Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game for distributed economic scheduling of microgrid with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station
Summary To stimulate cooperative transaction between different stakeholders and optimize the economic profits of each entity in the microgrid (MG) with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station (CSSIS), this article establishes a Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game model between MG and CSSIS,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of energy research 2022-12, Vol.46 (15), p.23927-23938 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23938 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 23927 |
container_title | International journal of energy research |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Cheng, Shan Zuo, Xianwang Wei, Zhaobin Ni, Kaixuan Wang, Can |
description | Summary
To stimulate cooperative transaction between different stakeholders and optimize the economic profits of each entity in the microgrid (MG) with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station (CSSIS), this article establishes a Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game model between MG and CSSIS, and proposes an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based distributed computation to reach Nash equilibrium. At first, MG and CSSIS are regarded as two different stakeholders, and their transactions are captured by the Nash bargaining framework, which takes the Stackelberg equilibrium solution as the initial bifurcation point of Nash negotiation, and constructs a bi‐level Nash bargaining game model for the microgrid and CSSIS. Then, theoretical analysis of the existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibrium is developed based on the proposed game property. Following that, with application of augmented Lagrange function and ADMM, the constraints coupled Nash bargaining mathematical problem is divided into two independent subproblems, namely, the economic profit maximization of MG and the economic operation maximization of CSSIS, whose solutions can be determined in a distributed iteration. Numerical simulation results indicate that, compared with Stackelberg equilibrium solution identified by the noncooperative game model, the model can further improve the benefits of both game participants and achieve win‐win results. At the same time, it can more reasonably schedule resources in the system to maximize the economic profit of the overall system.
Procedure overview. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/er.8689 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758633218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758633218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2199-49cd06935cf7f40b13e9ef92f3ba9ec28e406415b3b0cf65b6ee3fb94c9bf3a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxoMoWKv4CgEPHmRrstl_OUrxHxQFUehtSbKT3ZR2syZbS2--gT6jT2Lq9upphpnffB_fIHROyYQSEl-DmxRZwQ_QiBLOI0qT-SEaEZaxiJN8foxOvF8QEnY0H6GvJ-EbLIWrhWlNW_98fkvhocLK2g6c6M0H4FqsAGvrcGV874xc9wEAZVu7Mgp71UC1XoZjbDUOE2drZyq8MX2DVROkB12_EV23b3vrRA3YtD3UwSTI-T542fYUHWmx9HC2r2P0dnf7On2IZs_3j9ObWaRiGlIlXFUk4yxVOtcJkZQBB81jzaTgoOICEpIlNJVMEqWzVGYATEueKC41E4yN0cWg2zn7vgbflwu7dm2wLOM8LTLGYloE6nKgQibvHeiyc2Yl3LakpNx9uwRX7r4dyKuB3JglbP_DytuXP_oX_jmHWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758633218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game for distributed economic scheduling of microgrid with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cheng, Shan ; Zuo, Xianwang ; Wei, Zhaobin ; Ni, Kaixuan ; Wang, Can</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shan ; Zuo, Xianwang ; Wei, Zhaobin ; Ni, Kaixuan ; Wang, Can</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
To stimulate cooperative transaction between different stakeholders and optimize the economic profits of each entity in the microgrid (MG) with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station (CSSIS), this article establishes a Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game model between MG and CSSIS, and proposes an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based distributed computation to reach Nash equilibrium. At first, MG and CSSIS are regarded as two different stakeholders, and their transactions are captured by the Nash bargaining framework, which takes the Stackelberg equilibrium solution as the initial bifurcation point of Nash negotiation, and constructs a bi‐level Nash bargaining game model for the microgrid and CSSIS. Then, theoretical analysis of the existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibrium is developed based on the proposed game property. Following that, with application of augmented Lagrange function and ADMM, the constraints coupled Nash bargaining mathematical problem is divided into two independent subproblems, namely, the economic profit maximization of MG and the economic operation maximization of CSSIS, whose solutions can be determined in a distributed iteration. Numerical simulation results indicate that, compared with Stackelberg equilibrium solution identified by the noncooperative game model, the model can further improve the benefits of both game participants and achieve win‐win results. At the same time, it can more reasonably schedule resources in the system to maximize the economic profit of the overall system.
Procedure overview.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-907X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/er.8689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>alternating direction method of multipliers ; Bargaining ; Charging ; charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station ; Computation ; cooperative game ; Distributed generation ; Economics ; Equilibrium ; Game theory ; Iterative methods ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical problems ; Maximization ; microgrid ; Nash bargaining game ; Optimization ; Profit ; Scheduling ; Storage ; Theoretical analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of energy research, 2022-12, Vol.46 (15), p.23927-23938</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2199-49cd06935cf7f40b13e9ef92f3ba9ec28e406415b3b0cf65b6ee3fb94c9bf3a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2199-49cd06935cf7f40b13e9ef92f3ba9ec28e406415b3b0cf65b6ee3fb94c9bf3a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fer.8689$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fer.8689$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Xianwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhaobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Kaixuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Can</creatorcontrib><title>Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game for distributed economic scheduling of microgrid with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station</title><title>International journal of energy research</title><description>Summary
To stimulate cooperative transaction between different stakeholders and optimize the economic profits of each entity in the microgrid (MG) with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station (CSSIS), this article establishes a Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game model between MG and CSSIS, and proposes an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based distributed computation to reach Nash equilibrium. At first, MG and CSSIS are regarded as two different stakeholders, and their transactions are captured by the Nash bargaining framework, which takes the Stackelberg equilibrium solution as the initial bifurcation point of Nash negotiation, and constructs a bi‐level Nash bargaining game model for the microgrid and CSSIS. Then, theoretical analysis of the existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibrium is developed based on the proposed game property. Following that, with application of augmented Lagrange function and ADMM, the constraints coupled Nash bargaining mathematical problem is divided into two independent subproblems, namely, the economic profit maximization of MG and the economic operation maximization of CSSIS, whose solutions can be determined in a distributed iteration. Numerical simulation results indicate that, compared with Stackelberg equilibrium solution identified by the noncooperative game model, the model can further improve the benefits of both game participants and achieve win‐win results. At the same time, it can more reasonably schedule resources in the system to maximize the economic profit of the overall system.
Procedure overview.</description><subject>alternating direction method of multipliers</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Charging</subject><subject>charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>cooperative game</subject><subject>Distributed generation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>Maximization</subject><subject>microgrid</subject><subject>Nash bargaining game</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Profit</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Theoretical analysis</subject><issn>0363-907X</issn><issn>1099-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxoMoWKv4CgEPHmRrstl_OUrxHxQFUehtSbKT3ZR2syZbS2--gT6jT2Lq9upphpnffB_fIHROyYQSEl-DmxRZwQ_QiBLOI0qT-SEaEZaxiJN8foxOvF8QEnY0H6GvJ-EbLIWrhWlNW_98fkvhocLK2g6c6M0H4FqsAGvrcGV874xc9wEAZVu7Mgp71UC1XoZjbDUOE2drZyq8MX2DVROkB12_EV23b3vrRA3YtD3UwSTI-T542fYUHWmx9HC2r2P0dnf7On2IZs_3j9ObWaRiGlIlXFUk4yxVOtcJkZQBB81jzaTgoOICEpIlNJVMEqWzVGYATEueKC41E4yN0cWg2zn7vgbflwu7dm2wLOM8LTLGYloE6nKgQibvHeiyc2Yl3LakpNx9uwRX7r4dyKuB3JglbP_DytuXP_oX_jmHWw</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Cheng, Shan</creator><creator>Zuo, Xianwang</creator><creator>Wei, Zhaobin</creator><creator>Ni, Kaixuan</creator><creator>Wang, Can</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game for distributed economic scheduling of microgrid with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station</title><author>Cheng, Shan ; Zuo, Xianwang ; Wei, Zhaobin ; Ni, Kaixuan ; Wang, Can</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2199-49cd06935cf7f40b13e9ef92f3ba9ec28e406415b3b0cf65b6ee3fb94c9bf3a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>alternating direction method of multipliers</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Charging</topic><topic>charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>cooperative game</topic><topic>Distributed generation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>Maximization</topic><topic>microgrid</topic><topic>Nash bargaining game</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Profit</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Theoretical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Xianwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhaobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Kaixuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Can</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of energy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Shan</au><au>Zuo, Xianwang</au><au>Wei, Zhaobin</au><au>Ni, Kaixuan</au><au>Wang, Can</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game for distributed economic scheduling of microgrid with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station</atitle><jtitle>International journal of energy research</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>23927</spage><epage>23938</epage><pages>23927-23938</pages><issn>0363-907X</issn><eissn>1099-114X</eissn><abstract>Summary
To stimulate cooperative transaction between different stakeholders and optimize the economic profits of each entity in the microgrid (MG) with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station (CSSIS), this article establishes a Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game model between MG and CSSIS, and proposes an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based distributed computation to reach Nash equilibrium. At first, MG and CSSIS are regarded as two different stakeholders, and their transactions are captured by the Nash bargaining framework, which takes the Stackelberg equilibrium solution as the initial bifurcation point of Nash negotiation, and constructs a bi‐level Nash bargaining game model for the microgrid and CSSIS. Then, theoretical analysis of the existence and uniqueness of Nash equilibrium is developed based on the proposed game property. Following that, with application of augmented Lagrange function and ADMM, the constraints coupled Nash bargaining mathematical problem is divided into two independent subproblems, namely, the economic profit maximization of MG and the economic operation maximization of CSSIS, whose solutions can be determined in a distributed iteration. Numerical simulation results indicate that, compared with Stackelberg equilibrium solution identified by the noncooperative game model, the model can further improve the benefits of both game participants and achieve win‐win results. At the same time, it can more reasonably schedule resources in the system to maximize the economic profit of the overall system.
Procedure overview.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/er.8689</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-907X |
ispartof | International journal of energy research, 2022-12, Vol.46 (15), p.23927-23938 |
issn | 0363-907X 1099-114X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2758633218 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | alternating direction method of multipliers Bargaining Charging charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station Computation cooperative game Distributed generation Economics Equilibrium Game theory Iterative methods Mathematical models Mathematical problems Maximization microgrid Nash bargaining game Optimization Profit Scheduling Storage Theoretical analysis |
title | Nash bargaining‐based cooperative game for distributed economic scheduling of microgrid with charging‐swapping‐storage integrated station |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A30%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nash%20bargaining%E2%80%90based%20cooperative%20game%20for%20distributed%20economic%20scheduling%20of%20microgrid%20with%20charging%E2%80%90swapping%E2%80%90storage%20integrated%20station&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20energy%20research&rft.au=Cheng,%20Shan&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=23927&rft.epage=23938&rft.pages=23927-23938&rft.issn=0363-907X&rft.eissn=1099-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/er.8689&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758633218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758633218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |