Comparison of the Microbial Communities Affected by Different Environmental Factors in a Polluted River

Understanding how bacterial communities adapt to different environmental factors provides a scientific basis for developing and utilizing microbial resources in rivers. This study investigated the changes in the microbial communities of water and mud samples from two sites of an urban river (GH: Gon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.3844
Hauptverfasser: Ouyang, Liao, Liu, Xinyue, Chen, Huirong, Yang, Xuewei, Li, Shaofeng, Li, Shuangfei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 23
container_start_page 3844
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 14
creator Ouyang, Liao
Liu, Xinyue
Chen, Huirong
Yang, Xuewei
Li, Shaofeng
Li, Shuangfei
description Understanding how bacterial communities adapt to different environmental factors provides a scientific basis for developing and utilizing microbial resources in rivers. This study investigated the changes in the microbial communities of water and mud samples from two sites of an urban river (GH: Gonghe Village and YC: Yanchuan). Analysis of the water samples showed that site GH had higher concentrations of ammonium, total nitrogen, Mn, and Ni than site YC. High-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the community composition of the samples. The results showed that the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidete, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi. The alpha diversity of the microbial community in the mud samples was higher than in the water samples. Moreover, the relative abundance of the dominant genus varied a lot between the samples, with the highest relative abundance of Arcobacter and Vibrio found in the water samples at site GH in January and October, respectively. The correlation analysis showed that pH, TN, manganese, and fluoride were the main environmental factors that affected the composition and structure of the microbial communities. The phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) analysis showed that species associated with nitrogen metabolism differed between the sampling sites. In addition, potential pathogens, such as Vibrio and Arcobacter, which may pose potential risks to the environment and human health, were found in the samples.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w14233844
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2748562586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A812061795</galeid><sourcerecordid>A812061795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f39755c8668f74403c832e1a05d08ee00667e77f4654a522b529d905f8d20a8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePGzN5muzx1JbFSqK6HlJdyc1ZTepyW6l_96UijhzmDcz783AQ-g6J1PGSnL3nXPKmOL8DI0oKVjGOc_P_-FLNIlxS1LwUilBRmgz991OBxu9w97g_hPws62DX1vd4rTrBmd7CxHPjIG6hwavD_jepiaA6_HC7W3wrks48Ze67n2I2Dqs8atv2-EoeLN7CFfowug2wuS3jtHHcvE-f8xWLw9P89kqqxnL-8ywshCiVlIqU3BOWK0YhVwT0RAFQIiUBRSF4VJwLShdC1o2JRFGNZRoBWyMbk53d8F_DRD7auuH4NLLihZcCUmFkok1PbE2uoXKOuP7oOuUDXS29g6MTfOZyimReVGKJLg9CZI1MQYw1S7YTodDlZPq6H315z37AZl4dLY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748562586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Microbial Communities Affected by Different Environmental Factors in a Polluted River</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Ouyang, Liao ; Liu, Xinyue ; Chen, Huirong ; Yang, Xuewei ; Li, Shaofeng ; Li, Shuangfei</creator><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Liao ; Liu, Xinyue ; Chen, Huirong ; Yang, Xuewei ; Li, Shaofeng ; Li, Shuangfei</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding how bacterial communities adapt to different environmental factors provides a scientific basis for developing and utilizing microbial resources in rivers. This study investigated the changes in the microbial communities of water and mud samples from two sites of an urban river (GH: Gonghe Village and YC: Yanchuan). Analysis of the water samples showed that site GH had higher concentrations of ammonium, total nitrogen, Mn, and Ni than site YC. High-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the community composition of the samples. The results showed that the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidete, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi. The alpha diversity of the microbial community in the mud samples was higher than in the water samples. Moreover, the relative abundance of the dominant genus varied a lot between the samples, with the highest relative abundance of Arcobacter and Vibrio found in the water samples at site GH in January and October, respectively. The correlation analysis showed that pH, TN, manganese, and fluoride were the main environmental factors that affected the composition and structure of the microbial communities. The phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) analysis showed that species associated with nitrogen metabolism differed between the sampling sites. In addition, potential pathogens, such as Vibrio and Arcobacter, which may pose potential risks to the environment and human health, were found in the samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w14233844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Ammonia ; Ammonium ; Arcobacter ; Bacteria ; Community composition ; Comparative analysis ; Composition ; Correlation analysis ; Environmental factors ; Flow velocity ; Fluorides ; Genes ; Manganese ; Microbial activity ; Microorganisms ; Mud ; Next-generation sequencing ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen metabolism ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Pollution ; Relative abundance ; Resveratrol ; Rivers ; Statistical analysis ; Surface water ; Vibrio ; Water analysis ; Water pollution ; Water sampling</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.3844</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f39755c8668f74403c832e1a05d08ee00667e77f4654a522b529d905f8d20a8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f39755c8668f74403c832e1a05d08ee00667e77f4654a522b529d905f8d20a8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2981-0456 ; 0000-0003-3091-1668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Liao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xuewei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shuangfei</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Microbial Communities Affected by Different Environmental Factors in a Polluted River</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Understanding how bacterial communities adapt to different environmental factors provides a scientific basis for developing and utilizing microbial resources in rivers. This study investigated the changes in the microbial communities of water and mud samples from two sites of an urban river (GH: Gonghe Village and YC: Yanchuan). Analysis of the water samples showed that site GH had higher concentrations of ammonium, total nitrogen, Mn, and Ni than site YC. High-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the community composition of the samples. The results showed that the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidete, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi. The alpha diversity of the microbial community in the mud samples was higher than in the water samples. Moreover, the relative abundance of the dominant genus varied a lot between the samples, with the highest relative abundance of Arcobacter and Vibrio found in the water samples at site GH in January and October, respectively. The correlation analysis showed that pH, TN, manganese, and fluoride were the main environmental factors that affected the composition and structure of the microbial communities. The phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) analysis showed that species associated with nitrogen metabolism differed between the sampling sites. In addition, potential pathogens, such as Vibrio and Arcobacter, which may pose potential risks to the environment and human health, were found in the samples.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Arcobacter</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mud</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen metabolism</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Resveratrol</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Vibrio</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePGzN5muzx1JbFSqK6HlJdyc1ZTepyW6l_96UijhzmDcz783AQ-g6J1PGSnL3nXPKmOL8DI0oKVjGOc_P_-FLNIlxS1LwUilBRmgz991OBxu9w97g_hPws62DX1vd4rTrBmd7CxHPjIG6hwavD_jepiaA6_HC7W3wrks48Ze67n2I2Dqs8atv2-EoeLN7CFfowug2wuS3jtHHcvE-f8xWLw9P89kqqxnL-8ywshCiVlIqU3BOWK0YhVwT0RAFQIiUBRSF4VJwLShdC1o2JRFGNZRoBWyMbk53d8F_DRD7auuH4NLLihZcCUmFkok1PbE2uoXKOuP7oOuUDXS29g6MTfOZyimReVGKJLg9CZI1MQYw1S7YTodDlZPq6H315z37AZl4dLY</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Ouyang, Liao</creator><creator>Liu, Xinyue</creator><creator>Chen, Huirong</creator><creator>Yang, Xuewei</creator><creator>Li, Shaofeng</creator><creator>Li, Shuangfei</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2981-0456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-1668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Microbial Communities Affected by Different Environmental Factors in a Polluted River</title><author>Ouyang, Liao ; Liu, Xinyue ; Chen, Huirong ; Yang, Xuewei ; Li, Shaofeng ; Li, Shuangfei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-f39755c8668f74403c832e1a05d08ee00667e77f4654a522b529d905f8d20a8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Arcobacter</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mud</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen metabolism</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Resveratrol</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Vibrio</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Liao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xuewei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shuangfei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ouyang, Liao</au><au>Liu, Xinyue</au><au>Chen, Huirong</au><au>Yang, Xuewei</au><au>Li, Shaofeng</au><au>Li, Shuangfei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Microbial Communities Affected by Different Environmental Factors in a Polluted River</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>3844</spage><pages>3844-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Understanding how bacterial communities adapt to different environmental factors provides a scientific basis for developing and utilizing microbial resources in rivers. This study investigated the changes in the microbial communities of water and mud samples from two sites of an urban river (GH: Gonghe Village and YC: Yanchuan). Analysis of the water samples showed that site GH had higher concentrations of ammonium, total nitrogen, Mn, and Ni than site YC. High-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the community composition of the samples. The results showed that the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidete, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi. The alpha diversity of the microbial community in the mud samples was higher than in the water samples. Moreover, the relative abundance of the dominant genus varied a lot between the samples, with the highest relative abundance of Arcobacter and Vibrio found in the water samples at site GH in January and October, respectively. The correlation analysis showed that pH, TN, manganese, and fluoride were the main environmental factors that affected the composition and structure of the microbial communities. The phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) analysis showed that species associated with nitrogen metabolism differed between the sampling sites. In addition, potential pathogens, such as Vibrio and Arcobacter, which may pose potential risks to the environment and human health, were found in the samples.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w14233844</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2981-0456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-1668</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.3844
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2748562586
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Abundance
Ammonia
Ammonium
Arcobacter
Bacteria
Community composition
Comparative analysis
Composition
Correlation analysis
Environmental factors
Flow velocity
Fluorides
Genes
Manganese
Microbial activity
Microorganisms
Mud
Next-generation sequencing
Nitrogen
Nitrogen metabolism
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Pollution
Relative abundance
Resveratrol
Rivers
Statistical analysis
Surface water
Vibrio
Water analysis
Water pollution
Water sampling
title Comparison of the Microbial Communities Affected by Different Environmental Factors in a Polluted River
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Microbial%20Communities%20Affected%20by%20Different%20Environmental%20Factors%20in%20a%20Polluted%20River&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Ouyang,%20Liao&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=3844&rft.pages=3844-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w14233844&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA812061795%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748562586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A812061795&rfr_iscdi=true