DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions

Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.349-351
Hauptverfasser: Lucas, Ignacio, Jiménez-Murcia, Susana, Fernández-Aranda, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue 4
container_start_page 349
container_title Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 29
creator Lucas, Ignacio
Jiménez-Murcia, Susana
Fernández-Aranda, Fernando
description Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/cps0000096
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2747942438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747942438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a225t-9e67928a61e4f5768f28befb097085a9980c2527fab1e94c491df3a859c025d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcvfoKAb0o1TZM08U32R4WJ4PRRQpYmktG19SYV9u3tNsH7cg-H370HDkKXObnNSVHe2S6S3ShxhEY5EzKjkpNjNBoclXGpilN0FuN6QIQSZIQ-p8uXjOOl-3EQ0ha_mRSar4h9C3i213gaYguVg3iPl-3G4UkdmmBNjZ83XT2IFNomYtNUeN6nHtxwAM7u3XN04k0d3cXfHqOP-ex98pQtXh-fJw-LzFDKU6acKBWVRuSOeV4K6alcOb8iqiSSG6UksZTT0ptV7hSzTOWVL4zkyhLKK1aM0dXhbwftd-9i0uu2h2aI1LRkpWKUFXKgrg-UhTZGcF53EDYGtjonelef_q9vgG8OsOmM7uLWGkjB1i7aHsA1acdqqjTTBVPFL8p_cVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747942438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Lucas, Ignacio ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana ; Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creator><contributor>Nezu, Arthur M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Ignacio ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana ; Fernández-Aranda, Fernando ; Nezu, Arthur M</creatorcontrib><description>Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/cps0000096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington DC: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Between Groups Design ; Binge Eating Disorder ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ; Eating Disorders ; Psychodiagnostic Typologies ; Psychopathology ; Rating ; Severity (Disorders)</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.349-351</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a225t-9e67928a61e4f5768f28befb097085a9980c2527fab1e94c491df3a859c025d43</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9426-5082 ; 0000-0002-3596-8033 ; 0000-0002-2968-9898</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Nezu, Arthur M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</title><title>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Between Groups Design</subject><subject>Binge Eating Disorder</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</subject><subject>Eating Disorders</subject><subject>Psychodiagnostic Typologies</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Rating</subject><subject>Severity (Disorders)</subject><issn>0969-5893</issn><issn>1468-2850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcvfoKAb0o1TZM08U32R4WJ4PRRQpYmktG19SYV9u3tNsH7cg-H370HDkKXObnNSVHe2S6S3ShxhEY5EzKjkpNjNBoclXGpilN0FuN6QIQSZIQ-p8uXjOOl-3EQ0ha_mRSar4h9C3i213gaYguVg3iPl-3G4UkdmmBNjZ83XT2IFNomYtNUeN6nHtxwAM7u3XN04k0d3cXfHqOP-ex98pQtXh-fJw-LzFDKU6acKBWVRuSOeV4K6alcOb8iqiSSG6UksZTT0ptV7hSzTOWVL4zkyhLKK1aM0dXhbwftd-9i0uu2h2aI1LRkpWKUFXKgrg-UhTZGcF53EDYGtjonelef_q9vgG8OsOmM7uLWGkjB1i7aHsA1acdqqjTTBVPFL8p_cVI</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Lucas, Ignacio</creator><creator>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creator><creator>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-5082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-8033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-9898</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</title><author>Lucas, Ignacio ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana ; Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a225t-9e67928a61e4f5768f28befb097085a9980c2527fab1e94c491df3a859c025d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Between Groups Design</topic><topic>Binge Eating Disorder</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</topic><topic>Eating Disorders</topic><topic>Psychodiagnostic Typologies</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Rating</topic><topic>Severity (Disorders)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucas, Ignacio</au><au>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</au><au>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</au><au>Nezu, Arthur M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>349-351</pages><issn>0969-5893</issn><eissn>1468-2850</eissn><abstract>Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><cop>Washington DC</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/cps0000096</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-5082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-8033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-9898</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-5893
ispartof Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.349-351
issn 0969-5893
1468-2850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2747942438
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Between Groups Design
Binge Eating Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
Eating Disorders
Psychodiagnostic Typologies
Psychopathology
Rating
Severity (Disorders)
title DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A07%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DSM-5%20Severity%20Ratings%20for%20Eating%20Disorders:%20Some%20Clinical%20Implications%20and%20Future%20Directions&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lucas,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=349-351&rft.issn=0969-5893&rft.eissn=1468-2850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/cps0000096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747942438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747942438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true