Coloniality as Appropriation of Indigenous Ontologies: Insights From South Africa and Ethiopia
The purpose of this investigation is to frame Global North colonialism in southern and eastern Africa as ontological appropriation. In the article’s conceptual framework, ontological appropriation is colonial claims to aspects of African realities without acknowledgment of their original sources and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of black studies 2023-01, Vol.54 (1), p.45-61 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Journal of black studies |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Eybers, Oscar Oliver |
description | The purpose of this investigation is to frame Global North colonialism in southern and eastern Africa as ontological appropriation. In the article’s conceptual framework, ontological appropriation is colonial claims to aspects of African realities without acknowledgment of their original sources and creators. In the case of southern Africa, Global North appropriation of Khoi and San agriculturalist ontologies is illustrated. Additionally, attempts by the Global North to claim origination of Ethiopia’s ancient ontologies are cited as evidence of colonial appropriation. In accordance, the methods of the investigation involved a review of scholarship related to indigenous ontologies in South and East Africa. Moreover, scholarly voices speaking to epistemic encounters between the Global North with Africans are observed. Thus, a thesis of ontological appropriation is generated. Results of the investigation indicate sustained Global North warfare, and epistemic assaults led to the fall of Khoi, San, hunter-gather, and pastoral ontologies in the South. In contrast, in the East Ethiopia’s ancient theocracy, and monarchies prevented Global North acquisition of land, and ontic dominance. The article concludes colonialism was a deliberate attempt to modify, and control African ontologies. As a result, in southern Africa Khoi San ontologies transformed from hunter-gatherers, and pastoralists to colonial servitude. In Ethiopia, however, monarchical, and theocratic ontologies are vibrant to the present age. Hence, this article’s contribution to new knowledge is its accentuation of divergent hunter-gatherer, pastoralist, and monarchical responses to colonialism in ways that enabled, and resisted colonial appropriation of indigenous ontologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00219347221134282 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2747857637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00219347221134282</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2747857637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-efc31665d88ade6dd8848d2887ccbc3d7fed485a964d0bc370cb490609a830143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJg_fgB3gKet-Y7WW-ltFoo9KBeXdIku01pNzXJHvrvTangQZzLg5n33sw8AB4wGmMs5RNCBNeUSUIwpowocgFGmHNSMS7EJRid5tWJcA1uUtqiUkygEfichl3ovd75fIQ6wcnhEMMhep196GFo4aK3vnN9GBJc9bmQO-_Sc2kn321ygvMY9vAtDHkDJ230RkPdWzjLGx8OXt-Bq1bvkrv_wVvwMZ-9T1-r5eplMZ0sK0M5z5VrDcVCcKuUtk7YgkxZopQ0Zm2ola2zTHFdC2ZRaUhk1qxGAtVaUYQZvQWPZ99y_dfgUm62YYh9WdkQyaTiUlBZWPjMMjGkFF3blE_3Oh4bjJpTjM2fGItmfNYk3blf1_8F3y-Lcjk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747857637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coloniality as Appropriation of Indigenous Ontologies: Insights From South Africa and Ethiopia</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation is to frame Global North colonialism in southern and eastern Africa as ontological appropriation. In the article’s conceptual framework, ontological appropriation is colonial claims to aspects of African realities without acknowledgment of their original sources and creators. In the case of southern Africa, Global North appropriation of Khoi and San agriculturalist ontologies is illustrated. Additionally, attempts by the Global North to claim origination of Ethiopia’s ancient ontologies are cited as evidence of colonial appropriation. In accordance, the methods of the investigation involved a review of scholarship related to indigenous ontologies in South and East Africa. Moreover, scholarly voices speaking to epistemic encounters between the Global North with Africans are observed. Thus, a thesis of ontological appropriation is generated. Results of the investigation indicate sustained Global North warfare, and epistemic assaults led to the fall of Khoi, San, hunter-gather, and pastoral ontologies in the South. In contrast, in the East Ethiopia’s ancient theocracy, and monarchies prevented Global North acquisition of land, and ontic dominance. The article concludes colonialism was a deliberate attempt to modify, and control African ontologies. As a result, in southern Africa Khoi San ontologies transformed from hunter-gatherers, and pastoralists to colonial servitude. In Ethiopia, however, monarchical, and theocratic ontologies are vibrant to the present age. Hence, this article’s contribution to new knowledge is its accentuation of divergent hunter-gatherer, pastoralist, and monarchical responses to colonialism in ways that enabled, and resisted colonial appropriation of indigenous ontologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00219347221134282</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Appropriation ; Black people ; Colonialism ; Dominance ; Foreign Policy ; Hunter-gatherers ; Indigenous peoples ; Ontology ; Pastoralism ; Theocracy</subject><ispartof>Journal of black studies, 2023-01, Vol.54 (1), p.45-61</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-efc31665d88ade6dd8848d2887ccbc3d7fed485a964d0bc370cb490609a830143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-efc31665d88ade6dd8848d2887ccbc3d7fed485a964d0bc370cb490609a830143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2693-3955</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00219347221134282$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00219347221134282$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Coloniality as Appropriation of Indigenous Ontologies: Insights From South Africa and Ethiopia</title><title>Journal of black studies</title><description>The purpose of this investigation is to frame Global North colonialism in southern and eastern Africa as ontological appropriation. In the article’s conceptual framework, ontological appropriation is colonial claims to aspects of African realities without acknowledgment of their original sources and creators. In the case of southern Africa, Global North appropriation of Khoi and San agriculturalist ontologies is illustrated. Additionally, attempts by the Global North to claim origination of Ethiopia’s ancient ontologies are cited as evidence of colonial appropriation. In accordance, the methods of the investigation involved a review of scholarship related to indigenous ontologies in South and East Africa. Moreover, scholarly voices speaking to epistemic encounters between the Global North with Africans are observed. Thus, a thesis of ontological appropriation is generated. Results of the investigation indicate sustained Global North warfare, and epistemic assaults led to the fall of Khoi, San, hunter-gather, and pastoral ontologies in the South. In contrast, in the East Ethiopia’s ancient theocracy, and monarchies prevented Global North acquisition of land, and ontic dominance. The article concludes colonialism was a deliberate attempt to modify, and control African ontologies. As a result, in southern Africa Khoi San ontologies transformed from hunter-gatherers, and pastoralists to colonial servitude. In Ethiopia, however, monarchical, and theocratic ontologies are vibrant to the present age. Hence, this article’s contribution to new knowledge is its accentuation of divergent hunter-gatherer, pastoralist, and monarchical responses to colonialism in ways that enabled, and resisted colonial appropriation of indigenous ontologies.</description><subject>Appropriation</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Foreign Policy</subject><subject>Hunter-gatherers</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Pastoralism</subject><subject>Theocracy</subject><issn>0021-9347</issn><issn>1552-4566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJg_fgB3gKet-Y7WW-ltFoo9KBeXdIku01pNzXJHvrvTangQZzLg5n33sw8AB4wGmMs5RNCBNeUSUIwpowocgFGmHNSMS7EJRid5tWJcA1uUtqiUkygEfichl3ovd75fIQ6wcnhEMMhep196GFo4aK3vnN9GBJc9bmQO-_Sc2kn321ygvMY9vAtDHkDJ230RkPdWzjLGx8OXt-Bq1bvkrv_wVvwMZ-9T1-r5eplMZ0sK0M5z5VrDcVCcKuUtk7YgkxZopQ0Zm2ola2zTHFdC2ZRaUhk1qxGAtVaUYQZvQWPZ99y_dfgUm62YYh9WdkQyaTiUlBZWPjMMjGkFF3blE_3Oh4bjJpTjM2fGItmfNYk3blf1_8F3y-Lcjk</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-3955</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Coloniality as Appropriation of Indigenous Ontologies: Insights From South Africa and Ethiopia</title><author>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-efc31665d88ade6dd8848d2887ccbc3d7fed485a964d0bc370cb490609a830143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Appropriation</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Foreign Policy</topic><topic>Hunter-gatherers</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Pastoralism</topic><topic>Theocracy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of black studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eybers, Oscar Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coloniality as Appropriation of Indigenous Ontologies: Insights From South Africa and Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of black studies</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>45-61</pages><issn>0021-9347</issn><eissn>1552-4566</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this investigation is to frame Global North colonialism in southern and eastern Africa as ontological appropriation. In the article’s conceptual framework, ontological appropriation is colonial claims to aspects of African realities without acknowledgment of their original sources and creators. In the case of southern Africa, Global North appropriation of Khoi and San agriculturalist ontologies is illustrated. Additionally, attempts by the Global North to claim origination of Ethiopia’s ancient ontologies are cited as evidence of colonial appropriation. In accordance, the methods of the investigation involved a review of scholarship related to indigenous ontologies in South and East Africa. Moreover, scholarly voices speaking to epistemic encounters between the Global North with Africans are observed. Thus, a thesis of ontological appropriation is generated. Results of the investigation indicate sustained Global North warfare, and epistemic assaults led to the fall of Khoi, San, hunter-gather, and pastoral ontologies in the South. In contrast, in the East Ethiopia’s ancient theocracy, and monarchies prevented Global North acquisition of land, and ontic dominance. The article concludes colonialism was a deliberate attempt to modify, and control African ontologies. As a result, in southern Africa Khoi San ontologies transformed from hunter-gatherers, and pastoralists to colonial servitude. In Ethiopia, however, monarchical, and theocratic ontologies are vibrant to the present age. Hence, this article’s contribution to new knowledge is its accentuation of divergent hunter-gatherer, pastoralist, and monarchical responses to colonialism in ways that enabled, and resisted colonial appropriation of indigenous ontologies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00219347221134282</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-3955</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9347 |
ispartof | Journal of black studies, 2023-01, Vol.54 (1), p.45-61 |
issn | 0021-9347 1552-4566 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2747857637 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Appropriation Black people Colonialism Dominance Foreign Policy Hunter-gatherers Indigenous peoples Ontology Pastoralism Theocracy |
title | Coloniality as Appropriation of Indigenous Ontologies: Insights From South Africa and Ethiopia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coloniality%20as%20Appropriation%20of%20Indigenous%20Ontologies:%20Insights%20From%20South%20Africa%20and%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20black%20studies&rft.au=Eybers,%20Oscar%20Oliver&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=45-61&rft.issn=0021-9347&rft.eissn=1552-4566&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00219347221134282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747857637%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747857637&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00219347221134282&rfr_iscdi=true |