Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes
Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of athletic training 2022-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of athletic training |
container_volume | |
creator | Morris, Amanda Petersell, Tessa L Ryan Pelo Hill, Sarah Cassidy, Benjamin Jameson, Trevor Iriye, Tom Burke, Jon Dibble, Leland E Fino, Peter C |
description | Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2759650684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2759650684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p712-7c8bd29e810c242558b59da0fe158155e239056109d3fbd71e4a39df633dbdf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj8FKAzEQhoMoWKsP4G3B89ZJsskmRylqhYIgPXgr2WS2bkmza2fX5zdFPXj6P_hm_mEYu-WwqMCoew5alBoUlCAkXwhxxmbcSlNyLd7PM__5S3ZFtAfgQlk9Y7s3dH7svrBoXHTJY-GIkOiAaaTC94ch4okLH7vUeRfzHGFmzDL5iajr07-dLmUTI-46N-a28SPiiHTNLloXCW9-c842T4-b5apcvz6_LB_W5VBzUdbeNEFYNBy8qIRSplE2OGiRK8OVQiEtKM3BBtk2oeZYOWlDq6UMzSnm7O6ndjj2nxPSuN330zHli1tR54cVaFPJb0utWrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759650684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Morris, Amanda ; Petersell, Tessa L ; Ryan Pelo ; Hill, Sarah ; Cassidy, Benjamin ; Jameson, Trevor ; Iriye, Tom ; Burke, Jon ; Dibble, Leland E ; Fino, Peter C</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Amanda ; Petersell, Tessa L ; Ryan Pelo ; Hill, Sarah ; Cassidy, Benjamin ; Jameson, Trevor ; Iriye, Tom ; Burke, Jon ; Dibble, Leland E ; Fino, Peter C</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-6050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dallas: National Athletic Trainers Association</publisher><subject>Awards & honors ; Concussion ; Funding ; Kinesiology ; Outcome Measures ; Physical therapy ; Reaction Time ; Redundancy ; Social networks ; Sports training ; Student athletes ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of athletic training, 2022-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Dec 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersell, Tessa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan Pelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jameson, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iriye, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibble, Leland E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fino, Peter C</creatorcontrib><title>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</title><title>Journal of athletic training</title><description><![CDATA[Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.]]></description><subject>Awards & honors</subject><subject>Concussion</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Student athletes</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj8FKAzEQhoMoWKsP4G3B89ZJsskmRylqhYIgPXgr2WS2bkmza2fX5zdFPXj6P_hm_mEYu-WwqMCoew5alBoUlCAkXwhxxmbcSlNyLd7PM__5S3ZFtAfgQlk9Y7s3dH7svrBoXHTJY-GIkOiAaaTC94ch4okLH7vUeRfzHGFmzDL5iajr07-dLmUTI-46N-a28SPiiHTNLloXCW9-c842T4-b5apcvz6_LB_W5VBzUdbeNEFYNBy8qIRSplE2OGiRK8OVQiEtKM3BBtk2oeZYOWlDq6UMzSnm7O6ndjj2nxPSuN330zHli1tR54cVaFPJb0utWrs</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Morris, Amanda</creator><creator>Petersell, Tessa L</creator><creator>Ryan Pelo</creator><creator>Hill, Sarah</creator><creator>Cassidy, Benjamin</creator><creator>Jameson, Trevor</creator><creator>Iriye, Tom</creator><creator>Burke, Jon</creator><creator>Dibble, Leland E</creator><creator>Fino, Peter C</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers Association</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</title><author>Morris, Amanda ; Petersell, Tessa L ; Ryan Pelo ; Hill, Sarah ; Cassidy, Benjamin ; Jameson, Trevor ; Iriye, Tom ; Burke, Jon ; Dibble, Leland E ; Fino, Peter C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p712-7c8bd29e810c242558b59da0fe158155e239056109d3fbd71e4a39df633dbdf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Awards & honors</topic><topic>Concussion</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Student athletes</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersell, Tessa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan Pelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jameson, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iriye, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibble, Leland E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fino, Peter C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Amanda</au><au>Petersell, Tessa L</au><au>Ryan Pelo</au><au>Hill, Sarah</au><au>Cassidy, Benjamin</au><au>Jameson, Trevor</au><au>Iriye, Tom</au><au>Burke, Jon</au><au>Dibble, Leland E</au><au>Fino, Peter C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>1062-6050</issn><eissn>1938-162X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Context:Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment in current evaluations might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if redundancy exists within current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.Design:Cross Sectional StudySetting:Clinical AssessmentPatients or Other Participants:Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season from healthy NCAA Division I athletes. Within the first cohort (n = 191), correlation analyses with clinical scores and inertial measurements were run between the ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool), the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System), the modified Push and Release (mP&R), and instrumented mP&R (I-mP&R) to determine the strength of a relationship between these concussion tests. Within the second cohort (n = 88), correlation analyses were run between the BESS, the mP&R, Timed Tandem Gait, Walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time to determine the strength of the relationship between these concussion evaluation tests.Main Outcome Measures:ImPACT cognitive indices, BESS and mP&R clinical score and instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), TTG and Walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time.Results:The strongest inter-instrument correlation value was r= 0.347, which was considered a weak correlation, between clinical reaction time and single task time to stability from the I-mP&R. The I-mP&R and mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.Conclusion:The weak correlations between inter-assessment variables indicates that there is little redundancy within the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.]]></abstract><cop>Dallas</cop><pub>National Athletic Trainers Association</pub><doi>10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-6050 |
ispartof | Journal of athletic training, 2022-12 |
issn | 1062-6050 1938-162X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2759650684 |
source | PubMed Central Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Awards & honors Concussion Funding Kinesiology Outcome Measures Physical therapy Reaction Time Redundancy Social networks Sports training Student athletes Training |
title | Reactive balance assessments complement clinical baseline concussion assessments in collegiate athletes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A13%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reactive%20balance%20assessments%20complement%20clinical%20baseline%20concussion%20assessments%20in%20collegiate%20athletes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20athletic%20training&rft.au=Morris,%20Amanda&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.issn=1062-6050&rft.eissn=1938-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1062-6050-0231.22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2759650684%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759650684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |