3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase

A 3–4D soil model represents a logical step forward from one‐dimensional soil columns (1D), two‐dimensional soil maps (2D), and three‐dimensional soil volumes (3D) toward dynamic soil models (4D), with time as the fourth dimension. The challenge is to develop modeling tools that account for the stat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plant nutrition and soil science 2022-12, Vol.185 (6), p.720-744
Hauptverfasser: Gerke, Horst H., Vogel, Hans‐Jörg, Weber, Tobias K.D., Meij, W. Marijn, Scholten, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 744
container_issue 6
container_start_page 720
container_title Journal of plant nutrition and soil science
container_volume 185
creator Gerke, Horst H.
Vogel, Hans‐Jörg
Weber, Tobias K.D.
Meij, W. Marijn
Scholten, Thomas
description A 3–4D soil model represents a logical step forward from one‐dimensional soil columns (1D), two‐dimensional soil maps (2D), and three‐dimensional soil volumes (3D) toward dynamic soil models (4D), with time as the fourth dimension. The challenge is to develop modeling tools that account for the states of soil properties, including the spatial structure of solids and pores, as well as their dynamics, including soil mass and solute transfers in landscapes. Our envisioned 3–4D soil model approach aims at improving the capability to predict fundamental soil functions (e.g., plant growth, storage, matter fluxes) that provide ecosystem services in the socioeconomic context. This study provides a structured overview on current soil models, challenges, open questions, and urgent research needs for developing a 3–4D soil model. A 3–4D soil model should provide an inventory of spatially distributed and temporally variable soil properties. As basis for this, we propose a mass balance model for the solid phase, which needs to be supplemented by a model describing its structure. This should eventually provide adequate 3D parameter sets for the numerical modeling of soil functions (e.g., flow and transport). The target resolution is decameters in the horizontal plane and centimeters to decimeters in the vertical direction to represent characteristic soil properties and soil horizons. The actual state of soils and their properties can be estimated from spatial data that represent the soil forming factors, with the use of machine learning tools. Improved modeling of the dynamics of soil bulk density, biological processes, and the pore structure are required to relate the solid mass balance to matter fluxes. A 3–4D soil model can be built from several types of modeling approaches. We distinguish between (1) process models that simulate mass balances, fluxes and soil structure dynamics, (2) statistical pedometric models using machine learning and geostatistics to estimate the soil inventory within landscapes, and (3) pedotransfer functions to link observable attributes to specific model parameters required to simulate soil functions including water and matter fluxes. This should provide the prerequisites to predict the spatial distribution of soil functions and their changes in response to external forcing. This endeavor can draw upon many already established models and techniques, yet combining them into a newly created 3–4D soil model is a truly an ambitious, but promisin
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jpln.202200239
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2748161167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2748161167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-d180f0ccc5205f869b2121017fd0d4d2f2cb96218c1f65d9fa8b876447dcec43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZW2JdYo9cZyEHeKNKh5S95bjR5PKTYKdgLrjH_hDvoRUQcCO1czY58xIF6FjSmaUEDhdta6eAQEYhjjfQROaAETAge0OPYt5lKUx2UcHIawIIYzmMEEu_nz_YJc4NJXD60Ybh2XAqpTOmXppsG08tn3XezMi3gQjvSrP8HMv667qZFe9mj96VS9xIYPRuKlxV26_XKVxWw5vh2jPShfM0XedosX11eLiNpo_3txdnM8jFSdpHmmaEUuUUgmQxGY8L4ACJTS1mmimwYIqcg40U9TyROdWZkWWcsZSrYxi8RSdjGtb37z0JnRi1fS-Hi4KSFlGOaU8HajZSCnfhOCNFa2v1tJvBCViG6jYBip-Ah2EfBTeKmc2_9Di_mn-8Ot-AY8be00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748161167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Gerke, Horst H. ; Vogel, Hans‐Jörg ; Weber, Tobias K.D. ; Meij, W. Marijn ; Scholten, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerke, Horst H. ; Vogel, Hans‐Jörg ; Weber, Tobias K.D. ; Meij, W. Marijn ; Scholten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>A 3–4D soil model represents a logical step forward from one‐dimensional soil columns (1D), two‐dimensional soil maps (2D), and three‐dimensional soil volumes (3D) toward dynamic soil models (4D), with time as the fourth dimension. The challenge is to develop modeling tools that account for the states of soil properties, including the spatial structure of solids and pores, as well as their dynamics, including soil mass and solute transfers in landscapes. Our envisioned 3–4D soil model approach aims at improving the capability to predict fundamental soil functions (e.g., plant growth, storage, matter fluxes) that provide ecosystem services in the socioeconomic context. This study provides a structured overview on current soil models, challenges, open questions, and urgent research needs for developing a 3–4D soil model. A 3–4D soil model should provide an inventory of spatially distributed and temporally variable soil properties. As basis for this, we propose a mass balance model for the solid phase, which needs to be supplemented by a model describing its structure. This should eventually provide adequate 3D parameter sets for the numerical modeling of soil functions (e.g., flow and transport). The target resolution is decameters in the horizontal plane and centimeters to decimeters in the vertical direction to represent characteristic soil properties and soil horizons. The actual state of soils and their properties can be estimated from spatial data that represent the soil forming factors, with the use of machine learning tools. Improved modeling of the dynamics of soil bulk density, biological processes, and the pore structure are required to relate the solid mass balance to matter fluxes. A 3–4D soil model can be built from several types of modeling approaches. We distinguish between (1) process models that simulate mass balances, fluxes and soil structure dynamics, (2) statistical pedometric models using machine learning and geostatistics to estimate the soil inventory within landscapes, and (3) pedotransfer functions to link observable attributes to specific model parameters required to simulate soil functions including water and matter fluxes. This should provide the prerequisites to predict the spatial distribution of soil functions and their changes in response to external forcing. This endeavor can draw upon many already established models and techniques, yet combining them into a newly created 3–4D soil model is a truly an ambitious, but promising task. The core of such a model is the bookkeeping of the solid mass together with soil structure, while accounting for biogeochemical and mechanical processes. The presented concepts are ambitious in context for research avenues toward the improvement of soil modeling by conjoining methods from a wide range of disciplines, including geological, geophysical, pedological, and remote sensing and visualization applications. The paper reviews and outlines research tools and needs for the 3‐D, spatially continuous representation of relevant soil properties and the modeling to represent the dynamics of soil properties and soil functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-8730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202200239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological activity ; Bulk density ; coevolution ; Columns (structural) ; Context ; dynamics ; Ecosystem services ; Fluxes ; Geophysical methods ; Geostatistics ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Mass balance ; Mathematical models ; Microbalances ; Parameters ; Plant growth ; Remote sensing ; Reviews ; Soil columns ; Soil density ; Soil dynamics ; Soil horizons ; Soil improvement ; Soil maps ; Soil mechanics ; Soil properties ; Soil structure ; Soil water storage ; solid phase ; Solid phases ; Spatial data ; Spatial distribution ; Statistical analysis ; virtual soil</subject><ispartof>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science, 2022-12, Vol.185 (6), p.720-744</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-d180f0ccc5205f869b2121017fd0d4d2f2cb96218c1f65d9fa8b876447dcec43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-d180f0ccc5205f869b2121017fd0d4d2f2cb96218c1f65d9fa8b876447dcec43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6232-7688</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjpln.202200239$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjpln.202200239$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerke, Horst H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Hans‐Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Tobias K.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meij, W. Marijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase</title><title>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science</title><description>A 3–4D soil model represents a logical step forward from one‐dimensional soil columns (1D), two‐dimensional soil maps (2D), and three‐dimensional soil volumes (3D) toward dynamic soil models (4D), with time as the fourth dimension. The challenge is to develop modeling tools that account for the states of soil properties, including the spatial structure of solids and pores, as well as their dynamics, including soil mass and solute transfers in landscapes. Our envisioned 3–4D soil model approach aims at improving the capability to predict fundamental soil functions (e.g., plant growth, storage, matter fluxes) that provide ecosystem services in the socioeconomic context. This study provides a structured overview on current soil models, challenges, open questions, and urgent research needs for developing a 3–4D soil model. A 3–4D soil model should provide an inventory of spatially distributed and temporally variable soil properties. As basis for this, we propose a mass balance model for the solid phase, which needs to be supplemented by a model describing its structure. This should eventually provide adequate 3D parameter sets for the numerical modeling of soil functions (e.g., flow and transport). The target resolution is decameters in the horizontal plane and centimeters to decimeters in the vertical direction to represent characteristic soil properties and soil horizons. The actual state of soils and their properties can be estimated from spatial data that represent the soil forming factors, with the use of machine learning tools. Improved modeling of the dynamics of soil bulk density, biological processes, and the pore structure are required to relate the solid mass balance to matter fluxes. A 3–4D soil model can be built from several types of modeling approaches. We distinguish between (1) process models that simulate mass balances, fluxes and soil structure dynamics, (2) statistical pedometric models using machine learning and geostatistics to estimate the soil inventory within landscapes, and (3) pedotransfer functions to link observable attributes to specific model parameters required to simulate soil functions including water and matter fluxes. This should provide the prerequisites to predict the spatial distribution of soil functions and their changes in response to external forcing. This endeavor can draw upon many already established models and techniques, yet combining them into a newly created 3–4D soil model is a truly an ambitious, but promising task. The core of such a model is the bookkeeping of the solid mass together with soil structure, while accounting for biogeochemical and mechanical processes. The presented concepts are ambitious in context for research avenues toward the improvement of soil modeling by conjoining methods from a wide range of disciplines, including geological, geophysical, pedological, and remote sensing and visualization applications. The paper reviews and outlines research tools and needs for the 3‐D, spatially continuous representation of relevant soil properties and the modeling to represent the dynamics of soil properties and soil functions.</description><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>coevolution</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Geophysical methods</subject><subject>Geostatistics</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mass balance</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microbalances</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Soil columns</subject><subject>Soil density</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil horizons</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil maps</subject><subject>Soil mechanics</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soil water storage</subject><subject>solid phase</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>virtual soil</subject><issn>1436-8730</issn><issn>1522-2624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZW2JdYo9cZyEHeKNKh5S95bjR5PKTYKdgLrjH_hDvoRUQcCO1czY58xIF6FjSmaUEDhdta6eAQEYhjjfQROaAETAge0OPYt5lKUx2UcHIawIIYzmMEEu_nz_YJc4NJXD60Ybh2XAqpTOmXppsG08tn3XezMi3gQjvSrP8HMv667qZFe9mj96VS9xIYPRuKlxV26_XKVxWw5vh2jPShfM0XedosX11eLiNpo_3txdnM8jFSdpHmmaEUuUUgmQxGY8L4ACJTS1mmimwYIqcg40U9TyROdWZkWWcsZSrYxi8RSdjGtb37z0JnRi1fS-Hi4KSFlGOaU8HajZSCnfhOCNFa2v1tJvBCViG6jYBip-Ah2EfBTeKmc2_9Di_mn-8Ot-AY8be00</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Gerke, Horst H.</creator><creator>Vogel, Hans‐Jörg</creator><creator>Weber, Tobias K.D.</creator><creator>Meij, W. Marijn</creator><creator>Scholten, Thomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-7688</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase</title><author>Gerke, Horst H. ; Vogel, Hans‐Jörg ; Weber, Tobias K.D. ; Meij, W. Marijn ; Scholten, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-d180f0ccc5205f869b2121017fd0d4d2f2cb96218c1f65d9fa8b876447dcec43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>coevolution</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Geophysical methods</topic><topic>Geostatistics</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mass balance</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microbalances</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Soil columns</topic><topic>Soil density</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil horizons</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil maps</topic><topic>Soil mechanics</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soil water storage</topic><topic>solid phase</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>virtual soil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerke, Horst H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Hans‐Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Tobias K.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meij, W. Marijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerke, Horst H.</au><au>Vogel, Hans‐Jörg</au><au>Weber, Tobias K.D.</au><au>Meij, W. Marijn</au><au>Scholten, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>720</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>720-744</pages><issn>1436-8730</issn><eissn>1522-2624</eissn><abstract>A 3–4D soil model represents a logical step forward from one‐dimensional soil columns (1D), two‐dimensional soil maps (2D), and three‐dimensional soil volumes (3D) toward dynamic soil models (4D), with time as the fourth dimension. The challenge is to develop modeling tools that account for the states of soil properties, including the spatial structure of solids and pores, as well as their dynamics, including soil mass and solute transfers in landscapes. Our envisioned 3–4D soil model approach aims at improving the capability to predict fundamental soil functions (e.g., plant growth, storage, matter fluxes) that provide ecosystem services in the socioeconomic context. This study provides a structured overview on current soil models, challenges, open questions, and urgent research needs for developing a 3–4D soil model. A 3–4D soil model should provide an inventory of spatially distributed and temporally variable soil properties. As basis for this, we propose a mass balance model for the solid phase, which needs to be supplemented by a model describing its structure. This should eventually provide adequate 3D parameter sets for the numerical modeling of soil functions (e.g., flow and transport). The target resolution is decameters in the horizontal plane and centimeters to decimeters in the vertical direction to represent characteristic soil properties and soil horizons. The actual state of soils and their properties can be estimated from spatial data that represent the soil forming factors, with the use of machine learning tools. Improved modeling of the dynamics of soil bulk density, biological processes, and the pore structure are required to relate the solid mass balance to matter fluxes. A 3–4D soil model can be built from several types of modeling approaches. We distinguish between (1) process models that simulate mass balances, fluxes and soil structure dynamics, (2) statistical pedometric models using machine learning and geostatistics to estimate the soil inventory within landscapes, and (3) pedotransfer functions to link observable attributes to specific model parameters required to simulate soil functions including water and matter fluxes. This should provide the prerequisites to predict the spatial distribution of soil functions and their changes in response to external forcing. This endeavor can draw upon many already established models and techniques, yet combining them into a newly created 3–4D soil model is a truly an ambitious, but promising task. The core of such a model is the bookkeeping of the solid mass together with soil structure, while accounting for biogeochemical and mechanical processes. The presented concepts are ambitious in context for research avenues toward the improvement of soil modeling by conjoining methods from a wide range of disciplines, including geological, geophysical, pedological, and remote sensing and visualization applications. The paper reviews and outlines research tools and needs for the 3‐D, spatially continuous representation of relevant soil properties and the modeling to represent the dynamics of soil properties and soil functions.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jpln.202200239</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-7688</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-8730
ispartof Journal of plant nutrition and soil science, 2022-12, Vol.185 (6), p.720-744
issn 1436-8730
1522-2624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2748161167
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Biological activity
Bulk density
coevolution
Columns (structural)
Context
dynamics
Ecosystem services
Fluxes
Geophysical methods
Geostatistics
Learning algorithms
Machine learning
Mass balance
Mathematical models
Microbalances
Parameters
Plant growth
Remote sensing
Reviews
Soil columns
Soil density
Soil dynamics
Soil horizons
Soil improvement
Soil maps
Soil mechanics
Soil properties
Soil structure
Soil water storage
solid phase
Solid phases
Spatial data
Spatial distribution
Statistical analysis
virtual soil
title 3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T07%3A25%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3%E2%80%934D%20soil%20model%20as%20challenge%20for%20future%20soil%20research:%20Quantitative%20soil%20modeling%20based%20on%20the%20solid%20phase&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plant%20nutrition%20and%20soil%20science&rft.au=Gerke,%20Horst%20H.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=720-744&rft.issn=1436-8730&rft.eissn=1522-2624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jpln.202200239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2748161167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748161167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true