Balanced Opioid Prescribing via a Clinical Trade-Off: Pain Relief vs. Adverse Effects of Discomfort, Dependence, and Tolerance/Hypersensitivity
In the backdrop of the opioid epidemic, opioid prescribing has distinct medical and social challenges. Overprescribing contributes to the ongoing opioid epidemic, whereas underprescribing yields inadequate pain relief. Moreover, opioids have serious adverse effects including tolerance and increased...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Decision analysis 2022-12, Vol.19 (4), p.297-318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | Decision analysis |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Gökçınar, Abdullah Çakanyıldırım, Metin Price, Theodore Adams, Meredith C. B. |
description | In the backdrop of the opioid epidemic, opioid prescribing has distinct medical and social challenges. Overprescribing contributes to the ongoing opioid epidemic, whereas underprescribing yields inadequate pain relief. Moreover, opioids have serious adverse effects including tolerance and increased sensitivity to pain, paradoxically inducing more pain. Prescribing trade-offs are recognized but not modeled in the literature. We study the prescribing decisions for chronic, acute, and persistent pain types to minimize the cumulative pain that incorporates opioid adverse effects (discomfort and dependence) and the risk of tolerance or hypersensitivity (THS) developed with opioid use. After finding closed-form solutions for each pain type, we analytically investigate the sensitivity of acute pain prescriptions and examine policies on incorporation of THS, patient handover, and adaptive treatments. Our analyses show that the role of adverse effects in prescribing decisions is as critical as that of the pain level. Interestingly, we find that the optimal prescription duration is not necessarily increasing with the recovery time. We show that not incorporating THS or information curtailment at patient handovers leads to overprescribing that can be mitigated by adaptive treatments. Last, using real-life pain and opioid use data from two sources, we estimate THS parameters and discuss the proximity of our model to clinical practice. This paper has a pain management framework that leads to tractable models. These models can potentially support balanced opioid prescribing after their validation in a clinical setting. Then, they can be helpful to policy makers in assessment of prescription policies and of the controversy around over- and underprescribing.
History:
This paper has been accepted for the
Decision Analysis
Special Issue on Emerging Topics in Health Decision Analysis.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [Grants K08 EB022631, R24 DA055306, R33 DA046085, and U24 NS115708].
Supplemental Material:
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2021.0447
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/deca.2021.0447 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758390398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758390398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8ad926fa40ac34e568d5fe934b9e75fe28be9872c7ade1b40b35901290366733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhiMEEl-99jxSryQ4tpPY3OhCAQlpEdp75NjjyihrBzustL-Cv1xH26pHTp7D8847elwU32tS1VR01wa1qiihdUU4746Ks7rhTSkawo__zVyS0-I8pTdCKJNtfVZ8_lSj8hoNrCcXnIGXiElHNzj_G3ZOgYLV6LzTaoRNVAbLtbU38KKch1ccHVrYpQpuzQ5jQri3FvWcIFi4c0mHrQ1xvoI7nNAbzD1XoLyBTRgxLrXXj_tpCfrkZrdz8_6yOLFqTPjt73tRbH7db1aP5fP64Wl1-1xq1rK5FMpI2lrFidKMY9MK01iUjA8SuzxRMaAUHdVdPrkeOBlYI0lNJWFt2zF2Ufw4rJ1ieP_ANPdv4SP63NjTrhEsc1JkqjpQOoaUItp-im6r4r6vSb847xfn_eK8X5znABwCqIN36T-ef6ET-QKakfKAOJ_dbNNXK_8Aqz-OlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758390398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balanced Opioid Prescribing via a Clinical Trade-Off: Pain Relief vs. Adverse Effects of Discomfort, Dependence, and Tolerance/Hypersensitivity</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><creator>Gökçınar, Abdullah ; Çakanyıldırım, Metin ; Price, Theodore ; Adams, Meredith C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gökçınar, Abdullah ; Çakanyıldırım, Metin ; Price, Theodore ; Adams, Meredith C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In the backdrop of the opioid epidemic, opioid prescribing has distinct medical and social challenges. Overprescribing contributes to the ongoing opioid epidemic, whereas underprescribing yields inadequate pain relief. Moreover, opioids have serious adverse effects including tolerance and increased sensitivity to pain, paradoxically inducing more pain. Prescribing trade-offs are recognized but not modeled in the literature. We study the prescribing decisions for chronic, acute, and persistent pain types to minimize the cumulative pain that incorporates opioid adverse effects (discomfort and dependence) and the risk of tolerance or hypersensitivity (THS) developed with opioid use. After finding closed-form solutions for each pain type, we analytically investigate the sensitivity of acute pain prescriptions and examine policies on incorporation of THS, patient handover, and adaptive treatments. Our analyses show that the role of adverse effects in prescribing decisions is as critical as that of the pain level. Interestingly, we find that the optimal prescription duration is not necessarily increasing with the recovery time. We show that not incorporating THS or information curtailment at patient handovers leads to overprescribing that can be mitigated by adaptive treatments. Last, using real-life pain and opioid use data from two sources, we estimate THS parameters and discuss the proximity of our model to clinical practice. This paper has a pain management framework that leads to tractable models. These models can potentially support balanced opioid prescribing after their validation in a clinical setting. Then, they can be helpful to policy makers in assessment of prescription policies and of the controversy around over- and underprescribing.
History:
This paper has been accepted for the
Decision Analysis
Special Issue on Emerging Topics in Health Decision Analysis.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [Grants K08 EB022631, R24 DA055306, R33 DA046085, and U24 NS115708].
Supplemental Material:
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2021.0447
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-8490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-8504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/deca.2021.0447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>adaptive treatment ; chronic/acute pain ; Continuity of care ; Drug addiction ; Drug overdose ; Narcotics ; opioid adverse effects ; optimal prescription ; Pain ; Pain management ; patient handover ; Prescription drugs</subject><ispartof>Decision analysis, 2022-12, Vol.19 (4), p.297-318</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Dec 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8ad926fa40ac34e568d5fe934b9e75fe28be9872c7ade1b40b35901290366733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8ad926fa40ac34e568d5fe934b9e75fe28be9872c7ade1b40b35901290366733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3969-4279 ; 0000-0003-4364-1986 ; 0000-0001-6638-5087 ; 0000-0002-6971-6221</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/deca.2021.0447$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3679,27901,27902,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gökçınar, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakanyıldırım, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Meredith C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Balanced Opioid Prescribing via a Clinical Trade-Off: Pain Relief vs. Adverse Effects of Discomfort, Dependence, and Tolerance/Hypersensitivity</title><title>Decision analysis</title><description>In the backdrop of the opioid epidemic, opioid prescribing has distinct medical and social challenges. Overprescribing contributes to the ongoing opioid epidemic, whereas underprescribing yields inadequate pain relief. Moreover, opioids have serious adverse effects including tolerance and increased sensitivity to pain, paradoxically inducing more pain. Prescribing trade-offs are recognized but not modeled in the literature. We study the prescribing decisions for chronic, acute, and persistent pain types to minimize the cumulative pain that incorporates opioid adverse effects (discomfort and dependence) and the risk of tolerance or hypersensitivity (THS) developed with opioid use. After finding closed-form solutions for each pain type, we analytically investigate the sensitivity of acute pain prescriptions and examine policies on incorporation of THS, patient handover, and adaptive treatments. Our analyses show that the role of adverse effects in prescribing decisions is as critical as that of the pain level. Interestingly, we find that the optimal prescription duration is not necessarily increasing with the recovery time. We show that not incorporating THS or information curtailment at patient handovers leads to overprescribing that can be mitigated by adaptive treatments. Last, using real-life pain and opioid use data from two sources, we estimate THS parameters and discuss the proximity of our model to clinical practice. This paper has a pain management framework that leads to tractable models. These models can potentially support balanced opioid prescribing after their validation in a clinical setting. Then, they can be helpful to policy makers in assessment of prescription policies and of the controversy around over- and underprescribing.
History:
This paper has been accepted for the
Decision Analysis
Special Issue on Emerging Topics in Health Decision Analysis.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [Grants K08 EB022631, R24 DA055306, R33 DA046085, and U24 NS115708].
Supplemental Material:
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2021.0447
.</description><subject>adaptive treatment</subject><subject>chronic/acute pain</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Drug addiction</subject><subject>Drug overdose</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>opioid adverse effects</subject><subject>optimal prescription</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>patient handover</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><issn>1545-8490</issn><issn>1545-8504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhiMEEl-99jxSryQ4tpPY3OhCAQlpEdp75NjjyihrBzustL-Cv1xH26pHTp7D8847elwU32tS1VR01wa1qiihdUU4746Ks7rhTSkawo__zVyS0-I8pTdCKJNtfVZ8_lSj8hoNrCcXnIGXiElHNzj_G3ZOgYLV6LzTaoRNVAbLtbU38KKch1ccHVrYpQpuzQ5jQri3FvWcIFi4c0mHrQ1xvoI7nNAbzD1XoLyBTRgxLrXXj_tpCfrkZrdz8_6yOLFqTPjt73tRbH7db1aP5fP64Wl1-1xq1rK5FMpI2lrFidKMY9MK01iUjA8SuzxRMaAUHdVdPrkeOBlYI0lNJWFt2zF2Ufw4rJ1ieP_ANPdv4SP63NjTrhEsc1JkqjpQOoaUItp-im6r4r6vSb847xfn_eK8X5znABwCqIN36T-ef6ET-QKakfKAOJ_dbNNXK_8Aqz-OlA</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Gökçınar, Abdullah</creator><creator>Çakanyıldırım, Metin</creator><creator>Price, Theodore</creator><creator>Adams, Meredith C. B.</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-4279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-1986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-5087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-6221</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Balanced Opioid Prescribing via a Clinical Trade-Off: Pain Relief vs. Adverse Effects of Discomfort, Dependence, and Tolerance/Hypersensitivity</title><author>Gökçınar, Abdullah ; Çakanyıldırım, Metin ; Price, Theodore ; Adams, Meredith C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8ad926fa40ac34e568d5fe934b9e75fe28be9872c7ade1b40b35901290366733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>adaptive treatment</topic><topic>chronic/acute pain</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Drug addiction</topic><topic>Drug overdose</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>opioid adverse effects</topic><topic>optimal prescription</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>patient handover</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gökçınar, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakanyıldırım, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Meredith C. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gökçınar, Abdullah</au><au>Çakanyıldırım, Metin</au><au>Price, Theodore</au><au>Adams, Meredith C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balanced Opioid Prescribing via a Clinical Trade-Off: Pain Relief vs. Adverse Effects of Discomfort, Dependence, and Tolerance/Hypersensitivity</atitle><jtitle>Decision analysis</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>297-318</pages><issn>1545-8490</issn><eissn>1545-8504</eissn><abstract>In the backdrop of the opioid epidemic, opioid prescribing has distinct medical and social challenges. Overprescribing contributes to the ongoing opioid epidemic, whereas underprescribing yields inadequate pain relief. Moreover, opioids have serious adverse effects including tolerance and increased sensitivity to pain, paradoxically inducing more pain. Prescribing trade-offs are recognized but not modeled in the literature. We study the prescribing decisions for chronic, acute, and persistent pain types to minimize the cumulative pain that incorporates opioid adverse effects (discomfort and dependence) and the risk of tolerance or hypersensitivity (THS) developed with opioid use. After finding closed-form solutions for each pain type, we analytically investigate the sensitivity of acute pain prescriptions and examine policies on incorporation of THS, patient handover, and adaptive treatments. Our analyses show that the role of adverse effects in prescribing decisions is as critical as that of the pain level. Interestingly, we find that the optimal prescription duration is not necessarily increasing with the recovery time. We show that not incorporating THS or information curtailment at patient handovers leads to overprescribing that can be mitigated by adaptive treatments. Last, using real-life pain and opioid use data from two sources, we estimate THS parameters and discuss the proximity of our model to clinical practice. This paper has a pain management framework that leads to tractable models. These models can potentially support balanced opioid prescribing after their validation in a clinical setting. Then, they can be helpful to policy makers in assessment of prescription policies and of the controversy around over- and underprescribing.
History:
This paper has been accepted for the
Decision Analysis
Special Issue on Emerging Topics in Health Decision Analysis.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [Grants K08 EB022631, R24 DA055306, R33 DA046085, and U24 NS115708].
Supplemental Material:
The online appendix is available at
https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2021.0447
.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/deca.2021.0447</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-4279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-1986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-5087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-6221</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-8490 |
ispartof | Decision analysis, 2022-12, Vol.19 (4), p.297-318 |
issn | 1545-8490 1545-8504 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2758390398 |
source | INFORMS PubsOnLine |
subjects | adaptive treatment chronic/acute pain Continuity of care Drug addiction Drug overdose Narcotics opioid adverse effects optimal prescription Pain Pain management patient handover Prescription drugs |
title | Balanced Opioid Prescribing via a Clinical Trade-Off: Pain Relief vs. Adverse Effects of Discomfort, Dependence, and Tolerance/Hypersensitivity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T11%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balanced%20Opioid%20Prescribing%20via%20a%20Clinical%20Trade-Off:%20Pain%20Relief%20vs.%20Adverse%20Effects%20of%20Discomfort,%20Dependence,%20and%20Tolerance/Hypersensitivity&rft.jtitle=Decision%20analysis&rft.au=G%C3%B6k%C3%A7%C4%B1nar,%20Abdullah&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=297-318&rft.issn=1545-8490&rft.eissn=1545-8504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/deca.2021.0447&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758390398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758390398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |