A Story of Strengths and Weaknesses in Tertiary Education: Evaluating ‘Mobility’ and ‘Opportunities’ in OECD Countries with Composite Indicators
Assuming a high education level associated with a high probability of job occupancy and greater income, comparative exercises analyzing academic performances and socioeconomic dynamics at regional, country, or supra-national scales have intensified in recent years. As far as tertiary education is co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-12, Vol.14 (24), p.16463 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 16463 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Chelli, Francesco Ciommi, Mariateresa Mariani, Francesca Polinesi, Gloria Recchioni, Maria Cristina Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo Salvati, Luca |
description | Assuming a high education level associated with a high probability of job occupancy and greater income, comparative exercises analyzing academic performances and socioeconomic dynamics at regional, country, or supra-national scales have intensified in recent years. As far as tertiary education is concerned, a great disparity in academic performance was characteristic of OECD countries. While adults 25–34 years old were attaining tertiary degrees more frequently than adults 55–64 years old, adults 30–34 years old with at least one tertiary-educated parent were more likely to attain a tertiary degree than individuals from families whose parents have attended secondary—or at least primary—education. ‘Mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ are two dimensions of sustainable education systems that deserve further investigation when assessing disparities in academic performances as a possible source of unsustainable development and social polarizations. ‘Mobility’ refers to the probability of achieving tertiary education for children coming from families with a different—i.e., lower (e.g., secondary or primary)—level of education. ‘Opportunities’ refers to the probability for a child to attain tertiary education, regardless of the education level achieved by the parents. The present study proposes a quantitative assessment of both dimensions through an original approach and novel statistical measures ranking OECD countries. A comparison of individual rankings of ‘mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ reveals counterintuitive results in some cases. To overcome this issue, our study introduces aggregate methods combining the two measures with the aim of developing a bivariate ranking that accounts for both dimensions simultaneously and delineates a more complete evolution of academic performance divides in advanced economies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su142416463 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2756818257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746696983</galeid><sourcerecordid>A746696983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61b61277e191e7f367f675019161258665223e3e693e90586de7b1c15cdd39923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctOAjEUhidGEw268gWauDIG7IVpGXcEUUk0JF7iclJmzkAR2rHteNn5GPp6PokHcYHton__fP9pTk-SHDLaESKjp6FhXd5lsivFVrLHqWJtRlO6vaF3k4MQ5hSXECxjci_57JO76Pw7cRUKD3YaZ4FoW5JH0E8WQoBAjCX34KPRyA3LptDROHtGhi960aC2U_L98XnjJmZh4vv3x9dvHq1xXTsfG2uigbDysdB4ODgnA9fY6NEkrybO8LqsXTARyMiWBss7H_aTnUovAhz8na3k4WJ4P7hqX48vR4P-dbsQisW2ZBPJuFKA7YCqhFSVVCldNcd42pMy5VyAAJkJyCgaJagJK1halKXIMi5aydG6bu3dcwMh5nPXeItP5lylssd6PFVIddbUVC8gN7Zy0esCdwlLUzgLlUG_r7pSZjLrCQwc_wsgE-EtTnUTQj66u_3PnqzZwrsQPFR57c0SPztnNF-NNt8YrfgBdZCY6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756818257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Story of Strengths and Weaknesses in Tertiary Education: Evaluating ‘Mobility’ and ‘Opportunities’ in OECD Countries with Composite Indicators</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Chelli, Francesco ; Ciommi, Mariateresa ; Mariani, Francesca ; Polinesi, Gloria ; Recchioni, Maria Cristina ; Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo ; Salvati, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Chelli, Francesco ; Ciommi, Mariateresa ; Mariani, Francesca ; Polinesi, Gloria ; Recchioni, Maria Cristina ; Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo ; Salvati, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>Assuming a high education level associated with a high probability of job occupancy and greater income, comparative exercises analyzing academic performances and socioeconomic dynamics at regional, country, or supra-national scales have intensified in recent years. As far as tertiary education is concerned, a great disparity in academic performance was characteristic of OECD countries. While adults 25–34 years old were attaining tertiary degrees more frequently than adults 55–64 years old, adults 30–34 years old with at least one tertiary-educated parent were more likely to attain a tertiary degree than individuals from families whose parents have attended secondary—or at least primary—education. ‘Mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ are two dimensions of sustainable education systems that deserve further investigation when assessing disparities in academic performances as a possible source of unsustainable development and social polarizations. ‘Mobility’ refers to the probability of achieving tertiary education for children coming from families with a different—i.e., lower (e.g., secondary or primary)—level of education. ‘Opportunities’ refers to the probability for a child to attain tertiary education, regardless of the education level achieved by the parents. The present study proposes a quantitative assessment of both dimensions through an original approach and novel statistical measures ranking OECD countries. A comparison of individual rankings of ‘mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ reveals counterintuitive results in some cases. To overcome this issue, our study introduces aggregate methods combining the two measures with the aim of developing a bivariate ranking that accounts for both dimensions simultaneously and delineates a more complete evolution of academic performance divides in advanced economies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142416463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adults ; Bivariate analysis ; Children & youth ; Education ; Education, Higher ; Educational aspects ; Educational attainment ; Environmental education ; Evaluation ; Expenditures ; Families & family life ; Gender equity ; Income distribution ; Industrial nations ; Mobility ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Ranking ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Upward mobility</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.14 (24), p.16463</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61b61277e191e7f367f675019161258665223e3e693e90586de7b1c15cdd39923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61b61277e191e7f367f675019161258665223e3e693e90586de7b1c15cdd39923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4068-3411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciommi, Mariateresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polinesi, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recchioni, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvati, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>A Story of Strengths and Weaknesses in Tertiary Education: Evaluating ‘Mobility’ and ‘Opportunities’ in OECD Countries with Composite Indicators</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Assuming a high education level associated with a high probability of job occupancy and greater income, comparative exercises analyzing academic performances and socioeconomic dynamics at regional, country, or supra-national scales have intensified in recent years. As far as tertiary education is concerned, a great disparity in academic performance was characteristic of OECD countries. While adults 25–34 years old were attaining tertiary degrees more frequently than adults 55–64 years old, adults 30–34 years old with at least one tertiary-educated parent were more likely to attain a tertiary degree than individuals from families whose parents have attended secondary—or at least primary—education. ‘Mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ are two dimensions of sustainable education systems that deserve further investigation when assessing disparities in academic performances as a possible source of unsustainable development and social polarizations. ‘Mobility’ refers to the probability of achieving tertiary education for children coming from families with a different—i.e., lower (e.g., secondary or primary)—level of education. ‘Opportunities’ refers to the probability for a child to attain tertiary education, regardless of the education level achieved by the parents. The present study proposes a quantitative assessment of both dimensions through an original approach and novel statistical measures ranking OECD countries. A comparison of individual rankings of ‘mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ reveals counterintuitive results in some cases. To overcome this issue, our study introduces aggregate methods combining the two measures with the aim of developing a bivariate ranking that accounts for both dimensions simultaneously and delineates a more complete evolution of academic performance divides in advanced economies.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Higher</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Environmental education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Industrial nations</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Upward mobility</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkctOAjEUhidGEw268gWauDIG7IVpGXcEUUk0JF7iclJmzkAR2rHteNn5GPp6PokHcYHton__fP9pTk-SHDLaESKjp6FhXd5lsivFVrLHqWJtRlO6vaF3k4MQ5hSXECxjci_57JO76Pw7cRUKD3YaZ4FoW5JH0E8WQoBAjCX34KPRyA3LptDROHtGhi960aC2U_L98XnjJmZh4vv3x9dvHq1xXTsfG2uigbDysdB4ODgnA9fY6NEkrybO8LqsXTARyMiWBss7H_aTnUovAhz8na3k4WJ4P7hqX48vR4P-dbsQisW2ZBPJuFKA7YCqhFSVVCldNcd42pMy5VyAAJkJyCgaJagJK1halKXIMi5aydG6bu3dcwMh5nPXeItP5lylssd6PFVIddbUVC8gN7Zy0esCdwlLUzgLlUG_r7pSZjLrCQwc_wsgE-EtTnUTQj66u_3PnqzZwrsQPFR57c0SPztnNF-NNt8YrfgBdZCY6A</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Chelli, Francesco</creator><creator>Ciommi, Mariateresa</creator><creator>Mariani, Francesca</creator><creator>Polinesi, Gloria</creator><creator>Recchioni, Maria Cristina</creator><creator>Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo</creator><creator>Salvati, Luca</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-3411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>A Story of Strengths and Weaknesses in Tertiary Education: Evaluating ‘Mobility’ and ‘Opportunities’ in OECD Countries with Composite Indicators</title><author>Chelli, Francesco ; Ciommi, Mariateresa ; Mariani, Francesca ; Polinesi, Gloria ; Recchioni, Maria Cristina ; Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo ; Salvati, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61b61277e191e7f367f675019161258665223e3e693e90586de7b1c15cdd39923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Higher</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Environmental education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Industrial nations</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Upward mobility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciommi, Mariateresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polinesi, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recchioni, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvati, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chelli, Francesco</au><au>Ciommi, Mariateresa</au><au>Mariani, Francesca</au><au>Polinesi, Gloria</au><au>Recchioni, Maria Cristina</au><au>Lamonica, Giuseppe Ricciardo</au><au>Salvati, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Story of Strengths and Weaknesses in Tertiary Education: Evaluating ‘Mobility’ and ‘Opportunities’ in OECD Countries with Composite Indicators</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>16463</spage><pages>16463-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Assuming a high education level associated with a high probability of job occupancy and greater income, comparative exercises analyzing academic performances and socioeconomic dynamics at regional, country, or supra-national scales have intensified in recent years. As far as tertiary education is concerned, a great disparity in academic performance was characteristic of OECD countries. While adults 25–34 years old were attaining tertiary degrees more frequently than adults 55–64 years old, adults 30–34 years old with at least one tertiary-educated parent were more likely to attain a tertiary degree than individuals from families whose parents have attended secondary—or at least primary—education. ‘Mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ are two dimensions of sustainable education systems that deserve further investigation when assessing disparities in academic performances as a possible source of unsustainable development and social polarizations. ‘Mobility’ refers to the probability of achieving tertiary education for children coming from families with a different—i.e., lower (e.g., secondary or primary)—level of education. ‘Opportunities’ refers to the probability for a child to attain tertiary education, regardless of the education level achieved by the parents. The present study proposes a quantitative assessment of both dimensions through an original approach and novel statistical measures ranking OECD countries. A comparison of individual rankings of ‘mobility’ and ‘opportunities’ reveals counterintuitive results in some cases. To overcome this issue, our study introduces aggregate methods combining the two measures with the aim of developing a bivariate ranking that accounts for both dimensions simultaneously and delineates a more complete evolution of academic performance divides in advanced economies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142416463</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-3411</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.14 (24), p.16463 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2756818257 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adults Bivariate analysis Children & youth Education Education, Higher Educational aspects Educational attainment Environmental education Evaluation Expenditures Families & family life Gender equity Income distribution Industrial nations Mobility Parents Parents & parenting Ranking Statistical analysis Sustainability Sustainable development Upward mobility |
title | A Story of Strengths and Weaknesses in Tertiary Education: Evaluating ‘Mobility’ and ‘Opportunities’ in OECD Countries with Composite Indicators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Story%20of%20Strengths%20and%20Weaknesses%20in%20Tertiary%20Education:%20Evaluating%20%E2%80%98Mobility%E2%80%99%20and%20%E2%80%98Opportunities%E2%80%99%20in%20OECD%20Countries%20with%20Composite%20Indicators&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Chelli,%20Francesco&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=16463&rft.pages=16463-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142416463&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA746696983%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756818257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A746696983&rfr_iscdi=true |