Evaluating residents' satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China
The urban residential regeneration strongly supported by the 14th five-year plan of China should achieve social sustainability. Assessing residents' satisfaction with the housing quality and living environment is essential for social sustainability and, therefore, should be considered in any tr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cogent social sciences 2022-12, Vol.8 (1) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Cogent social sciences |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Chen, Jinliu Pellegrini, Paola Xu, Yunqing Ma, Geng Wang, Haoqi an, Yang Shi, Yihan Feng, Xiaoxiao |
| description | The urban residential regeneration strongly supported by the 14th five-year plan of China should achieve social sustainability. Assessing residents' satisfaction with the housing quality and living environment is essential for social sustainability and, therefore, should be considered in any transformation process. This study investigates which factors affect residents' satisfaction significantly in high-dense resettlement neighbourhoods, focusing on housing conditions and the community environment. The selected case study is Nanhuan Village, a large resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou built in the early "80s with medium-density multi-storey buildings and partly transformed with high-density high-rises in 2010. The study analyses residents" satisfaction before and after the regeneration and adopts a mixed research method: in-depth interviews with community managers and designers, fieldwork, and a structured questionnaire survey with residents to determine the influencing factors of satisfaction analysed by a structural equation model. The study identifies 24 indicators and the results highlight what matters for the residents: "community environment", "property management", and "surrounding facilities" are the factors that most significantly impact the residents' satisfaction, even though there are different opinions between the residents of the old part and the regenerated part. The results are surprising: it is not the residential unit that mostly impacts the assessment-once a decent dwelling is provided-but the urban environment. The results also reveal that the densification realized by the transformation is not perceived as a problem. The results of this study can contribute to the definition of the government's urban regeneration policy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2755673153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d6bcd5d438b2441094fad35d7db9bb3d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2755673153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b484dc3253d4dc4481391ee665e7ded091ee39a785220c25a64f67bbcc7372b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxlcIJKrSR0CyxIELCf673txAUQuVKnGgnK2xPZt1tLGL7YDCE_DYeElBnDiNPfPNb-z5uu4lo2tGB_qWC8HYMPRrTjlfcyYlE_pJd7HkV0vh6T_n591VKXtKKZOa6r6_6H5ef4P5CDXEHclYgsdYy2tSWqaM4GpIkVgcU0YC0RMYK-Ym3GHEDEt1Te4nJA4KkjQSIFPYTatGKaGeFiLWOuOhUUnEVrLpmKeUPAmRfD7-mNLxDdlOIcKL7tkIc8Grx3jZfbm5vt9-XN19-nC7fX-3clKxurJykN4JroRvUcqBiQ1D7HuF2qOny0VsQA-Kc-q4gl6OvbbWOS00txtx2d2euT7B3jzkcIB8MgmC-Z1IeWcg1-BmNL63zisvxWB5WyvdyBG8UF57u7FW-MZ6dWY95PT1iKWafftebM83XCvVa8GUaCp1VrmcSsk4_p3KqFk8NH88NIuH5tHD1vfu3Bdi2_8Bvqc8e1PhNKc8ZoguFCP-j_gFahOkYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755673153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating residents' satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Chen, Jinliu ; Pellegrini, Paola ; Xu, Yunqing ; Ma, Geng ; Wang, Haoqi ; an, Yang ; Shi, Yihan ; Feng, Xiaoxiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jinliu ; Pellegrini, Paola ; Xu, Yunqing ; Ma, Geng ; Wang, Haoqi ; an, Yang ; Shi, Yihan ; Feng, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><description>The urban residential regeneration strongly supported by the 14th five-year plan of China should achieve social sustainability. Assessing residents' satisfaction with the housing quality and living environment is essential for social sustainability and, therefore, should be considered in any transformation process. This study investigates which factors affect residents' satisfaction significantly in high-dense resettlement neighbourhoods, focusing on housing conditions and the community environment. The selected case study is Nanhuan Village, a large resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou built in the early "80s with medium-density multi-storey buildings and partly transformed with high-density high-rises in 2010. The study analyses residents" satisfaction before and after the regeneration and adopts a mixed research method: in-depth interviews with community managers and designers, fieldwork, and a structured questionnaire survey with residents to determine the influencing factors of satisfaction analysed by a structural equation model. The study identifies 24 indicators and the results highlight what matters for the residents: "community environment", "property management", and "surrounding facilities" are the factors that most significantly impact the residents' satisfaction, even though there are different opinions between the residents of the old part and the regenerated part. The results are surprising: it is not the residential unit that mostly impacts the assessment-once a decent dwelling is provided-but the urban environment. The results also reveal that the densification realized by the transformation is not perceived as a problem. The results of this study can contribute to the definition of the government's urban regeneration policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-1886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-1886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Cities ; College professors ; Community ; Community property ; Community satisfaction ; Construction ; Councils ; Density ; Design ; Environment ; high density ; Housing ; Neighborhoods ; Questionnaires ; Relocation ; Research methodology ; resettlement community ; Residents ; residents' satisfaction ; Rural communities ; Satisfaction ; Social sciences ; Social sustainability ; Sociology ; structural equation model ; Structural equation modeling ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable regeneration ; Transformation ; Urban areas ; Urban planning ; Urban policy ; Urban population ; Urban renewal ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Cogent social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.8 (1)</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b484dc3253d4dc4481391ee665e7ded091ee39a785220c25a64f67bbcc7372b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b484dc3253d4dc4481391ee665e7ded091ee39a785220c25a64f67bbcc7372b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27321,27479,27843,27901,27902,33751,59116,59117</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jinliu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yunqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Geng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haoqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>an, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating residents' satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China</title><title>Cogent social sciences</title><description>The urban residential regeneration strongly supported by the 14th five-year plan of China should achieve social sustainability. Assessing residents' satisfaction with the housing quality and living environment is essential for social sustainability and, therefore, should be considered in any transformation process. This study investigates which factors affect residents' satisfaction significantly in high-dense resettlement neighbourhoods, focusing on housing conditions and the community environment. The selected case study is Nanhuan Village, a large resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou built in the early "80s with medium-density multi-storey buildings and partly transformed with high-density high-rises in 2010. The study analyses residents" satisfaction before and after the regeneration and adopts a mixed research method: in-depth interviews with community managers and designers, fieldwork, and a structured questionnaire survey with residents to determine the influencing factors of satisfaction analysed by a structural equation model. The study identifies 24 indicators and the results highlight what matters for the residents: "community environment", "property management", and "surrounding facilities" are the factors that most significantly impact the residents' satisfaction, even though there are different opinions between the residents of the old part and the regenerated part. The results are surprising: it is not the residential unit that mostly impacts the assessment-once a decent dwelling is provided-but the urban environment. The results also reveal that the densification realized by the transformation is not perceived as a problem. The results of this study can contribute to the definition of the government's urban regeneration policy.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community property</subject><subject>Community satisfaction</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>high density</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>resettlement community</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>residents' satisfaction</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>structural equation model</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable regeneration</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urban policy</subject><subject>Urban population</subject><subject>Urban renewal</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>2331-1886</issn><issn>2331-1886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9uEzEQxlcIJKrSR0CyxIELCf673txAUQuVKnGgnK2xPZt1tLGL7YDCE_DYeElBnDiNPfPNb-z5uu4lo2tGB_qWC8HYMPRrTjlfcyYlE_pJd7HkV0vh6T_n591VKXtKKZOa6r6_6H5ef4P5CDXEHclYgsdYy2tSWqaM4GpIkVgcU0YC0RMYK-Ym3GHEDEt1Te4nJA4KkjQSIFPYTatGKaGeFiLWOuOhUUnEVrLpmKeUPAmRfD7-mNLxDdlOIcKL7tkIc8Grx3jZfbm5vt9-XN19-nC7fX-3clKxurJykN4JroRvUcqBiQ1D7HuF2qOny0VsQA-Kc-q4gl6OvbbWOS00txtx2d2euT7B3jzkcIB8MgmC-Z1IeWcg1-BmNL63zisvxWB5WyvdyBG8UF57u7FW-MZ6dWY95PT1iKWafftebM83XCvVa8GUaCp1VrmcSsk4_p3KqFk8NH88NIuH5tHD1vfu3Bdi2_8Bvqc8e1PhNKc8ZoguFCP-j_gFahOkYg</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Chen, Jinliu</creator><creator>Pellegrini, Paola</creator><creator>Xu, Yunqing</creator><creator>Ma, Geng</creator><creator>Wang, Haoqi</creator><creator>an, Yang</creator><creator>Shi, Yihan</creator><creator>Feng, Xiaoxiao</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Evaluating residents' satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China</title><author>Chen, Jinliu ; Pellegrini, Paola ; Xu, Yunqing ; Ma, Geng ; Wang, Haoqi ; an, Yang ; Shi, Yihan ; Feng, Xiaoxiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b484dc3253d4dc4481391ee665e7ded091ee39a785220c25a64f67bbcc7372b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community property</topic><topic>Community satisfaction</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>high density</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>resettlement community</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>residents' satisfaction</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>structural equation model</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable regeneration</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urban policy</topic><topic>Urban population</topic><topic>Urban renewal</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jinliu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yunqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Geng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haoqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>an, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cogent social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Jinliu</au><au>Pellegrini, Paola</au><au>Xu, Yunqing</au><au>Ma, Geng</au><au>Wang, Haoqi</au><au>an, Yang</au><au>Shi, Yihan</au><au>Feng, Xiaoxiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating residents' satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China</atitle><jtitle>Cogent social sciences</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2331-1886</issn><eissn>2331-1886</eissn><abstract>The urban residential regeneration strongly supported by the 14th five-year plan of China should achieve social sustainability. Assessing residents' satisfaction with the housing quality and living environment is essential for social sustainability and, therefore, should be considered in any transformation process. This study investigates which factors affect residents' satisfaction significantly in high-dense resettlement neighbourhoods, focusing on housing conditions and the community environment. The selected case study is Nanhuan Village, a large resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou built in the early "80s with medium-density multi-storey buildings and partly transformed with high-density high-rises in 2010. The study analyses residents" satisfaction before and after the regeneration and adopts a mixed research method: in-depth interviews with community managers and designers, fieldwork, and a structured questionnaire survey with residents to determine the influencing factors of satisfaction analysed by a structural equation model. The study identifies 24 indicators and the results highlight what matters for the residents: "community environment", "property management", and "surrounding facilities" are the factors that most significantly impact the residents' satisfaction, even though there are different opinions between the residents of the old part and the regenerated part. The results are surprising: it is not the residential unit that mostly impacts the assessment-once a decent dwelling is provided-but the urban environment. The results also reveal that the densification realized by the transformation is not perceived as a problem. The results of this study can contribute to the definition of the government's urban regeneration policy.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2331-1886 |
| ispartof | Cogent social sciences, 2022-12, Vol.8 (1) |
| issn | 2331-1886 2331-1886 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2755673153 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Case studies Cities College professors Community Community property Community satisfaction Construction Councils Density Design Environment high density Housing Neighborhoods Questionnaires Relocation Research methodology resettlement community Residents residents' satisfaction Rural communities Satisfaction Social sciences Social sustainability Sociology structural equation model Structural equation modeling Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable regeneration Transformation Urban areas Urban planning Urban policy Urban population Urban renewal Urbanization |
| title | Evaluating residents' satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20residents'%20satisfaction%20before%20and%20after%20regeneration.%20The%20case%20of%20a%20high-density%20resettlement%20neighbourhood%20in%20Suzhou,%20China&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Chen,%20Jinliu&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2331-1886&rft.eissn=2331-1886&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2755673153%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755673153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d6bcd5d438b2441094fad35d7db9bb3d&rfr_iscdi=true |