The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment

In science learning, it is important to develop procedural and conceptual understanding, one of which is to train students’ science process skills (SPS) in the classroom. SPS is very important for every student because it underlies students’ ability to train thinking such as formulating hypotheses,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L., Parno, Nasikhudin, Kusairi, Sentot, Latifah, Eny
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2659
creator Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L.
Parno
Nasikhudin
Kusairi, Sentot
Latifah, Eny
description In science learning, it is important to develop procedural and conceptual understanding, one of which is to train students’ science process skills (SPS) in the classroom. SPS is very important for every student because it underlies students’ ability to train thinking such as formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments and analyzing data. The fact is that SPS is still not optimally implemented during the learning process and is still rarely trained to students. The purpose of this study was to create the profile of students’ SPS which includes basic SPS and integrated SPS on thermodynamic topics through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. This study uses a descriptive analysis of the results of observations and student worksheets. The Indicators of SPS are categorized into four, namely very good (score 4), good (score 3), not good with (score 2), and very not good (score 1). The results of observations during the learning process showed that students’ basic SPS had percentages above 68% and integrated SPS above 70.6% with both categories being good and very good. The SPS indicators that students tend to master well are classification indicators, while those that tend to be difficult are predicting.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0113509
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2741109043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2741109043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1689-4913bcbf660ea76fe71ea6bf50c23269aae2344eff0ea2705ba82893fde5641a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUMtKxDAUDaLgOLrwDwLuhI55NW2WOviCEQVHcFfSNrEZ26Q2qTI71_6Bv-eXGJ1ZXTivezgAHGM0w4jTs3SGMKYpEjtggtMUJxnHfBdMEBIsIYw-74MD71cIEZFl-QR8LRsF-8Fp0yroNPRhrJUN_ufzG_rKKFv905XyHvpX07bQWRgaNXSuXlvZmcrD4HpTRXBw40sD5RhpGyLycLGAHyY08HF5eQdlH3NkFQW2htoNnQzmXUHpfczuouMQ7GnZenW0vVPwdHW5nN8ki_vr2_n5Iukxz0XCBKZlVWrOkZIZ1yrDSvJSp6gilHAhpSKUMaV15EmG0lLmJBdU1yrlDEs6BSeb3NjnbVQ-FCs3Dja-LEjGMEYCMRpVpxtVXCHEqs4W_WA6OawLjIq_rYu02G5NfwFqNHRb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2741109043</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L. ; Parno ; Nasikhudin ; Kusairi, Sentot ; Latifah, Eny</creator><contributor>Harahap, Fauziyah ; Sutiani, Ani ; Purba, Jamalum ; Zubir, Moondra ; Idrus, Said Iskandar Al</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L. ; Parno ; Nasikhudin ; Kusairi, Sentot ; Latifah, Eny ; Harahap, Fauziyah ; Sutiani, Ani ; Purba, Jamalum ; Zubir, Moondra ; Idrus, Said Iskandar Al</creatorcontrib><description>In science learning, it is important to develop procedural and conceptual understanding, one of which is to train students’ science process skills (SPS) in the classroom. SPS is very important for every student because it underlies students’ ability to train thinking such as formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments and analyzing data. The fact is that SPS is still not optimally implemented during the learning process and is still rarely trained to students. The purpose of this study was to create the profile of students’ SPS which includes basic SPS and integrated SPS on thermodynamic topics through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. This study uses a descriptive analysis of the results of observations and student worksheets. The Indicators of SPS are categorized into four, namely very good (score 4), good (score 3), not good with (score 2), and very not good (score 1). The results of observations during the learning process showed that students’ basic SPS had percentages above 68% and integrated SPS above 70.6% with both categories being good and very good. The SPS indicators that students tend to master well are classification indicators, while those that tend to be difficult are predicting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0113509</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Indicators ; Learning ; Students ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2022, Vol.2659 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2022 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0113509$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,791,4498,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,76133</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Harahap, Fauziyah</contributor><contributor>Sutiani, Ani</contributor><contributor>Purba, Jamalum</contributor><contributor>Zubir, Moondra</contributor><contributor>Idrus, Said Iskandar Al</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasikhudin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusairi, Sentot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latifah, Eny</creatorcontrib><title>The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>In science learning, it is important to develop procedural and conceptual understanding, one of which is to train students’ science process skills (SPS) in the classroom. SPS is very important for every student because it underlies students’ ability to train thinking such as formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments and analyzing data. The fact is that SPS is still not optimally implemented during the learning process and is still rarely trained to students. The purpose of this study was to create the profile of students’ SPS which includes basic SPS and integrated SPS on thermodynamic topics through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. This study uses a descriptive analysis of the results of observations and student worksheets. The Indicators of SPS are categorized into four, namely very good (score 4), good (score 3), not good with (score 2), and very not good (score 1). The results of observations during the learning process showed that students’ basic SPS had percentages above 68% and integrated SPS above 70.6% with both categories being good and very good. The SPS indicators that students tend to master well are classification indicators, while those that tend to be difficult are predicting.</description><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotUMtKxDAUDaLgOLrwDwLuhI55NW2WOviCEQVHcFfSNrEZ26Q2qTI71_6Bv-eXGJ1ZXTivezgAHGM0w4jTs3SGMKYpEjtggtMUJxnHfBdMEBIsIYw-74MD71cIEZFl-QR8LRsF-8Fp0yroNPRhrJUN_ufzG_rKKFv905XyHvpX07bQWRgaNXSuXlvZmcrD4HpTRXBw40sD5RhpGyLycLGAHyY08HF5eQdlH3NkFQW2htoNnQzmXUHpfczuouMQ7GnZenW0vVPwdHW5nN8ki_vr2_n5Iukxz0XCBKZlVWrOkZIZ1yrDSvJSp6gilHAhpSKUMaV15EmG0lLmJBdU1yrlDEs6BSeb3NjnbVQ-FCs3Dja-LEjGMEYCMRpVpxtVXCHEqs4W_WA6OawLjIq_rYu02G5NfwFqNHRb</recordid><startdate>20221129</startdate><enddate>20221129</enddate><creator>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L.</creator><creator>Parno</creator><creator>Nasikhudin</creator><creator>Kusairi, Sentot</creator><creator>Latifah, Eny</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221129</creationdate><title>The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment</title><author>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L. ; Parno ; Nasikhudin ; Kusairi, Sentot ; Latifah, Eny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1689-4913bcbf660ea76fe71ea6bf50c23269aae2344eff0ea2705ba82893fde5641a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasikhudin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusairi, Sentot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latifah, Eny</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jewaru, Aurelia Astria L.</au><au>Parno</au><au>Nasikhudin</au><au>Kusairi, Sentot</au><au>Latifah, Eny</au><au>Harahap, Fauziyah</au><au>Sutiani, Ani</au><au>Purba, Jamalum</au><au>Zubir, Moondra</au><au>Idrus, Said Iskandar Al</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2022-11-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2659</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>In science learning, it is important to develop procedural and conceptual understanding, one of which is to train students’ science process skills (SPS) in the classroom. SPS is very important for every student because it underlies students’ ability to train thinking such as formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments and analyzing data. The fact is that SPS is still not optimally implemented during the learning process and is still rarely trained to students. The purpose of this study was to create the profile of students’ SPS which includes basic SPS and integrated SPS on thermodynamic topics through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. This study uses a descriptive analysis of the results of observations and student worksheets. The Indicators of SPS are categorized into four, namely very good (score 4), good (score 3), not good with (score 2), and very not good (score 1). The results of observations during the learning process showed that students’ basic SPS had percentages above 68% and integrated SPS above 70.6% with both categories being good and very good. The SPS indicators that students tend to master well are classification indicators, while those that tend to be difficult are predicting.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0113509</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2022, Vol.2659 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2741109043
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Indicators
Learning
Students
Thermodynamics
title The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=The%20profile%20of%20students%E2%80%99%20science%20process%20skill%20on%20thermodynamics%20topic%20through%20authentic%20PBL%20with%20STEM%20approach%20and%20formative%20assessment&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Jewaru,%20Aurelia%20Astria%20L.&rft.date=2022-11-29&rft.volume=2659&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0113509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2741109043%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2741109043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true