Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom

Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tigh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2023-01, Vol.22, Article e49
Hauptverfasser: Jayamani, J., Osman, N. D., Tajuddin, A. A., Samson, D. O., Kamaruddin, K. E., Abdul Aziz, M. Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of radiotherapy in practice
container_volume 22
creator Jayamani, J.
Osman, N. D.
Tajuddin, A. A.
Samson, D. O.
Kamaruddin, K. E.
Abdul Aziz, M. Z.
description Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results & Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S146039692200019X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2739483363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S146039692200019X</cupid><sourcerecordid>2739483363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-b8e4fa061653ed710f64b8874ee494e2dcf6a0b3628c1cbf45049c27fd4819a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHPq8kmzW6OUl-FiqAVvC3ZzaRN2d2sSbbQo__crS14EE8zzPeYmQ-hS0quKaHZzRvlgjApZJoSQqj8OEKjYZQllDJ6_NOTZIeforMQ1oRwzkk2Ql93sIHadQ20EatWY-2CbSB6W2HYqLpX0boWO4PjCvDs-XWBO-9CVBGwitj1MVgNyQAm1nul7QBobCzUGtsWK7yCCN4toQUbt7hRNeAO6o0NuFupNrrmHJ0YVQe4ONQxen-4X0yfkvnL42x6O0-qVMiYlDlwo4igYsJAZ5QYwcs8zzgAlxxSXRmhSMlEmle0Kg2fEC6rNDOa51Qqxsboau873P_ZQ4jF2vW-HVYWacYkzxkTOxbds6rhy-DBFJ23jfLbgpJil3TxJ-lBww4a1ZTe6iX8Wv-v-gY6BoI-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739483363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Jayamani, J. ; Osman, N. D. ; Tajuddin, A. A. ; Samson, D. O. ; Kamaruddin, K. E. ; Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayamani, J. ; Osman, N. D. ; Tajuddin, A. A. ; Samson, D. O. ; Kamaruddin, K. E. ; Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results &amp; Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S146039692200019X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bladder ; Collimators ; Computed tomography ; Density ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Heterogeneity ; Males ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Original Article ; Patients ; Pelvis ; Planning ; Polyethylene ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Prostate ; Quality assurance ; Radiation ; Radiation dosimetry ; Radiation therapy ; Rectum ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2023-01, Vol.22, Article e49</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-b8e4fa061653ed710f64b8874ee494e2dcf6a0b3628c1cbf45049c27fd4819a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8150-925X ; 0000-0001-7131-6190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S146039692200019X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayamani, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, N. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajuddin, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamaruddin, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results &amp; Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.</description><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Collimators</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation dosimetry</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHPq8kmzW6OUl-FiqAVvC3ZzaRN2d2sSbbQo__crS14EE8zzPeYmQ-hS0quKaHZzRvlgjApZJoSQqj8OEKjYZQllDJ6_NOTZIeforMQ1oRwzkk2Ql93sIHadQ20EatWY-2CbSB6W2HYqLpX0boWO4PjCvDs-XWBO-9CVBGwitj1MVgNyQAm1nul7QBobCzUGtsWK7yCCN4toQUbt7hRNeAO6o0NuFupNrrmHJ0YVQe4ONQxen-4X0yfkvnL42x6O0-qVMiYlDlwo4igYsJAZ5QYwcs8zzgAlxxSXRmhSMlEmle0Kg2fEC6rNDOa51Qqxsboau873P_ZQ4jF2vW-HVYWacYkzxkTOxbds6rhy-DBFJ23jfLbgpJil3TxJ-lBww4a1ZTe6iX8Wv-v-gY6BoI-</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Jayamani, J.</creator><creator>Osman, N. D.</creator><creator>Tajuddin, A. A.</creator><creator>Samson, D. O.</creator><creator>Kamaruddin, K. E.</creator><creator>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-925X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-6190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</title><author>Jayamani, J. ; Osman, N. D. ; Tajuddin, A. A. ; Samson, D. O. ; Kamaruddin, K. E. ; Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-b8e4fa061653ed710f64b8874ee494e2dcf6a0b3628c1cbf45049c27fd4819a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Collimators</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation dosimetry</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayamani, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, N. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajuddin, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamaruddin, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayamani, J.</au><au>Osman, N. D.</au><au>Tajuddin, A. A.</au><au>Samson, D. O.</au><au>Kamaruddin, K. E.</au><au>Abdul Aziz, M. Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><artnum>e49</artnum><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Background:Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment delivery requires pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for the dosimetry verification due to its complex multileaf-collimator movement. The prostate target close position between the bladder and rectum requires a tight margin during planning, and mistreatment would have a huge impact on the patient. A commercially available QA tool consists of a homogeneous medium and does not represent an exact photon interaction on the tumour and also on the nearby healthy organ.Objective:A heterogeneous male pelvis phantom was developed and investigated the efficiency of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation on the off-axis region.Methods:Polymethyl methacrylate was used for the phantom housing, and the material closed to the bladder, rectum and prostate density was chosen to construct the organ models. The phantom was scanned and validated by the computed tomography number and density. An IMRT treatment was planned in the Monaco TPS, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) was used to validate the point dosimetry. In addition, an EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulation was carried out to validate the phantom dosimetry.Results &amp; Discussion:The dose measurement between TLD-100, TPS, and EGSnrc was compared and validated in the pelvis phantom. In the prostate region, the dose difference was within ± 5%, and the maximum dose difference outside-the-irradiated field was up to 20·07 % and 47·31 % in TPS and TLD-100, respectively. Meanwhile, the measured dose was lower than the calculated dose, and it was apparent for the dose outside-the-irradiated field.Conclusion:The developed heterogeneity male pelvis phantom was validated and verified to be an important QA device for validating radiation dosimetry in the pelvis region. The dose outside-the-irradiated field was underestimated by both TPS and TLD, respectively.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S146039692200019X</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-925X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-6190</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-3969
ispartof Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2023-01, Vol.22, Article e49
issn 1460-3969
1467-1131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2739483363
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Bladder
Collimators
Computed tomography
Density
Dosimeters
Dosimetry
Heterogeneity
Males
Monte Carlo simulation
Original Article
Patients
Pelvis
Planning
Polyethylene
Polymethyl methacrylate
Polymethylmethacrylate
Prostate
Quality assurance
Radiation
Radiation dosimetry
Radiation therapy
Rectum
Tomography
Tumors
title Development and dosimetric evaluation of the IMRT prostate at outside-the-irradiated field in a heterogeneity male pelvis phantom
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A41%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20dosimetric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20IMRT%20prostate%20at%20outside-the-irradiated%20field%20in%20a%20heterogeneity%20male%20pelvis%20phantom&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Jayamani,%20J.&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.artnum=e49&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S146039692200019X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2739483363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739483363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S146039692200019X&rfr_iscdi=true