Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom
Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tigh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2023-01, Vol.22, Article e49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of radiotherapy in practice |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Jayamani, J. Osman, N. D. Tajuddin, A. A. Samson, D. O. Kamaruddin, K. E. Abdul Aziz, M. Z. |
description | Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results & Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S146039692200019X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2739483363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S146039692200019X</cupid><sourcerecordid>2739483363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-b8e4fa061653ed710f64b8874ee494e2dcf6a0b3628c1cbf45049c27fd4819a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHPq8kmzW6OUl-FiqAVvC3ZzaRN2d2sSbbQo__crS14EE8zzPeYmQ-hS0quKaHZzRvlgjApZJoSQqj8OEKjYZQllDJ6_NOTZIeforMQ1oRwzkk2Ql93sIHadQ20EatWY-2CbSB6W2HYqLpX0boWO4PjCvDs-XWBO-9CVBGwitj1MVgNyQAm1nul7QBobCzUGtsWK7yCCN4toQUbt7hRNeAO6o0NuFupNrrmHJ0YVQe4ONQxen-4X0yfkvnL42x6O0-qVMiYlDlwo4igYsJAZ5QYwcs8zzgAlxxSXRmhSMlEmle0Kg2fEC6rNDOa51Qqxsboau873P_ZQ4jF2vW-HVYWacYkzxkTOxbds6rhy-DBFJ23jfLbgpJil3TxJ-lBww4a1ZTe6iX8Wv-v-gY6BoI-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739483363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Jayamani, J. ; Osman, N. D. ; Tajuddin, A. A. ; Samson, D. O. ; Kamaruddin, K. E. ; Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayamani, J. ; Osman, N. D. ; Tajuddin, A. A. ; Samson, D. O. ; Kamaruddin, K. E. ; Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results & Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S146039692200019X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bladder ; Collimators ; Computed tomography ; Density ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Heterogeneity ; Males ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Original Article ; Patients ; Pelvis ; Planning ; Polyethylene ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Prostate ; Quality assurance ; Radiation ; Radiation dosimetry ; Radiation therapy ; Rectum ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2023-01, Vol.22, Article e49</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-b8e4fa061653ed710f64b8874ee494e2dcf6a0b3628c1cbf45049c27fd4819a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8150-925X ; 0000-0001-7131-6190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S146039692200019X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayamani, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, N. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajuddin, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamaruddin, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results & Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.</description><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Collimators</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation dosimetry</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHPq8kmzW6OUl-FiqAVvC3ZzaRN2d2sSbbQo__crS14EE8zzPeYmQ-hS0quKaHZzRvlgjApZJoSQqj8OEKjYZQllDJ6_NOTZIeforMQ1oRwzkk2Ql93sIHadQ20EatWY-2CbSB6W2HYqLpX0boWO4PjCvDs-XWBO-9CVBGwitj1MVgNyQAm1nul7QBobCzUGtsWK7yCCN4toQUbt7hRNeAO6o0NuFupNrrmHJ0YVQe4ONQxen-4X0yfkvnL42x6O0-qVMiYlDlwo4igYsJAZ5QYwcs8zzgAlxxSXRmhSMlEmle0Kg2fEC6rNDOa51Qqxsboau873P_ZQ4jF2vW-HVYWacYkzxkTOxbds6rhy-DBFJ23jfLbgpJil3TxJ-lBww4a1ZTe6iX8Wv-v-gY6BoI-</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Jayamani, J.</creator><creator>Osman, N. D.</creator><creator>Tajuddin, A. A.</creator><creator>Samson, D. O.</creator><creator>Kamaruddin, K. E.</creator><creator>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-925X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-6190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</title><author>Jayamani, J. ; Osman, N. D. ; Tajuddin, A. A. ; Samson, D. O. ; Kamaruddin, K. E. ; Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-b8e4fa061653ed710f64b8874ee494e2dcf6a0b3628c1cbf45049c27fd4819a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Collimators</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation dosimetry</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayamani, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, N. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajuddin, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamaruddin, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayamani, J.</au><au>Osman, N. D.</au><au>Tajuddin, A. A.</au><au>Samson, D. O.</au><au>Kamaruddin, K. E.</au><au>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><artnum>e49</artnum><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results & Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S146039692200019X</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-925X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-6190</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-3969 |
ispartof | Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2023-01, Vol.22, Article e49 |
issn | 1460-3969 1467-1131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2739483363 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Bladder Collimators Computed tomography Density Dosimeters Dosimetry Heterogeneity Males Monte Carlo simulation Original Article Patients Pelvis Planning Polyethylene Polymethyl methacrylate Polymethylmethacrylate Prostate Quality assurance Radiation Radiation dosimetry Radiation therapy Rectum Tomography Tumors |
title | Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A41%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20dosimetric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20IMRT%20prostate%20at%20outside-the-irradiated%20field%20in%20a%20heterogeneity%20male%20pelvis%20phantom&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Jayamani,%20J.&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.artnum=e49&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S146039692200019X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2739483363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739483363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S146039692200019X&rfr_iscdi=true |