Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an accurate technique in diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis
The meta‐analysis was prepared to evaluate the diagnostic value of surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy for patients with breast cancer and to provide some statistically significant reference for the detection process. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were retrieved for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Raman spectroscopy 2022-12, Vol.53 (12), p.2058-2067 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2067 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2058 |
container_title | Journal of Raman spectroscopy |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Yue, Xiang Wang, Yashan Guo, Dingjie He, Guangliang Sui, Chuanying Qu, Zihan Zhao, Yinlong Liu, Xin |
description | The meta‐analysis was prepared to evaluate the diagnostic value of surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy for patients with breast cancer and to provide some statistically significant reference for the detection process. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were retrieved for randomized clinical trials by two independent reviewers. A comprehensive search was performed on July 15, 2022. Meta‐Disc 1.4 was used to calculate Spearman correlation coefficient. STATA 14.1 software was used to evaluate the diagnostic effect and the performance of subgroup analysis, which could be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Review manager 5.3 software was performed for quality assessment in our meta‐analysis. The results displayed 19 studies with 1299 patients were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis displayed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve of using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for diagnosing the patients with breast cancer were 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96), 14.06 (95% CI 9.25–21.35), 0.10 (95% CI 0.06–0.17), 140.64 (95% CI 59.63–331.70), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. The source of specificity heterogeneity was from different sample volume mixed with nanoparticle. Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. It was an accurate and effective technique for patients with breast cancer.
Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In the detection process, the diagnosis performance was higher when the test sample was serum and the laser wavelength was 785 nm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jrs.6437 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2747924282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747924282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-612146c84b01b97781964cf2f2793ef7b393e7662ea8ac28b32a107c7f96bb303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBN26m5tZk4q4U64WC0Oo6nEkTO6WdGZMZZHY-gs_ok5hat64OHD5-zvkRuqRkRAlhN5sQR1JwdYQGlGiVifF4fIwGhCuVEZHLU3QW44YQorWkA1Qvu-DBuu_PL1etobJuhRewgwrHxtk21NHWTY_LiNMKrO0CtA63zq6r8r1zuKzwqoS3qo6J1B4XwUFssd0nhVs8wTvXQgqHCrZ9MufoxMM2uou_OUSvs7uX6UM2f75_nE7mmWWaq0xSRoW0uSgILbRSOdVSWM88U5o7rwqehpKSOcjBsrzgDChRVnkti4ITPkRXh9wm1OnO2JpN3YV0RDRMCaWZYDlL6vqgbHo0BudNE8odhN5QYvZ1mlSn2deZaHagH-XW9f8687RY_voftgN4jA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747924282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an accurate technique in diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yue, Xiang ; Wang, Yashan ; Guo, Dingjie ; He, Guangliang ; Sui, Chuanying ; Qu, Zihan ; Zhao, Yinlong ; Liu, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiang ; Wang, Yashan ; Guo, Dingjie ; He, Guangliang ; Sui, Chuanying ; Qu, Zihan ; Zhao, Yinlong ; Liu, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>The meta‐analysis was prepared to evaluate the diagnostic value of surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy for patients with breast cancer and to provide some statistically significant reference for the detection process. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were retrieved for randomized clinical trials by two independent reviewers. A comprehensive search was performed on July 15, 2022. Meta‐Disc 1.4 was used to calculate Spearman correlation coefficient. STATA 14.1 software was used to evaluate the diagnostic effect and the performance of subgroup analysis, which could be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Review manager 5.3 software was performed for quality assessment in our meta‐analysis. The results displayed 19 studies with 1299 patients were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis displayed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve of using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for diagnosing the patients with breast cancer were 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96), 14.06 (95% CI 9.25–21.35), 0.10 (95% CI 0.06–0.17), 140.64 (95% CI 59.63–331.70), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. The source of specificity heterogeneity was from different sample volume mixed with nanoparticle. Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. It was an accurate and effective technique for patients with breast cancer.
Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In the detection process, the diagnosis performance was higher when the test sample was serum and the laser wavelength was 785 nm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-0486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jrs.6437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Clinical trials ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Diagnosis ; Heterogeneity ; Likelihood ratio ; Meta-analysis ; Nanoparticles ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Raman spectroscopy ; SERS ; Software ; Spectroscopy ; Spectrum analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Subgroups</subject><ispartof>Journal of Raman spectroscopy, 2022-12, Vol.53 (12), p.2058-2067</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-612146c84b01b97781964cf2f2793ef7b393e7662ea8ac28b32a107c7f96bb303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-612146c84b01b97781964cf2f2793ef7b393e7662ea8ac28b32a107c7f96bb303</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3486-5753</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjrs.6437$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjrs.6437$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yashan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Dingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sui, Chuanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yinlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an accurate technique in diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis</title><title>Journal of Raman spectroscopy</title><description>The meta‐analysis was prepared to evaluate the diagnostic value of surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy for patients with breast cancer and to provide some statistically significant reference for the detection process. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were retrieved for randomized clinical trials by two independent reviewers. A comprehensive search was performed on July 15, 2022. Meta‐Disc 1.4 was used to calculate Spearman correlation coefficient. STATA 14.1 software was used to evaluate the diagnostic effect and the performance of subgroup analysis, which could be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Review manager 5.3 software was performed for quality assessment in our meta‐analysis. The results displayed 19 studies with 1299 patients were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis displayed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve of using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for diagnosing the patients with breast cancer were 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96), 14.06 (95% CI 9.25–21.35), 0.10 (95% CI 0.06–0.17), 140.64 (95% CI 59.63–331.70), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. The source of specificity heterogeneity was from different sample volume mixed with nanoparticle. Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. It was an accurate and effective technique for patients with breast cancer.
Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In the detection process, the diagnosis performance was higher when the test sample was serum and the laser wavelength was 785 nm.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Likelihood ratio</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>SERS</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><issn>0377-0486</issn><issn>1097-4555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBN26m5tZk4q4U64WC0Oo6nEkTO6WdGZMZZHY-gs_ok5hat64OHD5-zvkRuqRkRAlhN5sQR1JwdYQGlGiVifF4fIwGhCuVEZHLU3QW44YQorWkA1Qvu-DBuu_PL1etobJuhRewgwrHxtk21NHWTY_LiNMKrO0CtA63zq6r8r1zuKzwqoS3qo6J1B4XwUFssd0nhVs8wTvXQgqHCrZ9MufoxMM2uou_OUSvs7uX6UM2f75_nE7mmWWaq0xSRoW0uSgILbRSOdVSWM88U5o7rwqehpKSOcjBsrzgDChRVnkti4ITPkRXh9wm1OnO2JpN3YV0RDRMCaWZYDlL6vqgbHo0BudNE8odhN5QYvZ1mlSn2deZaHagH-XW9f8687RY_voftgN4jA</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Yue, Xiang</creator><creator>Wang, Yashan</creator><creator>Guo, Dingjie</creator><creator>He, Guangliang</creator><creator>Sui, Chuanying</creator><creator>Qu, Zihan</creator><creator>Zhao, Yinlong</creator><creator>Liu, Xin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-5753</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an accurate technique in diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis</title><author>Yue, Xiang ; Wang, Yashan ; Guo, Dingjie ; He, Guangliang ; Sui, Chuanying ; Qu, Zihan ; Zhao, Yinlong ; Liu, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-612146c84b01b97781964cf2f2793ef7b393e7662ea8ac28b32a107c7f96bb303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Likelihood ratio</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>SERS</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yashan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Dingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sui, Chuanying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Zihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yinlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Raman spectroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yue, Xiang</au><au>Wang, Yashan</au><au>Guo, Dingjie</au><au>He, Guangliang</au><au>Sui, Chuanying</au><au>Qu, Zihan</au><au>Zhao, Yinlong</au><au>Liu, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an accurate technique in diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Raman spectroscopy</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2058</spage><epage>2067</epage><pages>2058-2067</pages><issn>0377-0486</issn><eissn>1097-4555</eissn><abstract>The meta‐analysis was prepared to evaluate the diagnostic value of surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy for patients with breast cancer and to provide some statistically significant reference for the detection process. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were retrieved for randomized clinical trials by two independent reviewers. A comprehensive search was performed on July 15, 2022. Meta‐Disc 1.4 was used to calculate Spearman correlation coefficient. STATA 14.1 software was used to evaluate the diagnostic effect and the performance of subgroup analysis, which could be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Review manager 5.3 software was performed for quality assessment in our meta‐analysis. The results displayed 19 studies with 1299 patients were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis displayed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve of using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for diagnosing the patients with breast cancer were 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96), 14.06 (95% CI 9.25–21.35), 0.10 (95% CI 0.06–0.17), 140.64 (95% CI 59.63–331.70), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. The source of specificity heterogeneity was from different sample volume mixed with nanoparticle. Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. It was an accurate and effective technique for patients with breast cancer.
Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In the detection process, the diagnosis performance was higher when the test sample was serum and the laser wavelength was 785 nm.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jrs.6437</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-5753</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-0486 |
ispartof | Journal of Raman spectroscopy, 2022-12, Vol.53 (12), p.2058-2067 |
issn | 0377-0486 1097-4555 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2747924282 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Breast cancer Clinical trials Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Diagnosis Heterogeneity Likelihood ratio Meta-analysis Nanoparticles Quality assessment Quality control Raman spectroscopy SERS Software Spectroscopy Spectrum analysis Statistical analysis Subgroups |
title | Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an accurate technique in diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A47%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%E2%80%90enhanced%20Raman%20spectroscopy%20is%20an%20accurate%20technique%20in%20diagnosis%20of%20breast%20cancer:%20A%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Raman%20spectroscopy&rft.au=Yue,%20Xiang&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2058&rft.epage=2067&rft.pages=2058-2067&rft.issn=0377-0486&rft.eissn=1097-4555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jrs.6437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747924282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747924282&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |