Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau

Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.15593
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Fenglin, Yang, Hongjie, Zhang, Yuqing, Wang, Shengbin, Liu, Kui, Qi, Zexue, Chai, Xiaoran, Wang, Liwei, Wang, Wanping, Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari, Senapthi, Venkatramanan, Xiao, Yong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 23
container_start_page 15593
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Wang, Fenglin
Yang, Hongjie
Zhang, Yuqing
Wang, Shengbin
Liu, Kui
Qi, Zexue
Chai, Xiaoran
Wang, Liwei
Wang, Wanping
Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari
Senapthi, Venkatramanan
Xiao, Yong
description Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su142315593
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2748568389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747188850</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747188850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsFRP_oGAJ5HWZNPsJsdSai0U_Mbjkk1m25Rt0iZZtP_eaD3UmcMMM887AzNZdkXwkFKB70JHRjkljAl6kvVyXJIBwQyfHuXn2WUIa5yMUiJI0ct2r67tIqAZOLWCjQnR75G0Gn3ICB49d7I1cY_GIUAIG7ARuQbNvOus_vwljE04Gnuj0dRq51dg1EEcVqCRs-jN1BAT89SmquwusrNGtgEu_2I_e7-fvk0eBovH2XwyXgwULUkcMFoC1yA1V4WqgYsaCoEFZUwXWoomNXIALAWWUuZaMw61ylVZKyIxHRW0n10f5m6923UQYrV2nbdpZZWXI84KTrlI1PBALWULlbGNi16q5DodQzkLjUn1cTkqCeec4SS4-SdITISvuJRdCNX89eU_e3tglXcheGiqrTcb6fcVwdXPz6qjn9FvONKJ6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748568389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Fenglin ; Yang, Hongjie ; Zhang, Yuqing ; Wang, Shengbin ; Liu, Kui ; Qi, Zexue ; Chai, Xiaoran ; Wang, Liwei ; Wang, Wanping ; Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ; Senapthi, Venkatramanan ; Xiao, Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Fenglin ; Yang, Hongjie ; Zhang, Yuqing ; Wang, Shengbin ; Liu, Kui ; Qi, Zexue ; Chai, Xiaoran ; Wang, Liwei ; Wang, Wanping ; Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ; Senapthi, Venkatramanan ; Xiao, Yong</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142315593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural pollution ; Agricultural wastes ; Analysis ; Aquatic resources ; Aquifers ; Arid zones ; Chemical properties ; Chemistry ; Climate change ; Confined aquifers ; Confined groundwater ; Earth ; Ecosystems ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Endowment ; Environmental aspects ; Evaluation ; Evaporation ; Fertilizers ; Freshwater resources ; Geochemistry ; Groundwater ; Groundwater chemistry ; Groundwater quality ; India ; Ion exchange ; Lithology ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Permeability ; Pollutants ; Precipitation ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Rivers ; Rock-salt ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Silicates ; Silicon compounds ; Sodium ; Sulfates ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Water in agriculture ; Water pollution ; Water quality ; Water quality assessments ; Water resources ; Water sampling ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water, Underground ; Water-supply, Agricultural ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.15593</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1698-1101 ; 0000-0002-6414-8384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Fenglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shengbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zexue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Xiaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.</description><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic resources</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Confined aquifers</subject><subject>Confined groundwater</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Endowment</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater chemistry</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Ion exchange</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rock-salt</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Silicon compounds</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Water in agriculture</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality assessments</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water, Underground</subject><subject>Water-supply, Agricultural</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsFRP_oGAJ5HWZNPsJsdSai0U_Mbjkk1m25Rt0iZZtP_eaD3UmcMMM887AzNZdkXwkFKB70JHRjkljAl6kvVyXJIBwQyfHuXn2WUIa5yMUiJI0ct2r67tIqAZOLWCjQnR75G0Gn3ICB49d7I1cY_GIUAIG7ARuQbNvOus_vwljE04Gnuj0dRq51dg1EEcVqCRs-jN1BAT89SmquwusrNGtgEu_2I_e7-fvk0eBovH2XwyXgwULUkcMFoC1yA1V4WqgYsaCoEFZUwXWoomNXIALAWWUuZaMw61ylVZKyIxHRW0n10f5m6923UQYrV2nbdpZZWXI84KTrlI1PBALWULlbGNi16q5DodQzkLjUn1cTkqCeec4SS4-SdITISvuJRdCNX89eU_e3tglXcheGiqrTcb6fcVwdXPz6qjn9FvONKJ6w</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Wang, Fenglin</creator><creator>Yang, Hongjie</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuqing</creator><creator>Wang, Shengbin</creator><creator>Liu, Kui</creator><creator>Qi, Zexue</creator><creator>Chai, Xiaoran</creator><creator>Wang, Liwei</creator><creator>Wang, Wanping</creator><creator>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</creator><creator>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</creator><creator>Xiao, Yong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-8384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</title><author>Wang, Fenglin ; Yang, Hongjie ; Zhang, Yuqing ; Wang, Shengbin ; Liu, Kui ; Qi, Zexue ; Chai, Xiaoran ; Wang, Liwei ; Wang, Wanping ; Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ; Senapthi, Venkatramanan ; Xiao, Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-537e8dead8c6cbe89be6909355d6da9fad82ee0a90aaa2dd58ebc2c7bc1a03463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic resources</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Confined aquifers</topic><topic>Confined groundwater</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Endowment</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater chemistry</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Ion exchange</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rock-salt</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Silicon compounds</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Water in agriculture</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality assessments</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water, Underground</topic><topic>Water-supply, Agricultural</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Fenglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shengbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zexue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Xiaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Fenglin</au><au>Yang, Hongjie</au><au>Zhang, Yuqing</au><au>Wang, Shengbin</au><au>Liu, Kui</au><au>Qi, Zexue</au><au>Chai, Xiaoran</au><au>Wang, Liwei</au><au>Wang, Wanping</au><au>Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari</au><au>Senapthi, Venkatramanan</au><au>Xiao, Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>15593</spage><pages>15593-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Understanding groundwater geochemistry is crucial for water supply in arid regions. The present research was conducted in the arid Mo river watershed on the Tibetan plateau to gain insights into the geochemical characteristics, governing processes and quality of groundwater in arid endorheic watersheds. A total of 28 groundwater samples were collected from the phreatic and confined aquifers for hydrochemical analysis. The results showed that the groundwater was slightly alkaline in all aquifers of the watershed. The phreatic groundwater samples (PGs) and confined groundwater samples (CGs) had the TDS value in the ranges of 609.19–56,715.34 mg/L and 811.86–2509.51 mg/L, respectively. PGs were salter than CGs, especially in the lower reaches. Both the PGs and CGs were dominated by the Cl-Na type, followed by the mixed Cl-Mg·Ca type. The toxic elements of NO2− (0.00–0.20 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.60 mg/L for CGs), NH4+ (0.00–0.02 mg/L for PGs and 0.00–0.02 mg/L for CGs) and F− (0.00–4.00 mg/L for PGs and 1.00–1.60 mg/L for CGs) exceeded the permissible limits of the Chinese guidelines at some sporadic sites. Water–rock interactions, including silicates weathering, mineral dissolution (halite and sulfates) and ion exchange, were the main contributions to the groundwater chemistry of all aquifers. The geochemistry of PGs in the lower reach was also greatly influenced by evaporation. Agricultural sulfate fertilizer input was responsible for the nitrogen pollutants and salinity of PGs. All CGs and 73.91% of PGs were within the Entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI) of below 100 and were suitable for direct drinking purposes. Precisely 8.70 and 17.39% of PGs were within the EWQI value in the range of 100–150 (medium quality and suitable for domestic usage) and beyond 200 (extremely poor quality and not suitable for domestic usage), respectively. The electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, sodium percentage and permeability index indicated that groundwater in most parts of the watershed was suitable for irrigation, and only a small portion might cause salinity, sodium or permeability hazards. Groundwater with poor quality was mainly distributed in the lower reaches. CGs and PGs in the middle-upper reaches could be considered as the primary water resources for water supply. Agricultural pollution should be paid more attention to safeguard the quality of groundwater.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142315593</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-8384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.15593
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2748568389
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural pollution
Agricultural wastes
Analysis
Aquatic resources
Aquifers
Arid zones
Chemical properties
Chemistry
Climate change
Confined aquifers
Confined groundwater
Earth
Ecosystems
Electrical conductivity
Electrical resistivity
Endowment
Environmental aspects
Evaluation
Evaporation
Fertilizers
Freshwater resources
Geochemistry
Groundwater
Groundwater chemistry
Groundwater quality
India
Ion exchange
Lithology
Nitrogen dioxide
Permeability
Pollutants
Precipitation
Quality assessment
Quality control
Rivers
Rock-salt
Salinity
Salinity effects
Silicates
Silicon compounds
Sodium
Sulfates
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Water in agriculture
Water pollution
Water quality
Water quality assessments
Water resources
Water sampling
Water shortages
Water supply
Water, Underground
Water-supply, Agricultural
Watersheds
title Solute Geochemistry and Water Quality Assessment of Groundwater in an Arid Endorheic Watershed on Tibetan Plateau
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A38%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solute%20Geochemistry%20and%20Water%20Quality%20Assessment%20of%20Groundwater%20in%20an%20Arid%20Endorheic%20Watershed%20on%20Tibetan%20Plateau&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Wang,%20Fenglin&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=15593&rft.pages=15593-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142315593&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747188850%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748568389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747188850&rfr_iscdi=true