Predicting Hydrological Drought With Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) Model
Streamflow deficit (hydrological drought) poses a large risk to water resources management, agricultural production, water supply, hydropower generation, and ecosystem services. Reliable and robust hydrological drought predictions are critical for water and food security and ecosystem health under a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2022-11, Vol.58 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Wu, Haijiang Su, Xiaoling Singh, Vijay P. Zhang, Te |
description | Streamflow deficit (hydrological drought) poses a large risk to water resources management, agricultural production, water supply, hydropower generation, and ecosystem services. Reliable and robust hydrological drought predictions are critical for water and food security and ecosystem health under anthropogenic warming. However, the prevalent statistical prediction methods, for example, the meta‐Gaussian (MG) model, usually do not lead to accurate drought predictions. We therefore developed a new drought prediction model utilizing the Bayesian Model Averaging coupled with Vine Copula, called Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model, in which previous meteorological drought, antecedent evaporative drought, and preceding hydrological drought were selected as three predictors. The BMAViC model was applied to the Upper Yellow River basin and showed robust skills during calibration and validation periods for 1‐ to 3‐month lead hydrological drought predictions. In comparison with the MG model (reference model), the skills of the proposed model were relatively stable and superior under diverse lead times. Good performances under the 1‐ to 3‐month lead times strongly implied that the BMAViC model yielded robust and accurate hydrological drought predictions. The study results enhance our confidence in seasonal drought prediction and help us understand drought dynamics in future months.
Key Points
Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model is developed to improve the accuracy of hydrological drought prediction
Multiple model ensembles are critical for robust predictions of hydrological droughts
BMAViC model yields more reliable prediction than does the meta‐Gaussian model |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2022WR033146 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2740532742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2740532742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-444713ae79ecaa99e0da90e7f5e5ea0aed84e050ae150500a8e45abb4bd4fe6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRsFZv_oAFLwpGd7ObbHOssVqhRSnaHsMkmbRb0mzdTZT8e1PiwZMwzJvD9-bBI-SSszvO_OjeZ76_WjAhuAyPyIBHUnoqUuKYDBiTwuMiUqfkzLktY1wGoRoQeLOY66zW1ZpO29ya0qx1BiV9tKZZb2q60vWGPkCLTkNF5ybHko6_0ML6YJlUDndpiXSpK6Sx2Tcl0OuH-Xip45uePicnBZQOL351SD6eJu_x1Ju9Pr_E45kHQrDQk1IqLgBVhBlAFCHLIWKoigADBAaYjySyoDt40AmDEcoA0lSmuSwwzMWQXPV_99Z8NujqZGsaW3WRia8kC0S3_Y667anMGucsFsne6h3YNuEsOZSY_C2xw0WPf-sS23_ZZLWIF34ouvkBc9tyyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2740532742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Hydrological Drought With Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) Model</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Wu, Haijiang ; Su, Xiaoling ; Singh, Vijay P. ; Zhang, Te</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haijiang ; Su, Xiaoling ; Singh, Vijay P. ; Zhang, Te</creatorcontrib><description>Streamflow deficit (hydrological drought) poses a large risk to water resources management, agricultural production, water supply, hydropower generation, and ecosystem services. Reliable and robust hydrological drought predictions are critical for water and food security and ecosystem health under anthropogenic warming. However, the prevalent statistical prediction methods, for example, the meta‐Gaussian (MG) model, usually do not lead to accurate drought predictions. We therefore developed a new drought prediction model utilizing the Bayesian Model Averaging coupled with Vine Copula, called Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model, in which previous meteorological drought, antecedent evaporative drought, and preceding hydrological drought were selected as three predictors. The BMAViC model was applied to the Upper Yellow River basin and showed robust skills during calibration and validation periods for 1‐ to 3‐month lead hydrological drought predictions. In comparison with the MG model (reference model), the skills of the proposed model were relatively stable and superior under diverse lead times. Good performances under the 1‐ to 3‐month lead times strongly implied that the BMAViC model yielded robust and accurate hydrological drought predictions. The study results enhance our confidence in seasonal drought prediction and help us understand drought dynamics in future months.
Key Points
Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model is developed to improve the accuracy of hydrological drought prediction
Multiple model ensembles are critical for robust predictions of hydrological droughts
BMAViC model yields more reliable prediction than does the meta‐Gaussian model</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022WR033146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian model averaging ; Bayesian theory ; Drought ; drought prediction ; Ecosystem services ; ensemble prediction ; Food security ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydroelectric power generation ; Hydrologic drought ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; meta‐Gaussian ; Modelling ; Prediction models ; Probability theory ; River basins ; Robustness ; Skills ; Statistical methods ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; vine copulas ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2022-11, Vol.58 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-444713ae79ecaa99e0da90e7f5e5ea0aed84e050ae150500a8e45abb4bd4fe6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-444713ae79ecaa99e0da90e7f5e5ea0aed84e050ae150500a8e45abb4bd4fe6d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1299-1457 ; 0000-0001-6380-5998 ; 0000-0002-6920-6512</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022WR033146$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022WR033146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,11495,27905,27906,45555,45556,46449,46873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haijiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Vijay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Te</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Hydrological Drought With Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) Model</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Streamflow deficit (hydrological drought) poses a large risk to water resources management, agricultural production, water supply, hydropower generation, and ecosystem services. Reliable and robust hydrological drought predictions are critical for water and food security and ecosystem health under anthropogenic warming. However, the prevalent statistical prediction methods, for example, the meta‐Gaussian (MG) model, usually do not lead to accurate drought predictions. We therefore developed a new drought prediction model utilizing the Bayesian Model Averaging coupled with Vine Copula, called Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model, in which previous meteorological drought, antecedent evaporative drought, and preceding hydrological drought were selected as three predictors. The BMAViC model was applied to the Upper Yellow River basin and showed robust skills during calibration and validation periods for 1‐ to 3‐month lead hydrological drought predictions. In comparison with the MG model (reference model), the skills of the proposed model were relatively stable and superior under diverse lead times. Good performances under the 1‐ to 3‐month lead times strongly implied that the BMAViC model yielded robust and accurate hydrological drought predictions. The study results enhance our confidence in seasonal drought prediction and help us understand drought dynamics in future months.
Key Points
Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model is developed to improve the accuracy of hydrological drought prediction
Multiple model ensembles are critical for robust predictions of hydrological droughts
BMAViC model yields more reliable prediction than does the meta‐Gaussian model</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian model averaging</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>drought prediction</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>ensemble prediction</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power generation</subject><subject>Hydrologic drought</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>meta‐Gaussian</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>vine copulas</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRsFZv_oAFLwpGd7ObbHOssVqhRSnaHsMkmbRb0mzdTZT8e1PiwZMwzJvD9-bBI-SSszvO_OjeZ76_WjAhuAyPyIBHUnoqUuKYDBiTwuMiUqfkzLktY1wGoRoQeLOY66zW1ZpO29ya0qx1BiV9tKZZb2q60vWGPkCLTkNF5ybHko6_0ML6YJlUDndpiXSpK6Sx2Tcl0OuH-Xip45uePicnBZQOL351SD6eJu_x1Ju9Pr_E45kHQrDQk1IqLgBVhBlAFCHLIWKoigADBAaYjySyoDt40AmDEcoA0lSmuSwwzMWQXPV_99Z8NujqZGsaW3WRia8kC0S3_Y667anMGucsFsne6h3YNuEsOZSY_C2xw0WPf-sS23_ZZLWIF34ouvkBc9tyyw</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Wu, Haijiang</creator><creator>Su, Xiaoling</creator><creator>Singh, Vijay P.</creator><creator>Zhang, Te</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-1457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6380-5998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6920-6512</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Predicting Hydrological Drought With Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) Model</title><author>Wu, Haijiang ; Su, Xiaoling ; Singh, Vijay P. ; Zhang, Te</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-444713ae79ecaa99e0da90e7f5e5ea0aed84e050ae150500a8e45abb4bd4fe6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian model averaging</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>drought prediction</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>ensemble prediction</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power generation</topic><topic>Hydrologic drought</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>meta‐Gaussian</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>vine copulas</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haijiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Vijay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Te</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Haijiang</au><au>Su, Xiaoling</au><au>Singh, Vijay P.</au><au>Zhang, Te</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Hydrological Drought With Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) Model</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Streamflow deficit (hydrological drought) poses a large risk to water resources management, agricultural production, water supply, hydropower generation, and ecosystem services. Reliable and robust hydrological drought predictions are critical for water and food security and ecosystem health under anthropogenic warming. However, the prevalent statistical prediction methods, for example, the meta‐Gaussian (MG) model, usually do not lead to accurate drought predictions. We therefore developed a new drought prediction model utilizing the Bayesian Model Averaging coupled with Vine Copula, called Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model, in which previous meteorological drought, antecedent evaporative drought, and preceding hydrological drought were selected as three predictors. The BMAViC model was applied to the Upper Yellow River basin and showed robust skills during calibration and validation periods for 1‐ to 3‐month lead hydrological drought predictions. In comparison with the MG model (reference model), the skills of the proposed model were relatively stable and superior under diverse lead times. Good performances under the 1‐ to 3‐month lead times strongly implied that the BMAViC model yielded robust and accurate hydrological drought predictions. The study results enhance our confidence in seasonal drought prediction and help us understand drought dynamics in future months.
Key Points
Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) model is developed to improve the accuracy of hydrological drought prediction
Multiple model ensembles are critical for robust predictions of hydrological droughts
BMAViC model yields more reliable prediction than does the meta‐Gaussian model</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2022WR033146</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-1457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6380-5998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6920-6512</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2022-11, Vol.58 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2740532742 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | Agricultural production Anthropogenic factors Bayesian analysis Bayesian model averaging Bayesian theory Drought drought prediction Ecosystem services ensemble prediction Food security Hydroelectric power Hydroelectric power generation Hydrologic drought Hydrologic models Hydrology meta‐Gaussian Modelling Prediction models Probability theory River basins Robustness Skills Statistical methods Stream discharge Stream flow vine copulas Water resources Water resources management Water supply |
title | Predicting Hydrological Drought With Bayesian Model Averaging Ensemble Vine Copula (BMAViC) Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A17%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Hydrological%20Drought%20With%20Bayesian%20Model%20Averaging%20Ensemble%20Vine%20Copula%20(BMAViC)%20Model&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Wu,%20Haijiang&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022WR033146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2740532742%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740532742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |