From Conceptual Content in Big Apes and AI, to the Classical Principle of Explosion: An Interview with Robert B. Brandom
In this Interview, Professor Robert B. Brandom answered ten detailed questions about his philosophy of Rational Pragmatism and Semantic Expressivism, grouped into four topics. 1. Metaphysics and Anthropology, 2. Pragmatics and Semantics, 3. Epistemic Expressivism and 4. Philosophy of Logic. With his...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Disputatio (Madrid, Spain) Spain), 2019-06, Vol.8 (9), p.645 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | Disputatio (Madrid, Spain) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Frápolli, María José Wischin, Kurt |
description | In this Interview, Professor Robert B. Brandom answered ten detailed questions about his philosophy of Rational Pragmatism and Semantic Expressivism, grouped into four topics. 1. Metaphysics and Anthropology, 2. Pragmatics and Semantics, 3. Epistemic Expressivism and 4. Philosophy of Logic. With his careful answers Professor Brandom offers many additional insights into his rigorously constructed account of the relationship “between what we say and think, and what we are saying and thinking about” around the human practice of asking for and giving reasons. A final, additional question pointed at a principal motivation for putting together the present issue: how to reconcile Wittgenstein’s assertion that philosophy must not proffer any theories with the very explicit system of explanations Brandom has constructed. This same issue is addressed to some extent already in Professor Brandom’s new article contained in this issue, but his answer, asserting that he does not proffer a theory but only makes explicit what is already there, might be seen as an unambiguous statement of the continuous presence of a contested Wittgensteinian principle in Brandom’s work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5281/zenodo.2642444 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2753683557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753683557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-ac4c600bab97f6711f53f7e91e61dc5ab02821cff13425f51e1da6585b1514b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzc9LwzAcBfAgCI65q-cveLUz3_xq560bmw4Giuh5pG3iMrqkNpkb_vVW9PTe4fF5hNwgnUpW4P238aEJU6YEE0JckBFjUmRUUbwikxj3lFIsJEdVjMh51YcDLIKvTZeOuv2tyfgEzsPcfUDZmQjaN1Cu7yAFSDsDi1bH6Oph_NI7X7uuNRAsLM9dG6IL_gFKD-uB6b-cOcHJpR28hsr0CeZTmPcDFw7X5NLqNprJf47J-2r5tnjKNs-P60W5yToseMp0LWpFaaWrWW5Vjmglt7mZoVHY1FJXlBUMa2uRCyatRIONVrKQFUoU1YyPye2f2_Xh82hi2u7DsffD5ZblkquCS5nzHwdnXQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753683557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Conceptual Content in Big Apes and AI, to the Classical Principle of Explosion: An Interview with Robert B. Brandom</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Frápolli, María José ; Wischin, Kurt</creator><creatorcontrib>Frápolli, María José ; Wischin, Kurt</creatorcontrib><description>In this Interview, Professor Robert B. Brandom answered ten detailed questions about his philosophy of Rational Pragmatism and Semantic Expressivism, grouped into four topics. 1. Metaphysics and Anthropology, 2. Pragmatics and Semantics, 3. Epistemic Expressivism and 4. Philosophy of Logic. With his careful answers Professor Brandom offers many additional insights into his rigorously constructed account of the relationship “between what we say and think, and what we are saying and thinking about” around the human practice of asking for and giving reasons. A final, additional question pointed at a principal motivation for putting together the present issue: how to reconcile Wittgenstein’s assertion that philosophy must not proffer any theories with the very explicit system of explanations Brandom has constructed. This same issue is addressed to some extent already in Professor Brandom’s new article contained in this issue, but his answer, asserting that he does not proffer a theory but only makes explicit what is already there, might be seen as an unambiguous statement of the continuous presence of a contested Wittgensteinian principle in Brandom’s work.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2254-0601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2642444</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: Universidad de Salamanca</publisher><subject>Philosophy ; Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1889-1951)</subject><ispartof>Disputatio (Madrid, Spain), 2019-06, Vol.8 (9), p.645</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frápolli, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wischin, Kurt</creatorcontrib><title>From Conceptual Content in Big Apes and AI, to the Classical Principle of Explosion: An Interview with Robert B. Brandom</title><title>Disputatio (Madrid, Spain)</title><description>In this Interview, Professor Robert B. Brandom answered ten detailed questions about his philosophy of Rational Pragmatism and Semantic Expressivism, grouped into four topics. 1. Metaphysics and Anthropology, 2. Pragmatics and Semantics, 3. Epistemic Expressivism and 4. Philosophy of Logic. With his careful answers Professor Brandom offers many additional insights into his rigorously constructed account of the relationship “between what we say and think, and what we are saying and thinking about” around the human practice of asking for and giving reasons. A final, additional question pointed at a principal motivation for putting together the present issue: how to reconcile Wittgenstein’s assertion that philosophy must not proffer any theories with the very explicit system of explanations Brandom has constructed. This same issue is addressed to some extent already in Professor Brandom’s new article contained in this issue, but his answer, asserting that he does not proffer a theory but only makes explicit what is already there, might be seen as an unambiguous statement of the continuous presence of a contested Wittgensteinian principle in Brandom’s work.</description><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1889-1951)</subject><issn>2254-0601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotzc9LwzAcBfAgCI65q-cveLUz3_xq560bmw4Giuh5pG3iMrqkNpkb_vVW9PTe4fF5hNwgnUpW4P238aEJU6YEE0JckBFjUmRUUbwikxj3lFIsJEdVjMh51YcDLIKvTZeOuv2tyfgEzsPcfUDZmQjaN1Cu7yAFSDsDi1bH6Oph_NI7X7uuNRAsLM9dG6IL_gFKD-uB6b-cOcHJpR28hsr0CeZTmPcDFw7X5NLqNprJf47J-2r5tnjKNs-P60W5yToseMp0LWpFaaWrWW5Vjmglt7mZoVHY1FJXlBUMa2uRCyatRIONVrKQFUoU1YyPye2f2_Xh82hi2u7DsffD5ZblkquCS5nzHwdnXQw</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Frápolli, María José</creator><creator>Wischin, Kurt</creator><general>Universidad de Salamanca</general><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>From Conceptual Content in Big Apes and AI, to the Classical Principle of Explosion: An Interview with Robert B. Brandom</title><author>Frápolli, María José ; Wischin, Kurt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-ac4c600bab97f6711f53f7e91e61dc5ab02821cff13425f51e1da6585b1514b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1889-1951)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frápolli, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wischin, Kurt</creatorcontrib><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Disputatio (Madrid, Spain)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frápolli, María José</au><au>Wischin, Kurt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Conceptual Content in Big Apes and AI, to the Classical Principle of Explosion: An Interview with Robert B. Brandom</atitle><jtitle>Disputatio (Madrid, Spain)</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>645</spage><pages>645-</pages><eissn>2254-0601</eissn><abstract>In this Interview, Professor Robert B. Brandom answered ten detailed questions about his philosophy of Rational Pragmatism and Semantic Expressivism, grouped into four topics. 1. Metaphysics and Anthropology, 2. Pragmatics and Semantics, 3. Epistemic Expressivism and 4. Philosophy of Logic. With his careful answers Professor Brandom offers many additional insights into his rigorously constructed account of the relationship “between what we say and think, and what we are saying and thinking about” around the human practice of asking for and giving reasons. A final, additional question pointed at a principal motivation for putting together the present issue: how to reconcile Wittgenstein’s assertion that philosophy must not proffer any theories with the very explicit system of explanations Brandom has constructed. This same issue is addressed to some extent already in Professor Brandom’s new article contained in this issue, but his answer, asserting that he does not proffer a theory but only makes explicit what is already there, might be seen as an unambiguous statement of the continuous presence of a contested Wittgensteinian principle in Brandom’s work.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>Universidad de Salamanca</pub><doi>10.5281/zenodo.2642444</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2254-0601 |
ispartof | Disputatio (Madrid, Spain), 2019-06, Vol.8 (9), p.645 |
issn | 2254-0601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2753683557 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Philosophy Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1889-1951) |
title | From Conceptual Content in Big Apes and AI, to the Classical Principle of Explosion: An Interview with Robert B. Brandom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Conceptual%20Content%20in%20Big%20Apes%20and%20AI,%20to%20the%20Classical%20Principle%20of%20Explosion:%20An%20Interview%20with%20Robert%20B.%20Brandom&rft.jtitle=Disputatio%20(Madrid,%20Spain)&rft.au=Fr%C3%A1polli,%20Mar%C3%ADa%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=645&rft.pages=645-&rft.eissn=2254-0601&rft_id=info:doi/10.5281/zenodo.2642444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2753683557%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753683557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |