Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia

This paper investigates part-year factory operation, a common but understudied dimension of industrializing economies, in a prototypical late-industrializing setting that offers rich factory-level data: Imperial Russia. Newly compiled data provides detailed descriptions of all Russian manufacturing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of economic history 2022-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1143-1182
Hauptverfasser: Gregg, Amanda, Matiashvili, Tamar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1182
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1143
container_title The Journal of economic history
container_volume 82
creator Gregg, Amanda
Matiashvili, Tamar
description This paper investigates part-year factory operation, a common but understudied dimension of industrializing economies, in a prototypical late-industrializing setting that offers rich factory-level data: Imperial Russia. Newly compiled data provides detailed descriptions of all Russian manufacturing firms operating in 1894 and shows that factories operating a greater number of annual working days were more mechanized, more urban, more likely to employ women and children, more productive, and more likely to survive. Rather than arguing that part-year operation demonstrated Russia’s uniquely inexorable backwardness, we stress operating time’s relationship to fundamental drivers of growth, including urbanization, geography, and institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022050722000341
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2744454594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022050722000341</cupid><sourcerecordid>2744454594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-779c5f24314fae88d02d8a2233f7b8a009d655d6f75fe03b745509dcd5b0bd8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4tqAn7XDDVUUKqVqxePAKXJiu7hq4mCnB_j1JLSoB8RlV9r5ZkZaAC4xusYIi5tnhAhBHIluIkQZPgIDzAROxlSQYzDo5aTXT8FZjOuOIUimAxDmXptQuy_VOl9DV8Nl8KtgYryFSxXa5M2oABeNCT_ACM5N-a5--RFUtYaZKnyAUx9KAye-anx0v2GZag2cVZ3dqQ182sbo1Dk4sWoTzcV-D8Hr9P5l8phki4fZ5C5LSoZEmwiRltwSRjGzykipEdFSEUKpFYVUCKV6zLkeW8GtQbQQjPPuVmpeoEJLS4fgapfbBP-xNbHN134b6q4yJ4IxxhlPWUfhHVUGH2MwNm-Cq1T4zDHK-9fmf17beeDOY0pfu3hwSCIJ55z0CN3HqqoITq_Mof3_4G86XIUP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2744454594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gregg, Amanda ; Matiashvili, Tamar</creator><creatorcontrib>Gregg, Amanda ; Matiashvili, Tamar</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates part-year factory operation, a common but understudied dimension of industrializing economies, in a prototypical late-industrializing setting that offers rich factory-level data: Imperial Russia. Newly compiled data provides detailed descriptions of all Russian manufacturing firms operating in 1894 and shows that factories operating a greater number of annual working days were more mechanized, more urban, more likely to employ women and children, more productive, and more likely to survive. Rather than arguing that part-year operation demonstrated Russia’s uniquely inexorable backwardness, we stress operating time’s relationship to fundamental drivers of growth, including urbanization, geography, and institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0507</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022050722000341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>1894 ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Datasets ; Division of labor ; Economic development ; Economic history ; Factories ; Farmworkers ; Geography ; Growth models ; Industrial development ; Industrialisierung ; Industrie ; Investigations ; Kinderarbeit ; Labor force ; Labor market ; Mechanization ; Modernization ; Mothers ; Productivity ; Property rights ; Russland ; Urbanization ; Weibliche Arbeitskräfte ; Women ; Working hours</subject><ispartof>The Journal of economic history, 2022-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1143-1182</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Economic History Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-779c5f24314fae88d02d8a2233f7b8a009d655d6f75fe03b745509dcd5b0bd8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-779c5f24314fae88d02d8a2233f7b8a009d655d6f75fe03b745509dcd5b0bd8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050722000341/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gregg, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matiashvili, Tamar</creatorcontrib><title>Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia</title><title>The Journal of economic history</title><addtitle>J. Econ. Hist</addtitle><description>This paper investigates part-year factory operation, a common but understudied dimension of industrializing economies, in a prototypical late-industrializing setting that offers rich factory-level data: Imperial Russia. Newly compiled data provides detailed descriptions of all Russian manufacturing firms operating in 1894 and shows that factories operating a greater number of annual working days were more mechanized, more urban, more likely to employ women and children, more productive, and more likely to survive. Rather than arguing that part-year operation demonstrated Russia’s uniquely inexorable backwardness, we stress operating time’s relationship to fundamental drivers of growth, including urbanization, geography, and institutions.</description><subject>1894</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Division of labor</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Factories</subject><subject>Farmworkers</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Industrialisierung</subject><subject>Industrie</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Kinderarbeit</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Mechanization</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Russland</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Weibliche Arbeitskräfte</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><issn>0022-0507</issn><issn>1471-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4tqAn7XDDVUUKqVqxePAKXJiu7hq4mCnB_j1JLSoB8RlV9r5ZkZaAC4xusYIi5tnhAhBHIluIkQZPgIDzAROxlSQYzDo5aTXT8FZjOuOIUimAxDmXptQuy_VOl9DV8Nl8KtgYryFSxXa5M2oABeNCT_ACM5N-a5--RFUtYaZKnyAUx9KAye-anx0v2GZag2cVZ3dqQ182sbo1Dk4sWoTzcV-D8Hr9P5l8phki4fZ5C5LSoZEmwiRltwSRjGzykipEdFSEUKpFYVUCKV6zLkeW8GtQbQQjPPuVmpeoEJLS4fgapfbBP-xNbHN134b6q4yJ4IxxhlPWUfhHVUGH2MwNm-Cq1T4zDHK-9fmf17beeDOY0pfu3hwSCIJ55z0CN3HqqoITq_Mof3_4G86XIUP</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Gregg, Amanda</creator><creator>Matiashvili, Tamar</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia</title><author>Gregg, Amanda ; Matiashvili, Tamar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-779c5f24314fae88d02d8a2233f7b8a009d655d6f75fe03b745509dcd5b0bd8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>1894</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Division of labor</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Factories</topic><topic>Farmworkers</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Industrialisierung</topic><topic>Industrie</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Kinderarbeit</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Mechanization</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Russland</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Weibliche Arbeitskräfte</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gregg, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matiashvili, Tamar</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of economic history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gregg, Amanda</au><au>Matiashvili, Tamar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of economic history</jtitle><addtitle>J. Econ. Hist</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1143</spage><epage>1182</epage><pages>1143-1182</pages><issn>0022-0507</issn><eissn>1471-6372</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates part-year factory operation, a common but understudied dimension of industrializing economies, in a prototypical late-industrializing setting that offers rich factory-level data: Imperial Russia. Newly compiled data provides detailed descriptions of all Russian manufacturing firms operating in 1894 and shows that factories operating a greater number of annual working days were more mechanized, more urban, more likely to employ women and children, more productive, and more likely to survive. Rather than arguing that part-year operation demonstrated Russia’s uniquely inexorable backwardness, we stress operating time’s relationship to fundamental drivers of growth, including urbanization, geography, and institutions.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022050722000341</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0507
ispartof The Journal of economic history, 2022-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1143-1182
issn 0022-0507
1471-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2744454594
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 1894
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Datasets
Division of labor
Economic development
Economic history
Factories
Farmworkers
Geography
Growth models
Industrial development
Industrialisierung
Industrie
Investigations
Kinderarbeit
Labor force
Labor market
Mechanization
Modernization
Mothers
Productivity
Property rights
Russland
Urbanization
Weibliche Arbeitskräfte
Women
Working hours
title Modernization in Progress: Part-Year Operation, Mechanization, and Labor Force Composition in Late Imperial Russia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modernization%20in%20Progress:%20Part-Year%20Operation,%20Mechanization,%20and%20Labor%20Force%20Composition%20in%20Late%20Imperial%20Russia&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20economic%20history&rft.au=Gregg,%20Amanda&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1143&rft.epage=1182&rft.pages=1143-1182&rft.issn=0022-0507&rft.eissn=1471-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022050722000341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744454594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2744454594&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022050722000341&rfr_iscdi=true