Fostering Scientific Reasoning Competencies in Undergraduate Laboratories Using “Classical” Kinetics Experiments

Scientific reasoning competencies enable students to engage in scientific inquiry through a wide range of methods, for example by asking questions, formulating hypotheses, and planning, carrying out, and evaluating experiments. Laboratories are particularly suitable to foster these competencies in h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2022-12, Vol.99 (12), p.3915-3922
Hauptverfasser: Reith, Marco, Nehring, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3922
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3915
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 99
creator Reith, Marco
Nehring, Andreas
description Scientific reasoning competencies enable students to engage in scientific inquiry through a wide range of methods, for example by asking questions, formulating hypotheses, and planning, carrying out, and evaluating experiments. Laboratories are particularly suitable to foster these competencies in higher education. In order to give lab educators the opportunity to foster scientific reasoning competencies, we present a learning sequence consisting of four established experiments in the field of kinetics. These include investigating reaction rate dependencies, for example of the reaction between sodium thiosulfate solution with hydrochloric acid solution depending on concentration and temperature and of the reaction between potassium peroxodisulfate solution with potassium iodide solution depending on the choice of catalyst. As a curricular innovation, these classical kinetics experiments are implemented in a manner that students have to reason scientifically including the control of variables strategy. The experiments are sequenced using the steps of confrontation, acquisition, application, reflection, and transfer. Deploying measures of learning support, this sequence allows students to develop a multitude of scientific reasoning skills, helping them to meet an increasing number of quality criteria of scientific investigations for ensuring the validity of their experimentation. We coded the lab reports with regard to fulfilled quality criteria based on a pre- and postevaluation design (N = 46). The results confirm significant gains in students’ scientific reasoning competencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00340
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2756217523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2756217523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-1674427ffe7ca8084e7efcb57e3af4e0750d663bc8c900ee57bb4bb8e82be42e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAjaRWKe1HSd2lqhqAVEJCejasp1JSdU6wXYl2PUgcLmeBIeWLauR5v83f_QRuiZ4RDAlY2X8aGXeYAPViBqMM4ZP0ICUmUhJRsUpGuBoS8tcsHN04f0KY0LzUgxQmLU-gGvsMnkxDdjQ1I1JnkH51vbLSbvpIICNmk8amyxsBW7pVLVVAZK50q1ToXW9uvA9sN99TdbK-8ao9X73nTw2FkJjfDL96GLOJkb4S3RWq7WHq-McosVs-jq5T-dPdw-T23mqaMFDSgrOGOV1DdwogQUDDrXROYdM1Qwwz3FVFJk2wpQYA-Rca6a1AEE1MArZEN0c7naufd-CD3LVbp2NkZLyvKCE5zSLruzgMq713kEtu_incp-SYNnXK2O98livPNYbqfGB-hX_zv5H_ADi54WU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756217523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fostering Scientific Reasoning Competencies in Undergraduate Laboratories Using “Classical” Kinetics Experiments</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Reith, Marco ; Nehring, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Reith, Marco ; Nehring, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific reasoning competencies enable students to engage in scientific inquiry through a wide range of methods, for example by asking questions, formulating hypotheses, and planning, carrying out, and evaluating experiments. Laboratories are particularly suitable to foster these competencies in higher education. In order to give lab educators the opportunity to foster scientific reasoning competencies, we present a learning sequence consisting of four established experiments in the field of kinetics. These include investigating reaction rate dependencies, for example of the reaction between sodium thiosulfate solution with hydrochloric acid solution depending on concentration and temperature and of the reaction between potassium peroxodisulfate solution with potassium iodide solution depending on the choice of catalyst. As a curricular innovation, these classical kinetics experiments are implemented in a manner that students have to reason scientifically including the control of variables strategy. The experiments are sequenced using the steps of confrontation, acquisition, application, reflection, and transfer. Deploying measures of learning support, this sequence allows students to develop a multitude of scientific reasoning skills, helping them to meet an increasing number of quality criteria of scientific investigations for ensuring the validity of their experimentation. We coded the lab reports with regard to fulfilled quality criteria based on a pre- and postevaluation design (N = 46). The results confirm significant gains in students’ scientific reasoning competencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Catalysts ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; College students ; Criteria ; Educational Innovation ; Experimentation ; Higher education ; Hydrochloric acid ; Inquiry method ; Iodides ; Kinetics ; Laboratories ; Laboratory tests ; Learning ; Learning transfer ; Potassium ; Potassium iodides ; Reasoning ; Science education ; Sodium thiosulfate ; Students ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2022-12, Vol.99 (12), p.3915-3922</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Dec 13, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-1674427ffe7ca8084e7efcb57e3af4e0750d663bc8c900ee57bb4bb8e82be42e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2573-3126 ; 0000-0002-8723-5552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00340$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00340$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reith, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nehring, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Fostering Scientific Reasoning Competencies in Undergraduate Laboratories Using “Classical” Kinetics Experiments</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>Scientific reasoning competencies enable students to engage in scientific inquiry through a wide range of methods, for example by asking questions, formulating hypotheses, and planning, carrying out, and evaluating experiments. Laboratories are particularly suitable to foster these competencies in higher education. In order to give lab educators the opportunity to foster scientific reasoning competencies, we present a learning sequence consisting of four established experiments in the field of kinetics. These include investigating reaction rate dependencies, for example of the reaction between sodium thiosulfate solution with hydrochloric acid solution depending on concentration and temperature and of the reaction between potassium peroxodisulfate solution with potassium iodide solution depending on the choice of catalyst. As a curricular innovation, these classical kinetics experiments are implemented in a manner that students have to reason scientifically including the control of variables strategy. The experiments are sequenced using the steps of confrontation, acquisition, application, reflection, and transfer. Deploying measures of learning support, this sequence allows students to develop a multitude of scientific reasoning skills, helping them to meet an increasing number of quality criteria of scientific investigations for ensuring the validity of their experimentation. We coded the lab reports with regard to fulfilled quality criteria based on a pre- and postevaluation design (N = 46). The results confirm significant gains in students’ scientific reasoning competencies.</description><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Educational Innovation</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Hydrochloric acid</subject><subject>Inquiry method</subject><subject>Iodides</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning transfer</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Potassium iodides</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Sodium thiosulfate</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAjaRWKe1HSd2lqhqAVEJCejasp1JSdU6wXYl2PUgcLmeBIeWLauR5v83f_QRuiZ4RDAlY2X8aGXeYAPViBqMM4ZP0ICUmUhJRsUpGuBoS8tcsHN04f0KY0LzUgxQmLU-gGvsMnkxDdjQ1I1JnkH51vbLSbvpIICNmk8amyxsBW7pVLVVAZK50q1ToXW9uvA9sN99TdbK-8ao9X73nTw2FkJjfDL96GLOJkb4S3RWq7WHq-McosVs-jq5T-dPdw-T23mqaMFDSgrOGOV1DdwogQUDDrXROYdM1Qwwz3FVFJk2wpQYA-Rca6a1AEE1MArZEN0c7naufd-CD3LVbp2NkZLyvKCE5zSLruzgMq713kEtu_incp-SYNnXK2O98livPNYbqfGB-hX_zv5H_ADi54WU</recordid><startdate>20221213</startdate><enddate>20221213</enddate><creator>Reith, Marco</creator><creator>Nehring, Andreas</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2573-3126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-5552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221213</creationdate><title>Fostering Scientific Reasoning Competencies in Undergraduate Laboratories Using “Classical” Kinetics Experiments</title><author>Reith, Marco ; Nehring, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-1674427ffe7ca8084e7efcb57e3af4e0750d663bc8c900ee57bb4bb8e82be42e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Educational Innovation</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Hydrochloric acid</topic><topic>Inquiry method</topic><topic>Iodides</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning transfer</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Potassium iodides</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Sodium thiosulfate</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reith, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nehring, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reith, Marco</au><au>Nehring, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fostering Scientific Reasoning Competencies in Undergraduate Laboratories Using “Classical” Kinetics Experiments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2022-12-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3915</spage><epage>3922</epage><pages>3915-3922</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>Scientific reasoning competencies enable students to engage in scientific inquiry through a wide range of methods, for example by asking questions, formulating hypotheses, and planning, carrying out, and evaluating experiments. Laboratories are particularly suitable to foster these competencies in higher education. In order to give lab educators the opportunity to foster scientific reasoning competencies, we present a learning sequence consisting of four established experiments in the field of kinetics. These include investigating reaction rate dependencies, for example of the reaction between sodium thiosulfate solution with hydrochloric acid solution depending on concentration and temperature and of the reaction between potassium peroxodisulfate solution with potassium iodide solution depending on the choice of catalyst. As a curricular innovation, these classical kinetics experiments are implemented in a manner that students have to reason scientifically including the control of variables strategy. The experiments are sequenced using the steps of confrontation, acquisition, application, reflection, and transfer. Deploying measures of learning support, this sequence allows students to develop a multitude of scientific reasoning skills, helping them to meet an increasing number of quality criteria of scientific investigations for ensuring the validity of their experimentation. We coded the lab reports with regard to fulfilled quality criteria based on a pre- and postevaluation design (N = 46). The results confirm significant gains in students’ scientific reasoning competencies.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00340</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2573-3126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-5552</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2022-12, Vol.99 (12), p.3915-3922
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2756217523
source ACS Publications
subjects Catalysts
Cognition & reasoning
College students
Criteria
Educational Innovation
Experimentation
Higher education
Hydrochloric acid
Inquiry method
Iodides
Kinetics
Laboratories
Laboratory tests
Learning
Learning transfer
Potassium
Potassium iodides
Reasoning
Science education
Sodium thiosulfate
Students
Thinking Skills
title Fostering Scientific Reasoning Competencies in Undergraduate Laboratories Using “Classical” Kinetics Experiments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fostering%20Scientific%20Reasoning%20Competencies%20in%20Undergraduate%20Laboratories%20Using%20%E2%80%9CClassical%E2%80%9D%20Kinetics%20Experiments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Reith,%20Marco&rft.date=2022-12-13&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3915&rft.epage=3922&rft.pages=3915-3922&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2756217523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756217523&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true