d‐mannosuria levels measured 1h afterd‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study

Backgroundd‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studiedd‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy.Material and MethodsFollowing institutional review board approv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2023-01, Vol.42 (1), p.49-55
Hauptverfasser: Fan, Ethan, Dashti, Marjan, Fuentes, Jorge, Reitzer, Larry, Christie, Alana L, Zimmern, Philippe E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 55
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 42
creator Fan, Ethan
Dashti, Marjan
Fuentes, Jorge
Reitzer, Larry
Christie, Alana L
Zimmern, Philippe E
description Backgroundd‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studiedd‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy.Material and MethodsFollowing institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home‐dose d‐mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to ad‐mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group.d‐mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine.ResultsFrom July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d‐mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with >20% increase in thed‐mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baselined‐mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary postd‐mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46).d‐mannose‐naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings.ConclusionThis preliminary study on d‐mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinaryd‐mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.25059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2759004441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2759004441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27590044413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiktOwzAQQC0EEuGz6A1GYp0ydpy6YYcQqAdgXw3NRKR17dRjV2LHETgjJ6ELJLasnp7eU2qmca4RzX2gMjcttt2ZqnRrsF44585Vha5pamMX7lJdiWwRcdnYrlK-__782lMIUUoaCTwf2QvsmU7OPeh3oCFz-tsYxpBpx7ChAMKeNxliyTDQMSZ68wyJZYqh5yQP8AjT6GMGyaX_uFEXA3nh219eq7uX59enVT2leCgseb2NJYVTWhvXdojWWt387_oBR3BQ7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759004441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>d‐mannosuria levels measured 1h afterd‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Fan, Ethan ; Dashti, Marjan ; Fuentes, Jorge ; Reitzer, Larry ; Christie, Alana L ; Zimmern, Philippe E</creator><creatorcontrib>Fan, Ethan ; Dashti, Marjan ; Fuentes, Jorge ; Reitzer, Larry ; Christie, Alana L ; Zimmern, Philippe E</creatorcontrib><description>Backgroundd‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studiedd‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy.Material and MethodsFollowing institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home‐dose d‐mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to ad‐mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group.d‐mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine.ResultsFrom July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d‐mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with &gt;20% increase in thed‐mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baselined‐mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary postd‐mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46).d‐mannose‐naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings.ConclusionThis preliminary study on d‐mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinaryd‐mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.25059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Creatinine ; Mannose ; Urinary tract ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2023-01, Vol.42 (1), p.49-55</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fan, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dashti, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitzer, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Alana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmern, Philippe E</creatorcontrib><title>d‐mannosuria levels measured 1h afterd‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><description>Backgroundd‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studiedd‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy.Material and MethodsFollowing institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home‐dose d‐mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to ad‐mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group.d‐mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine.ResultsFrom July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d‐mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with &gt;20% increase in thed‐mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baselined‐mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary postd‐mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46).d‐mannose‐naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings.ConclusionThis preliminary study on d‐mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinaryd‐mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.</description><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Mannose</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNiktOwzAQQC0EEuGz6A1GYp0ydpy6YYcQqAdgXw3NRKR17dRjV2LHETgjJ6ELJLasnp7eU2qmca4RzX2gMjcttt2ZqnRrsF44585Vha5pamMX7lJdiWwRcdnYrlK-__782lMIUUoaCTwf2QvsmU7OPeh3oCFz-tsYxpBpx7ChAMKeNxliyTDQMSZ68wyJZYqh5yQP8AjT6GMGyaX_uFEXA3nh219eq7uX59enVT2leCgseb2NJYVTWhvXdojWWt387_oBR3BQ7A</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Fan, Ethan</creator><creator>Dashti, Marjan</creator><creator>Fuentes, Jorge</creator><creator>Reitzer, Larry</creator><creator>Christie, Alana L</creator><creator>Zimmern, Philippe E</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>d‐mannosuria levels measured 1h afterd‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study</title><author>Fan, Ethan ; Dashti, Marjan ; Fuentes, Jorge ; Reitzer, Larry ; Christie, Alana L ; Zimmern, Philippe E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27590044413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Mannose</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fan, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dashti, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitzer, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Alana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmern, Philippe E</creatorcontrib><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fan, Ethan</au><au>Dashti, Marjan</au><au>Fuentes, Jorge</au><au>Reitzer, Larry</au><au>Christie, Alana L</au><au>Zimmern, Philippe E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>d‐mannosuria levels measured 1h afterd‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>49-55</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Backgroundd‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studiedd‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy.Material and MethodsFollowing institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home‐dose d‐mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to ad‐mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group.d‐mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine.ResultsFrom July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d‐mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with &gt;20% increase in thed‐mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baselined‐mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary postd‐mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46).d‐mannose‐naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings.ConclusionThis preliminary study on d‐mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinaryd‐mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/nau.25059</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2023-01, Vol.42 (1), p.49-55
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2759004441
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Creatinine
Mannose
Urinary tract
Urine
title d‐mannosuria levels measured 1h afterd‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=d%E2%80%90mannosuria%20levels%20measured%201h%20afterd%E2%80%90mannose%20intake%20can%20select%20out%20favorable%20responders:%20A%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Fan,%20Ethan&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=49-55&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.25059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2759004441%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759004441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true