Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation
In the United States, 'fenceline communities' next to petrochemical facilities have been conducting and advocating for air monitoring since the 1990s, highlighting gaps in U.S. environmental regulators' monitoring programs. Citizen science is imagined to be valuable as a source of dat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science as culture 2022-10, Vol.31 (4), p.504-529 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 529 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 504 |
container_title | Science as culture |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ottinger, Gwen |
description | In the United States, 'fenceline communities' next to petrochemical facilities have been conducting and advocating for air monitoring since the 1990s, highlighting gaps in U.S. environmental regulators' monitoring programs. Citizen science is imagined to be valuable as a source of data for filling such gaps. But fenceline communities' air monitoring activities also underscore regulators' hermeneutic ignorance, namely their lack of appropriate concepts, categories, and metrics for understanding the temporality of air pollution as experienced by marginalized communities. Citizen science could play a valuable role in addressing hermeneutic ignorance, by providing more adequate epistemic resources for understanding the environmental harms. In the case of community monitoring programs, these have included epistemic resources for understanding the immediacy of air pollution and the chronic nature of unpredictable spikes in pollution. However, regulators confronted with community-led monitoring have acknowledged neither citizen scientists' contributions to epistemic resources nor their own hermeneutic ignorance, limiting the potential for citizen science to address institutionalized ignorance. Recognizing hermeneutic ignorance shows the important role that epistemic resources play in institutionalizing ignorance, and points to reforms necessary if citizen science is to make robust contributions to environmental protection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2747751964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747751964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-eb2930917e59784a111e0bf170fc4c49a77d78ccb861a2b428689308ffb14a243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIAS8bs1p0yX1ShnTDRTBOfAupGk6MrpkJqkyn96WzVtvzoHD9_8HPoSugaRAOLklZUEKmkOakSzrR14wICdoBJSRBICXp2g0MMkAnaOLEDaEACclH6GPFxM6W2sforS1sWs8NdH8aIuXymir9B2ea7_VVnfRKLxYW-dlf8bG4lW6TPHMfhnvbE9E2eI3ve5aGY2zl-iskW3QV8c9RqvH2ft0njy_Pi2mD8-JynMeE11lZU5KYLooGacSADSpGmCkUVTRUjJWM65UxScgs4pmfML7AG-aCqjMaD5GN4fenXefnQ5RbFznbf9SZIwyVkA5GajiQCnvQvC6ETtvttLvBRAxSBR_EsUgURwl9rn7Q87Yxvmt_Ha-rUWU-9b5ZhBhgsj_r_gFzdd37g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747751964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Ottinger, Gwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Ottinger, Gwen</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States, 'fenceline communities' next to petrochemical facilities have been conducting and advocating for air monitoring since the 1990s, highlighting gaps in U.S. environmental regulators' monitoring programs. Citizen science is imagined to be valuable as a source of data for filling such gaps. But fenceline communities' air monitoring activities also underscore regulators' hermeneutic ignorance, namely their lack of appropriate concepts, categories, and metrics for understanding the temporality of air pollution as experienced by marginalized communities. Citizen science could play a valuable role in addressing hermeneutic ignorance, by providing more adequate epistemic resources for understanding the environmental harms. In the case of community monitoring programs, these have included epistemic resources for understanding the immediacy of air pollution and the chronic nature of unpredictable spikes in pollution. However, regulators confronted with community-led monitoring have acknowledged neither citizen scientists' contributions to epistemic resources nor their own hermeneutic ignorance, limiting the potential for citizen science to address institutionalized ignorance. Recognizing hermeneutic ignorance shows the important role that epistemic resources play in institutionalizing ignorance, and points to reforms necessary if citizen science is to make robust contributions to environmental protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-5431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; citizen science ; Citizens ; Community ; Environmental justice ; Environmental protection ; epistemic resources ; Epistemology ; Exegesis & hermeneutics ; hermeneutic ignorance ; Ignorance ; knowledge gaps ; Marginality ; Science ; undone science</subject><ispartof>Science as culture, 2022-10, Vol.31 (4), p.504-529</ispartof><rights>2022 Process Press 2022</rights><rights>2022 Process Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-eb2930917e59784a111e0bf170fc4c49a77d78ccb861a2b428689308ffb14a243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-eb2930917e59784a111e0bf170fc4c49a77d78ccb861a2b428689308ffb14a243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,33772,59645,60434</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ottinger, Gwen</creatorcontrib><title>Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation</title><title>Science as culture</title><description>In the United States, 'fenceline communities' next to petrochemical facilities have been conducting and advocating for air monitoring since the 1990s, highlighting gaps in U.S. environmental regulators' monitoring programs. Citizen science is imagined to be valuable as a source of data for filling such gaps. But fenceline communities' air monitoring activities also underscore regulators' hermeneutic ignorance, namely their lack of appropriate concepts, categories, and metrics for understanding the temporality of air pollution as experienced by marginalized communities. Citizen science could play a valuable role in addressing hermeneutic ignorance, by providing more adequate epistemic resources for understanding the environmental harms. In the case of community monitoring programs, these have included epistemic resources for understanding the immediacy of air pollution and the chronic nature of unpredictable spikes in pollution. However, regulators confronted with community-led monitoring have acknowledged neither citizen scientists' contributions to epistemic resources nor their own hermeneutic ignorance, limiting the potential for citizen science to address institutionalized ignorance. Recognizing hermeneutic ignorance shows the important role that epistemic resources play in institutionalizing ignorance, and points to reforms necessary if citizen science is to make robust contributions to environmental protection.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>citizen science</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>epistemic resources</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Exegesis & hermeneutics</subject><subject>hermeneutic ignorance</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>knowledge gaps</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>undone science</subject><issn>0950-5431</issn><issn>1470-1189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIAS8bs1p0yX1ShnTDRTBOfAupGk6MrpkJqkyn96WzVtvzoHD9_8HPoSugaRAOLklZUEKmkOakSzrR14wICdoBJSRBICXp2g0MMkAnaOLEDaEACclH6GPFxM6W2sforS1sWs8NdH8aIuXymir9B2ea7_VVnfRKLxYW-dlf8bG4lW6TPHMfhnvbE9E2eI3ve5aGY2zl-iskW3QV8c9RqvH2ft0njy_Pi2mD8-JynMeE11lZU5KYLooGacSADSpGmCkUVTRUjJWM65UxScgs4pmfML7AG-aCqjMaD5GN4fenXefnQ5RbFznbf9SZIwyVkA5GajiQCnvQvC6ETtvttLvBRAxSBR_EsUgURwl9rn7Q87Yxvmt_Ha-rUWU-9b5ZhBhgsj_r_gFzdd37g</recordid><startdate>20221002</startdate><enddate>20221002</enddate><creator>Ottinger, Gwen</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221002</creationdate><title>Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation</title><author>Ottinger, Gwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-eb2930917e59784a111e0bf170fc4c49a77d78ccb861a2b428689308ffb14a243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>citizen science</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>epistemic resources</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Exegesis & hermeneutics</topic><topic>hermeneutic ignorance</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>knowledge gaps</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>undone science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ottinger, Gwen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Science as culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ottinger, Gwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation</atitle><jtitle>Science as culture</jtitle><date>2022-10-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>504-529</pages><issn>0950-5431</issn><eissn>1470-1189</eissn><abstract>In the United States, 'fenceline communities' next to petrochemical facilities have been conducting and advocating for air monitoring since the 1990s, highlighting gaps in U.S. environmental regulators' monitoring programs. Citizen science is imagined to be valuable as a source of data for filling such gaps. But fenceline communities' air monitoring activities also underscore regulators' hermeneutic ignorance, namely their lack of appropriate concepts, categories, and metrics for understanding the temporality of air pollution as experienced by marginalized communities. Citizen science could play a valuable role in addressing hermeneutic ignorance, by providing more adequate epistemic resources for understanding the environmental harms. In the case of community monitoring programs, these have included epistemic resources for understanding the immediacy of air pollution and the chronic nature of unpredictable spikes in pollution. However, regulators confronted with community-led monitoring have acknowledged neither citizen scientists' contributions to epistemic resources nor their own hermeneutic ignorance, limiting the potential for citizen science to address institutionalized ignorance. Recognizing hermeneutic ignorance shows the important role that epistemic resources play in institutionalizing ignorance, and points to reforms necessary if citizen science is to make robust contributions to environmental protection.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-5431 |
ispartof | Science as culture, 2022-10, Vol.31 (4), p.504-529 |
issn | 0950-5431 1470-1189 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2747751964 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Air pollution citizen science Citizens Community Environmental justice Environmental protection epistemic resources Epistemology Exegesis & hermeneutics hermeneutic ignorance Ignorance knowledge gaps Marginality Science undone science |
title | Misunderstanding Citizen Science: Hermeneutic Ignorance in U.S. Environmental Regulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misunderstanding%20Citizen%20Science:%20Hermeneutic%20Ignorance%20in%20U.S.%20Environmental%20Regulation&rft.jtitle=Science%20as%20culture&rft.au=Ottinger,%20Gwen&rft.date=2022-10-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=504-529&rft.issn=0950-5431&rft.eissn=1470-1189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2747751964%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747751964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |