Residential Exodus from Dublin Circa 1900: Municipal Annexation and Preferences for Local Government

Dublin experienced a marked stagnation in population growth in the second half of the nineteenth century, accompanied by decaying infrastructure and poor public health. Historians have emphasized that this crisis was coupled with poor governance of the city of Dublin—manifested by eroding public ser...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of economic history 2022-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1109-1141
Hauptverfasser: Berger, Silvi K., Mariuzzo, Franco, Ormosi, Peter L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1141
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1109
container_title The Journal of economic history
container_volume 82
creator Berger, Silvi K.
Mariuzzo, Franco
Ormosi, Peter L.
description Dublin experienced a marked stagnation in population growth in the second half of the nineteenth century, accompanied by decaying infrastructure and poor public health. Historians have emphasized that this crisis was coupled with poor governance of the city of Dublin—manifested by eroding public services together with increasing tax burdens to counteract growing debt. This paper studies the municipal boundary expansion of Dublin in 1901, which occurred as a way to alleviate the city’s financial distress. It saw multiple relatively wealthy townships annexed by the city via royal order to increase Dublin’s tax base. Using a sample of census records matched to city streets, we show that wealthy residents and Protestant residents were more likely to leave annexed areas compared to areas that remained independent. Moreover, we offer anecdotal evidence that at least some of the wealthy Protestant households departing annexed townships sorted into jurisdictions that remained independent. Our findings offer support to arguments that the municipal annexation by the city of Dublin may have accelerated the decline of annexed areas in the early twentieth century and contributed to municipal fragmentation in metropolitan Dublin.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022050722000390
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2744451368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022050722000390</cupid><sourcerecordid>2744451368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1f7fcec65a74000436caf3bde994951b741b3d40f6c74aa02f282f1844a707453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4hxYPxIn3KpSClIRiMc5chwbuWrsYieo_HtctVIPiMvuYb-ZHQ1ClwSuCRBx8wZAKeQg0gRgFRyhEeGCZAUT9BiNtudsez9FZzEuE0OhrEaofdXRttr1Vq7wbOPbIWITfIfvhmZlHZ7aoCQmFcAtfhqcVXadwIlzeiN76x2WrsUvQRsdtFM6iX3AC68SNPffOrgueZ-jEyNXUV_s9xh93M_epw_Z4nn-OJ0sMsUY7TNihFFaFbkUPAXkrFDSsKbVVcWrnDSCk4a1HEyhBJcSqKElNaTkXAoQPGdjdLXzXQf_NejY10s_BJde1lRwznPCijJRZEep4GNM0et1sJ0MPzWBeltm_afMpME7jVbe2XhQlClCnvOKJITtbWXXBNt-6sP3_41_AaHxfu4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2744451368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residential Exodus from Dublin Circa 1900: Municipal Annexation and Preferences for Local Government</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Berger, Silvi K. ; Mariuzzo, Franco ; Ormosi, Peter L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, Silvi K. ; Mariuzzo, Franco ; Ormosi, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><description>Dublin experienced a marked stagnation in population growth in the second half of the nineteenth century, accompanied by decaying infrastructure and poor public health. Historians have emphasized that this crisis was coupled with poor governance of the city of Dublin—manifested by eroding public services together with increasing tax burdens to counteract growing debt. This paper studies the municipal boundary expansion of Dublin in 1901, which occurred as a way to alleviate the city’s financial distress. It saw multiple relatively wealthy townships annexed by the city via royal order to increase Dublin’s tax base. Using a sample of census records matched to city streets, we show that wealthy residents and Protestant residents were more likely to leave annexed areas compared to areas that remained independent. Moreover, we offer anecdotal evidence that at least some of the wealthy Protestant households departing annexed townships sorted into jurisdictions that remained independent. Our findings offer support to arguments that the municipal annexation by the city of Dublin may have accelerated the decline of annexed areas in the early twentieth century and contributed to municipal fragmentation in metropolitan Dublin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0507</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022050722000390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>1900 ; 19th century ; 20th century ; Annexation ; Censuses ; Cities ; Dublin ; Economic history ; Gemeindefinanzen ; Governance ; Grenze ; Historians ; Households ; Infrastructure ; Irland ; Kommunalverwaltung ; Local government ; Politics ; Population growth ; Psychological distress ; Public health ; Public services ; Segmentation ; Social history ; Stadtflucht ; Stagnation ; Suburban areas ; Taxation ; Townships ; Vermögen</subject><ispartof>The Journal of economic history, 2022-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1109-1141</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Economic History Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050722000390/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, Silvi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariuzzo, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormosi, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><title>Residential Exodus from Dublin Circa 1900: Municipal Annexation and Preferences for Local Government</title><title>The Journal of economic history</title><addtitle>J. Econ. Hist</addtitle><description>Dublin experienced a marked stagnation in population growth in the second half of the nineteenth century, accompanied by decaying infrastructure and poor public health. Historians have emphasized that this crisis was coupled with poor governance of the city of Dublin—manifested by eroding public services together with increasing tax burdens to counteract growing debt. This paper studies the municipal boundary expansion of Dublin in 1901, which occurred as a way to alleviate the city’s financial distress. It saw multiple relatively wealthy townships annexed by the city via royal order to increase Dublin’s tax base. Using a sample of census records matched to city streets, we show that wealthy residents and Protestant residents were more likely to leave annexed areas compared to areas that remained independent. Moreover, we offer anecdotal evidence that at least some of the wealthy Protestant households departing annexed townships sorted into jurisdictions that remained independent. Our findings offer support to arguments that the municipal annexation by the city of Dublin may have accelerated the decline of annexed areas in the early twentieth century and contributed to municipal fragmentation in metropolitan Dublin.</description><subject>1900</subject><subject>19th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Annexation</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Dublin</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Gemeindefinanzen</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Grenze</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Irland</subject><subject>Kommunalverwaltung</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Stadtflucht</subject><subject>Stagnation</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Townships</subject><subject>Vermögen</subject><issn>0022-0507</issn><issn>1471-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4hxYPxIn3KpSClIRiMc5chwbuWrsYieo_HtctVIPiMvuYb-ZHQ1ClwSuCRBx8wZAKeQg0gRgFRyhEeGCZAUT9BiNtudsez9FZzEuE0OhrEaofdXRttr1Vq7wbOPbIWITfIfvhmZlHZ7aoCQmFcAtfhqcVXadwIlzeiN76x2WrsUvQRsdtFM6iX3AC68SNPffOrgueZ-jEyNXUV_s9xh93M_epw_Z4nn-OJ0sMsUY7TNihFFaFbkUPAXkrFDSsKbVVcWrnDSCk4a1HEyhBJcSqKElNaTkXAoQPGdjdLXzXQf_NejY10s_BJde1lRwznPCijJRZEep4GNM0et1sJ0MPzWBeltm_afMpME7jVbe2XhQlClCnvOKJITtbWXXBNt-6sP3_41_AaHxfu4</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Berger, Silvi K.</creator><creator>Mariuzzo, Franco</creator><creator>Ormosi, Peter L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Residential Exodus from Dublin Circa 1900: Municipal Annexation and Preferences for Local Government</title><author>Berger, Silvi K. ; Mariuzzo, Franco ; Ormosi, Peter L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1f7fcec65a74000436caf3bde994951b741b3d40f6c74aa02f282f1844a707453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>1900</topic><topic>19th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Annexation</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Dublin</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Gemeindefinanzen</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Grenze</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Irland</topic><topic>Kommunalverwaltung</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Stadtflucht</topic><topic>Stagnation</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Townships</topic><topic>Vermögen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, Silvi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariuzzo, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormosi, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of economic history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, Silvi K.</au><au>Mariuzzo, Franco</au><au>Ormosi, Peter L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residential Exodus from Dublin Circa 1900: Municipal Annexation and Preferences for Local Government</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of economic history</jtitle><addtitle>J. Econ. Hist</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1109-1141</pages><issn>0022-0507</issn><eissn>1471-6372</eissn><abstract>Dublin experienced a marked stagnation in population growth in the second half of the nineteenth century, accompanied by decaying infrastructure and poor public health. Historians have emphasized that this crisis was coupled with poor governance of the city of Dublin—manifested by eroding public services together with increasing tax burdens to counteract growing debt. This paper studies the municipal boundary expansion of Dublin in 1901, which occurred as a way to alleviate the city’s financial distress. It saw multiple relatively wealthy townships annexed by the city via royal order to increase Dublin’s tax base. Using a sample of census records matched to city streets, we show that wealthy residents and Protestant residents were more likely to leave annexed areas compared to areas that remained independent. Moreover, we offer anecdotal evidence that at least some of the wealthy Protestant households departing annexed townships sorted into jurisdictions that remained independent. Our findings offer support to arguments that the municipal annexation by the city of Dublin may have accelerated the decline of annexed areas in the early twentieth century and contributed to municipal fragmentation in metropolitan Dublin.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022050722000390</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0507
ispartof The Journal of economic history, 2022-12, Vol.82 (4), p.1109-1141
issn 0022-0507
1471-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2744451368
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 1900
19th century
20th century
Annexation
Censuses
Cities
Dublin
Economic history
Gemeindefinanzen
Governance
Grenze
Historians
Households
Infrastructure
Irland
Kommunalverwaltung
Local government
Politics
Population growth
Psychological distress
Public health
Public services
Segmentation
Social history
Stadtflucht
Stagnation
Suburban areas
Taxation
Townships
Vermögen
title Residential Exodus from Dublin Circa 1900: Municipal Annexation and Preferences for Local Government
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residential%20Exodus%20from%20Dublin%20Circa%201900:%20Municipal%20Annexation%20and%20Preferences%20for%20Local%20Government&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20economic%20history&rft.au=Berger,%20Silvi%20K.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1109-1141&rft.issn=0022-0507&rft.eissn=1471-6372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022050722000390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2744451368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2744451368&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022050722000390&rfr_iscdi=true