On the identification of cross-flow mode in three-dimensional boundary layers

Parametric zones are obtained where the cross-flow instability can be identified as a mode in the three-dimensional boundary layers with the Mach number ranging from 0 to 10. Although the term cross-flow mode is widely used in the investigations on boundary-layer instability, the previous work [Z. L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIP advances 2023-01, Vol.13 (1), p.015203-015203-19
1. Verfasser: Liu, Zhiyong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 015203-19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 015203
container_title AIP advances
container_volume 13
creator Liu, Zhiyong
description Parametric zones are obtained where the cross-flow instability can be identified as a mode in the three-dimensional boundary layers with the Mach number ranging from 0 to 10. Although the term cross-flow mode is widely used in the investigations on boundary-layer instability, the previous work [Z. Liu, Phys. Fluids 34, 094110 (2022)] has demonstrated that a cross-flow mode cannot be designated in certain circumstances. The identification of the cross-flow mode is significant not only in the justifiable use of the term but also in judging whether a disturbance is more inclined to a cross-flow type or not. In this work, a criterion is built to identify the cross-flow mode based on the growth-rate peak and disturbance shape. By means of extensive calculations and identifications, parametric zones are presented for the unstable cross-flow mode. It is found that the cross-flow mode cannot be identified at large local sweep or at Mach numbers larger than 1.6. In parametric zones, the cross-flow mode can be distinguished from the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, or identified as the solely dominant mode. Based on the identifications, the maximum growth rates of the cross-flow mode, the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, and the Mack modes in the three-dimensional boundary layers are provided. The dominant mode can be determined at different Mach numbers. The cross-flow mode is revealed to dominate the boundary-layer instability at low Mach numbers. Under large cross-flow strengths, the second mode could not be the dominant mode in the hypersonic boundary layers, which contrasts sharply with the two-dimensional case.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0135008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2760278981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_73af2af5317b47e9b0218e9403cb6d1a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2760278981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c1127e0be74b613ec959eea9aecd2b2c107399f1bfcaa1f23a11097dab611e473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KxDAUBeAiCoq68A0KrhSquUnbNEsR_0Bxo-twm9xohk4zJh3FtzfOiAqC2SSEj5ObUxQHwE6AteK0OWEgGsa6jWKHQ9NVgvN289d5u9hPacbyqhWwrt4p7u7Hcnqm0lsaJ--8wcmHsQyuNDGkVLkhvJXzYLP4hJGosn5OY8oKh7IPy9FifC8HfKeY9ooth0Oi_a99t3i8vHg4v65u769uzs9uK1PzbqoMAJfEepJ134IgoxpFhArJWN5zA0wKpRz0ziCC4wIBmJIWswaqpdgtbta5NuBML6Kf5xl0QK9XFyE-aYyTNwNpKdBxdI0A2deSVM84dKRqJkzfWsCcdbjOWsTwsqQ06VlYxvy5pLlsGZed6iCro7Va1RLJfb8KTH-Wrxv9VX62x2ubjJ9WfX7j1xB_oF5Y9x_-m_wBM8GR3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760278981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the identification of cross-flow mode in three-dimensional boundary layers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Liu, Zhiyong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><description>Parametric zones are obtained where the cross-flow instability can be identified as a mode in the three-dimensional boundary layers with the Mach number ranging from 0 to 10. Although the term cross-flow mode is widely used in the investigations on boundary-layer instability, the previous work [Z. Liu, Phys. Fluids 34, 094110 (2022)] has demonstrated that a cross-flow mode cannot be designated in certain circumstances. The identification of the cross-flow mode is significant not only in the justifiable use of the term but also in judging whether a disturbance is more inclined to a cross-flow type or not. In this work, a criterion is built to identify the cross-flow mode based on the growth-rate peak and disturbance shape. By means of extensive calculations and identifications, parametric zones are presented for the unstable cross-flow mode. It is found that the cross-flow mode cannot be identified at large local sweep or at Mach numbers larger than 1.6. In parametric zones, the cross-flow mode can be distinguished from the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, or identified as the solely dominant mode. Based on the identifications, the maximum growth rates of the cross-flow mode, the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, and the Mack modes in the three-dimensional boundary layers are provided. The dominant mode can be determined at different Mach numbers. The cross-flow mode is revealed to dominate the boundary-layer instability at low Mach numbers. Under large cross-flow strengths, the second mode could not be the dominant mode in the hypersonic boundary layers, which contrasts sharply with the two-dimensional case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-3226</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-3226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0135008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAIDBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Cross flow ; Flow stability ; Mach number ; Ponds ; Three dimensional boundary layer ; Three dimensional flow ; Turnaround time</subject><ispartof>AIP advances, 2023-01, Vol.13 (1), p.015203-015203-19</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c1127e0be74b613ec959eea9aecd2b2c107399f1bfcaa1f23a11097dab611e473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c1127e0be74b613ec959eea9aecd2b2c107399f1bfcaa1f23a11097dab611e473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1366-2236</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><title>On the identification of cross-flow mode in three-dimensional boundary layers</title><title>AIP advances</title><description>Parametric zones are obtained where the cross-flow instability can be identified as a mode in the three-dimensional boundary layers with the Mach number ranging from 0 to 10. Although the term cross-flow mode is widely used in the investigations on boundary-layer instability, the previous work [Z. Liu, Phys. Fluids 34, 094110 (2022)] has demonstrated that a cross-flow mode cannot be designated in certain circumstances. The identification of the cross-flow mode is significant not only in the justifiable use of the term but also in judging whether a disturbance is more inclined to a cross-flow type or not. In this work, a criterion is built to identify the cross-flow mode based on the growth-rate peak and disturbance shape. By means of extensive calculations and identifications, parametric zones are presented for the unstable cross-flow mode. It is found that the cross-flow mode cannot be identified at large local sweep or at Mach numbers larger than 1.6. In parametric zones, the cross-flow mode can be distinguished from the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, or identified as the solely dominant mode. Based on the identifications, the maximum growth rates of the cross-flow mode, the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, and the Mack modes in the three-dimensional boundary layers are provided. The dominant mode can be determined at different Mach numbers. The cross-flow mode is revealed to dominate the boundary-layer instability at low Mach numbers. Under large cross-flow strengths, the second mode could not be the dominant mode in the hypersonic boundary layers, which contrasts sharply with the two-dimensional case.</description><subject>Cross flow</subject><subject>Flow stability</subject><subject>Mach number</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Three dimensional boundary layer</subject><subject>Three dimensional flow</subject><subject>Turnaround time</subject><issn>2158-3226</issn><issn>2158-3226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1KxDAUBeAiCoq68A0KrhSquUnbNEsR_0Bxo-twm9xohk4zJh3FtzfOiAqC2SSEj5ObUxQHwE6AteK0OWEgGsa6jWKHQ9NVgvN289d5u9hPacbyqhWwrt4p7u7Hcnqm0lsaJ--8wcmHsQyuNDGkVLkhvJXzYLP4hJGosn5OY8oKh7IPy9FifC8HfKeY9ooth0Oi_a99t3i8vHg4v65u769uzs9uK1PzbqoMAJfEepJ134IgoxpFhArJWN5zA0wKpRz0ziCC4wIBmJIWswaqpdgtbta5NuBML6Kf5xl0QK9XFyE-aYyTNwNpKdBxdI0A2deSVM84dKRqJkzfWsCcdbjOWsTwsqQ06VlYxvy5pLlsGZed6iCro7Va1RLJfb8KTH-Wrxv9VX62x2ubjJ9WfX7j1xB_oF5Y9x_-m_wBM8GR3A</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Liu, Zhiyong</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><general>AIP Publishing LLC</general><scope>AJDQP</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1366-2236</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>On the identification of cross-flow mode in three-dimensional boundary layers</title><author>Liu, Zhiyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c1127e0be74b613ec959eea9aecd2b2c107399f1bfcaa1f23a11097dab611e473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cross flow</topic><topic>Flow stability</topic><topic>Mach number</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Three dimensional boundary layer</topic><topic>Three dimensional flow</topic><topic>Turnaround time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><collection>AIP Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>AIP advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zhiyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the identification of cross-flow mode in three-dimensional boundary layers</atitle><jtitle>AIP advances</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>015203</spage><epage>015203-19</epage><pages>015203-015203-19</pages><issn>2158-3226</issn><eissn>2158-3226</eissn><coden>AAIDBI</coden><abstract>Parametric zones are obtained where the cross-flow instability can be identified as a mode in the three-dimensional boundary layers with the Mach number ranging from 0 to 10. Although the term cross-flow mode is widely used in the investigations on boundary-layer instability, the previous work [Z. Liu, Phys. Fluids 34, 094110 (2022)] has demonstrated that a cross-flow mode cannot be designated in certain circumstances. The identification of the cross-flow mode is significant not only in the justifiable use of the term but also in judging whether a disturbance is more inclined to a cross-flow type or not. In this work, a criterion is built to identify the cross-flow mode based on the growth-rate peak and disturbance shape. By means of extensive calculations and identifications, parametric zones are presented for the unstable cross-flow mode. It is found that the cross-flow mode cannot be identified at large local sweep or at Mach numbers larger than 1.6. In parametric zones, the cross-flow mode can be distinguished from the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, or identified as the solely dominant mode. Based on the identifications, the maximum growth rates of the cross-flow mode, the Tollmien–Schlichting mode, and the Mack modes in the three-dimensional boundary layers are provided. The dominant mode can be determined at different Mach numbers. The cross-flow mode is revealed to dominate the boundary-layer instability at low Mach numbers. Under large cross-flow strengths, the second mode could not be the dominant mode in the hypersonic boundary layers, which contrasts sharply with the two-dimensional case.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0135008</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1366-2236</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2158-3226
ispartof AIP advances, 2023-01, Vol.13 (1), p.015203-015203-19
issn 2158-3226
2158-3226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2760278981
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Cross flow
Flow stability
Mach number
Ponds
Three dimensional boundary layer
Three dimensional flow
Turnaround time
title On the identification of cross-flow mode in three-dimensional boundary layers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T00%3A10%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20identification%20of%20cross-flow%20mode%20in%20three-dimensional%20boundary%20layers&rft.jtitle=AIP%20advances&rft.au=Liu,%20Zhiyong&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=015203&rft.epage=015203-19&rft.pages=015203-015203-19&rft.issn=2158-3226&rft.eissn=2158-3226&rft.coden=AAIDBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0135008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2760278981%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760278981&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_73af2af5317b47e9b0218e9403cb6d1a&rfr_iscdi=true