Facing Tradition: Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk as a Statement of Artistic Individuality
The present paper advances a new understanding of Fyodor Dostoevsky's first novel, Poor Folk (1846), - as a parody of literary patterns promoted by Natural School's ideology. Dostoevsky builds his text on an underlying network of literary conventions, artistic devices, and intertextual ref...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania) Romania), 2022-01, Vol.27 (2), p.327-338 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 327 |
container_title | Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Stan, Gabriel-Andrei |
description | The present paper advances a new understanding of Fyodor Dostoevsky's first novel, Poor Folk (1846), - as a parody of literary patterns promoted by Natural School's ideology. Dostoevsky builds his text on an underlying network of literary conventions, artistic devices, and intertextual references, used in a parodic manner. in addition, the novel makes use of a complex narratological strategy, in which the two characters play several roles simultaneously. All this turns the text into a literary experiment, intended by the young Dostoevsky to define his original contribution to the Russian literary tradition, in an overt dialogue with Aleksandr Pushkin and Nikolay Gogol. More specifically, it is the revival of the epistolary genre that allows Dostoevsky to engage in a dialog with his two predecessors. Therefore, Dostoevsky's debut novel should not be seen as a simple literary exercise, but, rather, as the assertion of its author's artistic individuality in the context of the literary tradition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26424/philobib.2022.27.2.06 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758662478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758662478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c160t-b6ded9759d76acd5ff4d1b8d1246b9c8896bfa8afa9dd9142a73b2e3e8280003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kNFKwzAUhoMoOKevIAGvW5PTNE29G9PpYKCw3Ye0STVb18wkG_TO1_D1fBKr06vDge__D-dD6JqSFDgDdrt7s62rbJUCAUihSCEl_ASNAFiRCMbgFI3osCQFY-IcXYSwJoTTnNMRWs5UbbtXvPJK22hdd4fvXYjOHMKm__r4DPjFOY9nrt1gFbDCy6ii2ZouYtfgiY82RFvjeaftweq9am3sL9FZo9pgrv7mGK1mD6vpU7J4fpxPJ4ukppzEpOLa6LLIS11wVeu8aZimldAUGK_KWoiSV40SqlGl1iVloIqsApMZAYIQko3RzbF259373oQo127vu-GihCIXnA_vi4HiR6r2LgRvGrnzdqt8LymRv_7kvz_542_ISpCEZ99hOmfb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758662478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facing Tradition: Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk as a Statement of Artistic Individuality</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei</creator><creatorcontrib>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei ; University of Bucharest</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper advances a new understanding of Fyodor Dostoevsky's first novel, Poor Folk (1846), - as a parody of literary patterns promoted by Natural School's ideology. Dostoevsky builds his text on an underlying network of literary conventions, artistic devices, and intertextual references, used in a parodic manner. in addition, the novel makes use of a complex narratological strategy, in which the two characters play several roles simultaneously. All this turns the text into a literary experiment, intended by the young Dostoevsky to define his original contribution to the Russian literary tradition, in an overt dialogue with Aleksandr Pushkin and Nikolay Gogol. More specifically, it is the revival of the epistolary genre that allows Dostoevsky to engage in a dialog with his two predecessors. Therefore, Dostoevsky's debut novel should not be seen as a simple literary exercise, but, rather, as the assertion of its author's artistic individuality in the context of the literary tradition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1224-7448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-8442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26424/philobib.2022.27.2.06</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cluj-Napoca: The Lucian Blaga Central University Library; Research Department, Cluj, Romania</publisher><subject>Critics ; Dostoevsky, Fyodor Mikhailovich (1821-1881) ; Genre ; Intertextuality ; Novels ; Poverty ; Pushkin, Aleksandr Sergeyevich (1799-1837) ; Russian literature ; Social criticism & satire ; Traditions ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania), 2022-01, Vol.27 (2), p.327-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Lucian Blaga Central University Library; Research Department, Cluj, Romania 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Bucharest</creatorcontrib><title>Facing Tradition: Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk as a Statement of Artistic Individuality</title><title>Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania)</title><description>The present paper advances a new understanding of Fyodor Dostoevsky's first novel, Poor Folk (1846), - as a parody of literary patterns promoted by Natural School's ideology. Dostoevsky builds his text on an underlying network of literary conventions, artistic devices, and intertextual references, used in a parodic manner. in addition, the novel makes use of a complex narratological strategy, in which the two characters play several roles simultaneously. All this turns the text into a literary experiment, intended by the young Dostoevsky to define his original contribution to the Russian literary tradition, in an overt dialogue with Aleksandr Pushkin and Nikolay Gogol. More specifically, it is the revival of the epistolary genre that allows Dostoevsky to engage in a dialog with his two predecessors. Therefore, Dostoevsky's debut novel should not be seen as a simple literary exercise, but, rather, as the assertion of its author's artistic individuality in the context of the literary tradition.</description><subject>Critics</subject><subject>Dostoevsky, Fyodor Mikhailovich (1821-1881)</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Intertextuality</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Pushkin, Aleksandr Sergeyevich (1799-1837)</subject><subject>Russian literature</subject><subject>Social criticism & satire</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>1224-7448</issn><issn>2247-8442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kNFKwzAUhoMoOKevIAGvW5PTNE29G9PpYKCw3Ye0STVb18wkG_TO1_D1fBKr06vDge__D-dD6JqSFDgDdrt7s62rbJUCAUihSCEl_ASNAFiRCMbgFI3osCQFY-IcXYSwJoTTnNMRWs5UbbtXvPJK22hdd4fvXYjOHMKm__r4DPjFOY9nrt1gFbDCy6ii2ZouYtfgiY82RFvjeaftweq9am3sL9FZo9pgrv7mGK1mD6vpU7J4fpxPJ4ukppzEpOLa6LLIS11wVeu8aZimldAUGK_KWoiSV40SqlGl1iVloIqsApMZAYIQko3RzbF259373oQo127vu-GihCIXnA_vi4HiR6r2LgRvGrnzdqt8LymRv_7kvz_542_ISpCEZ99hOmfb</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei</creator><general>The Lucian Blaga Central University Library; Research Department, Cluj, Romania</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Facing Tradition: Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk as a Statement of Artistic Individuality</title><author>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c160t-b6ded9759d76acd5ff4d1b8d1246b9c8896bfa8afa9dd9142a73b2e3e8280003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Critics</topic><topic>Dostoevsky, Fyodor Mikhailovich (1821-1881)</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Intertextuality</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Pushkin, Aleksandr Sergeyevich (1799-1837)</topic><topic>Russian literature</topic><topic>Social criticism & satire</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Bucharest</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stan, Gabriel-Andrei</au><aucorp>University of Bucharest</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facing Tradition: Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk as a Statement of Artistic Individuality</atitle><jtitle>Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania)</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>327-338</pages><issn>1224-7448</issn><eissn>2247-8442</eissn><abstract>The present paper advances a new understanding of Fyodor Dostoevsky's first novel, Poor Folk (1846), - as a parody of literary patterns promoted by Natural School's ideology. Dostoevsky builds his text on an underlying network of literary conventions, artistic devices, and intertextual references, used in a parodic manner. in addition, the novel makes use of a complex narratological strategy, in which the two characters play several roles simultaneously. All this turns the text into a literary experiment, intended by the young Dostoevsky to define his original contribution to the Russian literary tradition, in an overt dialogue with Aleksandr Pushkin and Nikolay Gogol. More specifically, it is the revival of the epistolary genre that allows Dostoevsky to engage in a dialog with his two predecessors. Therefore, Dostoevsky's debut novel should not be seen as a simple literary exercise, but, rather, as the assertion of its author's artistic individuality in the context of the literary tradition.</abstract><cop>Cluj-Napoca</cop><pub>The Lucian Blaga Central University Library; Research Department, Cluj, Romania</pub><doi>10.26424/philobib.2022.27.2.06</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1224-7448 |
ispartof | Philobiblon (Cluj, Romania), 2022-01, Vol.27 (2), p.327-338 |
issn | 1224-7448 2247-8442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2758662478 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Critics Dostoevsky, Fyodor Mikhailovich (1821-1881) Genre Intertextuality Novels Poverty Pushkin, Aleksandr Sergeyevich (1799-1837) Russian literature Social criticism & satire Traditions Writers |
title | Facing Tradition: Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk as a Statement of Artistic Individuality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T21%3A32%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facing%20Tradition:%20Dostoevsky%E2%80%99s%20Poor%20Folk%20as%20a%20Statement%20of%20Artistic%20Individuality&rft.jtitle=Philobiblon%20(Cluj,%20Romania)&rft.au=Stan,%20Gabriel-Andrei&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20Bucharest&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=327-338&rft.issn=1224-7448&rft.eissn=2247-8442&rft_id=info:doi/10.26424/philobib.2022.27.2.06&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758662478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758662478&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |