OP74 Assessing Public Confidence Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Through Social Media Insights Leveraged Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques

IntroductionIn areas where public confidence is low and there is a lack of understanding around behaviors, such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, there is a need to explore novel sources of evidence. When leveraged using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, social media data may offer rich insights...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S28-S28
Hauptverfasser: Green, Rhiannon, Lanyi, Kate, Marshall, Christopher, Craig, Dawn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S28
container_issue S1
container_start_page S28
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 38
creator Green, Rhiannon
Lanyi, Kate
Marshall, Christopher
Craig, Dawn
description IntroductionIn areas where public confidence is low and there is a lack of understanding around behaviors, such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, there is a need to explore novel sources of evidence. When leveraged using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, social media data may offer rich insights into public concerns around vaccination. Currently, sources of ‘soft-intelligence’ are underutilized by policy makers, health technology assessment (HTA) and other public health research agencies. In this work, we used an AI platform to rapidly detect and analyze key barriers to vaccine uptake from a sample of geo-located tweets.MethodsAn AI-based tool was deployed using a robust search strategy to capture tweets associated with COVID-19 vaccination, posted from users in London, United Kingdom. The tool’s algorithm automatically clustered tweets based on key topics of discussion and sentiment. Tweets contained within the 12 most populated topics with negative sentiment were extracted. The extracted tweets were mapped to one of six pre-determined themes (safety, mistrust, under-representation, complacency, ineffectiveness, and access) informed using the World Health Organization’s 3Cs vaccine hesitancy model. All collated tweets were anonymized.ResultsWe identified 91,473 tweets posted between 30 November 2020 and 15 August 2021. A sample of 913 tweets were extracted from the twelve negative topic clusters. Of these, 302 tweets were coded to a vaccine hesitancy theme. ‘Safety’ (29%) and ‘mistrust’ (23%) were the most commonly coded themes; the least commonly coded was ‘under-representation’ (3%). Within the main themes, adverse reactions, inadequate assessment, and rushed development of the vaccines as key findings. Our analysis also revealed widespread sharing of misinformation.ConclusionsUsing an AI-based text analytics tool, we were able to rapidly assess public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination and identify key barriers to uptake from a corpus of geo-located tweets. Our findings support a growing body of evidence and confidence surrounding the use of AI tools to efficiently analyze early sources of soft-intelligence evidence in public health research.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462322001234
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2756911928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462322001234</cupid><sourcerecordid>2756911928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2134-c2fd877cfdc64fdfb9e2378ea2472d91a6069a668de0b8c86e62d675a49107323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3DAUhUVJoZO0D9CdIGun-otkr8owTdqBKRPIJFshS9e2gkdKJTuhz9CXrp0ZGkrp5t7FOee7By5CHym5oISqT7eESSkk44wRQhkXb9CCCkULyUV5ghazXMz6O3Sa88Pk4aQiC_Rre6MEXuYMOfvQ4pux7r3Fqxga7yBYwLv4bJLLeLW9X38paIXvjbU-QMa7LsWx7fBttN70-Ds4b_A6ZN92Q8YbeIJkWnD47oW8TINv_ItzHQboe98e-GC74H-MkN-jt43pM3w47jN0d321W30rNtuv69VyU1hGuZhm40qlbOOsFI1r6goYVyUYJhRzFTWSyMpIWTogdWlLCZI5qS6NqChRnPEz9PnAfRzrPTgLYUim14_J7036qaPx-m8l-E638UlTqngpZDkRzo-EFOfmg36IYwpTac3UpawordjsogeXTTHnBM2fE5To-Wv6n69NGX7MmH2dvGvhFf3_1G9KvZqa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756911928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP74 Assessing Public Confidence Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Through Social Media Insights Leveraged Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Green, Rhiannon ; Lanyi, Kate ; Marshall, Christopher ; Craig, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Rhiannon ; Lanyi, Kate ; Marshall, Christopher ; Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionIn areas where public confidence is low and there is a lack of understanding around behaviors, such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, there is a need to explore novel sources of evidence. When leveraged using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, social media data may offer rich insights into public concerns around vaccination. Currently, sources of ‘soft-intelligence’ are underutilized by policy makers, health technology assessment (HTA) and other public health research agencies. In this work, we used an AI platform to rapidly detect and analyze key barriers to vaccine uptake from a sample of geo-located tweets.MethodsAn AI-based tool was deployed using a robust search strategy to capture tweets associated with COVID-19 vaccination, posted from users in London, United Kingdom. The tool’s algorithm automatically clustered tweets based on key topics of discussion and sentiment. Tweets contained within the 12 most populated topics with negative sentiment were extracted. The extracted tweets were mapped to one of six pre-determined themes (safety, mistrust, under-representation, complacency, ineffectiveness, and access) informed using the World Health Organization’s 3Cs vaccine hesitancy model. All collated tweets were anonymized.ResultsWe identified 91,473 tweets posted between 30 November 2020 and 15 August 2021. A sample of 913 tweets were extracted from the twelve negative topic clusters. Of these, 302 tweets were coded to a vaccine hesitancy theme. ‘Safety’ (29%) and ‘mistrust’ (23%) were the most commonly coded themes; the least commonly coded was ‘under-representation’ (3%). Within the main themes, adverse reactions, inadequate assessment, and rushed development of the vaccines as key findings. Our analysis also revealed widespread sharing of misinformation.ConclusionsUsing an AI-based text analytics tool, we were able to rapidly assess public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination and identify key barriers to uptake from a corpus of geo-located tweets. Our findings support a growing body of evidence and confidence surrounding the use of AI tools to efficiently analyze early sources of soft-intelligence evidence in public health research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462322001234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Digital media ; Immunization ; Medical research ; Oral Presentations ; Public concern ; Public health ; Representations ; Safety ; Social networks ; Technology assessment ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S28-S28</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462322001234/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Rhiannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanyi, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>OP74 Assessing Public Confidence Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Through Social Media Insights Leveraged Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>IntroductionIn areas where public confidence is low and there is a lack of understanding around behaviors, such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, there is a need to explore novel sources of evidence. When leveraged using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, social media data may offer rich insights into public concerns around vaccination. Currently, sources of ‘soft-intelligence’ are underutilized by policy makers, health technology assessment (HTA) and other public health research agencies. In this work, we used an AI platform to rapidly detect and analyze key barriers to vaccine uptake from a sample of geo-located tweets.MethodsAn AI-based tool was deployed using a robust search strategy to capture tweets associated with COVID-19 vaccination, posted from users in London, United Kingdom. The tool’s algorithm automatically clustered tweets based on key topics of discussion and sentiment. Tweets contained within the 12 most populated topics with negative sentiment were extracted. The extracted tweets were mapped to one of six pre-determined themes (safety, mistrust, under-representation, complacency, ineffectiveness, and access) informed using the World Health Organization’s 3Cs vaccine hesitancy model. All collated tweets were anonymized.ResultsWe identified 91,473 tweets posted between 30 November 2020 and 15 August 2021. A sample of 913 tweets were extracted from the twelve negative topic clusters. Of these, 302 tweets were coded to a vaccine hesitancy theme. ‘Safety’ (29%) and ‘mistrust’ (23%) were the most commonly coded themes; the least commonly coded was ‘under-representation’ (3%). Within the main themes, adverse reactions, inadequate assessment, and rushed development of the vaccines as key findings. Our analysis also revealed widespread sharing of misinformation.ConclusionsUsing an AI-based text analytics tool, we were able to rapidly assess public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination and identify key barriers to uptake from a corpus of geo-located tweets. Our findings support a growing body of evidence and confidence surrounding the use of AI tools to efficiently analyze early sources of soft-intelligence evidence in public health research.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Public concern</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3DAUhUVJoZO0D9CdIGun-otkr8owTdqBKRPIJFshS9e2gkdKJTuhz9CXrp0ZGkrp5t7FOee7By5CHym5oISqT7eESSkk44wRQhkXb9CCCkULyUV5ghazXMz6O3Sa88Pk4aQiC_Rre6MEXuYMOfvQ4pux7r3Fqxga7yBYwLv4bJLLeLW9X38paIXvjbU-QMa7LsWx7fBttN70-Ds4b_A6ZN92Q8YbeIJkWnD47oW8TINv_ItzHQboe98e-GC74H-MkN-jt43pM3w47jN0d321W30rNtuv69VyU1hGuZhm40qlbOOsFI1r6goYVyUYJhRzFTWSyMpIWTogdWlLCZI5qS6NqChRnPEz9PnAfRzrPTgLYUim14_J7036qaPx-m8l-E638UlTqngpZDkRzo-EFOfmg36IYwpTac3UpawordjsogeXTTHnBM2fE5To-Wv6n69NGX7MmH2dvGvhFf3_1G9KvZqa</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Green, Rhiannon</creator><creator>Lanyi, Kate</creator><creator>Marshall, Christopher</creator><creator>Craig, Dawn</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>OP74 Assessing Public Confidence Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Through Social Media Insights Leveraged Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques</title><author>Green, Rhiannon ; Lanyi, Kate ; Marshall, Christopher ; Craig, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2134-c2fd877cfdc64fdfb9e2378ea2472d91a6069a668de0b8c86e62d675a49107323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Public concern</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Rhiannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanyi, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Rhiannon</au><au>Lanyi, Kate</au><au>Marshall, Christopher</au><au>Craig, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP74 Assessing Public Confidence Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Through Social Media Insights Leveraged Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S28</spage><epage>S28</epage><pages>S28-S28</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>IntroductionIn areas where public confidence is low and there is a lack of understanding around behaviors, such as COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, there is a need to explore novel sources of evidence. When leveraged using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, social media data may offer rich insights into public concerns around vaccination. Currently, sources of ‘soft-intelligence’ are underutilized by policy makers, health technology assessment (HTA) and other public health research agencies. In this work, we used an AI platform to rapidly detect and analyze key barriers to vaccine uptake from a sample of geo-located tweets.MethodsAn AI-based tool was deployed using a robust search strategy to capture tweets associated with COVID-19 vaccination, posted from users in London, United Kingdom. The tool’s algorithm automatically clustered tweets based on key topics of discussion and sentiment. Tweets contained within the 12 most populated topics with negative sentiment were extracted. The extracted tweets were mapped to one of six pre-determined themes (safety, mistrust, under-representation, complacency, ineffectiveness, and access) informed using the World Health Organization’s 3Cs vaccine hesitancy model. All collated tweets were anonymized.ResultsWe identified 91,473 tweets posted between 30 November 2020 and 15 August 2021. A sample of 913 tweets were extracted from the twelve negative topic clusters. Of these, 302 tweets were coded to a vaccine hesitancy theme. ‘Safety’ (29%) and ‘mistrust’ (23%) were the most commonly coded themes; the least commonly coded was ‘under-representation’ (3%). Within the main themes, adverse reactions, inadequate assessment, and rushed development of the vaccines as key findings. Our analysis also revealed widespread sharing of misinformation.ConclusionsUsing an AI-based text analytics tool, we were able to rapidly assess public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination and identify key barriers to uptake from a corpus of geo-located tweets. Our findings support a growing body of evidence and confidence surrounding the use of AI tools to efficiently analyze early sources of soft-intelligence evidence in public health research.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266462322001234</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2022-12, Vol.38 (S1), p.S28-S28
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2756911928
source Cambridge Journals
subjects Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Coronaviruses
COVID-19 vaccines
Digital media
Immunization
Medical research
Oral Presentations
Public concern
Public health
Representations
Safety
Social networks
Technology assessment
Vaccines
title OP74 Assessing Public Confidence Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Through Social Media Insights Leveraged Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A41%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP74%20Assessing%20Public%20Confidence%20Towards%20COVID-19%20Vaccines%20Through%20Social%20Media%20Insights%20Leveraged%20Using%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Green,%20Rhiannon&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S28&rft.epage=S28&rft.pages=S28-S28&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462322001234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2756911928%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756911928&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462322001234&rfr_iscdi=true