—each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su15010013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2761207077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2761207077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-66531104bf2a6e8bbd8bf0a54a2d8f260d2c039afd3ed50974bc3062444061d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEUDKJgqb34CwLehNWXZDfb9VaW2hYKHtSjLPmUlDapSfaw_94tFey7zIOZN48ZhO4JPDHWwHPqSQUEgLArNKFQk4JABdcX-y2apbSDcRgjDeET9LVUwYeDU3jjtVMih5iwDRFvnTW4HdTe4Pc-ZeG8kG7v8oAXKZmUDsbnF7wKzn9jaYbg9eVJG1IemTt0Y8U-mdkfTtHn6_KjXRfbt9WmXWwLRZsqF5xXjBAopaWCm7mUei4tiKoUVM8t5aCpAtYIq5nRFTR1KRUDTsuyBE50zabo4ex7jOGnNyl3u9BHP77saM3JmB_qk-rxrFIxpBSN7Y7RHUQcOgLdqcHuv0H2C-lYYkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2761207077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Arulnathan, Vivek ; Heidari, Mohammad Davoud ; Doyon, Maurice ; Li, Eric P. H. ; Pelletier, Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Arulnathan, Vivek ; Heidari, Mohammad Davoud ; Doyon, Maurice ; Li, Eric P. H. ; Pelletier, Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010–2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories—profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy—each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su15010013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Costs ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Distributive justice ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Externality ; Impact analysis ; Indicators ; Principles ; Product life cycle ; Reviews ; Society ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (1), p.13</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-66531104bf2a6e8bbd8bf0a54a2d8f260d2c039afd3ed50974bc3062444061d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-66531104bf2a6e8bbd8bf0a54a2d8f260d2c039afd3ed50974bc3062444061d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3831-0974 ; 0000-0003-1943-9008</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arulnathan, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Mohammad Davoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyon, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Eric P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010–2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories—profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy—each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Product life cycle</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEUDKJgqb34CwLehNWXZDfb9VaW2hYKHtSjLPmUlDapSfaw_94tFey7zIOZN48ZhO4JPDHWwHPqSQUEgLArNKFQk4JABdcX-y2apbSDcRgjDeET9LVUwYeDU3jjtVMih5iwDRFvnTW4HdTe4Pc-ZeG8kG7v8oAXKZmUDsbnF7wKzn9jaYbg9eVJG1IemTt0Y8U-mdkfTtHn6_KjXRfbt9WmXWwLRZsqF5xXjBAopaWCm7mUei4tiKoUVM8t5aCpAtYIq5nRFTR1KRUDTsuyBE50zabo4ex7jOGnNyl3u9BHP77saM3JmB_qk-rxrFIxpBSN7Y7RHUQcOgLdqcHuv0H2C-lYYkw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Arulnathan, Vivek</creator><creator>Heidari, Mohammad Davoud</creator><creator>Doyon, Maurice</creator><creator>Li, Eric P. H.</creator><creator>Pelletier, Nathan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-0974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-9008</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing</title><author>Arulnathan, Vivek ; Heidari, Mohammad Davoud ; Doyon, Maurice ; Li, Eric P. H. ; Pelletier, Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-66531104bf2a6e8bbd8bf0a54a2d8f260d2c039afd3ed50974bc3062444061d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Product life cycle</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arulnathan, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Mohammad Davoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyon, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Eric P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arulnathan, Vivek</au><au>Heidari, Mohammad Davoud</au><au>Doyon, Maurice</au><au>Li, Eric P. H.</au><au>Pelletier, Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><pages>13-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010–2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories—profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy—each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su15010013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-0974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-9008</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-01, Vol.15 (1), p.13 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2761207077 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Costs Criteria Decision making Distributive justice Economic impact Economics Externality Impact analysis Indicators Principles Product life cycle Reviews Society Sustainability Sustainable development |
title | Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20Indicators%20for%20Life%20Cycle%20Sustainability%20Assessment:%20Going%20beyond%20Life%20Cycle%20Costing&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Arulnathan,%20Vivek&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.pages=13-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su15010013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2761207077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2761207077&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |