Comparison of Extraction Behavior of Magnesium from Magnesite/Magnesia by Aluminothermic Process in Flowing Argon

The reduction process of extracting magnesium directly from low-grade magnesite by aluminothermic method in flowing argon was investigated. Then the difference between this process and the process of extracting magnesium directly from magnesia was compared and analyzed. The results indicated that th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sustainable metallurgy 2022-12, Vol.8 (4), p.1756-1768
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Junhua, Li, Xin, Zhang, Ting’an, Han, Jibiao, Geng, Jianyuan, Wang, Yaosong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1768
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1756
container_title Journal of sustainable metallurgy
container_volume 8
creator Guo, Junhua
Li, Xin
Zhang, Ting’an
Han, Jibiao
Geng, Jianyuan
Wang, Yaosong
description The reduction process of extracting magnesium directly from low-grade magnesite by aluminothermic method in flowing argon was investigated. Then the difference between this process and the process of extracting magnesium directly from magnesia was compared and analyzed. The results indicated that the reduction percentage of magnesium oxide was higher when extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al pellets at the same temperature and time compared to MgO–Al pellets. The reduction percentage of magnesium oxide could reach more than 70% at 1523 K for 2 h. The kinetic models of extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al and MgO–Al systems in flowing argon could be explained by three-dimensional diffusion (D3) and first-order reaction model (F1), respectively. The apparent activation energies were 232.68 kJ/mol and 110.01 kJ/mol, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the reduction products of MgCO 3 –Al pellets formed MgO·Al 2 O 3 phase with regular octahedral structure at high temperature. For MgO–Al pellets, because MgO was easy to absorb moisture and deteriorate, with the progress of reduction reaction, layered double hydroxide compounds would be formed in the reduction products. Graphical Abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40831-022-00604-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2747917909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747917909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7854604e57de698bd27ee476e562615719f6a6c4bcb951f48d5d2189ae14db3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAf4GSJc6hfieNjqVpAKoIDnC0ncVJXjd3aCbR_j0sK3Djt7GhmVjsA3GB0hxHik8BQTnGCCEkQyhBL9mdgRLAQCY38-S8m9BKMQ1gjhAinjHM8AruZa7fKm-AsdDWc7zuvys7E7V6v1Idx_kg_q8bqYPoW1t61P2unJyekYHGA003fGuu6lfatKeGrd6UOARoLFxv3aWwDp75x9hpc1GoT9Pg0r8D7Yv42e0yWLw9Ps-kyKSkWXcLzlMVfdMornYm8qAjXmvFMpxnJcMqxqDOVlawoC5HimuVVWhGcC6Uxqwpa0CtwO-Ruvdv1OnRy7Xpv40lJOOMCc4FEVJFBVXoXgte13HrTKn-QGMlju3JoV8Z25Xe7ch9NdDCFKLaN9n_R_7i-AJGKflE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747917909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Extraction Behavior of Magnesium from Magnesite/Magnesia by Aluminothermic Process in Flowing Argon</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Guo, Junhua ; Li, Xin ; Zhang, Ting’an ; Han, Jibiao ; Geng, Jianyuan ; Wang, Yaosong</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Junhua ; Li, Xin ; Zhang, Ting’an ; Han, Jibiao ; Geng, Jianyuan ; Wang, Yaosong</creatorcontrib><description>The reduction process of extracting magnesium directly from low-grade magnesite by aluminothermic method in flowing argon was investigated. Then the difference between this process and the process of extracting magnesium directly from magnesia was compared and analyzed. The results indicated that the reduction percentage of magnesium oxide was higher when extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al pellets at the same temperature and time compared to MgO–Al pellets. The reduction percentage of magnesium oxide could reach more than 70% at 1523 K for 2 h. The kinetic models of extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al and MgO–Al systems in flowing argon could be explained by three-dimensional diffusion (D3) and first-order reaction model (F1), respectively. The apparent activation energies were 232.68 kJ/mol and 110.01 kJ/mol, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the reduction products of MgCO 3 –Al pellets formed MgO·Al 2 O 3 phase with regular octahedral structure at high temperature. For MgO–Al pellets, because MgO was easy to absorb moisture and deteriorate, with the progress of reduction reaction, layered double hydroxide compounds would be formed in the reduction products. Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-3823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-3831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40831-022-00604-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Argon ; Chemical reduction ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; High temperature ; Magnesite ; Magnesium carbonate ; Magnesium oxide ; Metallic Materials ; Moisture effects ; Pellets ; Research Article ; Superconductors (materials) ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Journal of sustainable metallurgy, 2022-12, Vol.8 (4), p.1756-1768</ispartof><rights>The Minerals, Metals &amp; Materials Society 2022</rights><rights>The Minerals, Metals &amp; Materials Society 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7854604e57de698bd27ee476e562615719f6a6c4bcb951f48d5d2189ae14db3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7854604e57de698bd27ee476e562615719f6a6c4bcb951f48d5d2189ae14db3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9778-5259</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40831-022-00604-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40831-022-00604-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Junhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ting’an</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jibiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Jianyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yaosong</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Extraction Behavior of Magnesium from Magnesite/Magnesia by Aluminothermic Process in Flowing Argon</title><title>Journal of sustainable metallurgy</title><addtitle>J. Sustain. Metall</addtitle><description>The reduction process of extracting magnesium directly from low-grade magnesite by aluminothermic method in flowing argon was investigated. Then the difference between this process and the process of extracting magnesium directly from magnesia was compared and analyzed. The results indicated that the reduction percentage of magnesium oxide was higher when extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al pellets at the same temperature and time compared to MgO–Al pellets. The reduction percentage of magnesium oxide could reach more than 70% at 1523 K for 2 h. The kinetic models of extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al and MgO–Al systems in flowing argon could be explained by three-dimensional diffusion (D3) and first-order reaction model (F1), respectively. The apparent activation energies were 232.68 kJ/mol and 110.01 kJ/mol, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the reduction products of MgCO 3 –Al pellets formed MgO·Al 2 O 3 phase with regular octahedral structure at high temperature. For MgO–Al pellets, because MgO was easy to absorb moisture and deteriorate, with the progress of reduction reaction, layered double hydroxide compounds would be formed in the reduction products. Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Argon</subject><subject>Chemical reduction</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Magnesite</subject><subject>Magnesium carbonate</subject><subject>Magnesium oxide</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Pellets</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Superconductors (materials)</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>2199-3823</issn><issn>2199-3831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIVNAf4GSJc6hfieNjqVpAKoIDnC0ncVJXjd3aCbR_j0sK3Djt7GhmVjsA3GB0hxHik8BQTnGCCEkQyhBL9mdgRLAQCY38-S8m9BKMQ1gjhAinjHM8AruZa7fKm-AsdDWc7zuvys7E7V6v1Idx_kg_q8bqYPoW1t61P2unJyekYHGA003fGuu6lfatKeGrd6UOARoLFxv3aWwDp75x9hpc1GoT9Pg0r8D7Yv42e0yWLw9Ps-kyKSkWXcLzlMVfdMornYm8qAjXmvFMpxnJcMqxqDOVlawoC5HimuVVWhGcC6Uxqwpa0CtwO-Ruvdv1OnRy7Xpv40lJOOMCc4FEVJFBVXoXgte13HrTKn-QGMlju3JoV8Z25Xe7ch9NdDCFKLaN9n_R_7i-AJGKflE</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Guo, Junhua</creator><creator>Li, Xin</creator><creator>Zhang, Ting’an</creator><creator>Han, Jibiao</creator><creator>Geng, Jianyuan</creator><creator>Wang, Yaosong</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-5259</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Extraction Behavior of Magnesium from Magnesite/Magnesia by Aluminothermic Process in Flowing Argon</title><author>Guo, Junhua ; Li, Xin ; Zhang, Ting’an ; Han, Jibiao ; Geng, Jianyuan ; Wang, Yaosong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7854604e57de698bd27ee476e562615719f6a6c4bcb951f48d5d2189ae14db3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Argon</topic><topic>Chemical reduction</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Magnesite</topic><topic>Magnesium carbonate</topic><topic>Magnesium oxide</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Pellets</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Superconductors (materials)</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Junhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ting’an</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jibiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Jianyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yaosong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of sustainable metallurgy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Junhua</au><au>Li, Xin</au><au>Zhang, Ting’an</au><au>Han, Jibiao</au><au>Geng, Jianyuan</au><au>Wang, Yaosong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Extraction Behavior of Magnesium from Magnesite/Magnesia by Aluminothermic Process in Flowing Argon</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sustainable metallurgy</jtitle><stitle>J. Sustain. Metall</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1756</spage><epage>1768</epage><pages>1756-1768</pages><issn>2199-3823</issn><eissn>2199-3831</eissn><abstract>The reduction process of extracting magnesium directly from low-grade magnesite by aluminothermic method in flowing argon was investigated. Then the difference between this process and the process of extracting magnesium directly from magnesia was compared and analyzed. The results indicated that the reduction percentage of magnesium oxide was higher when extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al pellets at the same temperature and time compared to MgO–Al pellets. The reduction percentage of magnesium oxide could reach more than 70% at 1523 K for 2 h. The kinetic models of extracting magnesium from MgCO 3 –Al and MgO–Al systems in flowing argon could be explained by three-dimensional diffusion (D3) and first-order reaction model (F1), respectively. The apparent activation energies were 232.68 kJ/mol and 110.01 kJ/mol, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the reduction products of MgCO 3 –Al pellets formed MgO·Al 2 O 3 phase with regular octahedral structure at high temperature. For MgO–Al pellets, because MgO was easy to absorb moisture and deteriorate, with the progress of reduction reaction, layered double hydroxide compounds would be formed in the reduction products. Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40831-022-00604-x</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-5259</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-3823
ispartof Journal of sustainable metallurgy, 2022-12, Vol.8 (4), p.1756-1768
issn 2199-3823
2199-3831
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2747917909
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aluminum oxide
Argon
Chemical reduction
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
High temperature
Magnesite
Magnesium carbonate
Magnesium oxide
Metallic Materials
Moisture effects
Pellets
Research Article
Superconductors (materials)
Sustainable Development
title Comparison of Extraction Behavior of Magnesium from Magnesite/Magnesia by Aluminothermic Process in Flowing Argon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A09%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Extraction%20Behavior%20of%20Magnesium%20from%20Magnesite/Magnesia%20by%20Aluminothermic%20Process%20in%20Flowing%20Argon&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sustainable%20metallurgy&rft.au=Guo,%20Junhua&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1756&rft.epage=1768&rft.pages=1756-1768&rft.issn=2199-3823&rft.eissn=2199-3831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40831-022-00604-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747917909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747917909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true