Comparative study of homogeneous ensemble methods with conventional ML classifiers in litho-facies detection using real-time drilling data
The drilling operation is known to be influenced by the formation’s lithology. Real-time prediction of formation parameters is essential to steer the well and make proper completion decisions—litho-facies aid in quantifying formation qualities, allowing drilling parameters to be optimized. Tradition...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2022-12, Vol.15 (23), Article 1732 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Agrawal, Romy Malik, Aashish Samuel, Robello Saxena, Amit |
description | The drilling operation is known to be influenced by the formation’s lithology. Real-time prediction of formation parameters is essential to steer the well and make proper completion decisions—litho-facies aid in quantifying formation qualities, allowing drilling parameters to be optimized. Traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms such as logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) are compared to new homogeneous ensemble algorithms such as random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and XGBoost for predicting the litho-facies of any formation within the research area in real time. Field data from four wells with over 31,000 data points were used to identify litho-facies in real time. The developed model was trained with fourteen different drilling parameters as independent variables and litho-facies as the dependent variable from the Eagleford shale region of the USA. Drilling parameters such as rotation per minute, rate of penetration, differential pressure, surface torque, gamma-ray correlation, and others are used in the model. The suggested study employs a fivefold cross-validation strategy for developing the models. The F1 and accuracy scores were used to assess the model’s efficiency. When the various machine learning algorithms were examined, it was clear that XGBoost outperformed all other algorithms, with an accuracy of nearly 90%. The proposed approach is unique in the industry since it can predict complicated lithology in real time for vertical/inclined/horizontal wellbores without considering survey parameters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-022-10982-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2741010180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2741010180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-42a94eaf4544d3997c0ed9aa94823c6048958dbafdf7bf378c4512f656ed8543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhCMEEr8vwMkSZ4PtOLFzRBV_UhEX7pYbr1ujJC5eB8or8NSkFMEN7WFXo29G2imKc84uOWPqCrmouKJMCMpZowXd7BVHXNc1VVWp939vzg-LY8QXxmrNlD4qPmexX9tkc3gDgnl0HyR6sop9XMIAcUQCA0K_6ID0kFfRIXkPeUXaOLzBkEMcbEce56TtLGLwARKSMJBuYiL1tg2AxEGGdouSEcOwJAlsR3PogbgUum4rOZvtaXHgbYdw9rNPiufbm-fZPZ0_3T3MrufUcq02VArbSLBeVlK6smlUy8A1dhK1KNuaSd1U2i2sd14tfKl0KysufF3V4HQly5PiYhe7TvF1BMzmJY5pegONUJKzaTSbKLGj2hQRE3izTqG36cNwZraVm13lZqrcfFduNpOp3JlwgoclpL_of1xfnKKIDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2741010180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of homogeneous ensemble methods with conventional ML classifiers in litho-facies detection using real-time drilling data</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Agrawal, Romy ; Malik, Aashish ; Samuel, Robello ; Saxena, Amit</creator><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Romy ; Malik, Aashish ; Samuel, Robello ; Saxena, Amit</creatorcontrib><description>The drilling operation is known to be influenced by the formation’s lithology. Real-time prediction of formation parameters is essential to steer the well and make proper completion decisions—litho-facies aid in quantifying formation qualities, allowing drilling parameters to be optimized. Traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms such as logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) are compared to new homogeneous ensemble algorithms such as random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and XGBoost for predicting the litho-facies of any formation within the research area in real time. Field data from four wells with over 31,000 data points were used to identify litho-facies in real time. The developed model was trained with fourteen different drilling parameters as independent variables and litho-facies as the dependent variable from the Eagleford shale region of the USA. Drilling parameters such as rotation per minute, rate of penetration, differential pressure, surface torque, gamma-ray correlation, and others are used in the model. The suggested study employs a fivefold cross-validation strategy for developing the models. The F1 and accuracy scores were used to assess the model’s efficiency. When the various machine learning algorithms were examined, it was clear that XGBoost outperformed all other algorithms, with an accuracy of nearly 90%. The proposed approach is unique in the industry since it can predict complicated lithology in real time for vertical/inclined/horizontal wellbores without considering survey parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10982-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Data points ; Decision trees ; Dependent variables ; Differential pressure ; Drilling ; Drilling machines (tools) ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Gamma rays ; Independent variables ; Learning algorithms ; Lithology ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Original Paper ; Parameters ; Real time ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shale ; Support vector machines ; Surveying ; Torque ; Well drilling</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022-12, Vol.15 (23), Article 1732</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-42a94eaf4544d3997c0ed9aa94823c6048958dbafdf7bf378c4512f656ed8543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-42a94eaf4544d3997c0ed9aa94823c6048958dbafdf7bf378c4512f656ed8543</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7958-3576</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-022-10982-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-022-10982-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Romy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Aashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Robello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Amit</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of homogeneous ensemble methods with conventional ML classifiers in litho-facies detection using real-time drilling data</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>The drilling operation is known to be influenced by the formation’s lithology. Real-time prediction of formation parameters is essential to steer the well and make proper completion decisions—litho-facies aid in quantifying formation qualities, allowing drilling parameters to be optimized. Traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms such as logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) are compared to new homogeneous ensemble algorithms such as random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and XGBoost for predicting the litho-facies of any formation within the research area in real time. Field data from four wells with over 31,000 data points were used to identify litho-facies in real time. The developed model was trained with fourteen different drilling parameters as independent variables and litho-facies as the dependent variable from the Eagleford shale region of the USA. Drilling parameters such as rotation per minute, rate of penetration, differential pressure, surface torque, gamma-ray correlation, and others are used in the model. The suggested study employs a fivefold cross-validation strategy for developing the models. The F1 and accuracy scores were used to assess the model’s efficiency. When the various machine learning algorithms were examined, it was clear that XGBoost outperformed all other algorithms, with an accuracy of nearly 90%. The proposed approach is unique in the industry since it can predict complicated lithology in real time for vertical/inclined/horizontal wellbores without considering survey parameters.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Data points</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>Differential pressure</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Drilling machines (tools)</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Gamma rays</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Well drilling</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhCMEEr8vwMkSZ4PtOLFzRBV_UhEX7pYbr1ujJC5eB8or8NSkFMEN7WFXo29G2imKc84uOWPqCrmouKJMCMpZowXd7BVHXNc1VVWp939vzg-LY8QXxmrNlD4qPmexX9tkc3gDgnl0HyR6sop9XMIAcUQCA0K_6ID0kFfRIXkPeUXaOLzBkEMcbEce56TtLGLwARKSMJBuYiL1tg2AxEGGdouSEcOwJAlsR3PogbgUum4rOZvtaXHgbYdw9rNPiufbm-fZPZ0_3T3MrufUcq02VArbSLBeVlK6smlUy8A1dhK1KNuaSd1U2i2sd14tfKl0KysufF3V4HQly5PiYhe7TvF1BMzmJY5pegONUJKzaTSbKLGj2hQRE3izTqG36cNwZraVm13lZqrcfFduNpOp3JlwgoclpL_of1xfnKKIDw</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Agrawal, Romy</creator><creator>Malik, Aashish</creator><creator>Samuel, Robello</creator><creator>Saxena, Amit</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-3576</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Comparative study of homogeneous ensemble methods with conventional ML classifiers in litho-facies detection using real-time drilling data</title><author>Agrawal, Romy ; Malik, Aashish ; Samuel, Robello ; Saxena, Amit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-42a94eaf4544d3997c0ed9aa94823c6048958dbafdf7bf378c4512f656ed8543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Data points</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>Differential pressure</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Drilling machines (tools)</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Gamma rays</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Well drilling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Romy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Aashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Robello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Amit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agrawal, Romy</au><au>Malik, Aashish</au><au>Samuel, Robello</au><au>Saxena, Amit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of homogeneous ensemble methods with conventional ML classifiers in litho-facies detection using real-time drilling data</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>23</issue><artnum>1732</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>The drilling operation is known to be influenced by the formation’s lithology. Real-time prediction of formation parameters is essential to steer the well and make proper completion decisions—litho-facies aid in quantifying formation qualities, allowing drilling parameters to be optimized. Traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms such as logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM) are compared to new homogeneous ensemble algorithms such as random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and XGBoost for predicting the litho-facies of any formation within the research area in real time. Field data from four wells with over 31,000 data points were used to identify litho-facies in real time. The developed model was trained with fourteen different drilling parameters as independent variables and litho-facies as the dependent variable from the Eagleford shale region of the USA. Drilling parameters such as rotation per minute, rate of penetration, differential pressure, surface torque, gamma-ray correlation, and others are used in the model. The suggested study employs a fivefold cross-validation strategy for developing the models. The F1 and accuracy scores were used to assess the model’s efficiency. When the various machine learning algorithms were examined, it was clear that XGBoost outperformed all other algorithms, with an accuracy of nearly 90%. The proposed approach is unique in the industry since it can predict complicated lithology in real time for vertical/inclined/horizontal wellbores without considering survey parameters.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-022-10982-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-3576</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022-12, Vol.15 (23), Article 1732 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2741010180 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Comparative analysis Comparative studies Data points Decision trees Dependent variables Differential pressure Drilling Drilling machines (tools) Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Gamma rays Independent variables Learning algorithms Lithology Machine learning Mathematical models Original Paper Parameters Real time Sedimentary rocks Shale Support vector machines Surveying Torque Well drilling |
title | Comparative study of homogeneous ensemble methods with conventional ML classifiers in litho-facies detection using real-time drilling data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A39%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20homogeneous%20ensemble%20methods%20with%20conventional%20ML%20classifiers%20in%20litho-facies%20detection%20using%20real-time%20drilling%20data&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Agrawal,%20Romy&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=23&rft.artnum=1732&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-022-10982-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2741010180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2741010180&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |