DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions
Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.349-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 351 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 349 |
container_title | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Lucas, Ignacio Jiménez-Murcia, Susana Fernández-Aranda, Fernando |
description | Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/cps0000096 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2747942438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747942438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a225t-9e67928a61e4f5768f28befb097085a9980c2527fab1e94c491df3a859c025d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcvfoKAb0o1TZM08U32R4WJ4PRRQpYmktG19SYV9u3tNsH7cg-H370HDkKXObnNSVHe2S6S3ShxhEY5EzKjkpNjNBoclXGpilN0FuN6QIQSZIQ-p8uXjOOl-3EQ0ha_mRSar4h9C3i213gaYguVg3iPl-3G4UkdmmBNjZ83XT2IFNomYtNUeN6nHtxwAM7u3XN04k0d3cXfHqOP-ex98pQtXh-fJw-LzFDKU6acKBWVRuSOeV4K6alcOb8iqiSSG6UksZTT0ptV7hSzTOWVL4zkyhLKK1aM0dXhbwftd-9i0uu2h2aI1LRkpWKUFXKgrg-UhTZGcF53EDYGtjonelef_q9vgG8OsOmM7uLWGkjB1i7aHsA1acdqqjTTBVPFL8p_cVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747942438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Lucas, Ignacio ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana ; Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creator><contributor>Nezu, Arthur M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Ignacio ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana ; Fernández-Aranda, Fernando ; Nezu, Arthur M</creatorcontrib><description>Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/cps0000096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington DC: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Between Groups Design ; Binge Eating Disorder ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ; Eating Disorders ; Psychodiagnostic Typologies ; Psychopathology ; Rating ; Severity (Disorders)</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.349-351</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a225t-9e67928a61e4f5768f28befb097085a9980c2527fab1e94c491df3a859c025d43</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9426-5082 ; 0000-0002-3596-8033 ; 0000-0002-2968-9898</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Nezu, Arthur M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</title><title>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Between Groups Design</subject><subject>Binge Eating Disorder</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</subject><subject>Eating Disorders</subject><subject>Psychodiagnostic Typologies</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Rating</subject><subject>Severity (Disorders)</subject><issn>0969-5893</issn><issn>1468-2850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcvfoKAb0o1TZM08U32R4WJ4PRRQpYmktG19SYV9u3tNsH7cg-H370HDkKXObnNSVHe2S6S3ShxhEY5EzKjkpNjNBoclXGpilN0FuN6QIQSZIQ-p8uXjOOl-3EQ0ha_mRSar4h9C3i213gaYguVg3iPl-3G4UkdmmBNjZ83XT2IFNomYtNUeN6nHtxwAM7u3XN04k0d3cXfHqOP-ex98pQtXh-fJw-LzFDKU6acKBWVRuSOeV4K6alcOb8iqiSSG6UksZTT0ptV7hSzTOWVL4zkyhLKK1aM0dXhbwftd-9i0uu2h2aI1LRkpWKUFXKgrg-UhTZGcF53EDYGtjonelef_q9vgG8OsOmM7uLWGkjB1i7aHsA1acdqqjTTBVPFL8p_cVI</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Lucas, Ignacio</creator><creator>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creator><creator>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-5082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-8033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-9898</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</title><author>Lucas, Ignacio ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana ; Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a225t-9e67928a61e4f5768f28befb097085a9980c2527fab1e94c491df3a859c025d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Between Groups Design</topic><topic>Binge Eating Disorder</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</topic><topic>Eating Disorders</topic><topic>Psychodiagnostic Typologies</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Rating</topic><topic>Severity (Disorders)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucas, Ignacio</au><au>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</au><au>Fernández-Aranda, Fernando</au><au>Nezu, Arthur M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>349-351</pages><issn>0969-5893</issn><eissn>1468-2850</eissn><abstract>Comments on the article by A. B. Dang et al. (see record 2022-48933-001). This review summarizes important evidence on what researchers have been claiming since the severity criteria for eating disorders (ED) were established, that these criteria do not represent all the relevant symptoms related to ED and that they are based on arbitrary thresholds. Upcoming versions of the DSM should consider all the evidence that point out the limitations of the current severity diagnosis for ED. Moreover, future classifications for ED severity should be based on robust empirical evidence that supports its use. In conclusion, the results presented in the review by Dang et al. should be a springboard to establish new classification criteria that overcome the limitations of the current system and help to improve the clinical tools, with the aim of establishing more precise diagnoses for ED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><cop>Washington DC</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/cps0000096</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-5082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-8033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-9898</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-5893 |
ispartof | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.349-351 |
issn | 0969-5893 1468-2850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2747942438 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Between Groups Design Binge Eating Disorder Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Eating Disorders Psychodiagnostic Typologies Psychopathology Rating Severity (Disorders) |
title | DSM-5 Severity Ratings for Eating Disorders: Some Clinical Implications and Future Directions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A07%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DSM-5%20Severity%20Ratings%20for%20Eating%20Disorders:%20Some%20Clinical%20Implications%20and%20Future%20Directions&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lucas,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=349-351&rft.issn=0969-5893&rft.eissn=1468-2850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/cps0000096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747942438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747942438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |