Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models

Although zooplankton play a substantial role in the biological carbon pump and serve as a crucial link between primary producers and higher trophic level consumers, the skillful representation of zooplankton is not often a focus of ocean biogeochemical models. Systematic evaluations of zooplankton i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global biogeochemical cycles 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Petrik, C. M., Luo, J. Y., Heneghan, R. F., Everett, J. D., Harrison, C. S., Richardson, A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Global biogeochemical cycles
container_volume 36
creator Petrik, C. M.
Luo, J. Y.
Heneghan, R. F.
Everett, J. D.
Harrison, C. S.
Richardson, A. J.
description Although zooplankton play a substantial role in the biological carbon pump and serve as a crucial link between primary producers and higher trophic level consumers, the skillful representation of zooplankton is not often a focus of ocean biogeochemical models. Systematic evaluations of zooplankton in models could improve their representation, but so far, ocean biogeochemical skill assessment of Earth system model (ESM) ensembles have not included zooplankton. Here we use a recently developed global, observationally based map of mesozooplankton biomass to assess the skill of mesozooplankton in six CMIP6 ESMs. We also employ a biome‐based assessment of the ability of these models to reproduce the observed relationship between mesozooplankton biomass and surface chlorophyll. The combined analysis found that most models were able to reasonably simulate the large regional variations in mesozooplankton biomass at the global scale. Additionally, three of the ESMs simulated a mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationship within the observational bounds, which we used as an emergent constraint on future mesozooplankton projections. We highlight where differences in model structure and parameters may give rise to varied mesozooplankton distributions under historic and future conditions, and the resultant wide ensemble spread in projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass. Despite differences, the strength of the mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationships across all models was related to the projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass globally and in regional biomes. These results suggest that improved observations of mesozooplankton and their relationship to chlorophyll will better constrain projections of climate change impacts on these important animals. Plain Language Summary Zooplankton are marine animals that have a key role in transferring carbon from the atmosphere deeper into the ocean. They also serve as a crucial link in food chains between microscopic marine plants (phytoplankton) and predators like fish and whales. Researchers have created mathematical representations (models) of the linked processes of the oceans, atmosphere, and land, most of which include zooplankton. Yet how well these models represent zooplankton has not been adequately tested. We compared observations of zooplankton biomass to model estimates. We explored if these models reproduce the observed relationship between zooplankton biomass and chlorophyll concentration, which is useful for a
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022GB007367
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2740475775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2740475775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3443-d0f6748f01b28b20ee2995fa7bf2ce6e65541b44f1177897273974c5f2f46ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEUBeAgCtbqzgcIuHU0ufmbLNtBa6FFwe5DZprg1GlSkylSn96RunDl6nDg4144CF1TckcJ6HsgALMpIYpJdYJGVHNeaAB-ikakLGUhgclzdJHzhhDKhdAjNJ_k7HLeutBjG9a4iiH3ybZDjR4vXY5fMe46G977GHAbcLWcv0j8YFP_hl8PuXdbvIxr1-VLdOZtl93Vb47R6vFhVT0Vi-fZvJosioZxzoo18VLx0hNaQ1kDcQ60Ft6q2kPjpJNCcFpz7ilVqtQKFNOKN8KD59I6NkY3x7O7FD_2LvdmE_cpDB8NKE64EkqJQd0eVZNizsl5s0vt1qaDocT8bGX-bjVwOPLPtnOHf62ZTSugTDD2DRaRaHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2740475775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Petrik, C. M. ; Luo, J. Y. ; Heneghan, R. F. ; Everett, J. D. ; Harrison, C. S. ; Richardson, A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Petrik, C. M. ; Luo, J. Y. ; Heneghan, R. F. ; Everett, J. D. ; Harrison, C. S. ; Richardson, A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Although zooplankton play a substantial role in the biological carbon pump and serve as a crucial link between primary producers and higher trophic level consumers, the skillful representation of zooplankton is not often a focus of ocean biogeochemical models. Systematic evaluations of zooplankton in models could improve their representation, but so far, ocean biogeochemical skill assessment of Earth system model (ESM) ensembles have not included zooplankton. Here we use a recently developed global, observationally based map of mesozooplankton biomass to assess the skill of mesozooplankton in six CMIP6 ESMs. We also employ a biome‐based assessment of the ability of these models to reproduce the observed relationship between mesozooplankton biomass and surface chlorophyll. The combined analysis found that most models were able to reasonably simulate the large regional variations in mesozooplankton biomass at the global scale. Additionally, three of the ESMs simulated a mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationship within the observational bounds, which we used as an emergent constraint on future mesozooplankton projections. We highlight where differences in model structure and parameters may give rise to varied mesozooplankton distributions under historic and future conditions, and the resultant wide ensemble spread in projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass. Despite differences, the strength of the mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationships across all models was related to the projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass globally and in regional biomes. These results suggest that improved observations of mesozooplankton and their relationship to chlorophyll will better constrain projections of climate change impacts on these important animals. Plain Language Summary Zooplankton are marine animals that have a key role in transferring carbon from the atmosphere deeper into the ocean. They also serve as a crucial link in food chains between microscopic marine plants (phytoplankton) and predators like fish and whales. Researchers have created mathematical representations (models) of the linked processes of the oceans, atmosphere, and land, most of which include zooplankton. Yet how well these models represent zooplankton has not been adequately tested. We compared observations of zooplankton biomass to model estimates. We explored if these models reproduce the observed relationship between zooplankton biomass and chlorophyll concentration, which is useful for assessing how well the models represent predator‐prey relationships. Five of six models had similar patterns and comparable average biomasses across the global ocean as the observations. The historic relationship in three models fell within the observed relationship. The strength of the relationships across all models was related to how much zooplankton biomass will decrease with climate change. To improve the representation of zooplankton in models, we need better observations of the relationships between organisms. This would advance estimates of carbon transfer to the deep sea and carbon available to fish, and how they will change with climate change. Key Points On the global scale, five of six models that include mesozooplankton perform moderately well with respect to the observations We identify an emergent constraint using the mesozooplankton versus chlorophyll relationship that can help constrain zooplankton projections More attention needs to be paid to prey preferences, food web structure and temperature sensitivity in addition to existing key parameters</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-6236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022GB007367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheric models ; biogeochemical modeling ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Chlorophyll ; Chlorophylls ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Deep sea ; Earth system modeling ; ecosystem modeling ; emergent constraint ; Environmental impact ; Estimates ; Fish ; Food chains ; impacts of global change ; Marine animals ; Marine mammals ; Marine organisms ; Marine plants ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Ocean models ; Oceans ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Predator-prey simulation ; Predators ; Prey ; Regional variations ; Representations ; Trophic levels ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Global biogeochemical cycles, 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3443-d0f6748f01b28b20ee2995fa7bf2ce6e65541b44f1177897273974c5f2f46ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3443-d0f6748f01b28b20ee2995fa7bf2ce6e65541b44f1177897273974c5f2f46ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7626-1248 ; 0000-0002-9289-7366 ; 0000-0002-0032-9370 ; 0000-0002-6681-8054 ; 0000-0003-3253-0455 ; 0000-0003-4544-947X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022GB007367$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022GB007367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petrik, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, J. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heneghan, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everett, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models</title><title>Global biogeochemical cycles</title><description>Although zooplankton play a substantial role in the biological carbon pump and serve as a crucial link between primary producers and higher trophic level consumers, the skillful representation of zooplankton is not often a focus of ocean biogeochemical models. Systematic evaluations of zooplankton in models could improve their representation, but so far, ocean biogeochemical skill assessment of Earth system model (ESM) ensembles have not included zooplankton. Here we use a recently developed global, observationally based map of mesozooplankton biomass to assess the skill of mesozooplankton in six CMIP6 ESMs. We also employ a biome‐based assessment of the ability of these models to reproduce the observed relationship between mesozooplankton biomass and surface chlorophyll. The combined analysis found that most models were able to reasonably simulate the large regional variations in mesozooplankton biomass at the global scale. Additionally, three of the ESMs simulated a mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationship within the observational bounds, which we used as an emergent constraint on future mesozooplankton projections. We highlight where differences in model structure and parameters may give rise to varied mesozooplankton distributions under historic and future conditions, and the resultant wide ensemble spread in projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass. Despite differences, the strength of the mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationships across all models was related to the projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass globally and in regional biomes. These results suggest that improved observations of mesozooplankton and their relationship to chlorophyll will better constrain projections of climate change impacts on these important animals. Plain Language Summary Zooplankton are marine animals that have a key role in transferring carbon from the atmosphere deeper into the ocean. They also serve as a crucial link in food chains between microscopic marine plants (phytoplankton) and predators like fish and whales. Researchers have created mathematical representations (models) of the linked processes of the oceans, atmosphere, and land, most of which include zooplankton. Yet how well these models represent zooplankton has not been adequately tested. We compared observations of zooplankton biomass to model estimates. We explored if these models reproduce the observed relationship between zooplankton biomass and chlorophyll concentration, which is useful for assessing how well the models represent predator‐prey relationships. Five of six models had similar patterns and comparable average biomasses across the global ocean as the observations. The historic relationship in three models fell within the observed relationship. The strength of the relationships across all models was related to how much zooplankton biomass will decrease with climate change. To improve the representation of zooplankton in models, we need better observations of the relationships between organisms. This would advance estimates of carbon transfer to the deep sea and carbon available to fish, and how they will change with climate change. Key Points On the global scale, five of six models that include mesozooplankton perform moderately well with respect to the observations We identify an emergent constraint using the mesozooplankton versus chlorophyll relationship that can help constrain zooplankton projections More attention needs to be paid to prey preferences, food web structure and temperature sensitivity in addition to existing key parameters</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>biogeochemical modeling</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Chlorophylls</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Deep sea</subject><subject>Earth system modeling</subject><subject>ecosystem modeling</subject><subject>emergent constraint</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>impacts of global change</subject><subject>Marine animals</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Marine organisms</subject><subject>Marine plants</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Predator-prey simulation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0886-6236</issn><issn>1944-9224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEUBeAgCtbqzgcIuHU0ufmbLNtBa6FFwe5DZprg1GlSkylSn96RunDl6nDg4144CF1TckcJ6HsgALMpIYpJdYJGVHNeaAB-ikakLGUhgclzdJHzhhDKhdAjNJ_k7HLeutBjG9a4iiH3ybZDjR4vXY5fMe46G977GHAbcLWcv0j8YFP_hl8PuXdbvIxr1-VLdOZtl93Vb47R6vFhVT0Vi-fZvJosioZxzoo18VLx0hNaQ1kDcQ60Ft6q2kPjpJNCcFpz7ilVqtQKFNOKN8KD59I6NkY3x7O7FD_2LvdmE_cpDB8NKE64EkqJQd0eVZNizsl5s0vt1qaDocT8bGX-bjVwOPLPtnOHf62ZTSugTDD2DRaRaHg</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Petrik, C. M.</creator><creator>Luo, J. Y.</creator><creator>Heneghan, R. F.</creator><creator>Everett, J. D.</creator><creator>Harrison, C. S.</creator><creator>Richardson, A. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7626-1248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-7366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-9370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-8054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-0455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4544-947X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models</title><author>Petrik, C. M. ; Luo, J. Y. ; Heneghan, R. F. ; Everett, J. D. ; Harrison, C. S. ; Richardson, A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3443-d0f6748f01b28b20ee2995fa7bf2ce6e65541b44f1177897273974c5f2f46ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>biogeochemical modeling</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Chlorophylls</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Deep sea</topic><topic>Earth system modeling</topic><topic>ecosystem modeling</topic><topic>emergent constraint</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>impacts of global change</topic><topic>Marine animals</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Marine organisms</topic><topic>Marine plants</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Predator-prey simulation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petrik, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, J. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heneghan, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everett, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petrik, C. M.</au><au>Luo, J. Y.</au><au>Heneghan, R. F.</au><au>Everett, J. D.</au><au>Harrison, C. S.</au><au>Richardson, A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models</atitle><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0886-6236</issn><eissn>1944-9224</eissn><abstract>Although zooplankton play a substantial role in the biological carbon pump and serve as a crucial link between primary producers and higher trophic level consumers, the skillful representation of zooplankton is not often a focus of ocean biogeochemical models. Systematic evaluations of zooplankton in models could improve their representation, but so far, ocean biogeochemical skill assessment of Earth system model (ESM) ensembles have not included zooplankton. Here we use a recently developed global, observationally based map of mesozooplankton biomass to assess the skill of mesozooplankton in six CMIP6 ESMs. We also employ a biome‐based assessment of the ability of these models to reproduce the observed relationship between mesozooplankton biomass and surface chlorophyll. The combined analysis found that most models were able to reasonably simulate the large regional variations in mesozooplankton biomass at the global scale. Additionally, three of the ESMs simulated a mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationship within the observational bounds, which we used as an emergent constraint on future mesozooplankton projections. We highlight where differences in model structure and parameters may give rise to varied mesozooplankton distributions under historic and future conditions, and the resultant wide ensemble spread in projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass. Despite differences, the strength of the mesozooplankton‐chlorophyll relationships across all models was related to the projected changes in mesozooplankton biomass globally and in regional biomes. These results suggest that improved observations of mesozooplankton and their relationship to chlorophyll will better constrain projections of climate change impacts on these important animals. Plain Language Summary Zooplankton are marine animals that have a key role in transferring carbon from the atmosphere deeper into the ocean. They also serve as a crucial link in food chains between microscopic marine plants (phytoplankton) and predators like fish and whales. Researchers have created mathematical representations (models) of the linked processes of the oceans, atmosphere, and land, most of which include zooplankton. Yet how well these models represent zooplankton has not been adequately tested. We compared observations of zooplankton biomass to model estimates. We explored if these models reproduce the observed relationship between zooplankton biomass and chlorophyll concentration, which is useful for assessing how well the models represent predator‐prey relationships. Five of six models had similar patterns and comparable average biomasses across the global ocean as the observations. The historic relationship in three models fell within the observed relationship. The strength of the relationships across all models was related to how much zooplankton biomass will decrease with climate change. To improve the representation of zooplankton in models, we need better observations of the relationships between organisms. This would advance estimates of carbon transfer to the deep sea and carbon available to fish, and how they will change with climate change. Key Points On the global scale, five of six models that include mesozooplankton perform moderately well with respect to the observations We identify an emergent constraint using the mesozooplankton versus chlorophyll relationship that can help constrain zooplankton projections More attention needs to be paid to prey preferences, food web structure and temperature sensitivity in addition to existing key parameters</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022GB007367</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7626-1248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-7366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-9370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-8054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-0455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4544-947X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-6236
ispartof Global biogeochemical cycles, 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.n/a
issn 0886-6236
1944-9224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2740475775
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Atmosphere
Atmospheric models
biogeochemical modeling
Biogeochemistry
Biomass
Carbon
Chlorophyll
Chlorophylls
Climate change
Climate models
Deep sea
Earth system modeling
ecosystem modeling
emergent constraint
Environmental impact
Estimates
Fish
Food chains
impacts of global change
Marine animals
Marine mammals
Marine organisms
Marine plants
Mathematical models
Modelling
Ocean models
Oceans
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Predator-prey simulation
Predators
Prey
Regional variations
Representations
Trophic levels
Zooplankton
title Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A45%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20and%20Constraint%20of%20Mesozooplankton%20in%20CMIP6%20Earth%20System%20Models&rft.jtitle=Global%20biogeochemical%20cycles&rft.au=Petrik,%20C.%20M.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0886-6236&rft.eissn=1944-9224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022GB007367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2740475775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740475775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true