Sadder ≠ Wiser: Depressive Realism Is Not Robust to Replication

The theory of depressive realism holds that depressed individuals are less prone to optimistic bias, and are thus more realistic, in assessing their control or performance. Since the theory was proposed 40 years ago, many innovations have been validated for testing cognitive accuracy, including impr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Collabra. Psychology 2022-10, Vol.8 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Dev, Amelia S, Moore, Don A, Johnson, Sheri L, Garrett, Karin T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Collabra. Psychology
container_volume 8
creator Dev, Amelia S
Moore, Don A
Johnson, Sheri L
Garrett, Karin T
description The theory of depressive realism holds that depressed individuals are less prone to optimistic bias, and are thus more realistic, in assessing their control or performance. Since the theory was proposed 40 years ago, many innovations have been validated for testing cognitive accuracy, including improved measures of bias in perceived control and performance. We incorporate several of those innovations in a well-powered, pre-registered study designed to identify depressive realism. Amazon MTurk workers (N = 246) and undergraduate students (N = 134) completed a classic contingency task, an overconfidence task, and measures of mental health constructs, including depression and anxiety. We measured perceived control throughout the contingency task, allowing us to compare control estimates at the trial-level to estimates assessed at task conclusion. We found no evidence that depressive symptoms relate to illusory control or to overconfidence. Our results suggest that despite its popular acceptance, depressive realism is not replicable.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/collabra.38529
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2753691147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A802996595</galeid><sourcerecordid>A802996595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-af6a4c6c095688daf72df54d916b8324eeae8ef040cc102a6c414baaed31db803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctKA0EQRQdRMGi2rgdcuUjs1_T0uAvxFQgKieKyqempCR0m6djdEf0E_8Jv80scX2gg1KKKqnNvLW6SHFHSpxnLTo1rGig99LnKWLGTdJjIRS_nhdj9N-8n3RDmhBBGpZKcd5LBFKoKffr--pY-2ID-LD3HlccQ7BOmE4TGhkU6CumNi-nElesQ0-jaw6qxBqJ1y8Nkr4YmYPenHyT3lxd3w-ve-PZqNByMe4ZzFXtQSxBGGlJkUqkK6pxVdSaqgspScSYQARXWRBBjKGEgjaCiBMCK06pUhB8kx9--K-8e1xiinru1X7YvNcszLgtKRf5HzaBBbZe1ix7MwgajB4qwopBZkbVUfwvVVoULa9wSa9vuNwQnG4KWifgcZ7AOQY-mk63mxrsQPNZ65e0C_IumRH-GpX_D0l9h8Q9hSIcd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753691147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sadder ≠ Wiser: Depressive Realism Is Not Robust to Replication</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dev, Amelia S ; Moore, Don A ; Johnson, Sheri L ; Garrett, Karin T</creator><contributor>Inbar, Yoel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dev, Amelia S ; Moore, Don A ; Johnson, Sheri L ; Garrett, Karin T ; Inbar, Yoel</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of depressive realism holds that depressed individuals are less prone to optimistic bias, and are thus more realistic, in assessing their control or performance. Since the theory was proposed 40 years ago, many innovations have been validated for testing cognitive accuracy, including improved measures of bias in perceived control and performance. We incorporate several of those innovations in a well-powered, pre-registered study designed to identify depressive realism. Amazon MTurk workers (N = 246) and undergraduate students (N = 134) completed a classic contingency task, an overconfidence task, and measures of mental health constructs, including depression and anxiety. We measured perceived control throughout the contingency task, allowing us to compare control estimates at the trial-level to estimates assessed at task conclusion. We found no evidence that depressive symptoms relate to illusory control or to overconfidence. Our results suggest that despite its popular acceptance, depressive realism is not replicable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2474-7394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2474-7394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/collabra.38529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oakland: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; College students ; Depression, Mental ; Estimates ; Hypotheses ; Mental depression ; Mental health ; Missing data ; Realism ; Sample size</subject><ispartof>Collabra. Psychology, 2022-10, Vol.8 (1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 University of California Press</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-af6a4c6c095688daf72df54d916b8324eeae8ef040cc102a6c414baaed31db803</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6537-9598 ; 0000-0003-0989-5421</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Inbar, Yoel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dev, Amelia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Don A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Sheri L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Karin T</creatorcontrib><title>Sadder ≠ Wiser: Depressive Realism Is Not Robust to Replication</title><title>Collabra. Psychology</title><description>The theory of depressive realism holds that depressed individuals are less prone to optimistic bias, and are thus more realistic, in assessing their control or performance. Since the theory was proposed 40 years ago, many innovations have been validated for testing cognitive accuracy, including improved measures of bias in perceived control and performance. We incorporate several of those innovations in a well-powered, pre-registered study designed to identify depressive realism. Amazon MTurk workers (N = 246) and undergraduate students (N = 134) completed a classic contingency task, an overconfidence task, and measures of mental health constructs, including depression and anxiety. We measured perceived control throughout the contingency task, allowing us to compare control estimates at the trial-level to estimates assessed at task conclusion. We found no evidence that depressive symptoms relate to illusory control or to overconfidence. Our results suggest that despite its popular acceptance, depressive realism is not replicable.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><issn>2474-7394</issn><issn>2474-7394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkctKA0EQRQdRMGi2rgdcuUjs1_T0uAvxFQgKieKyqempCR0m6djdEf0E_8Jv80scX2gg1KKKqnNvLW6SHFHSpxnLTo1rGig99LnKWLGTdJjIRS_nhdj9N-8n3RDmhBBGpZKcd5LBFKoKffr--pY-2ID-LD3HlccQ7BOmE4TGhkU6CumNi-nElesQ0-jaw6qxBqJ1y8Nkr4YmYPenHyT3lxd3w-ve-PZqNByMe4ZzFXtQSxBGGlJkUqkK6pxVdSaqgspScSYQARXWRBBjKGEgjaCiBMCK06pUhB8kx9--K-8e1xiinru1X7YvNcszLgtKRf5HzaBBbZe1ix7MwgajB4qwopBZkbVUfwvVVoULa9wSa9vuNwQnG4KWifgcZ7AOQY-mk63mxrsQPNZ65e0C_IumRH-GpX_D0l9h8Q9hSIcd</recordid><startdate>20221006</startdate><enddate>20221006</enddate><creator>Dev, Amelia S</creator><creator>Moore, Don A</creator><creator>Johnson, Sheri L</creator><creator>Garrett, Karin T</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>University of California Press, Journals &amp; Digital Publishing Division</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-9598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-5421</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221006</creationdate><title>Sadder ≠ Wiser: Depressive Realism Is Not Robust to Replication</title><author>Dev, Amelia S ; Moore, Don A ; Johnson, Sheri L ; Garrett, Karin T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-af6a4c6c095688daf72df54d916b8324eeae8ef040cc102a6c414baaed31db803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dev, Amelia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Don A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Sheri L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Karin T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Collabra. Psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dev, Amelia S</au><au>Moore, Don A</au><au>Johnson, Sheri L</au><au>Garrett, Karin T</au><au>Inbar, Yoel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sadder ≠ Wiser: Depressive Realism Is Not Robust to Replication</atitle><jtitle>Collabra. Psychology</jtitle><date>2022-10-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2474-7394</issn><eissn>2474-7394</eissn><abstract>The theory of depressive realism holds that depressed individuals are less prone to optimistic bias, and are thus more realistic, in assessing their control or performance. Since the theory was proposed 40 years ago, many innovations have been validated for testing cognitive accuracy, including improved measures of bias in perceived control and performance. We incorporate several of those innovations in a well-powered, pre-registered study designed to identify depressive realism. Amazon MTurk workers (N = 246) and undergraduate students (N = 134) completed a classic contingency task, an overconfidence task, and measures of mental health constructs, including depression and anxiety. We measured perceived control throughout the contingency task, allowing us to compare control estimates at the trial-level to estimates assessed at task conclusion. We found no evidence that depressive symptoms relate to illusory control or to overconfidence. Our results suggest that despite its popular acceptance, depressive realism is not replicable.</abstract><cop>Oakland</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/collabra.38529</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-9598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-5421</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2474-7394
ispartof Collabra. Psychology, 2022-10, Vol.8 (1)
issn 2474-7394
2474-7394
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2753691147
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Bias
College students
Depression, Mental
Estimates
Hypotheses
Mental depression
Mental health
Missing data
Realism
Sample size
title Sadder ≠ Wiser: Depressive Realism Is Not Robust to Replication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sadder%20%E2%89%A0%20Wiser:%20Depressive%20Realism%20Is%20Not%20Robust%20to%20Replication&rft.jtitle=Collabra.%20Psychology&rft.au=Dev,%20Amelia%20S&rft.date=2022-10-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2474-7394&rft.eissn=2474-7394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/collabra.38529&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA802996595%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753691147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A802996595&rfr_iscdi=true