Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising
Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2022-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Lv, Hongtao Zhang, Zhilin Zheng, Zhenzhe Liu, Jinghan Yu, Chuan Liu, Lei Cui, Lizhen Wu, Fan |
description | Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2743825250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2743825250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27438252503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNik0LgkAUAJcgSMr_8KCzYLua0q1PukiX6phI-7Qn61q7Gtavz0PQtdPAzAyYw4WYeXHA-Yi51pa-7_N5xMNQOOxyakhR84Ik66iiNxqoDZwz1eJPLSDB6y3TZCvYoKVCQ95fCXUoYUVSorFAGg5akUZYyieahizpYsKGeaYsul-O2XS3Pa733t3UjxZtk5Z1a3SfUh4FIuYhD33x3_UBL4FDzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2743825250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Lv, Hongtao ; Zhang, Zhilin ; Zheng, Zhenzhe ; Liu, Jinghan ; Yu, Chuan ; Liu, Lei ; Cui, Lizhen ; Wu, Fan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hongtao ; Zhang, Zhilin ; Zheng, Zhenzhe ; Liu, Jinghan ; Yu, Chuan ; Liu, Lei ; Cui, Lizhen ; Wu, Fan</creatorcontrib><description>Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Bids ; Constraint modelling ; Design parameters ; Lower bounds ; Optimization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-11</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhenzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jinghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Lizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fan</creatorcontrib><title>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Lower bounds</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNik0LgkAUAJcgSMr_8KCzYLua0q1PukiX6phI-7Qn61q7Gtavz0PQtdPAzAyYw4WYeXHA-Yi51pa-7_N5xMNQOOxyakhR84Ik66iiNxqoDZwz1eJPLSDB6y3TZCvYoKVCQ95fCXUoYUVSorFAGg5akUZYyieahizpYsKGeaYsul-O2XS3Pa733t3UjxZtk5Z1a3SfUh4FIuYhD33x3_UBL4FDzQ</recordid><startdate>20221130</startdate><enddate>20221130</enddate><creator>Lv, Hongtao</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhilin</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhenzhe</creator><creator>Liu, Jinghan</creator><creator>Yu, Chuan</creator><creator>Liu, Lei</creator><creator>Cui, Lizhen</creator><creator>Wu, Fan</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221130</creationdate><title>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</title><author>Lv, Hongtao ; Zhang, Zhilin ; Zheng, Zhenzhe ; Liu, Jinghan ; Yu, Chuan ; Liu, Lei ; Cui, Lizhen ; Wu, Fan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27438252503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Lower bounds</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhenzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jinghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Lizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Hongtao</au><au>Zhang, Zhilin</au><au>Zheng, Zhenzhe</au><au>Liu, Jinghan</au><au>Yu, Chuan</au><au>Liu, Lei</au><au>Cui, Lizhen</au><au>Wu, Fan</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-11-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Digital advertising constitutes one of the main revenue sources for online platforms. In recent years, some advertisers tend to adopt auto-bidding tools to facilitate advertising performance optimization, making the classical \emph{utility maximizer} model in auction theory not fit well. Some recent studies proposed a new model, called \emph{value maximizer}, for auto-bidding advertisers with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. However, the model of either utility maximizer or value maximizer could only characterize partial advertisers in real-world advertising platforms. In a mixed environment where utility maximizers and value maximizers coexist, the truthful ad auction design would be challenging since bidders could manipulate both their values and affiliated classes, leading to a multi-parameter mechanism design problem. In this work, we address this issue by proposing a payment rule which combines the corresponding ones in classical VCG and GSP mechanisms in a novel way. Based on this payment rule, we propose a truthful auction mechanism with an approximation ratio of \(2\) on social welfare, which is close to the lower bound of at least \(\frac{5}{4}\) that we also prove. The designed auction mechanism is a generalization of VCG for utility maximizers and GSP for value maximizers.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2022-11 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2743825250 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Advertising Bids Constraint modelling Design parameters Lower bounds Optimization |
title | Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online Advertising |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Utility%20Maximizer%20or%20Value%20Maximizer:%20Mechanism%20Design%20for%20Mixed%20Bidders%20in%20Online%20Advertising&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Lv,%20Hongtao&rft.date=2022-11-30&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2743825250%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2743825250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |