Improving precision of objective image/video quality meters
Although subjective test is the most accurate image/video quality assessment tool, it is extremely time demanding. In the past two decades, a variety of objective quality measuring tools, such as SSIM, IW-SSIM, SPSIM, FSIM, etc., have been devised, that well correlate with the subjective tests resul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multimedia tools and applications 2023, Vol.82 (3), p.4465-4478 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4478 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 4465 |
container_title | Multimedia tools and applications |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Behzadpour, Majid Ghanbari, Mohammad |
description | Although subjective test is the most accurate image/video quality assessment tool, it is extremely time demanding. In the past two decades, a variety of objective quality measuring tools, such as SSIM, IW-SSIM, SPSIM, FSIM, etc., have been devised, that well correlate with the subjective tests results. However, the main problem with these methods is that they do not discriminate the measured quality well enough, especially at high quality range. In this article we show how the accuracy/precision of these Image Quality Assessment (IQA) meters can be increased by mapping them into a Logistic Function (LF). The precisions are tested over a variety of image/video databases. Our experimental tests indicate while the used high-quality images can be discriminated by 23% resolution on the MOS subjective scores, discrimination resolution by the widely used IQAs are only 2%, but their mapped IQAs to Logistic Function at this quality range can be improved to 9 − 17%, depending on the characteristics of the LF function. Moreover, their precision at low to mid quality range can also be improved. At this quality range, while the discrimination resolution of MOS of the tested images is 23.2%, those of raw IQAs is nearly 8.9%, but discrimination of their adapted logistic functions can be very close to that of MOS. Moreover, with the used image databases the Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) of MOS with the logistic function can be improved by 2 − 20% as well. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11042-022-13416-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2760713340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760713340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-89530ae98aac75b053ca89e12852e48841ee386b436ddf1830b543f3fe0656bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLA0EQhAdRMEb_gKcFz6Pd0_MKniT4CAS86HnY3fSGDUk2mdkE8u8dXcGbp65DVXXxCXGLcI8A7iEhglYSlJJIGq30Z2KExpF0TuF51uRBOgN4Ka5SWgGgNUqPxONss4vdsd0ui13kuk1tty26puiqFdd9e-Si3ZRLfji2C-6K_aFct_2p2HDPMV2Li6ZcJ775vWPx-fL8MX2T8_fX2fRpLmuy1Es_MQQlT3xZ1s5UYKgu_YRReaNYe6-RmbytNNnFokFPUBlNDTUM1tiqprG4G3rz0v2BUx9W3SFu88ugnAWHRBqySw2uOnYpRW7CLubt8RQQwjekMEAKGVL4gRR8DtEQStm8XXL8q_4n9QVzZGkR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760713340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving precision of objective image/video quality meters</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Behzadpour, Majid ; Ghanbari, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Behzadpour, Majid ; Ghanbari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>Although subjective test is the most accurate image/video quality assessment tool, it is extremely time demanding. In the past two decades, a variety of objective quality measuring tools, such as SSIM, IW-SSIM, SPSIM, FSIM, etc., have been devised, that well correlate with the subjective tests results. However, the main problem with these methods is that they do not discriminate the measured quality well enough, especially at high quality range. In this article we show how the accuracy/precision of these Image Quality Assessment (IQA) meters can be increased by mapping them into a Logistic Function (LF). The precisions are tested over a variety of image/video databases. Our experimental tests indicate while the used high-quality images can be discriminated by 23% resolution on the MOS subjective scores, discrimination resolution by the widely used IQAs are only 2%, but their mapped IQAs to Logistic Function at this quality range can be improved to 9 − 17%, depending on the characteristics of the LF function. Moreover, their precision at low to mid quality range can also be improved. At this quality range, while the discrimination resolution of MOS of the tested images is 23.2%, those of raw IQAs is nearly 8.9%, but discrimination of their adapted logistic functions can be very close to that of MOS. Moreover, with the used image databases the Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) of MOS with the logistic function can be improved by 2 − 20% as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-13416-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Correlation coefficients ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Discrimination ; Image quality ; Measuring instruments ; Multimedia Information Systems ; Quality assessment ; Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><ispartof>Multimedia tools and applications, 2023, Vol.82 (3), p.4465-4478</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-89530ae98aac75b053ca89e12852e48841ee386b436ddf1830b543f3fe0656bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-89530ae98aac75b053ca89e12852e48841ee386b436ddf1830b543f3fe0656bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5482-8378</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-022-13416-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-022-13416-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behzadpour, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghanbari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>Improving precision of objective image/video quality meters</title><title>Multimedia tools and applications</title><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><description>Although subjective test is the most accurate image/video quality assessment tool, it is extremely time demanding. In the past two decades, a variety of objective quality measuring tools, such as SSIM, IW-SSIM, SPSIM, FSIM, etc., have been devised, that well correlate with the subjective tests results. However, the main problem with these methods is that they do not discriminate the measured quality well enough, especially at high quality range. In this article we show how the accuracy/precision of these Image Quality Assessment (IQA) meters can be increased by mapping them into a Logistic Function (LF). The precisions are tested over a variety of image/video databases. Our experimental tests indicate while the used high-quality images can be discriminated by 23% resolution on the MOS subjective scores, discrimination resolution by the widely used IQAs are only 2%, but their mapped IQAs to Logistic Function at this quality range can be improved to 9 − 17%, depending on the characteristics of the LF function. Moreover, their precision at low to mid quality range can also be improved. At this quality range, while the discrimination resolution of MOS of the tested images is 23.2%, those of raw IQAs is nearly 8.9%, but discrimination of their adapted logistic functions can be very close to that of MOS. Moreover, with the used image databases the Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) of MOS with the logistic function can be improved by 2 − 20% as well.</description><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Multimedia Information Systems</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><issn>1380-7501</issn><issn>1573-7721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLA0EQhAdRMEb_gKcFz6Pd0_MKniT4CAS86HnY3fSGDUk2mdkE8u8dXcGbp65DVXXxCXGLcI8A7iEhglYSlJJIGq30Z2KExpF0TuF51uRBOgN4Ka5SWgGgNUqPxONss4vdsd0ui13kuk1tty26puiqFdd9e-Si3ZRLfji2C-6K_aFct_2p2HDPMV2Li6ZcJ775vWPx-fL8MX2T8_fX2fRpLmuy1Es_MQQlT3xZ1s5UYKgu_YRReaNYe6-RmbytNNnFokFPUBlNDTUM1tiqprG4G3rz0v2BUx9W3SFu88ugnAWHRBqySw2uOnYpRW7CLubt8RQQwjekMEAKGVL4gRR8DtEQStm8XXL8q_4n9QVzZGkR</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Behzadpour, Majid</creator><creator>Ghanbari, Mohammad</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-8378</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Improving precision of objective image/video quality meters</title><author>Behzadpour, Majid ; Ghanbari, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-89530ae98aac75b053ca89e12852e48841ee386b436ddf1830b543f3fe0656bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Multimedia Information Systems</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behzadpour, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghanbari, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behzadpour, Majid</au><au>Ghanbari, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving precision of objective image/video quality meters</atitle><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle><stitle>Multimed Tools Appl</stitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>4465</spage><epage>4478</epage><pages>4465-4478</pages><issn>1380-7501</issn><eissn>1573-7721</eissn><abstract>Although subjective test is the most accurate image/video quality assessment tool, it is extremely time demanding. In the past two decades, a variety of objective quality measuring tools, such as SSIM, IW-SSIM, SPSIM, FSIM, etc., have been devised, that well correlate with the subjective tests results. However, the main problem with these methods is that they do not discriminate the measured quality well enough, especially at high quality range. In this article we show how the accuracy/precision of these Image Quality Assessment (IQA) meters can be increased by mapping them into a Logistic Function (LF). The precisions are tested over a variety of image/video databases. Our experimental tests indicate while the used high-quality images can be discriminated by 23% resolution on the MOS subjective scores, discrimination resolution by the widely used IQAs are only 2%, but their mapped IQAs to Logistic Function at this quality range can be improved to 9 − 17%, depending on the characteristics of the LF function. Moreover, their precision at low to mid quality range can also be improved. At this quality range, while the discrimination resolution of MOS of the tested images is 23.2%, those of raw IQAs is nearly 8.9%, but discrimination of their adapted logistic functions can be very close to that of MOS. Moreover, with the used image databases the Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) of MOS with the logistic function can be improved by 2 − 20% as well.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11042-022-13416-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-8378</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1380-7501 |
ispartof | Multimedia tools and applications, 2023, Vol.82 (3), p.4465-4478 |
issn | 1380-7501 1573-7721 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2760713340 |
source | SpringerLink |
subjects | Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Correlation coefficients Data Structures and Information Theory Discrimination Image quality Measuring instruments Multimedia Information Systems Quality assessment Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems |
title | Improving precision of objective image/video quality meters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20precision%20of%20objective%20image/video%20quality%20meters&rft.jtitle=Multimedia%20tools%20and%20applications&rft.au=Behzadpour,%20Majid&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=4465&rft.epage=4478&rft.pages=4465-4478&rft.issn=1380-7501&rft.eissn=1573-7721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11042-022-13416-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760713340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760713340&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |