Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems
Conventional control of fluid systems does not consider system-wide knowledge for optimising energy efficient operation. Distributed control of fluid systems combines reliable local control of components while using system-wide cooperation to ensure energy efficient operation. The presented work com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2023-04 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Logan, Kevin T Stürmer, J Marius Müller, Tim M Pelz, Peter F |
description | Conventional control of fluid systems does not consider system-wide knowledge for optimising energy efficient operation. Distributed control of fluid systems combines reliable local control of components while using system-wide cooperation to ensure energy efficient operation. The presented work compares three approaches to distributed control based on multi-agent systems, distributed model predictive control (DMPC), multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) and market mechanism design. These approaches were applied to a generic fluid system and evaluated with regard to functionality, energy efficient operation, modeling effort, reliability in the face of disruptions, and transparency of control decisions. All approaches were shown to fulfil the functionality, though a trade-off between functional quality and energy efficiency was identified. Increased modeling effort was shown to improve the performance slightly while a strong interdependence of information caused by excessive information sharing has proven to be disadvantageous. DMPC and partially observable MADRL were less sensitive to disruptions than market mechanism. In conclusion, agent-based control of fluid systems achieves greater energy efficiency than conventional methods, with values similar to centralized optimal control and thus represent a viable design approach of fluid system control. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2755698852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2755698852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27556988523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzbEOgjAUheHGxESivMNNnEmwWMCRoMTFSRcnUqRgSWmxtx18exl0dzrDd5J_QQKaJLso31O6IiHiEMcxTTPKWBKQe2nGiVupeyimyRr-eAoEZ-Ao0VnZeCdaKI121igwHVTKyxaub3RiRGg4zmw0XLxyMip6od0PN2TZcYUi_O6abKvTrTxHc-XlBbp6MN7qmWqaMZYe8pzR5L_XB-XwQlk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755698852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Logan, Kevin T ; Stürmer, J Marius ; Müller, Tim M ; Pelz, Peter F</creator><creatorcontrib>Logan, Kevin T ; Stürmer, J Marius ; Müller, Tim M ; Pelz, Peter F</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional control of fluid systems does not consider system-wide knowledge for optimising energy efficient operation. Distributed control of fluid systems combines reliable local control of components while using system-wide cooperation to ensure energy efficient operation. The presented work compares three approaches to distributed control based on multi-agent systems, distributed model predictive control (DMPC), multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) and market mechanism design. These approaches were applied to a generic fluid system and evaluated with regard to functionality, energy efficient operation, modeling effort, reliability in the face of disruptions, and transparency of control decisions. All approaches were shown to fulfil the functionality, though a trade-off between functional quality and energy efficiency was identified. Increased modeling effort was shown to improve the performance slightly while a strong interdependence of information caused by excessive information sharing has proven to be disadvantageous. DMPC and partially observable MADRL were less sensitive to disruptions than market mechanism. In conclusion, agent-based control of fluid systems achieves greater energy efficiency than conventional methods, with values similar to centralized optimal control and thus represent a viable design approach of fluid system control.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Control systems ; Energy efficiency ; Modelling ; Multiagent systems ; Optimal control ; Optimization ; Predictive control ; Reliability analysis</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-04</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logan, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stürmer, J Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Tim M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelz, Peter F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Conventional control of fluid systems does not consider system-wide knowledge for optimising energy efficient operation. Distributed control of fluid systems combines reliable local control of components while using system-wide cooperation to ensure energy efficient operation. The presented work compares three approaches to distributed control based on multi-agent systems, distributed model predictive control (DMPC), multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) and market mechanism design. These approaches were applied to a generic fluid system and evaluated with regard to functionality, energy efficient operation, modeling effort, reliability in the face of disruptions, and transparency of control decisions. All approaches were shown to fulfil the functionality, though a trade-off between functional quality and energy efficiency was identified. Increased modeling effort was shown to improve the performance slightly while a strong interdependence of information caused by excessive information sharing has proven to be disadvantageous. DMPC and partially observable MADRL were less sensitive to disruptions than market mechanism. In conclusion, agent-based control of fluid systems achieves greater energy efficiency than conventional methods, with values similar to centralized optimal control and thus represent a viable design approach of fluid system control.</description><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Multiagent systems</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzbEOgjAUheHGxESivMNNnEmwWMCRoMTFSRcnUqRgSWmxtx18exl0dzrDd5J_QQKaJLso31O6IiHiEMcxTTPKWBKQe2nGiVupeyimyRr-eAoEZ-Ao0VnZeCdaKI121igwHVTKyxaub3RiRGg4zmw0XLxyMip6od0PN2TZcYUi_O6abKvTrTxHc-XlBbp6MN7qmWqaMZYe8pzR5L_XB-XwQlk</recordid><startdate>20230425</startdate><enddate>20230425</enddate><creator>Logan, Kevin T</creator><creator>Stürmer, J Marius</creator><creator>Müller, Tim M</creator><creator>Pelz, Peter F</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230425</creationdate><title>Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems</title><author>Logan, Kevin T ; Stürmer, J Marius ; Müller, Tim M ; Pelz, Peter F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27556988523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Multiagent systems</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logan, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stürmer, J Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Tim M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelz, Peter F</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logan, Kevin T</au><au>Stürmer, J Marius</au><au>Müller, Tim M</au><au>Pelz, Peter F</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-04-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Conventional control of fluid systems does not consider system-wide knowledge for optimising energy efficient operation. Distributed control of fluid systems combines reliable local control of components while using system-wide cooperation to ensure energy efficient operation. The presented work compares three approaches to distributed control based on multi-agent systems, distributed model predictive control (DMPC), multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) and market mechanism design. These approaches were applied to a generic fluid system and evaluated with regard to functionality, energy efficient operation, modeling effort, reliability in the face of disruptions, and transparency of control decisions. All approaches were shown to fulfil the functionality, though a trade-off between functional quality and energy efficiency was identified. Increased modeling effort was shown to improve the performance slightly while a strong interdependence of information caused by excessive information sharing has proven to be disadvantageous. DMPC and partially observable MADRL were less sensitive to disruptions than market mechanism. In conclusion, agent-based control of fluid systems achieves greater energy efficiency than conventional methods, with values similar to centralized optimal control and thus represent a viable design approach of fluid system control.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-04 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2755698852 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Control systems Energy efficiency Modelling Multiagent systems Optimal control Optimization Predictive control Reliability analysis |
title | Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Approaches%20to%20Distributed%20Control%20of%20Fluid%20Systems%20based%20on%20Multi-Agent%20Systems&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Logan,%20Kevin%20T&rft.date=2023-04-25&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2755698852%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755698852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |