The longitudinal effect of social media use on adolescent mental health in the UK: findings from the UK Longitudinal Household Study
Cross-sectional studies have suggested an association between the use of social media and depression and anxiety in young people. We examined the longitudinal relationship between social media use and young people's mental health, and the role of self-esteem and social connectedness as potentia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2022-11, Vol.400, p.S71-S71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S71 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S71 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 400 |
creator | Plackett, Ruth Sheringham, Jessica Dykxhoorn, Jen |
description | Cross-sectional studies have suggested an association between the use of social media and depression and anxiety in young people. We examined the longitudinal relationship between social media use and young people's mental health, and the role of self-esteem and social connectedness as potential mediators.
Adolescents (aged 10–15 years) from the UK Longitudinal Household Study (2009–19) were included. Mental health was measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties score. The number of hours spent on social media was measured on a 5-point scale, from zero to ≥7 h. Self-esteem and social connectedness were measured at ages 13–14 years. Covariates included demographic and household variables. Unadjusted and adjusted multilevel linear regression models explored whether social media use at ages 12–13 years predicted mental health at ages 14–15 years (expressed as beta values and 95% CIs). Path analysis with structural equation modelling was used to investigate the mediation pathways.
We included 3228 adolescents (1659 [51·4%] girls and 1569 [48·6%] boys) for whom social media and mental health data at ages 12–13 years and 14–15 years were available. In adjusted analysis, no association between time spent on social media and poorer mental health was identified (n=2603; b=0·21 [95% CI –0·43 to 0·84]; p=0·52). In adjusted path analysis, there was no mediation of self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2316; b=0·24 [95% CI –0·12 to 0·66]; p=0·22) or social connectedness (indirect effect; –0·03 [–0·20 to 0·12]; p=0·74), but in unadjusted analysis, 68% of the effect of social media use on mental health was mediated by self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2569; 0·70 [0·15 to 1·30]; p=0.016) but not by social connectedness. Similar results were found when the analysis was re-run on a multiply imputed dataset that filled in missing values using multiple imputation.
Our data show the importance of longitudinal evidence. We found there was little evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the use of social media and mental health issues 2 years later. Interventions that address social media use alone might not improve young people's mental health, and considering factors such as self-esteem might be more effective.
UK National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research (grant reference PD-SPH-2015). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the UK Dep |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02281-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2739729697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673622022814</els_id><sourcerecordid>2739729697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3224-6ed02d0ede5d6e242acbc592c24551abde6ee2c6d78ff1c7ac25cce5c5f961d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPHCEYhonR1K3tT9CQeLGHsfANMDtejNnYatykBzXpjbDw4WJmB4UZE-_-8KK7mt48kbw83_vBQ8g-Z8eccfXzmnHBKtXU6gjgBwOY8kpskQkXjaikaP5uk8kHsku-5nzPGBOKyS9kt1ZtzRhvJ-TlZom0i_1dGEYXetNR9B7tQKOnOdpQghW6YOiYkcaeGhc7zBb7oeT9UK6XaLphSUNPh1J1e3VCfehL1V2mPsXVJqXz_3dcxFK3jJ2j1yV6_kZ2vOkyft-ce-T21_nN7KKa__l9OTubV7YGEJVCx8AxdCidQhBg7MLKFiwIKblZOFSIYJVrpt5z2xgL0lqUVvpWcTet98jhuvchxccR86Dv45jKg7KGpm4baFXbFEquKZtizgm9fkhhZdKz5ky_utdv7vWrWA2g39xrUeYONu3jojj7mHqXXYDTNYDlj08Bk842YG-L31SUaxfDJyv-AfIJlXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739729697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The longitudinal effect of social media use on adolescent mental health in the UK: findings from the UK Longitudinal Household Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Plackett, Ruth ; Sheringham, Jessica ; Dykxhoorn, Jen</creator><creatorcontrib>Plackett, Ruth ; Sheringham, Jessica ; Dykxhoorn, Jen</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-sectional studies have suggested an association between the use of social media and depression and anxiety in young people. We examined the longitudinal relationship between social media use and young people's mental health, and the role of self-esteem and social connectedness as potential mediators.
Adolescents (aged 10–15 years) from the UK Longitudinal Household Study (2009–19) were included. Mental health was measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties score. The number of hours spent on social media was measured on a 5-point scale, from zero to ≥7 h. Self-esteem and social connectedness were measured at ages 13–14 years. Covariates included demographic and household variables. Unadjusted and adjusted multilevel linear regression models explored whether social media use at ages 12–13 years predicted mental health at ages 14–15 years (expressed as beta values and 95% CIs). Path analysis with structural equation modelling was used to investigate the mediation pathways.
We included 3228 adolescents (1659 [51·4%] girls and 1569 [48·6%] boys) for whom social media and mental health data at ages 12–13 years and 14–15 years were available. In adjusted analysis, no association between time spent on social media and poorer mental health was identified (n=2603; b=0·21 [95% CI –0·43 to 0·84]; p=0·52). In adjusted path analysis, there was no mediation of self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2316; b=0·24 [95% CI –0·12 to 0·66]; p=0·22) or social connectedness (indirect effect; –0·03 [–0·20 to 0·12]; p=0·74), but in unadjusted analysis, 68% of the effect of social media use on mental health was mediated by self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2569; 0·70 [0·15 to 1·30]; p=0.016) but not by social connectedness. Similar results were found when the analysis was re-run on a multiply imputed dataset that filled in missing values using multiple imputation.
Our data show the importance of longitudinal evidence. We found there was little evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the use of social media and mental health issues 2 years later. Interventions that address social media use alone might not improve young people's mental health, and considering factors such as self-esteem might be more effective.
UK National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research (grant reference PD-SPH-2015). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02281-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36930019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Age ; Child & adolescent mental health ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Demographic variables ; Digital media ; Female ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical research ; Mental disorders ; Mental Health ; Multivariate statistical analysis ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Self esteem ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Teenagers ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2022-11, Vol.400, p.S71-S71</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3224-6ed02d0ede5d6e242acbc592c24551abde6ee2c6d78ff1c7ac25cce5c5f961d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2739729697?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36930019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plackett, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheringham, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykxhoorn, Jen</creatorcontrib><title>The longitudinal effect of social media use on adolescent mental health in the UK: findings from the UK Longitudinal Household Study</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Cross-sectional studies have suggested an association between the use of social media and depression and anxiety in young people. We examined the longitudinal relationship between social media use and young people's mental health, and the role of self-esteem and social connectedness as potential mediators.
Adolescents (aged 10–15 years) from the UK Longitudinal Household Study (2009–19) were included. Mental health was measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties score. The number of hours spent on social media was measured on a 5-point scale, from zero to ≥7 h. Self-esteem and social connectedness were measured at ages 13–14 years. Covariates included demographic and household variables. Unadjusted and adjusted multilevel linear regression models explored whether social media use at ages 12–13 years predicted mental health at ages 14–15 years (expressed as beta values and 95% CIs). Path analysis with structural equation modelling was used to investigate the mediation pathways.
We included 3228 adolescents (1659 [51·4%] girls and 1569 [48·6%] boys) for whom social media and mental health data at ages 12–13 years and 14–15 years were available. In adjusted analysis, no association between time spent on social media and poorer mental health was identified (n=2603; b=0·21 [95% CI –0·43 to 0·84]; p=0·52). In adjusted path analysis, there was no mediation of self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2316; b=0·24 [95% CI –0·12 to 0·66]; p=0·22) or social connectedness (indirect effect; –0·03 [–0·20 to 0·12]; p=0·74), but in unadjusted analysis, 68% of the effect of social media use on mental health was mediated by self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2569; 0·70 [0·15 to 1·30]; p=0.016) but not by social connectedness. Similar results were found when the analysis was re-run on a multiply imputed dataset that filled in missing values using multiple imputation.
Our data show the importance of longitudinal evidence. We found there was little evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the use of social media and mental health issues 2 years later. Interventions that address social media use alone might not improve young people's mental health, and considering factors such as self-esteem might be more effective.
UK National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research (grant reference PD-SPH-2015). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Child & adolescent mental health</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Demographic variables</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Multivariate statistical analysis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Self esteem</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFPHCEYhonR1K3tT9CQeLGHsfANMDtejNnYatykBzXpjbDw4WJmB4UZE-_-8KK7mt48kbw83_vBQ8g-Z8eccfXzmnHBKtXU6gjgBwOY8kpskQkXjaikaP5uk8kHsku-5nzPGBOKyS9kt1ZtzRhvJ-TlZom0i_1dGEYXetNR9B7tQKOnOdpQghW6YOiYkcaeGhc7zBb7oeT9UK6XaLphSUNPh1J1e3VCfehL1V2mPsXVJqXz_3dcxFK3jJ2j1yV6_kZ2vOkyft-ce-T21_nN7KKa__l9OTubV7YGEJVCx8AxdCidQhBg7MLKFiwIKblZOFSIYJVrpt5z2xgL0lqUVvpWcTet98jhuvchxccR86Dv45jKg7KGpm4baFXbFEquKZtizgm9fkhhZdKz5ky_utdv7vWrWA2g39xrUeYONu3jojj7mHqXXYDTNYDlj08Bk842YG-L31SUaxfDJyv-AfIJlXI</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Plackett, Ruth</creator><creator>Sheringham, Jessica</creator><creator>Dykxhoorn, Jen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>The longitudinal effect of social media use on adolescent mental health in the UK: findings from the UK Longitudinal Household Study</title><author>Plackett, Ruth ; Sheringham, Jessica ; Dykxhoorn, Jen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3224-6ed02d0ede5d6e242acbc592c24551abde6ee2c6d78ff1c7ac25cce5c5f961d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Child & adolescent mental health</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Demographic variables</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Multivariate statistical analysis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Self esteem</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plackett, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheringham, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykxhoorn, Jen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plackett, Ruth</au><au>Sheringham, Jessica</au><au>Dykxhoorn, Jen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The longitudinal effect of social media use on adolescent mental health in the UK: findings from the UK Longitudinal Household Study</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>400</volume><spage>S71</spage><epage>S71</epage><pages>S71-S71</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>Cross-sectional studies have suggested an association between the use of social media and depression and anxiety in young people. We examined the longitudinal relationship between social media use and young people's mental health, and the role of self-esteem and social connectedness as potential mediators.
Adolescents (aged 10–15 years) from the UK Longitudinal Household Study (2009–19) were included. Mental health was measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties score. The number of hours spent on social media was measured on a 5-point scale, from zero to ≥7 h. Self-esteem and social connectedness were measured at ages 13–14 years. Covariates included demographic and household variables. Unadjusted and adjusted multilevel linear regression models explored whether social media use at ages 12–13 years predicted mental health at ages 14–15 years (expressed as beta values and 95% CIs). Path analysis with structural equation modelling was used to investigate the mediation pathways.
We included 3228 adolescents (1659 [51·4%] girls and 1569 [48·6%] boys) for whom social media and mental health data at ages 12–13 years and 14–15 years were available. In adjusted analysis, no association between time spent on social media and poorer mental health was identified (n=2603; b=0·21 [95% CI –0·43 to 0·84]; p=0·52). In adjusted path analysis, there was no mediation of self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2316; b=0·24 [95% CI –0·12 to 0·66]; p=0·22) or social connectedness (indirect effect; –0·03 [–0·20 to 0·12]; p=0·74), but in unadjusted analysis, 68% of the effect of social media use on mental health was mediated by self-esteem (indirect effect; n=2569; 0·70 [0·15 to 1·30]; p=0.016) but not by social connectedness. Similar results were found when the analysis was re-run on a multiply imputed dataset that filled in missing values using multiple imputation.
Our data show the importance of longitudinal evidence. We found there was little evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the use of social media and mental health issues 2 years later. Interventions that address social media use alone might not improve young people's mental health, and considering factors such as self-esteem might be more effective.
UK National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research (grant reference PD-SPH-2015). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36930019</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02281-4</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2022-11, Vol.400, p.S71-S71 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2739729697 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Age Child & adolescent mental health Cross-Sectional Studies Demographic variables Digital media Female Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Medical research Mental disorders Mental Health Multivariate statistical analysis Public health Regression analysis Regression models Self esteem Social Media Social networks Teenagers United Kingdom - epidemiology Young adults |
title | The longitudinal effect of social media use on adolescent mental health in the UK: findings from the UK Longitudinal Household Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20longitudinal%20effect%20of%20social%20media%20use%20on%20adolescent%20mental%20health%20in%20the%20UK:%20findings%20from%20the%20UK%20Longitudinal%20Household%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Plackett,%20Ruth&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=400&rft.spage=S71&rft.epage=S71&rft.pages=S71-S71&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02281-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2739729697%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739729697&rft_id=info:pmid/36930019&rft_els_id=S0140673622022814&rfr_iscdi=true |