Comparison of physicochemical and sensory properties between normal and DFD boar meats

The physicochemical and sensory properties of normal and high pH (DFD) meats from wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) were compared. Each sample of boar meat (M. longissimus thoracis) was cut to a thickness of 1 cm, placed in boiling NaCl aqueous solution (10 g/L) and heated for 2 minutes after the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 2022/05/25, Vol.93(2), pp.133-138
Hauptverfasser: SUZUKI, Yuiko, NAKAI, Mizuho, INOUE, Sakumi, KURABE, Suzumi, KINOSHITA, Kazunari, HIRATA, Shigeki, MURAMOTO, Takayuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 133
container_title Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho
container_volume 93
creator SUZUKI, Yuiko
NAKAI, Mizuho
INOUE, Sakumi
KURABE, Suzumi
KINOSHITA, Kazunari
HIRATA, Shigeki
MURAMOTO, Takayuki
description The physicochemical and sensory properties of normal and high pH (DFD) meats from wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) were compared. Each sample of boar meat (M. longissimus thoracis) was cut to a thickness of 1 cm, placed in boiling NaCl aqueous solution (10 g/L) and heated for 2 minutes after the center temperature reached 90°C. Cooking loss and maximum load of each sample were analyzed, and sensory evaluations were performed to compare juiciness, toughness, taste, and flavor between normal and DFD samples. Cooking loss, maximum load, and toughness were significantly lower in DFD samples compared with normal samples. There were no significant differences in juiciness, taste, and flavor between DFD and normal boar meat. These results suggest that at least DFD boar meat was not inferior to normal boar meat in juiciness, taste, and flavor ; however, the water holding capacity during cooking is higher in DFD boar meat compared with normal boar meat and DFD boar meat is more tender than normal boar meat.
doi_str_mv 10.2508/chikusan.93.133
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2754598436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2754598436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1556-4e3a02134782209f306ea5aa4b96bc2b3462d9654b6e458a788da95440d748e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4soOObOXgOeO9P8anLUzakw8KLiLby2r65zbWrSIfvvjWyKXjzlQT7f9758kuQ8o1Mmqb4sV83bNkA3NXyacX6UjDKtaaqZlMdx5kKlhuYvp8kkhKaglGd5RnM2Sp5nru3BN8F1xNWkX-1CU7pyhW1TwoZAV5GAXXB-R3rvevRDg4EUOHwgdqRzvj1Q88WcFA48aRGGcJac1LAJODm84-RpcfM4u0uXD7f3s6tlWmZSqlQgB8pivVwzRk3NqUKQAKIwqihZEXuzyigpCoVCasi1rsBIIWiVC42Sj5OL_d5Y7n2LYbBrt_VdPGlZLoU0WnD1L6U0z5SJUKQu91TpXQgea9v7pgW_sxm1X5btt2VruI2WY-J6n1iHAV7xh4doqdzgH54dQr8-wVvs-CfNh4kU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2683169363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of physicochemical and sensory properties between normal and DFD boar meats</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AgriKnowledge(アグリナレッジ)AGROLib</source><creator>SUZUKI, Yuiko ; NAKAI, Mizuho ; INOUE, Sakumi ; KURABE, Suzumi ; KINOSHITA, Kazunari ; HIRATA, Shigeki ; MURAMOTO, Takayuki</creator><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Yuiko ; NAKAI, Mizuho ; INOUE, Sakumi ; KURABE, Suzumi ; KINOSHITA, Kazunari ; HIRATA, Shigeki ; MURAMOTO, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><description>The physicochemical and sensory properties of normal and high pH (DFD) meats from wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) were compared. Each sample of boar meat (M. longissimus thoracis) was cut to a thickness of 1 cm, placed in boiling NaCl aqueous solution (10 g/L) and heated for 2 minutes after the center temperature reached 90°C. Cooking loss and maximum load of each sample were analyzed, and sensory evaluations were performed to compare juiciness, toughness, taste, and flavor between normal and DFD samples. Cooking loss, maximum load, and toughness were significantly lower in DFD samples compared with normal samples. There were no significant differences in juiciness, taste, and flavor between DFD and normal boar meat. These results suggest that at least DFD boar meat was not inferior to normal boar meat in juiciness, taste, and flavor ; however, the water holding capacity during cooking is higher in DFD boar meat compared with normal boar meat and DFD boar meat is more tender than normal boar meat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1346-907X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1880-8255</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2508/chikusan.93.133</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Tokyo: Japanese Society of Animal Science</publisher><subject>Aqueous solutions ; Cooking ; DFD ; Flavor ; Flavors ; Meat ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory properties ; Sodium chloride ; Sus scrofa leucomystax ; Taste ; tenderness ; Toughness ; water holding capacity ; wild boar meat</subject><ispartof>Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 2022/05/25, Vol.93(2), pp.133-138</ispartof><rights>2022 by Japanese Society of Animal Science</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1556-4e3a02134782209f306ea5aa4b96bc2b3462d9654b6e458a788da95440d748e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Yuiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAI, Mizuho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INOUE, Sakumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURABE, Suzumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KINOSHITA, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRATA, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURAMOTO, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of physicochemical and sensory properties between normal and DFD boar meats</title><title>Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho</title><addtitle>Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho</addtitle><description>The physicochemical and sensory properties of normal and high pH (DFD) meats from wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) were compared. Each sample of boar meat (M. longissimus thoracis) was cut to a thickness of 1 cm, placed in boiling NaCl aqueous solution (10 g/L) and heated for 2 minutes after the center temperature reached 90°C. Cooking loss and maximum load of each sample were analyzed, and sensory evaluations were performed to compare juiciness, toughness, taste, and flavor between normal and DFD samples. Cooking loss, maximum load, and toughness were significantly lower in DFD samples compared with normal samples. There were no significant differences in juiciness, taste, and flavor between DFD and normal boar meat. These results suggest that at least DFD boar meat was not inferior to normal boar meat in juiciness, taste, and flavor ; however, the water holding capacity during cooking is higher in DFD boar meat compared with normal boar meat and DFD boar meat is more tender than normal boar meat.</description><subject>Aqueous solutions</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>DFD</subject><subject>Flavor</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Sus scrofa leucomystax</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>tenderness</subject><subject>Toughness</subject><subject>water holding capacity</subject><subject>wild boar meat</subject><issn>1346-907X</issn><issn>1880-8255</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4soOObOXgOeO9P8anLUzakw8KLiLby2r65zbWrSIfvvjWyKXjzlQT7f9758kuQ8o1Mmqb4sV83bNkA3NXyacX6UjDKtaaqZlMdx5kKlhuYvp8kkhKaglGd5RnM2Sp5nru3BN8F1xNWkX-1CU7pyhW1TwoZAV5GAXXB-R3rvevRDg4EUOHwgdqRzvj1Q88WcFA48aRGGcJac1LAJODm84-RpcfM4u0uXD7f3s6tlWmZSqlQgB8pivVwzRk3NqUKQAKIwqihZEXuzyigpCoVCasi1rsBIIWiVC42Sj5OL_d5Y7n2LYbBrt_VdPGlZLoU0WnD1L6U0z5SJUKQu91TpXQgea9v7pgW_sxm1X5btt2VruI2WY-J6n1iHAV7xh4doqdzgH54dQr8-wVvs-CfNh4kU</recordid><startdate>20220525</startdate><enddate>20220525</enddate><creator>SUZUKI, Yuiko</creator><creator>NAKAI, Mizuho</creator><creator>INOUE, Sakumi</creator><creator>KURABE, Suzumi</creator><creator>KINOSHITA, Kazunari</creator><creator>HIRATA, Shigeki</creator><creator>MURAMOTO, Takayuki</creator><general>Japanese Society of Animal Science</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220525</creationdate><title>Comparison of physicochemical and sensory properties between normal and DFD boar meats</title><author>SUZUKI, Yuiko ; NAKAI, Mizuho ; INOUE, Sakumi ; KURABE, Suzumi ; KINOSHITA, Kazunari ; HIRATA, Shigeki ; MURAMOTO, Takayuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1556-4e3a02134782209f306ea5aa4b96bc2b3462d9654b6e458a788da95440d748e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aqueous solutions</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>DFD</topic><topic>Flavor</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Sus scrofa leucomystax</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>tenderness</topic><topic>Toughness</topic><topic>water holding capacity</topic><topic>wild boar meat</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Yuiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAI, Mizuho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INOUE, Sakumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURABE, Suzumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KINOSHITA, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRATA, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURAMOTO, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SUZUKI, Yuiko</au><au>NAKAI, Mizuho</au><au>INOUE, Sakumi</au><au>KURABE, Suzumi</au><au>KINOSHITA, Kazunari</au><au>HIRATA, Shigeki</au><au>MURAMOTO, Takayuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of physicochemical and sensory properties between normal and DFD boar meats</atitle><jtitle>Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho</jtitle><addtitle>Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho</addtitle><date>2022-05-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>133-138</pages><issn>1346-907X</issn><eissn>1880-8255</eissn><abstract>The physicochemical and sensory properties of normal and high pH (DFD) meats from wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) were compared. Each sample of boar meat (M. longissimus thoracis) was cut to a thickness of 1 cm, placed in boiling NaCl aqueous solution (10 g/L) and heated for 2 minutes after the center temperature reached 90°C. Cooking loss and maximum load of each sample were analyzed, and sensory evaluations were performed to compare juiciness, toughness, taste, and flavor between normal and DFD samples. Cooking loss, maximum load, and toughness were significantly lower in DFD samples compared with normal samples. There were no significant differences in juiciness, taste, and flavor between DFD and normal boar meat. These results suggest that at least DFD boar meat was not inferior to normal boar meat in juiciness, taste, and flavor ; however, the water holding capacity during cooking is higher in DFD boar meat compared with normal boar meat and DFD boar meat is more tender than normal boar meat.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Japanese Society of Animal Science</pub><doi>10.2508/chikusan.93.133</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1346-907X
ispartof Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 2022/05/25, Vol.93(2), pp.133-138
issn 1346-907X
1880-8255
language jpn
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2754598436
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; AgriKnowledge(アグリナレッジ)AGROLib
subjects Aqueous solutions
Cooking
DFD
Flavor
Flavors
Meat
Sensory evaluation
Sensory properties
Sodium chloride
Sus scrofa leucomystax
Taste
tenderness
Toughness
water holding capacity
wild boar meat
title Comparison of physicochemical and sensory properties between normal and DFD boar meats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20physicochemical%20and%20sensory%20properties%20between%20normal%20and%20DFD%20boar%20meats&rft.jtitle=Nihon%20Chikusan%20Gakkaiho&rft.au=SUZUKI,%20Yuiko&rft.date=2022-05-25&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=133-138&rft.issn=1346-907X&rft.eissn=1880-8255&rft_id=info:doi/10.2508/chikusan.93.133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2754598436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2683169363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true