The NFT Boom and Bust: Musicians as Productive Laborers in the Post-Streaming Music Industry
Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of popular music studies 2022-12, Vol.34 (4), p.39-60 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Journal of popular music studies |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Krasikov, Hannah N |
description | Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that was exacerbated over the course of the coronavirus pandemic. Following the successful debut of non-fungible token (NFT) collections by musicians including Grimes, Kings of Leon, and deadmau5 early in 2021, some of the biggest mainstream reporters in music began calling NFTs the future of the music industry. The decentralized funding structure NFTs offered appeared to provide a solution for compensating artists fairly; however, in practice, NFTs have primarily only benefitted musicians of celebrity status. This article provides a brief introduction to non-fungible tokens and examines why they have appealed to musicians. Additionally, it establishes the difference between visual art NFTs and music NFTs by situating the latter within both historical and neoliberal capitalist understandings of musical value. Drawing from evidence demonstrating how NFTs have been used in practice, this essay suggests that by assetizing music, NFTs re-legitimize the undervaluing of musicians by establishing them as productive laborers in technoscientific capitalist societies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2753881220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753881220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-e13a9176fea934c5732917ef3964f840f8361ae68bb3686f448a99b0cbe10f973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjb1PAjEchhsjiQQZGdwucW7p76O9dhQiSkJkOWbSYhslwp307v8Xo9P7PMvzCvEAWoFBMz92p6JQIypixYr8jRiDIZJgvLv9ZWSJiPZOTEv5jNowa-utGYtZ85Gqt1VTLdr2VIXze7UYSn8vRjl8lTT934nYrZ6b5avcbF_Wy6eN7MBRLxNQ8FDbnIInPpia8Kopk7ecHevsyEJI1sVI1tnM7IL3UR9iAp19TRPx-NftLu33kEq_P7bD5Xy93GNtyDlA1PQD8WI7MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753881220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The NFT Boom and Bust: Musicians as Productive Laborers in the Post-Streaming Music Industry</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Krasikov, Hannah N</creator><creatorcontrib>Krasikov, Hannah N</creatorcontrib><description>Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that was exacerbated over the course of the coronavirus pandemic. Following the successful debut of non-fungible token (NFT) collections by musicians including Grimes, Kings of Leon, and deadmau5 early in 2021, some of the biggest mainstream reporters in music began calling NFTs the future of the music industry. The decentralized funding structure NFTs offered appeared to provide a solution for compensating artists fairly; however, in practice, NFTs have primarily only benefitted musicians of celebrity status. This article provides a brief introduction to non-fungible tokens and examines why they have appealed to musicians. Additionally, it establishes the difference between visual art NFTs and music NFTs by situating the latter within both historical and neoliberal capitalist understandings of musical value. Drawing from evidence demonstrating how NFTs have been used in practice, this essay suggests that by assetizing music, NFTs re-legitimize the undervaluing of musicians by establishing them as productive laborers in technoscientific capitalist societies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-2226</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Music ; Musicians & conductors ; Non-fungible tokens ; Streaming media ; Streaming services</subject><ispartof>Journal of popular music studies, 2022-12, Vol.34 (4), p.39-60</ispartof><rights>2022 by the International Association for the Study of Popular Music, U.S. Branch (IASPM-US)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krasikov, Hannah N</creatorcontrib><title>The NFT Boom and Bust: Musicians as Productive Laborers in the Post-Streaming Music Industry</title><title>Journal of popular music studies</title><description>Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that was exacerbated over the course of the coronavirus pandemic. Following the successful debut of non-fungible token (NFT) collections by musicians including Grimes, Kings of Leon, and deadmau5 early in 2021, some of the biggest mainstream reporters in music began calling NFTs the future of the music industry. The decentralized funding structure NFTs offered appeared to provide a solution for compensating artists fairly; however, in practice, NFTs have primarily only benefitted musicians of celebrity status. This article provides a brief introduction to non-fungible tokens and examines why they have appealed to musicians. Additionally, it establishes the difference between visual art NFTs and music NFTs by situating the latter within both historical and neoliberal capitalist understandings of musical value. Drawing from evidence demonstrating how NFTs have been used in practice, this essay suggests that by assetizing music, NFTs re-legitimize the undervaluing of musicians by establishing them as productive laborers in technoscientific capitalist societies.</description><subject>Music</subject><subject>Musicians & conductors</subject><subject>Non-fungible tokens</subject><subject>Streaming media</subject><subject>Streaming services</subject><issn>1524-2226</issn><issn>1533-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjb1PAjEchhsjiQQZGdwucW7p76O9dhQiSkJkOWbSYhslwp307v8Xo9P7PMvzCvEAWoFBMz92p6JQIypixYr8jRiDIZJgvLv9ZWSJiPZOTEv5jNowa-utGYtZ85Gqt1VTLdr2VIXze7UYSn8vRjl8lTT934nYrZ6b5avcbF_Wy6eN7MBRLxNQ8FDbnIInPpia8Kopk7ecHevsyEJI1sVI1tnM7IL3UR9iAp19TRPx-NftLu33kEq_P7bD5Xy93GNtyDlA1PQD8WI7MA</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Krasikov, Hannah N</creator><general>University of California Press</general><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>The NFT Boom and Bust</title><author>Krasikov, Hannah N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-e13a9176fea934c5732917ef3964f840f8361ae68bb3686f448a99b0cbe10f973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Music</topic><topic>Musicians & conductors</topic><topic>Non-fungible tokens</topic><topic>Streaming media</topic><topic>Streaming services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krasikov, Hannah N</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of popular music studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krasikov, Hannah N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The NFT Boom and Bust: Musicians as Productive Laborers in the Post-Streaming Music Industry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of popular music studies</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>39-60</pages><issn>1524-2226</issn><eissn>1533-1598</eissn><abstract>Since the popularization of digital music downloading and streaming services beginning in 1999 with Napster, artists have struggled to recover financially from the decline of physical album sales. Streaming services like Spotify have been scrutinized for low royalty payments to artists—an issue that was exacerbated over the course of the coronavirus pandemic. Following the successful debut of non-fungible token (NFT) collections by musicians including Grimes, Kings of Leon, and deadmau5 early in 2021, some of the biggest mainstream reporters in music began calling NFTs the future of the music industry. The decentralized funding structure NFTs offered appeared to provide a solution for compensating artists fairly; however, in practice, NFTs have primarily only benefitted musicians of celebrity status. This article provides a brief introduction to non-fungible tokens and examines why they have appealed to musicians. Additionally, it establishes the difference between visual art NFTs and music NFTs by situating the latter within both historical and neoliberal capitalist understandings of musical value. Drawing from evidence demonstrating how NFTs have been used in practice, this essay suggests that by assetizing music, NFTs re-legitimize the undervaluing of musicians by establishing them as productive laborers in technoscientific capitalist societies.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-2226 |
ispartof | Journal of popular music studies, 2022-12, Vol.34 (4), p.39-60 |
issn | 1524-2226 1533-1598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2753881220 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Music Musicians & conductors Non-fungible tokens Streaming media Streaming services |
title | The NFT Boom and Bust: Musicians as Productive Laborers in the Post-Streaming Music Industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A37%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20NFT%20Boom%20and%20Bust:%20Musicians%20as%20Productive%20Laborers%20in%20the%20Post-Streaming%20Music%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20popular%20music%20studies&rft.au=Krasikov,%20Hannah%20N&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=39-60&rft.issn=1524-2226&rft.eissn=1533-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/jpms.2022.34.4.39&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2753881220%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753881220&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |