The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region
High concentrations of ozone along the coastline of Lake Michigan are a persistent air quality management challenge. Complementing observations during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS 2017), WRF‐Chem modeling was used to quantify sensitivity of modeled ozone (O3) to anthropogenic nitrogen ox...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2022-11, Vol.127 (22), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam Roozitalab, Behrooz Stanier, Charles O. Christiansen, Megan Pfister, Gabriele Pierce, R. Bradley McDonald, Brian C. Adelman, Zac Janseen, Mark Dickens, Angela F. Carmichael, Gregory R. |
description | High concentrations of ozone along the coastline of Lake Michigan are a persistent air quality management challenge. Complementing observations during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS 2017), WRF‐Chem modeling was used to quantify sensitivity of modeled ozone (O3) to anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, including to changes in volatile chemical product (VCP). The daily maximum 8 hr average (MDA8) over the high ozone region of Lake Michigan decreased by 2.7 ppb with exclusion of VCP from the inventory, and was sensitive to both NOx and VOC changes, with greater sensitivity to NOx. Close to urban centers, MDA8 ozone was VOC‐sensitive. Clusters of coastal receptor sites were identified based on similarity in response to emission perturbations, with most clusters being NOx‐sensitive and NOx‐sensitivity increasing with distance from major emission sources. The 2 June 2017 ozone event, which has received considerable focus, is shown to be atypical due to unusually strong and spatially extended VOC‐sensitive behavior. WRF‐Chem integrated reaction rate analysis was used to compute radical termination rates due to NOx (LNOx) and to radical‐radical reactions (LROx). LROx/LNOx and formaldehyde to NO2 ratio (FNR) were shown to be predictive of modeled MDA8 ozone sensitivity, but with variation in predictive power as a function of time of day, which has implications for air quality management use of FNR from geostationary satellites.
Plain Language Summary
Surface ozone is an air pollutant of concern due to human health impacts. In locations with elevated ozone concentrations, including coastal regions around Lake Michigan, ozone pollution is managed by controlling emissions of the two classes of chemicals that drive ozone chemistry: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). However, due to large reductions in emissions of NOx and VOC over the past 20 years, the leverage that future reductions will have is uncertain. Reductions of 4–5 ppb (∼7%) are needed in several locations, relative to 2017–2019 concentrations, to meet the 2015 ozone standard of 70 ppb. In this paper, we use simulations of atmospheric chemistry and airflow over the Midwestern US to address this issue. By comparing simulations based on different VOC and NOx emissions, we find that reductions in NOx emissions have more influence on ozone than reductions in VOC emissions, except for a small zone downwind of Chicago. On high ozone d |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2022JD037042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2740532597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2740532597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2653-1d32d3447c021b8f4ac0fa036af48bb45682907b4242c3c92f483f2d0a62fd643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFRvfoABr0Y3s5s_e5RUa0s1pdTiLWw2myZtmo1JitZP70pFnMs8hh_zeI-QK5feuhTFHVLE6YiygHI8IQN0feGEQvinfzp4OyeXXbehdkLKuMcHZL0sNEx2jVQ9mBxWppJ9WWmICr0rlaxg3ppsr_ruBuK-0C2s4shqWWfwEn-CqWGu5RbiL1NrKGuwDMzkVsNzqYpyLWtY6HVp6gtylsuq05e_e0heHx-W0ZMzi8eT6H7mNOh7zHEzhhnjPFAU3TTMuVQ0l5T5MudhmnLPD1HQIOXIUTEl0J5ZjhmVPuaZz9mQXB__Nq153-uuTzZm39bWMsGAU4-hJwJLsSP1YbMekqYtd7I9JC5NfqpM_leZTMeLkWddGfsGICRlMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2740532597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam ; Roozitalab, Behrooz ; Stanier, Charles O. ; Christiansen, Megan ; Pfister, Gabriele ; Pierce, R. Bradley ; McDonald, Brian C. ; Adelman, Zac ; Janseen, Mark ; Dickens, Angela F. ; Carmichael, Gregory R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam ; Roozitalab, Behrooz ; Stanier, Charles O. ; Christiansen, Megan ; Pfister, Gabriele ; Pierce, R. Bradley ; McDonald, Brian C. ; Adelman, Zac ; Janseen, Mark ; Dickens, Angela F. ; Carmichael, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><description>High concentrations of ozone along the coastline of Lake Michigan are a persistent air quality management challenge. Complementing observations during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS 2017), WRF‐Chem modeling was used to quantify sensitivity of modeled ozone (O3) to anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, including to changes in volatile chemical product (VCP). The daily maximum 8 hr average (MDA8) over the high ozone region of Lake Michigan decreased by 2.7 ppb with exclusion of VCP from the inventory, and was sensitive to both NOx and VOC changes, with greater sensitivity to NOx. Close to urban centers, MDA8 ozone was VOC‐sensitive. Clusters of coastal receptor sites were identified based on similarity in response to emission perturbations, with most clusters being NOx‐sensitive and NOx‐sensitivity increasing with distance from major emission sources. The 2 June 2017 ozone event, which has received considerable focus, is shown to be atypical due to unusually strong and spatially extended VOC‐sensitive behavior. WRF‐Chem integrated reaction rate analysis was used to compute radical termination rates due to NOx (LNOx) and to radical‐radical reactions (LROx). LROx/LNOx and formaldehyde to NO2 ratio (FNR) were shown to be predictive of modeled MDA8 ozone sensitivity, but with variation in predictive power as a function of time of day, which has implications for air quality management use of FNR from geostationary satellites.
Plain Language Summary
Surface ozone is an air pollutant of concern due to human health impacts. In locations with elevated ozone concentrations, including coastal regions around Lake Michigan, ozone pollution is managed by controlling emissions of the two classes of chemicals that drive ozone chemistry: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). However, due to large reductions in emissions of NOx and VOC over the past 20 years, the leverage that future reductions will have is uncertain. Reductions of 4–5 ppb (∼7%) are needed in several locations, relative to 2017–2019 concentrations, to meet the 2015 ozone standard of 70 ppb. In this paper, we use simulations of atmospheric chemistry and airflow over the Midwestern US to address this issue. By comparing simulations based on different VOC and NOx emissions, we find that reductions in NOx emissions have more influence on ozone than reductions in VOC emissions, except for a small zone downwind of Chicago. On high ozone days over Lake Michigan, a 10% decrease in VOC (NOx) emissions can lower ozone in the key high ozone zone over southern Lake Michigan by 0.4% (0.8%). Volatile chemical products, an uncertain component of emission inventories, are responsible for 2.7 ppb (∼4%) of ozone.
Key Points
Outside of a small (85 km) zone downwind of Chicago, ozone concentrations and production near Lake Michigan is generally NOx‐sensitive
On event days 10% decrease in volatile organic compound emission can lower MDA8 by 0.4% and 10% decrease in nitrogen oxides emission can lower MDA8 by 0.8% over Lake Michigan
Volatile chemical product emissions were modeled to produce an average 2.7 ppb ozone increase over the lake</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022JD037042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Air ; Air flow ; Air pollution ; Air quality ; Air quality management ; Anthropogenic factors ; Atmospheric chemistry ; Clusters ; Coastal zone ; Emission inventories ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Geophysics ; Geostationary satellites ; Human influences ; Lakes ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen compounds ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Nitrogen oxides ; Nitrogen oxides emissions ; Organic compounds ; Ozone ; Ozone chemistry ; Perturbation ; Photochemicals ; Pollutants ; Quality management ; Radicals ; Receptors ; Sensitivity ; Synchronous satellites ; Time of use ; Urban areas ; Urban environments ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2022-11, Vol.127 (22), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5223-9238 ; 0000-0001-9924-0853 ; 0000-0002-0876-8853 ; 0000-0001-6987-2171 ; 0000-0002-9177-1315</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022JD037042$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022JD037042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roozitalab, Behrooz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanier, Charles O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, R. Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Zac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janseen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickens, Angela F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>High concentrations of ozone along the coastline of Lake Michigan are a persistent air quality management challenge. Complementing observations during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS 2017), WRF‐Chem modeling was used to quantify sensitivity of modeled ozone (O3) to anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, including to changes in volatile chemical product (VCP). The daily maximum 8 hr average (MDA8) over the high ozone region of Lake Michigan decreased by 2.7 ppb with exclusion of VCP from the inventory, and was sensitive to both NOx and VOC changes, with greater sensitivity to NOx. Close to urban centers, MDA8 ozone was VOC‐sensitive. Clusters of coastal receptor sites were identified based on similarity in response to emission perturbations, with most clusters being NOx‐sensitive and NOx‐sensitivity increasing with distance from major emission sources. The 2 June 2017 ozone event, which has received considerable focus, is shown to be atypical due to unusually strong and spatially extended VOC‐sensitive behavior. WRF‐Chem integrated reaction rate analysis was used to compute radical termination rates due to NOx (LNOx) and to radical‐radical reactions (LROx). LROx/LNOx and formaldehyde to NO2 ratio (FNR) were shown to be predictive of modeled MDA8 ozone sensitivity, but with variation in predictive power as a function of time of day, which has implications for air quality management use of FNR from geostationary satellites.
Plain Language Summary
Surface ozone is an air pollutant of concern due to human health impacts. In locations with elevated ozone concentrations, including coastal regions around Lake Michigan, ozone pollution is managed by controlling emissions of the two classes of chemicals that drive ozone chemistry: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). However, due to large reductions in emissions of NOx and VOC over the past 20 years, the leverage that future reductions will have is uncertain. Reductions of 4–5 ppb (∼7%) are needed in several locations, relative to 2017–2019 concentrations, to meet the 2015 ozone standard of 70 ppb. In this paper, we use simulations of atmospheric chemistry and airflow over the Midwestern US to address this issue. By comparing simulations based on different VOC and NOx emissions, we find that reductions in NOx emissions have more influence on ozone than reductions in VOC emissions, except for a small zone downwind of Chicago. On high ozone days over Lake Michigan, a 10% decrease in VOC (NOx) emissions can lower ozone in the key high ozone zone over southern Lake Michigan by 0.4% (0.8%). Volatile chemical products, an uncertain component of emission inventories, are responsible for 2.7 ppb (∼4%) of ozone.
Key Points
Outside of a small (85 km) zone downwind of Chicago, ozone concentrations and production near Lake Michigan is generally NOx‐sensitive
On event days 10% decrease in volatile organic compound emission can lower MDA8 by 0.4% and 10% decrease in nitrogen oxides emission can lower MDA8 by 0.8% over Lake Michigan
Volatile chemical product emissions were modeled to produce an average 2.7 ppb ozone increase over the lake</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Air quality management</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Emission inventories</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Geostationary satellites</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen compounds</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Nitrogen oxides emissions</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone chemistry</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Photochemicals</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Radicals</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Synchronous satellites</subject><subject>Time of use</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFRvfoABr0Y3s5s_e5RUa0s1pdTiLWw2myZtmo1JitZP70pFnMs8hh_zeI-QK5feuhTFHVLE6YiygHI8IQN0feGEQvinfzp4OyeXXbehdkLKuMcHZL0sNEx2jVQ9mBxWppJ9WWmICr0rlaxg3ppsr_ruBuK-0C2s4shqWWfwEn-CqWGu5RbiL1NrKGuwDMzkVsNzqYpyLWtY6HVp6gtylsuq05e_e0heHx-W0ZMzi8eT6H7mNOh7zHEzhhnjPFAU3TTMuVQ0l5T5MudhmnLPD1HQIOXIUTEl0J5ZjhmVPuaZz9mQXB__Nq153-uuTzZm39bWMsGAU4-hJwJLsSP1YbMekqYtd7I9JC5NfqpM_leZTMeLkWddGfsGICRlMA</recordid><startdate>20221127</startdate><enddate>20221127</enddate><creator>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam</creator><creator>Roozitalab, Behrooz</creator><creator>Stanier, Charles O.</creator><creator>Christiansen, Megan</creator><creator>Pfister, Gabriele</creator><creator>Pierce, R. Bradley</creator><creator>McDonald, Brian C.</creator><creator>Adelman, Zac</creator><creator>Janseen, Mark</creator><creator>Dickens, Angela F.</creator><creator>Carmichael, Gregory R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-9238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-0853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-8853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6987-2171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-1315</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221127</creationdate><title>The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region</title><author>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam ; Roozitalab, Behrooz ; Stanier, Charles O. ; Christiansen, Megan ; Pfister, Gabriele ; Pierce, R. Bradley ; McDonald, Brian C. ; Adelman, Zac ; Janseen, Mark ; Dickens, Angela F. ; Carmichael, Gregory R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2653-1d32d3447c021b8f4ac0fa036af48bb45682907b4242c3c92f483f2d0a62fd643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Air quality management</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Emission inventories</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Geostationary satellites</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen compounds</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Nitrogen oxides emissions</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone chemistry</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Photochemicals</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Radicals</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Synchronous satellites</topic><topic>Time of use</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roozitalab, Behrooz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanier, Charles O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, R. Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Zac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janseen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickens, Angela F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Gregory R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdi‐Oskouei, Maryam</au><au>Roozitalab, Behrooz</au><au>Stanier, Charles O.</au><au>Christiansen, Megan</au><au>Pfister, Gabriele</au><au>Pierce, R. Bradley</au><au>McDonald, Brian C.</au><au>Adelman, Zac</au><au>Janseen, Mark</au><au>Dickens, Angela F.</au><au>Carmichael, Gregory R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2022-11-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>22</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>High concentrations of ozone along the coastline of Lake Michigan are a persistent air quality management challenge. Complementing observations during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS 2017), WRF‐Chem modeling was used to quantify sensitivity of modeled ozone (O3) to anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, including to changes in volatile chemical product (VCP). The daily maximum 8 hr average (MDA8) over the high ozone region of Lake Michigan decreased by 2.7 ppb with exclusion of VCP from the inventory, and was sensitive to both NOx and VOC changes, with greater sensitivity to NOx. Close to urban centers, MDA8 ozone was VOC‐sensitive. Clusters of coastal receptor sites were identified based on similarity in response to emission perturbations, with most clusters being NOx‐sensitive and NOx‐sensitivity increasing with distance from major emission sources. The 2 June 2017 ozone event, which has received considerable focus, is shown to be atypical due to unusually strong and spatially extended VOC‐sensitive behavior. WRF‐Chem integrated reaction rate analysis was used to compute radical termination rates due to NOx (LNOx) and to radical‐radical reactions (LROx). LROx/LNOx and formaldehyde to NO2 ratio (FNR) were shown to be predictive of modeled MDA8 ozone sensitivity, but with variation in predictive power as a function of time of day, which has implications for air quality management use of FNR from geostationary satellites.
Plain Language Summary
Surface ozone is an air pollutant of concern due to human health impacts. In locations with elevated ozone concentrations, including coastal regions around Lake Michigan, ozone pollution is managed by controlling emissions of the two classes of chemicals that drive ozone chemistry: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). However, due to large reductions in emissions of NOx and VOC over the past 20 years, the leverage that future reductions will have is uncertain. Reductions of 4–5 ppb (∼7%) are needed in several locations, relative to 2017–2019 concentrations, to meet the 2015 ozone standard of 70 ppb. In this paper, we use simulations of atmospheric chemistry and airflow over the Midwestern US to address this issue. By comparing simulations based on different VOC and NOx emissions, we find that reductions in NOx emissions have more influence on ozone than reductions in VOC emissions, except for a small zone downwind of Chicago. On high ozone days over Lake Michigan, a 10% decrease in VOC (NOx) emissions can lower ozone in the key high ozone zone over southern Lake Michigan by 0.4% (0.8%). Volatile chemical products, an uncertain component of emission inventories, are responsible for 2.7 ppb (∼4%) of ozone.
Key Points
Outside of a small (85 km) zone downwind of Chicago, ozone concentrations and production near Lake Michigan is generally NOx‐sensitive
On event days 10% decrease in volatile organic compound emission can lower MDA8 by 0.4% and 10% decrease in nitrogen oxides emission can lower MDA8 by 0.8% over Lake Michigan
Volatile chemical product emissions were modeled to produce an average 2.7 ppb ozone increase over the lake</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022JD037042</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-9238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-0853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-8853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6987-2171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-1315</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2022-11, Vol.127 (22), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2740532597 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Air Air flow Air pollution Air quality Air quality management Anthropogenic factors Atmospheric chemistry Clusters Coastal zone Emission inventories Emissions Emissions control Geophysics Geostationary satellites Human influences Lakes Nitrogen Nitrogen compounds Nitrogen dioxide Nitrogen oxides Nitrogen oxides emissions Organic compounds Ozone Ozone chemistry Perturbation Photochemicals Pollutants Quality management Radicals Receptors Sensitivity Synchronous satellites Time of use Urban areas Urban environments VOCs Volatile organic compounds |
title | The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A23%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Volatile%20Chemical%20Products,%20Other%20VOCs,%20and%20NOx%20on%20Peak%20Ozone%20in%20the%20Lake%20Michigan%20Region&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Abdi%E2%80%90Oskouei,%20Maryam&rft.date=2022-11-27&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=22&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022JD037042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2740532597%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740532597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |