Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes

Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of athletic training 2022-12
Hauptverfasser: Morris, Amanda, Petersell, Tessa L, Ryan Pelo, Hill, Sarah, Cassidy, Benjamin, Jameson, Trevor, Iriye, Tom, Burke, Jon, Dibble, Leland E, Fino, Peter C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of athletic training
container_volume
creator Morris, Amanda
Petersell, Tessa L
Ryan Pelo
Hill, Sarah
Cassidy, Benjamin
Jameson, Trevor
Iriye, Tom
Burke, Jon
Dibble, Leland E
Fino, Peter C
description Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2759650684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2759650684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p712-7c8bd29e810c242558b59da0fe158155e239056109d3fbd71e4a39df633dbdf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj8FKAzEQhoMoWKsP4G3B89ZJsskmRylqhYIgPXgr2WS2bkmza2fX5zdFPXj6P_hm_mEYu-WwqMCoew5alBoUlCAkXwhxxmbcSlNyLd7PM__5S3ZFtAfgQlk9Y7s3dH7svrBoXHTJY-GIkOiAaaTC94ch4okLH7vUeRfzHGFmzDL5iajr07-dLmUTI-46N-a28SPiiHTNLloXCW9-c842T4-b5apcvz6_LB_W5VBzUdbeNEFYNBy8qIRSplE2OGiRK8OVQiEtKM3BBtk2oeZYOWlDq6UMzSnm7O6ndjj2nxPSuN330zHli1tR54cVaFPJb0utWrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759650684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Morris, Amanda ; Petersell, Tessa L ; Ryan Pelo ; Hill, Sarah ; Cassidy, Benjamin ; Jameson, Trevor ; Iriye, Tom ; Burke, Jon ; Dibble, Leland E ; Fino, Peter C</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Amanda ; Petersell, Tessa L ; Ryan Pelo ; Hill, Sarah ; Cassidy, Benjamin ; Jameson, Trevor ; Iriye, Tom ; Burke, Jon ; Dibble, Leland E ; Fino, Peter C</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-6050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dallas: National Athletic Trainers Association</publisher><subject>Awards &amp; honors ; Concussion ; Funding ; Kinesiology ; Outcome Measures ; Physical therapy ; Reaction Time ; Redundancy ; Social networks ; Sports training ; Student athletes ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of athletic training, 2022-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Dec 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersell, Tessa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan Pelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jameson, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iriye, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibble, Leland E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fino, Peter C</creatorcontrib><title>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</title><title>Journal of athletic training</title><description><![CDATA[Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.]]></description><subject>Awards &amp; honors</subject><subject>Concussion</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Student athletes</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj8FKAzEQhoMoWKsP4G3B89ZJsskmRylqhYIgPXgr2WS2bkmza2fX5zdFPXj6P_hm_mEYu-WwqMCoew5alBoUlCAkXwhxxmbcSlNyLd7PM__5S3ZFtAfgQlk9Y7s3dH7svrBoXHTJY-GIkOiAaaTC94ch4okLH7vUeRfzHGFmzDL5iajr07-dLmUTI-46N-a28SPiiHTNLloXCW9-c842T4-b5apcvz6_LB_W5VBzUdbeNEFYNBy8qIRSplE2OGiRK8OVQiEtKM3BBtk2oeZYOWlDq6UMzSnm7O6ndjj2nxPSuN330zHli1tR54cVaFPJb0utWrs</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Morris, Amanda</creator><creator>Petersell, Tessa L</creator><creator>Ryan Pelo</creator><creator>Hill, Sarah</creator><creator>Cassidy, Benjamin</creator><creator>Jameson, Trevor</creator><creator>Iriye, Tom</creator><creator>Burke, Jon</creator><creator>Dibble, Leland E</creator><creator>Fino, Peter C</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers Association</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</title><author>Morris, Amanda ; Petersell, Tessa L ; Ryan Pelo ; Hill, Sarah ; Cassidy, Benjamin ; Jameson, Trevor ; Iriye, Tom ; Burke, Jon ; Dibble, Leland E ; Fino, Peter C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p712-7c8bd29e810c242558b59da0fe158155e239056109d3fbd71e4a39df633dbdf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Awards &amp; honors</topic><topic>Concussion</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Student athletes</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersell, Tessa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan Pelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jameson, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iriye, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibble, Leland E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fino, Peter C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Amanda</au><au>Petersell, Tessa L</au><au>Ryan Pelo</au><au>Hill, Sarah</au><au>Cassidy, Benjamin</au><au>Jameson, Trevor</au><au>Iriye, Tom</au><au>Burke, Jon</au><au>Dibble, Leland E</au><au>Fino, Peter C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>1062-6050</issn><eissn>1938-162X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.]]></abstract><cop>Dallas</cop><pub>National Athletic Trainers Association</pub><doi>10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-6050
ispartof Journal of athletic training, 2022-12
issn 1062-6050
1938-162X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2759650684
source PubMed Central Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free E- Journals
subjects Awards & honors
Concussion
Funding
Kinesiology
Outcome Measures
Physical therapy
Reaction Time
Redundancy
Social networks
Sports training
Student athletes
Training
title Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A13%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reactive%20balance%20assessments%20complement%20clinical%20baseline%20concussion%20assessments%20in%20collegiate%20athletes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20athletic%20training&rft.au=Morris,%20Amanda&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.issn=1062-6050&rft.eissn=1938-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2759650684%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759650684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true