Japan, Taiwan and the “One China” Framework after 50 Years

This study analyses the “one China” framework's significance for Japan–Taiwan relations since Tokyo switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1972. Drawing on Chinese-, Japanese- and English-language sources, it examines developments since the breakthrough Japan–PRC normalizatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The China quarterly (London) 2022-12, Vol.252, p.1066-1093
1. Verfasser: Liff, Adam P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1093
container_issue
container_start_page 1066
container_title The China quarterly (London)
container_volume 252
creator Liff, Adam P.
description This study analyses the “one China” framework's significance for Japan–Taiwan relations since Tokyo switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1972. Drawing on Chinese-, Japanese- and English-language sources, it examines developments since the breakthrough Japan–PRC normalization communiqué and the “Japan formula,” which enabled Tokyo to normalize relations – six years before Washington – without recognizing Beijing's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan, and while maintaining robust, if unofficial, ties with Taipei thenceforth. Highlighting distinctions between Beijing's self-asserted “one-China principle” and Japan's ambiguous official position and subsequent effective policies, it assesses incremental but practically significant evolutions of Japan–Taiwan relations over the past half-century. In the 21st century, the trend towards incrementally closer ties has proven strikingly resilient to political transitions in Japan and Taiwan, China's growing power, pushback from Beijing and worsening cross-Strait frictions. Beyond Japan–Taiwan relations and theoretical debates on “one China,” this article's findings carry significant implications for Taiwan's international space, cross-Strait dynamics and China–Japan–United States relations.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0305741022001357
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2743901489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305741022001357</cupid><sourcerecordid>2743901489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-5ef7cf468398c3c110063bcc712684975c965c7661c78739bd22c44a0416dd5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRMFYfwN2AW6Nz5zfZCFJsVQpdWBeuwu1kYlNNUmdSirs-iL5cn8SUFlyIq7s45zvncgg5B3YFDMz1ExNMGQmMc8ZAKHNAIpA6ibmWySGJtnK81Y_JSQjzzsMV6IjcPOIC60s6wXKFNcU6p-3M0c36a1w72p-VNW7W33TgsXKrxr9RLFrnqWL0xaEPp-SowPfgzva3R54Hd5P-fTwaDx_6t6PYCi7aWLnC2KJ7R6SJFRaAMS2m1hrgOpGpUTbVyhqtwZrEiHSac26lRCZB57myokcudrkL33wsXWizebP0dVeZcSNFykAmaeeCncv6JgTvimzhywr9ZwYs286U_ZmpY8SewWrqy_zV_Ub_T_0A-PRnVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2743901489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Japan, Taiwan and the “One China” Framework after 50 Years</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Liff, Adam P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liff, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses the “one China” framework's significance for Japan–Taiwan relations since Tokyo switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1972. Drawing on Chinese-, Japanese- and English-language sources, it examines developments since the breakthrough Japan–PRC normalization communiqué and the “Japan formula,” which enabled Tokyo to normalize relations – six years before Washington – without recognizing Beijing's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan, and while maintaining robust, if unofficial, ties with Taipei thenceforth. Highlighting distinctions between Beijing's self-asserted “one-China principle” and Japan's ambiguous official position and subsequent effective policies, it assesses incremental but practically significant evolutions of Japan–Taiwan relations over the past half-century. In the 21st century, the trend towards incrementally closer ties has proven strikingly resilient to political transitions in Japan and Taiwan, China's growing power, pushback from Beijing and worsening cross-Strait frictions. Beyond Japan–Taiwan relations and theoretical debates on “one China,” this article's findings carry significant implications for Taiwan's international space, cross-Strait dynamics and China–Japan–United States relations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305741022001357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>21st century ; Ambiguity ; Cooperation ; Democracy ; Diplomacy ; Diplomatic &amp; consular services ; Diplomatic recognition ; International relations ; Normalization ; Political power ; Political transition ; Politics ; Reunification ; Rhetoric ; Sovereignty ; Special Section: The “One China” Framework and International Politics: Guest-edited by Adam P. Liff and Dalton Lin</subject><ispartof>The China quarterly (London), 2022-12, Vol.252, p.1066-1093</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-5ef7cf468398c3c110063bcc712684975c965c7661c78739bd22c44a0416dd5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-5ef7cf468398c3c110063bcc712684975c965c7661c78739bd22c44a0416dd5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0305741022001357/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12824,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liff, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><title>Japan, Taiwan and the “One China” Framework after 50 Years</title><title>The China quarterly (London)</title><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><description>This study analyses the “one China” framework's significance for Japan–Taiwan relations since Tokyo switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1972. Drawing on Chinese-, Japanese- and English-language sources, it examines developments since the breakthrough Japan–PRC normalization communiqué and the “Japan formula,” which enabled Tokyo to normalize relations – six years before Washington – without recognizing Beijing's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan, and while maintaining robust, if unofficial, ties with Taipei thenceforth. Highlighting distinctions between Beijing's self-asserted “one-China principle” and Japan's ambiguous official position and subsequent effective policies, it assesses incremental but practically significant evolutions of Japan–Taiwan relations over the past half-century. In the 21st century, the trend towards incrementally closer ties has proven strikingly resilient to political transitions in Japan and Taiwan, China's growing power, pushback from Beijing and worsening cross-Strait frictions. Beyond Japan–Taiwan relations and theoretical debates on “one China,” this article's findings carry significant implications for Taiwan's international space, cross-Strait dynamics and China–Japan–United States relations.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Diplomatic &amp; consular services</subject><subject>Diplomatic recognition</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Normalization</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Political transition</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reunification</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Special Section: The “One China” Framework and International Politics: Guest-edited by Adam P. Liff and Dalton Lin</subject><issn>0305-7410</issn><issn>1468-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRMFYfwN2AW6Nz5zfZCFJsVQpdWBeuwu1kYlNNUmdSirs-iL5cn8SUFlyIq7s45zvncgg5B3YFDMz1ExNMGQmMc8ZAKHNAIpA6ibmWySGJtnK81Y_JSQjzzsMV6IjcPOIC60s6wXKFNcU6p-3M0c36a1w72p-VNW7W33TgsXKrxr9RLFrnqWL0xaEPp-SowPfgzva3R54Hd5P-fTwaDx_6t6PYCi7aWLnC2KJ7R6SJFRaAMS2m1hrgOpGpUTbVyhqtwZrEiHSac26lRCZB57myokcudrkL33wsXWizebP0dVeZcSNFykAmaeeCncv6JgTvimzhywr9ZwYs286U_ZmpY8SewWrqy_zV_Ub_T_0A-PRnVQ</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Liff, Adam P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Japan, Taiwan and the “One China” Framework after 50 Years</title><author>Liff, Adam P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-5ef7cf468398c3c110063bcc712684975c965c7661c78739bd22c44a0416dd5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Diplomatic &amp; consular services</topic><topic>Diplomatic recognition</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Normalization</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Political transition</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reunification</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Special Section: The “One China” Framework and International Politics: Guest-edited by Adam P. Liff and Dalton Lin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liff, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liff, Adam P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Japan, Taiwan and the “One China” Framework after 50 Years</atitle><jtitle>The China quarterly (London)</jtitle><addtitle>The China Quarterly</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>1066</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1066-1093</pages><issn>0305-7410</issn><eissn>1468-2648</eissn><abstract>This study analyses the “one China” framework's significance for Japan–Taiwan relations since Tokyo switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1972. Drawing on Chinese-, Japanese- and English-language sources, it examines developments since the breakthrough Japan–PRC normalization communiqué and the “Japan formula,” which enabled Tokyo to normalize relations – six years before Washington – without recognizing Beijing's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan, and while maintaining robust, if unofficial, ties with Taipei thenceforth. Highlighting distinctions between Beijing's self-asserted “one-China principle” and Japan's ambiguous official position and subsequent effective policies, it assesses incremental but practically significant evolutions of Japan–Taiwan relations over the past half-century. In the 21st century, the trend towards incrementally closer ties has proven strikingly resilient to political transitions in Japan and Taiwan, China's growing power, pushback from Beijing and worsening cross-Strait frictions. Beyond Japan–Taiwan relations and theoretical debates on “one China,” this article's findings carry significant implications for Taiwan's international space, cross-Strait dynamics and China–Japan–United States relations.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0305741022001357</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7410
ispartof The China quarterly (London), 2022-12, Vol.252, p.1066-1093
issn 0305-7410
1468-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2743901489
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 21st century
Ambiguity
Cooperation
Democracy
Diplomacy
Diplomatic & consular services
Diplomatic recognition
International relations
Normalization
Political power
Political transition
Politics
Reunification
Rhetoric
Sovereignty
Special Section: The “One China” Framework and International Politics: Guest-edited by Adam P. Liff and Dalton Lin
title Japan, Taiwan and the “One China” Framework after 50 Years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T11%3A47%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Japan,%20Taiwan%20and%20the%20%E2%80%9COne%20China%E2%80%9D%20Framework%20after%2050%20Years&rft.jtitle=The%20China%20quarterly%20(London)&rft.au=Liff,%20Adam%20P.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=1066&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1066-1093&rft.issn=0305-7410&rft.eissn=1468-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305741022001357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2743901489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2743901489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305741022001357&rfr_iscdi=true