Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau
Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.15593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 15593 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Wang, Fenglin Yang, Hongjie Zhang, Yuqing Wang, Shengbin Liu, Kui Qi, Zexue Chai, Xiaoran Wang, Liwei Wang, Wanping Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari Senapthi, Venkatramanan Xiao, Yong |
description | Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su142315593 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2748568389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747188850</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747188850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsFRP_oGAJ5HWZNPsJsdSai0U_Mbjkk1m25Rt0iZZtP_eaD3UmcMMM887AzNZdkXwkFKB70JHRjkljAl6kvVyXJIBwQyfHuXn2WUIa5yMUiJI0ct2r67tIqAZOLWCjQnR75G0Gn3ICB49d7I1cY_GIUAIG7ARuQbNvOus_vwljE04Gnuj0dRq51dg1EEcVqCRs-jN1BAT89SmquwusrNGtgEu_2I_e7-fvk0eBovH2XwyXgwULUkcMFoC1yA1V4WqgYsaCoEFZUwXWoomNXIALAWWUuZaMw61ylVZKyIxHRW0n10f5m6923UQYrV2nbdpZZWXI84KTrlI1PBALWULlbGNi16q5DodQzkLjUn1cTkqCeec4SS4-SdITISvuJRdCNX89eU_e3tglXcheGiqrTcb6fcVwdXPz6qjn9FvONKJ6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748568389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Fenglin ; Yang, Hongjie ; Zhang, Yuqing ; Wang, Shengbin ; Liu, Kui ; Qi, Zexue ; Chai, Xiaoran ; Wang, Liwei ; Wang, Wanping ; Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ; Senapthi, Venkatramanan ; Xiao, Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Fenglin ; Yang, Hongjie ; Zhang, Yuqing ; Wang, Shengbin ; Liu, Kui ; Qi, Zexue ; Chai, Xiaoran ; Wang, Liwei ; Wang, Wanping ; Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ; Senapthi, Venkatramanan ; Xiao, Yong</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142315593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural pollution ; Agricultural wastes ; Analysis ; Aquatic resources ; Aquifers ; Arid zones ; Chemical properties ; Chemistry ; Climate change ; Confined aquifers ; Confined groundwater ; Earth ; Ecosystems ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Endowment ; Environmental aspects ; Evaluation ; Evaporation ; Fertilizers ; Freshwater resources ; Geochemistry ; Groundwater ; Groundwater chemistry ; Groundwater quality ; India ; Ion exchange ; Lithology ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Permeability ; Pollutants ; Precipitation ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Rivers ; Rock-salt ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Silicates ; Silicon compounds ; Sodium ; Sulfates ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Water in agriculture ; Water pollution ; Water quality ; Water quality assessments ; Water resources ; Water sampling ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water, Underground ; Water-supply, Agricultural ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.15593</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1698-1101 ; 0000-0002-6414-8384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Fenglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shengbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zexue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Xiaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.</description><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic resources</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Confined aquifers</subject><subject>Confined groundwater</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Endowment</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater chemistry</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Ion exchange</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rock-salt</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Silicon compounds</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Water in agriculture</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality assessments</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water, Underground</subject><subject>Water-supply, Agricultural</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsFRP_oGAJ5HWZNPsJsdSai0U_Mbjkk1m25Rt0iZZtP_eaD3UmcMMM887AzNZdkXwkFKB70JHRjkljAl6kvVyXJIBwQyfHuXn2WUIa5yMUiJI0ct2r67tIqAZOLWCjQnR75G0Gn3ICB49d7I1cY_GIUAIG7ARuQbNvOus_vwljE04Gnuj0dRq51dg1EEcVqCRs-jN1BAT89SmquwusrNGtgEu_2I_e7-fvk0eBovH2XwyXgwULUkcMFoC1yA1V4WqgYsaCoEFZUwXWoomNXIALAWWUuZaMw61ylVZKyIxHRW0n10f5m6923UQYrV2nbdpZZWXI84KTrlI1PBALWULlbGNi16q5DodQzkLjUn1cTkqCeec4SS4-SdITISvuJRdCNX89eU_e3tglXcheGiqrTcb6fcVwdXPz6qjn9FvONKJ6w</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Wang, Fenglin</creator><creator>Yang, Hongjie</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuqing</creator><creator>Wang, Shengbin</creator><creator>Liu, Kui</creator><creator>Qi, Zexue</creator><creator>Chai, Xiaoran</creator><creator>Wang, Liwei</creator><creator>Wang, Wanping</creator><creator>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</creator><creator>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</creator><creator>Xiao, Yong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-8384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</title><author>Wang, Fenglin ; Yang, Hongjie ; Zhang, Yuqing ; Wang, Shengbin ; Liu, Kui ; Qi, Zexue ; Chai, Xiaoran ; Wang, Liwei ; Wang, Wanping ; Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ; Senapthi, Venkatramanan ; Xiao, Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic resources</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Confined aquifers</topic><topic>Confined groundwater</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Endowment</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater chemistry</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Ion exchange</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rock-salt</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Silicon compounds</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Water in agriculture</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality assessments</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water, Underground</topic><topic>Water-supply, Agricultural</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Fenglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shengbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zexue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Xiaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Fenglin</au><au>Yang, Hongjie</au><au>Zhang, Yuqing</au><au>Wang, Shengbin</au><au>Liu, Kui</au><au>Qi, Zexue</au><au>Chai, Xiaoran</au><au>Wang, Liwei</au><au>Wang, Wanping</au><au>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</au><au>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</au><au>Xiao, Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>15593</spage><pages>15593-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142315593</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-8384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.15593 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2748568389 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural pollution Agricultural wastes Analysis Aquatic resources Aquifers Arid zones Chemical properties Chemistry Climate change Confined aquifers Confined groundwater Earth Ecosystems Electrical conductivity Electrical resistivity Endowment Environmental aspects Evaluation Evaporation Fertilizers Freshwater resources Geochemistry Groundwater Groundwater chemistry Groundwater quality India Ion exchange Lithology Nitrogen dioxide Permeability Pollutants Precipitation Quality assessment Quality control Rivers Rock-salt Salinity Salinity effects Silicates Silicon compounds Sodium Sulfates Sustainability Sustainable development Water in agriculture Water pollution Water quality Water quality assessments Water resources Water sampling Water shortages Water supply Water, Underground Water-supply, Agricultural Watersheds |
title | Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A38%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solute%20Geochemistry%20and%20Water%20Quality%20Assessment%20of%20Groundwater%20in%20an%20Arid%20Endorheic%20Watershed%20on%20Tibetan%20Plateau&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Wang,%20Fenglin&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=15593&rft.pages=15593-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142315593&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747188850%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748568389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747188850&rfr_iscdi=true |