Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising

Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2022-11
Hauptverfasser: Lv, Hongtao, Zhang, Zhilin, Zheng, Zhenzhe, Liu, Jinghan, Yu, Chuan, Liu, Lei, Cui, Lizhen, Wu, Fan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Lv, Hongtao
Zhang, Zhilin
Zheng, Zhenzhe
Liu, Jinghan
Yu, Chuan
Liu, Lei
Cui, Lizhen
Wu, Fan
description Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2743825250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2743825250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27438252503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNik0LgkAUAJcgSMr_8KCzYLua0q1PukiX6phI-7Qn61q7Gtavz0PQtdPAzAyYw4WYeXHA-Yi51pa-7_N5xMNQOOxyakhR84Ik66iiNxqoDZwz1eJPLSDB6y3TZCvYoKVCQ95fCXUoYUVSorFAGg5akUZYyieahizpYsKGeaYsul-O2XS3Pa733t3UjxZtk5Z1a3SfUh4FIuYhD33x3_UBL4FDzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2743825250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Lv, Hongtao ; Zhang, Zhilin ; Zheng, Zhenzhe ; Liu, Jinghan ; Yu, Chuan ; Liu, Lei ; Cui, Lizhen ; Wu, Fan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hongtao ; Zhang, Zhilin ; Zheng, Zhenzhe ; Liu, Jinghan ; Yu, Chuan ; Liu, Lei ; Cui, Lizhen ; Wu, Fan</creatorcontrib><description>Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Bids ; Constraint modelling ; Design parameters ; Lower bounds ; Optimization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-11</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhenzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jinghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Lizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fan</creatorcontrib><title>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Lower bounds</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNik0LgkAUAJcgSMr_8KCzYLua0q1PukiX6phI-7Qn61q7Gtavz0PQtdPAzAyYw4WYeXHA-Yi51pa-7_N5xMNQOOxyakhR84Ik66iiNxqoDZwz1eJPLSDB6y3TZCvYoKVCQ95fCXUoYUVSorFAGg5akUZYyieahizpYsKGeaYsul-O2XS3Pa733t3UjxZtk5Z1a3SfUh4FIuYhD33x3_UBL4FDzQ</recordid><startdate>20221130</startdate><enddate>20221130</enddate><creator>Lv, Hongtao</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhilin</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhenzhe</creator><creator>Liu, Jinghan</creator><creator>Yu, Chuan</creator><creator>Liu, Lei</creator><creator>Cui, Lizhen</creator><creator>Wu, Fan</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221130</creationdate><title>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</title><author>Lv, Hongtao ; Zhang, Zhilin ; Zheng, Zhenzhe ; Liu, Jinghan ; Yu, Chuan ; Liu, Lei ; Cui, Lizhen ; Wu, Fan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27438252503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Lower bounds</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhenzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jinghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Lizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Hongtao</au><au>Zhang, Zhilin</au><au>Zheng, Zhenzhe</au><au>Liu, Jinghan</au><au>Yu, Chuan</au><au>Liu, Lei</au><au>Cui, Lizhen</au><au>Wu, Fan</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-11-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-11
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2743825250
source Free E- Journals
subjects Advertising
Bids
Constraint modelling
Design parameters
Lower bounds
Optimization
title Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Utility%20Maximizer%20or%20Value%20Maximizer:%20Mechanism%20Design%20for%20Mixed%20Bidders%20in%20Online%20Advertising&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Lv,%20Hongtao&rft.date=2022-11-30&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2743825250%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2743825250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true